Analyzing Mother Tongue Interference in Turkish EFL Students' Written Products: A Lexical and Syntactical Perspective

Samet Hasırcıoğlu; Mustafa Serkan Öztürk

doi:10.52911/itall.1438891

EN TR

Analyzing Mother Tongue Interference in Turkish EFL Students' Written Products: A Lexical and Syntactical Perspective

Abstract

Languages exhibit diverse characteristics and undergo constant evolution. The intricate nature of language interaction during Second Language Acquisition intrigues experts. Language learning involves exposure to multifaceted elements, and despite extensive research, the phenomenon of language transfer remains elusive. This study aims to identify errors stemming from the influence of Turkish, the first language, on the written English proficiency of Turkish learners in a formal setting. The objective is to scrutinize the linguistic domains affected by transfer and assess its impact on the educational process. Additionally, the study investigates the potential correlation between error rates and proficiency levels in the target language (L2). Employing qualitative and quantitative data analysis, the research involves 252 participants, excluding 16 non-native Turkish speakers from the initial 268. Results reveal negative transfer in both lexical and syntactical language aspects. Gathered evidence establishes a robust correlation between specific error types and students' proficiency levels. The study concludes with tailored recommendations to enhance Second Language Acquisition (SLA) and acknowledges its limitations.

Keywords

Second Language Acquisition, Error, Error Analysis, Language Transfer, Mother Tongue Interference

Abstract

Diller çeşitli özellikler sergiler ve sürekli evrim geçirir. İkinci Dil Edinimi sırasında dil etkileşiminin karmaşık doğası uzmanların ilgisini çekmektedir. Dil öğrenimi çok yönlü unsurlara maruz kalmayı içerir ve kapsamlı araştırmalara rağmen, dil aktarımı olgusu anlaşılması zor olmaya devam etmektedir. Bu çalışma, resmi bir ortamda yabancı dil olarak İngilizce öğrenen Türk öğrencilerin yazılı İngilizce yeterlilikleri üzerinde ana dilleri olan Türkçenin etkisinden kaynaklanan hataları tespit etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Amaç, aktarımdan etkilenen dilsel alanları incelemek ve bunun eğitim süreci üzerindeki etkisini değerlendirmektir. Ayrıca, çalışma hata oranları ile hedef dildeki (L2) yeterlilik seviyeleri arasındaki potansiyel ilişkiyi araştırmaktadır. Nitel ve nicel veri analizinin kullanıldığı araştırma, başlangıçta 268 katılımcıdan ana dili Türkçe olmayan 16 kişi hariç bırakılarak toplamda 252 katılımcıyı kapsamaktadır. Sonuçlar hem sözcüksel hem de sözdizimsel dil boyutlarında olumsuz aktarımı ortaya koymaktadır. Elde edilen kanıtlar, belirli hata türleri ile öğrencilerin yeterlilik düzeyleri arasında sağlam bir ilişki olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Çalışma, İkinci Dil Edinimini (İDE) geliştirmek için belirli önerilerle sonuçlanmakta ve sınırlılıklarını kabul etmektedir.

Keywords

İkinci Dil Edinimi, Hata, Hata Analizi, Dil Aktarımı, Anadilin İkinci Dile Etkisi

Project Number

1

Ethical Statement

İlgili çalışma 2019 yılında savunulmuş olan yüksek lisans tezinden oluşturulduğu için Etik kurul raporu alınamamaktadır. Her iki yazar da etik kurallarına uyduğunu taahhüt eder.

References

Alhaysony, M. (2012). An Analysis of Article Errors Among Saudi Female EFL Students: A Case Study. Asian Social Science, 8(12), 55-66.
Bennui , P. (2008). A study of L1 interference in the writing of Thai EFL students. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 4. https://doi.org/ISSN: 1511-8002
Bhela, B., (1999). Native language interference in learning a second language: Exploratory case studies of native language interference with target language usage. International Education Journal, 1(1), 22-31.
Brown, H. D. (1980). Principles of Learning and Teaching English. Prentice-Hall Inc.
Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of language learning and teaching. Prentice Hall.
Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners' errors. IRAL, 5, 161-170.
Corder, S. P. (1974). Error Analysis. In J.P.B. Allen and S.P Corder (Eds.), Techniques in Applied Linguistics. The Edinburgh course in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Corder, S. P. (1982). Error Analysis and Interlanguage. Oxford University Press.
Corder, S. P., (1983). A Role for The Mother Tongue. In S. Gass, S., and Selinker, L. (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning. Newbury House.
Corder, S. P. (2000). Error Analysis. Longman Publisher.

Darus, S., & Subramaniam, K. (2009). Error analysis of the written English essays of secondary school students in Malaysia: A case study. European Journal of Social Sciences, 8(3), 483-495.
Demirezen, M., (2010). The causes of the schwa phoneme as a fossilized pronunciation problem for Turks. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 1567–1571.
Duygun B. & Karabacak, P. (2022). An error analysis on Turkish EFL learners’ writing tasks. The Literacy Trek, 8(2), 121-141. https://doi.org/10.47216/literacytrek.1117158
Ellis, R. (1997). Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Erkaya, O. R. (2012). Vocabulary and L1 interference – error analysis of Turkish students. Mextesol Journal, 36(2).
Gass, S. (2009). Second language acquisition. In Language acquisition (pp. 109-139). Palgrave Macmillan.
Gobbo, F. (2020). Introduction to interlinguistics. GRIN Verlag. http://nbnresolving.de/urn:nbn:de:101:1-2020020602315352551624
Grosjean, F. (1982). Life with two languages: An introduction to bilingualism. Harvard University Press.
Haryanto, T. (2007). Grammatical error analysis in students’ recount texts. Unpublished Thesis. Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Jarvis, S., (2000). Methodological rigour in the study of transfer: Identifying L1 influence in the interlanguage lexicon. Language Learning, 50, 245-309.
Jarvis, S., (2009). Lexical transfer. In A. Pavlenko (Ed.), The bilingual mental lexicon. Interdisciplinary Approaches. Multilingual Matters, pp. 99-124.
Kellerman, E. (1977). Towards characterization of the strategies of transfer in second language learning. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 2, 58-145.
Kellerman, E., & Sharwood Smith, M. S. (1986). Cross-linguistic influence in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.
Keshavarz, M. D. (1999). Contrastive Analysis and Error Analysis (6th ed.). Rahnama Press.
Kırkgöz, Y. (2009). An analysis of written errors of Turkish adult learners of English. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 4352-4358.
Mahmoodzadeh, M. (2012). A cross-linguistic study of prepositions in Persian and English: The effect of transfer. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.4.734-740
Masangya, E., & Lozada, L. (2009). An investigation on the relationship between the language exposures and errors in English essays of high school students. Philippine ESL Journal, 2(2009).
Mungungu, S. S. (2010). Error analysis: Investigating the writing of ESL Namibian learners. Doctoral dissertation, University of South Africa.
Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer. Cambridge University Press.
Odlin, T. (2003). Cross-linguistic influence. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Blackwell, pp. 436-486.
Pavlenko, A. (1999). New approaches to concepts in bilingual memory. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2(3), 209-230.
Rabab’ah, G. (2005). Communication problems facing Arab learners of English. Journal of Language and Learning, 3(1), 194.
Rahayu, R., & Basri, N. (2021). Mother-tongue interference in learning English in English meeting club. FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(3), 387-397.
Richards, J. C. (1974). Error analysis. Perspectives on second language acquisition. Longman.
Richards, J. C., Plott, J., & Platt, H. (1996). Dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Longman.
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage in International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL), 10(2), 209-231.
Stenson, N. (1983). Induced errors, in “A Tentative Analysis of Errors in Language.”
Tat, G. (2013). Language Transfer in the Written English of Turkish Speaking Learners of English (Postgraduate). University of Westminster.
Tamba, S. (2023). Mother tongue interference in teaching and learning English language: A Case study of Kissi Teng, Kissi Kama and Kissi Tongi Chiefdoms in Sierra Leone. Indiana Journal of Arts & Literature, 4(6), 1-8.
Turnuk, T., & Aydin, S. (2020). Interlanguage effect on writing anxiety in a foreign language context. The Literacy Trek, 6(1), 1-19.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Social and Humanities Education (Excluding Economics, Business and Management)

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Samet Hasırcıoğlu
0000-0003-3656-7626
Türkiye

Mustafa Serkan Öztürk ^*
0000-0003-4820-8022
Türkiye

Early Pub Date

May 15, 2024

Publication Date

June 30, 2024

Submission Date

February 17, 2024

Acceptance Date

April 30, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 5 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.52911/itall.1438891

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA64YR89JE

APA

Hasırcıoğlu, S., & Öztürk, M. S. (2024). Analyzing Mother Tongue Interference in Turkish EFL Students’ Written Products: A Lexical and Syntactical Perspective. Instructional Technology and Lifelong Learning, 5(1), 116-152. https://doi.org/10.52911/itall.1438891

AMA

1.Hasırcıoğlu S, Öztürk MS. Analyzing Mother Tongue Interference in Turkish EFL Students’ Written Products: A Lexical and Syntactical Perspective. ITALL. 2024;5(1):116-152. doi:10.52911/itall.1438891

Chicago

Hasırcıoğlu, Samet, and Mustafa Serkan Öztürk. 2024. “Analyzing Mother Tongue Interference in Turkish EFL Students’ Written Products: A Lexical and Syntactical Perspective”. Instructional Technology and Lifelong Learning 5 (1): 116-52. https://doi.org/10.52911/itall.1438891.

EndNote

Hasırcıoğlu S, Öztürk MS (June 1, 2024) Analyzing Mother Tongue Interference in Turkish EFL Students’ Written Products: A Lexical and Syntactical Perspective. Instructional Technology and Lifelong Learning 5 1 116–152.

IEEE

[1]S. Hasırcıoğlu and M. S. Öztürk, “Analyzing Mother Tongue Interference in Turkish EFL Students’ Written Products: A Lexical and Syntactical Perspective”, ITALL, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 116–152, June 2024, doi: 10.52911/itall.1438891.

ISNAD

Hasırcıoğlu, Samet - Öztürk, Mustafa Serkan. “Analyzing Mother Tongue Interference in Turkish EFL Students’ Written Products: A Lexical and Syntactical Perspective”. Instructional Technology and Lifelong Learning 5/1 (June 1, 2024): 116-152. https://doi.org/10.52911/itall.1438891.

JAMA

1.Hasırcıoğlu S, Öztürk MS. Analyzing Mother Tongue Interference in Turkish EFL Students’ Written Products: A Lexical and Syntactical Perspective. ITALL. 2024;5:116–152.

MLA

Hasırcıoğlu, Samet, and Mustafa Serkan Öztürk. “Analyzing Mother Tongue Interference in Turkish EFL Students’ Written Products: A Lexical and Syntactical Perspective”. Instructional Technology and Lifelong Learning, vol. 5, no. 1, June 2024, pp. 116-52, doi:10.52911/itall.1438891.

Vancouver

1.Samet Hasırcıoğlu, Mustafa Serkan Öztürk. Analyzing Mother Tongue Interference in Turkish EFL Students’ Written Products: A Lexical and Syntactical Perspective. ITALL. 2024 Jun. 1;5(1):116-52. doi:10.52911/itall.1438891

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Analyzing Mother Tongue Interference in Turkish EFL Students' Written Products: A Lexical and Syntactical Perspective

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Keywords

Project Number

Ethical Statement

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Early Pub Date

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite