Aile Sistemlerinde Şiddetin Döngüsü

Berna Akçinar

doi:10.15869/itobiad.327091

TR EN

Aile Sistemlerinde Şiddetin Döngüsü

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, aile-birey etkileşimi sunularak toplumsal cinsiyet rolleri, aile içi şiddet ve kadının problem çözme becerileri incelenerek, bu durum ve tutumların kadınların ebeveynlik öz-yeterlik algılarına ve cezaya dayalı ebeveynlik davranışlarına olan etkisi araştırılmıştır. Türkiye genelinde, temsili bir örneklem ile rassal yöntemle seçilmiş, 2-8 yaş arası çocuğu olan, kentsel ve kırsal yerleşim bölgelerinden 810 kadın ile görüşülmüştür. Sonuçlar göstermiştir ki, kırsal bölgelerde yaşayan, sosyo-ekonomik ve eğitim düzeyleri düşük olan anneler hem daha geleneksel cinsiyetçi tutumlara sahipler, hem de eşlerinden daha fazla şiddet görmekteler. Sosyo-ekonomik düzey kontrol edilerek yapılan yordayıcı analizlerin sonuçlarına göre de, daha geleneksel cinsiyetçi tutumlara sahip, eşinden fiziksel ve duygusal şiddet gören ve çaresiz hisseden anneler, çocuklarına karşı daha çok cezaya dayalı disiplin davranışlarını göstermektedirler.

Keywords

Toplumsal Cinsiyet Rolleri,Şiddet,Aile,Ebeveynlik Davranışları,Problem Çözme Becerisi,Erken Çocukluk,Temsili Örneklem

References

Akar, T., Aksakal, F. N., Demirel, B., Durukan, E., ve Özkan, S. (2010). ”The prevalence of domestic violence against women among a group of women: Ankara, Turkey”. Journal of Family Violence, 25(5), 449-460.
Almeida, D. M., Wethington, E., ve Chandler, A. L. (1999). Daily transmission of tensions between marital dyads and parent-child dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(1), 49-61.
Aunola, K., ve Nurmi, J. E. (2005). The Role of Parenting Styles in Children's Problem Behavior. Child Development, 76, 1144-1159.
Aycan, Z. (2001). “Human resource management in Turkey-Current issues and future challenges.” International Journal of Manpower, 22(3), 252-260.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 32(2), 122–147.
Baumrind, D. (1996). The Discipline Controversy Revisited. Family Relations, 4(4), 405–414.
Baydar, N., Küntay, A. C., Yagmurlu, B., Aydemir, N., Cankaya, D., Göksen, F., ve Cemalcilar, Z. (2014). “It takes a village” to support the vocabulary development of children with multiple risk factors. Developmental Psychology, 50(4), 1014.
Baydar ve Yumbul (2004). Evlilikte Doyum Ölçeği, Basılmamış yayına hazır çalışma.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bryant, A. N. (2003). “Changes in attitudes toward women’s roles: Predicting gender-role traditionalism among college students.” Sex Roles, 48, 131-142.

Conger, R. D., ve Elder, G. H., Jr. (1994). “Families in troubled times: Adapting to change in rural America.” Chicago: Aldine de Gruyter.
Cox, M. J., ve Paley, B. (1997). Families as systems. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 243-267.
Deater- Deckard K., ve Dodge, K. A. (1997). Externalizing Behavior Problems and Discipline Revisited: Nonlinear Effects of Culture, Context, and Gender. Psychological Inquiry, 8, 161-175.
Dorahy, M. J., Lewis, C., ve Wolfe, F. A. (2007). Psychological distress associated with domestic violence in Northern Ireland. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social, 25(4), 295-305.
Erel, O., ve Burman, B. (1995). Interrelatedness of marital relations and parent-child relations: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 108-132.
Güvenç, G. (2014). “Construction of Wife and Mother Identities in Women’s Talk of Intrafamily Violence in Saraycık-Turkey.” International perspectives in Psycholgy: Research, Practice, Consultation, 3(2), 76-92.
Hassall, R., Rose J., ve McDonald, J. (2005). Parenting stress in mothers of children with an intellectual disability: the effects of parental cognitions in relation to child characteristics and family support. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49(6), 405-418.
Hilton, N. Z., Harris, G. T., ve Rice, M. E. (2003). Correspondence between self-report measures of interpersonal aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18(3), 223-239.
Holloway, S. D., Suzuki, S., Yamamoto Y., ve Behrens, K. Y. (2005). Parenting self-efficacy among Japanese mothers. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 36(1), 61-76.
Hortaçsu, N., Kalaycıoğlu, S., ve Rittersberger-Tılıç, H. (2003). “Intrafamily aggression in Turkey: Frequency, instigation and acceptance.” The Journal of Social Psychology, 143(2), 163-184.
İmamoğlu, O. (1994). “Değişim sürecinde aile: Evlilik ilişkileri, bireysel gelişim ve demoktratik değerler.” T.C. Başbakanlık Aile Araştırma Kurumu Başkanlığı. Aile Kurultayı (33-51).
Jansen, H. A. F. M., Yüksel, I., ve Çağatay, P. (2009). “National Research on Domestic Violence Against Women in Turkey.” Main Report. SVRI Forum, Johannesburg, South Africa, 6-9 July.
Kaner, S. (Proje Başkanı), Şekercioğlu, G. ve Yellice-Yüksel, B. (2007). Öğretmenlerin ve ana-babaların öz-yetkinlik inançları, tükenmişlik algıları ve çocukların problem davranışları. Yayınlanmamış Araştırma Projesi. Proje Numarası: 2006 09 04 009.
Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1996). Family and human development across cultures: A view from the other side. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., (2005). Autonomy and Relatedness in Cultural Context: Implications for Self and Family. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol 36(4), 403-422.
Kandiyoti, D. (1997). “Gendering the modern: On missing dimensions in the study of Turkish modernity.” Editör: S. Bozdoğan ve R. Kasaba, Rethinking modernity and national identity in Turkey. Seattle/London: University of Washington Press.
Kanoy, K., Ulku-Steiner, B., Cox, M., ve Burchinal, M. (2003). Marital relationship and individual psychological characteristics that predict physical punishment of children. Journal of Family Psychology, 17(1), 20-28.
Karney, B. R., ve Bradbury, T. N. (2005). “Contextual influences on marriage: implications for policy and intervention.” Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 171-74.
Knafo, A., ve Plomin, R. (2006). Parental discipline and affection and children's prosocial behavior: Genetic and environmental links. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 147-164.
Landry, S. H., Smith, K. E., Miller-Loncar, C. L., ve Swank, P. R. (1997). Predicting cognitive-language and social growth curves from early maternal behaviors in children at varying degrees of biological risk. Developmental Psychology, 33, 6, 1040-1053.
Markowitz, F. E. (2001). “Attitudes and family violence: Linking intergenerational and cultural theories.” Journal of Family Violence, 16, 205-218.
McGovern, J. M., Meyers, S. A.(2002). “Relationships between sex-role attitudes, division of household tasks, and marital adjustment.” Contemporary Family Therapy, 24, 601-618.
Gender Equity Index (2012). Measuring Inequity: The 2012 Gender Equity Index, http://www. socialwatch.org/node/14366.
Paterson, G., ve Sanson, A. (1999). The association of behavioral adjustment to temperament, parenting and family characteristics among 5-year-old children. Social Development, 8(3), 293-309.
Popenoe, D. (2007). “What Is Happening to the Family in Developed Nations?” Loveless. The Family in the New Millennium: World Voices Supporting the ‘Natural’ Clan, Volume 1: The Place of Family in Human Society. Editör: A. Scott and Thomas B. Holman. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Powell, G. N., ve Greenhaus, J. H. (2010). Sex, gender, and the work-to-family interface: Exploring negative and positive interdependencies. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 513-534.
Shumow, L., Vandell, D. L. ve Posner, J. K. (1998). Harsh, firm, and permissive parenting in low-income families: Relations to children’s academic achievement and behavioral adjustment. Journal of Family Issues, 19(5):483–507.
Sirman, N. (2000). “Writing the usual love story: The fashioning of conjugal and national subjects in Turkey”, Sayfa 250-272. Gender, agency and change. Editör: Goddard, V. A. London: Routledge.
Smith, J.R., ve Brooks-Gunn, J. (1997) . Correlates and consequences of harsh discipline for young children. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 151(8):777–786.
Stocker, C. M., ve Youngblade, L. (1999). Marital conflict and parental hostility: Links with children’s sibling and peer relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 598-609.
Straus, M. A., ve Douglas, E. M. (2004). A short form of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, and typologies for severity and mutuality. Violence and victims, 19(5), 507-520.
Şenol, D. ve Yıldız, S. (2011). “Bir Kentleşme Sorunu Olarak Gecekondularda Yaşanan Aile İçi Şiddet ve Kadın –Ankara İli, Çankaya İlçesi, Yıldız Örneği-“, 38. (ICANAS) Uluslar arası Asya ve Kuzey Afrika Çalışmaları Kongresi. Çevre, Kentleşme Sorunları ve Çözümleri Bildiriler Kitabı, Cilt II. ss.841-851.
Teti, D. M., ve Gelfand, D. M. (1991). Behavioral competence among mothers of infants in the first year: the meditational role of maternal self-efficacy. Child Development, 62, 918- 929.
TUIK (Turkish Statistical Institute) (2014). Temel İstatistikler. Alınmıştır: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/UstMenu.do?metod=temelist
Webster-Stratton, C., & Hammond, M. (1999). Marital Conflict Management Skills, Parenting Style, and Early-onset Conduct Problems: Processes and Pathways. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 40, 917-927.
WHO, (2002). World report on violence and health. Geneva: p. 1-46.
Worden, A. P., ve Carlson, B. E. (2005). Attitudes and beliefs about domestic violence: results of a public opinion survey II. Beliefs about causes. Journal of interpersonal violence, 20(10), 1219-1243.
Yağmurlu, B., ve Sanson, A. (2009). The role of child temperament, parenting and culture in the development of prosocial behaviors. Australian Journal of Psychology, 61(2), 77-88.
Zeyneloğlu, S., ve Terzioğlu, F. (2011). Development and psychometric properties gender roles attitude scale. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 40(40).

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Berna Akçinar
IŞIK ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Türkiye

Publication Date

August 27, 2017

Submission Date

July 7, 2017

Acceptance Date

August 23, 2017

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 6 Number: 4

DOI

https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.327091

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA55FY77HP

APA

Akçinar, B. (2017). Aile Sistemlerinde Şiddetin Döngüsü. İnsan Ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(4), 40-64. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.327091

AMA

1.Akçinar B. Aile Sistemlerinde Şiddetin Döngüsü. itobiad. 2017;6(4):40-64. doi:10.15869/itobiad.327091

Chicago

Akçinar, Berna. 2017. “Aile Sistemlerinde Şiddetin Döngüsü”. İnsan Ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi 6 (4): 40-64. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.327091.

EndNote

Akçinar B (September 1, 2017) Aile Sistemlerinde Şiddetin Döngüsü. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi 6 4 40–64.

IEEE

[1]B. Akçinar, “Aile Sistemlerinde Şiddetin Döngüsü”, itobiad, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 40–64, Sept. 2017, doi: 10.15869/itobiad.327091.

ISNAD

Akçinar, Berna. “Aile Sistemlerinde Şiddetin Döngüsü”. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi 6/4 (September 1, 2017): 40-64. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.327091.

JAMA

1.Akçinar B. Aile Sistemlerinde Şiddetin Döngüsü. itobiad. 2017;6:40–64.

MLA

Akçinar, Berna. “Aile Sistemlerinde Şiddetin Döngüsü”. İnsan Ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol. 6, no. 4, Sept. 2017, pp. 40-64, doi:10.15869/itobiad.327091.

Vancouver

1.Berna Akçinar. Aile Sistemlerinde Şiddetin Döngüsü. itobiad. 2017 Sep. 1;6(4):40-64. doi:10.15869/itobiad.327091

Journal of the Human and Social Science Researches is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY NC).

35894

The Cycle of Violence in Family Systems

Aile Sistemlerinde Şiddetin Döngüsü

Abstract

Keywords

The Cycle of Violence in Family Systems

Abstract

Keywords

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite