Have Turkish Courts Started to Enforce Foreign Joint Custody Judgments?

Abstract

The approach of Turkish courts related to the enforcement of joint custody decisions is chang-ing in line with the international perspective. Important development and change arrive with the adoption of the “Protocol No. 7 amended with Protocol No. 11, Annex to the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms” (Protocol No. 7). Referring to this, Turkish Courts have both started to rule in favor of joint custody and started to en-force foreign joint custody judgments. The decision of the Supreme Court 2nd Legal Depart-ment, dated February 20, 2017, numbered E. 2016/15771, K. 2017/1737 has been the turning point on this. We expect that this encouraging attitude of the Supreme Court will positively affect the enforcement of foreign joint custody decisions, especially in cases where joint cus-tody is in the best interest of the child and the fact that the issue of joint custody after divorce is not regulated in Turkish Law will no longer face public policy interference. However, in order to achieve this, we are of the opinion that provisions that bring a detailed arrangement related to joint custody should be included in the “Turkish Civil Code” (TCC).

Keywords

• Joint custody
• enforcement
• the best interest of the child
• public policy
• Protocol No. 7

References

1. Akıncı Z and Gökyayla CD, Milletlerarası Aile Hukuku [International Family Law] (1st ed., Vedat 2010). google scholar
2. Akıntürk T and Ateş D, Türk Medeni Hukuku [Turkish Civil Law] (23rd ed., Beta 2021). google scholar
3. Akkurt SS, ‘Çocuğun Kişiliğinin Korunması ve Velayetin Belirlenmesinde Çocuğun Menfaati google scholar Olgusu’ [Interest of The Child in the Protection of the Child’s Personality and the Determination of Custody] in B. İ. Engin (eds), In Honor of Prof. Dr. Rona Serozan (On İki Levha 2010) 91-121. google scholar
4. Akyüz E, Çocuk Hukuku, Çocukların Hakları ve Korunması [Child Law, Children’s Rights and Protection] (6th ed., Pegem 2018). google scholar
5. Alibaba A and Rodoslu E, The Role of Public Policy in the Enforcement of Foreign Custody Judgments: An Example of Joint Custody in Turkish Law, 12 (5) (2020) Sustainability 1-28. google scholar
6. Apaydın E, ‘Ortak Hayata Son Verilmesi Sonrası Ortak Velayet Hususunda Yasal Düzenleme Gereği’ [The Necessity of a Legislative Regulation on the Joint Custody After the Dissolution of Marital Union] (2018) 9 (1) Inonu University Law Review 445-476. google scholar
7. Arkan AS, ‘Boşanma Halinde Ortak Velayet [Joint Custody in Case of Divorce]’ (2016) 14 (167) Legal Hukuk Dergisi [Legal Journal of Law] 6075-6088. google scholar
8. Arslan İ, ‘Türk Hukukunda Yabancı Mahkeme Kararlarının Tenfizinin Mütekabiliyet Şartına google scholar

9. Bağlanmasının Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi’nin m. 6 (1) Açısından Değerlendirilmesi [The Evaluation of the Reciprocity as a Condition for the Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Terms of art. 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights in Turkish Law]’ (2019) 10 (1) Inonu University Law Review 1-15. google scholar
10. Aybay R and Dardağan E, Uluslararası Düzeyde Yasaların Çatışması (Kanunlar İhtilafı) [Conflict of Laws at International Level (Conflict of Laws)] (2nd ed., Istanbul Bilgi University Press 2008). google scholar
11. Barumandzadeh R, Lebrun EM, Barumandzadeh T and Poussin G, ‘The Impact of Parental google scholar Conflict and the Mitigating Effect of Joint Custody After Divorce or Separation’ (2016) 57 (3) Journal of Divorce & Remarriage 212-223. google scholar
12. Baygın C, Soybağı Hukuku [Paternity Law] (On İki Levha 2010). google scholar
13. Blasio G and Vuri D, ‘Effects of the Joint Custody Law in Italy’ (2019) 16 (3) Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 479-514. google scholar
14. Buchanan CM and Jahromi PB, ‘A psychological perspective on shared custody arrangements’ (2008), 43 (2) Wake Forest University Law Review 419-439. google scholar
15. Canyaş AB, ‘Why Not Enforce? A Critical Analysis of Refusal to Enforce Foreign Joint google scholar
16. Custody Judgments in Turkish Courts’ (2013) 27 (3) International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 310-331. google scholar
17. Carlsund A, Asplund K, Eva S and Eriksson U, ‘Swedish Parent’s Experiences of Joint Physical Custody’ (2014) The Open Family Studies Journal 1-7. google scholar
18. Ceylan E, ‘Türk Velayet Hukukunda Yeni Gelişmeler’ [Recent Developments in Turkish Custody Law] (2018) 16 (181) Legal Hukuk Dergisi [Legal Journal of Law] 35-68. google scholar
19. Courbe P and Gouttenoire A, Droit de la Famille (7th ed., Sirey 2017). google scholar
20. Çavuşoğlu AU, Türk Milletlerarası Özel Hukukunda Boşanma [Divorce in Turkish Private International Law] (1st ed., Beta, 2006). google scholar
21. Çelikel A and Erdem BB, Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk [Private International Law] (17th ed., Beta 2021). google scholar
22. Çelikel A, ‘Yeni Kanuna Göre Yabancı Mahkeme Kararlarının Tenfiz Şartları [Enforcement Requirements According to the New Law]’ (1982)2 (2) Public and Private International Law Bulletin 7-13. google scholar
23. Doğan V, Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk [Private International Law] (Savaş 2021). google scholar
24. Dural M, Öğüz T and Gümüş A, Türk Özel Hukuku [Turkish Private Law] Vol. 3, Aile Hukuku [Family Law] (Filiz 2021). google scholar
25. Eekelaar J, ‘Beyond the Welfare Principle’ (2002) 14 (3) Child and Family Law Quarterly 237-250. google scholar
26. Egea V, Droit de la famille, (2nd. ed., Lexis Nexis 2018). google scholar
27. Ekşi N, Milletlerarası Özel Hukukta Medeni Olmayan Evliliklerin ve Adli Olmayan Boşanmaların Tanınması [Recognition of Unofficial Marriages and Non-Judicial Divorces in International Private Law] (Beta 2012). google scholar
28. Ekşi N, Türk Mahkemelerinin Milletlerarası Yetkisi [International Competence of Turkish Courts] (2nd ed., Beta 2000). google scholar
29. Ekşi N, Yabancı Mahkeme Kararlarının Tanınması ve Tenfizi [Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments] (2nd ed., Beta 2020). google scholar
30. Elçin EG, Çocuğun Menfaati Gereği Çocukla İlgili Uyuşmazlıklarda Görüşünün Alınmaması Gereken Durumlar [Circumstances Where the Opinion of the Child Should Not Be Taken in the Disputes Related to the child Due to Child’s Interest] in G. Elçin Evgen and A. Genç Arıdemir (eds), Çocuk Hakları Çalışmaları I [Children’s Rights Studies I] (On İki Levha 2017) 1- 26. google scholar
31. Elrod DL and Spector RG, ‘A Review of the Year in Family Law 2007-2008: Federalization and Nationalization Continue’ (2009) 42 (4) Family Law Quarterly 713-765. google scholar
32. Erdem M, Aile Hukuku [Family Law] (2nd ed., Seçkin 2019). google scholar
33. Erlüle F, İsviçre Medeni Kanunu’nda Yapılan Değişiklikler Işığında Boşanmada Birlikte Velayet [Shared Custody in Divorce in the Light of Changes in Swiss Civil Code] (Yetkin 2019). google scholar
34. Ertaş Ş, ‘Yabancı İlamların Taninmasi ve Tenfizi [Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments]’ 3 (1-4) Dokuz Eylul University Law Review, In Honour ofKudret Ayiter, (1987) 365-439. google scholar
35. Esen E, ‘Türk Hukukunda Yabancı Mahkeme Kararlarının Tanınması ve Tenfizinde Münhasır google scholar Yetki Kavramı [Exclusive Jurisdiction in Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments under Turkish Law] (2002) 22 (2) Public and Private Law Bulletin 183-206. google scholar
36. Folberg J, Joint Custody and Shared Parenting (Guilford Press 1991). google scholar
37. Gelgel G, Devletler Özel Hukukunda Çocuk Hukukundan Doğan Problemler-Ders Notları-[Problems Arising out of Child Law in Private International Law-Lecture Notes-] (Beta 2012) google scholar
38. Gelgel GÖ, ‘Devletler Özel Hukukunda Velayet, Çocuk Kaçırmaları, Evlat Edinmeye İlişkin Problemler [Custody, Child Abductions, Adoption Problems in Private International Law]’ (2005) 8 (2) Istanbul Commerce University Social Sciences Review 119-148. google scholar
39. Gelgel GÖ, ‘Türk Devletler Özel Hukukunda Velayet ve Vesayet Kararlarının Tanınması ve Tenfizine İlişkin Bazı Problemler [Custody and Guardianship Issues in Private International Law]’ (2015) 35 (2) Public and Private International Law Bulletin 107-138. google scholar
40. Gelgel GÖ, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Court Judgments Within the Framework of the Application of the Supreme Court of Appeals in R. Kender and S. Ünan (eds.), In Honour of Prof. Dr. Tahir Çağa (Beta 2000) 389-397. google scholar
41. Gençcan ÖU, ‘Ortak Velayet’ [Joint Custody], Izmir Bar Association Bulletin (2017) 24-31. google scholar
42. George R, Ideas and Debates in Family Law (1st ed., Hart Publishing 2012). google scholar
43. Giray FK, ‘Karşılıklılık Koşulu ve Uluslararası Anlasmalarla MÖHUK’un Tanıma-Tenfiz Sistemine Getirilen Farkliliklar [Condition of Reciprocity and Differences Introduced with International Conventions to the Recognition-Enforcement System of CPIPL]’ in S. B. Bozkurt (ed.) Yabancı Mahkeme ve Hakem Kararlarının Tanınması ve Tenfizinde Güncel Gelişmeler [CurrentDevelopments in Recognition and Enforcement ofForeign Courts and Arbitral Awards] (On İki Levha 2018) 69-83. google scholar
44. Gökyayla CD, ‘Yeni Yargıtay Kararları Işığında Gerekçesiz Yabancı Mahkeme Kararlarının Tanınması ve Tenfizi [Recognition and Enforcement of Unjustified Foreign Court Decisions in the Light of New Supreme Court Decisions]’ (2013) 9 (105-106) Bahcesehir University Law Review 7-42. google scholar
45. Grassinger GE, Türk Medeni Kanununda Yer Alan Velayet Hükümleri Kapsamında Küçüğün Kişi Varlığının Korunması İçin Alınan Tedbirler [Measures Taken for the Protection of the Personal Presence of the Minor Under the Provisions of Custody in Turkish Civil Code] (On İki Levha 2009). google scholar
46. Gülgösteren ZA, ‘Boşanma Sonucunda Ortak (Birlikte) Velayet [Joint (Shared) Custody as a Result of Divorce]’ (2017) 2 (2) Cankaya University Journal of Law 157-180. google scholar
47. Güven K, ‘Türk Hukukunda Evliligin Sona Ermesi ve Evlilik Disi Iliskide Velayet Hakkının Geldigi Son Nokta: Ortak Velayet’ [The Last Word in Turkish Law About Parental Authority After Termination of Marriage and in Concubinage: Joint Parental Authority] (2018) 4 (1) Baskent University Law Review 11-64. google scholar
48. Güven P, Tanıma-Tenfiz, Yabancı Mahkeme Kararlarının Tanınması ve Tenfizi [Recognition-Enforcement, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments] (Yetkin 2013). google scholar
49. Hatemi H, Aile Hukuku [Family Law] (9th ed., On İki Levha 2021). google scholar
50. Huysal B, Devletler Özel Hukukunda Velayet [Custody in Private International Law] (Legal 2005). google scholar
51. İnce N, ‘Karşılaştırmalı Hukukta ve Türk Hukukunda Evlilik Birliğinin Boşanma ile Sona Ermesi Durumunda Birlikte Velayet’ [Joint Custody in Comparative Law and Turkish Law in the Case of Termination of the Marriage by Divorce] (2018), Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi [Turkish Justice Academy Review] 189-230. google scholar
52. Kahraman S, Türk Milletlerarası Aile Hukukunda Ortak Velayet [Joint Custody in Turkish International Family Law] (On İki Levha 2019). google scholar
53. Kılıçoğlu A, Aile Hukuku [Family Law] (5th ed., Turhan 2020). google scholar
54. Koçhisarlıoğlu C, Boşanmada Birlikte Velayet ve Yasanın Aşılması [Shared Custody in Divorce and Overcoming the Law] (Turhan 2004). google scholar
55. Kurt LM, ‘Bosanma Durumunda Birlikte (Ortak) Velayet’ [Joint Custody in the Case of Divorce] (2018) 9 (2) Inonu University Law Review 157-186. google scholar
56. Malkoç EŞ, Aile Hukukuna İlişkin Yabancı Kararların Tanınması [Recognition of Foreign Judgments Regarding Family Law] (On İki Levha 2017). google scholar
57. Marinho S and Vladimira Correia S, ‘Notas finais’, in S. Marinho and S.V. Correia (eds.), Una familia parental, duas casas (Silabo 2017) 255-263. google scholar
58. Martiny D, ‘The Changing Concept of Family and Challenges for Family Law in Germany in J. M. Scherpe (ed.), European Family Law Volume II: The Changing Concept of ‘Family’ and Challenges for Domestic Family Law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2016). google scholar
59. Michaels R, ‘Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments’ in Rüdiger Wolfrum (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2009). google scholar
60. Mnookin RH, ‘Child Custody Adjudication: Judicial Functions in the Face of Indeterminacy’ (1975) 39 Law and Contemporary Problems 226-293. google scholar
61. Nomer E, Devletler Hususi Hukuku [Private International Law] (22nd ed., Beta 2017). google scholar
62. Novales TP, ‘The Development of ‘Shared Custody’ in Spain and Southern Europe’, in J. Eekelaar and R. George (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Family Law and Policy (2nd ed., Oxon: Routledge 2021). google scholar
63. Özgenç Z, ‘Velayete Uygulanacak Hukukun Tespitinde Kamu Düzeni Müdahalesine İlişkin Değerlendirmeler [Evaluations Regarding Public Policy Exception in Determination of Applicable Law to Custody] (2018) 22 (1) Ankara Haci Bayram Veli University Faculty of Law Review 3-47. google scholar
64. Öztan B, ‘Türk Hukukunda Bosanmada Birlikte Velayet Sorunu’ [The Problem of Shared Custody in Divorce in Turkish Law] in S. Arkan and A. Yongalık (eds.), In Honour of Prof. Dr. Tuğrul Ansay (Turhan 2006). google scholar
65. Öztan B, Aile Hukuku [Family Law] (6th ed., Turhan 2015). google scholar
66. Öztürk MK, ‘Boşanma Sürecinde Ortak (Müşterek) Velayet ve Toplumsal Bakış Açısı’ [Joint (Shared) Custody and Social Point of View in the Process of Divorce] in G. Elcin Evgen and A. Genc Aridemir (eds), Çocuk Hakları Çalışmaları I [Children’s Rights Studies I] (On İki Levha 2017) 59-116. google scholar
67. Parkinson P, Family Law and the Indissolubility of Parenthood (Cambridge University Press 2011). google scholar
68. Ruhi AC, and Özdemir H, Çocuk Hukuku ve Çocuk Hakları [Child Law and Child Rights] (On İki Levha 2016). google scholar
69. Ruhi C and Ruhi AC, Velayet Hukuku [Law of Custody] (Seçkin 2017). google scholar
70. Sakmar A, Yabancı İlamların Türkiye’deki Sonuçları [Consequences of Foreign Judgments in Turkey] (Istanbul University Press, 1982) google scholar
71. Sargın F and Erten R, ‘MÖHUK Hükümleri Dairesinde Tanımanın Hukuki Niteliği, Usulu ve google scholar Karşılaşılan Bazı Sorunlar: Yeni Bir Düzenleme Yapma Gereği [Legal Nature, Procedure of the Recognition under the Provisions of CPIPL and Some Problems Encountered: Need of New Regulation]’, Journal of International Trade and Arbitration Law (2014) 37-136. google scholar
72. Schwenzer I and Keller T, ‘The Changing Concept of Family and Challenges for Family Law in Switzerland in J. M. Scherpe (ed.), European Family Law Volume II: The Changing Concept of ‘Family’ and Challenges for Domestic Family Law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2016). google scholar
73. Scott E, Derdeyn A, ‘Rethinking Joint Custody’, (1984) 45 (2) Ohio State Law Journal 455-498. google scholar
74. Serdar İ, ‘Birlikte Velayet’ [Shared Custody] (2008) 10 (1) Dokuz Eylul University Law Review 155-197. google scholar
75. Serozan R, Çocuk Hukuku [Child Law] (Vedat 2017). google scholar
76. Singer A, ‘Parenting Issues After Separation A Scandinavian Perspective’ in J. Eekelaar and R. George (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Family Law and Policy (2nd ed., Routledge 2021). google scholar
77. Statsky WP, Family Law: The Essentials (Cengage Learning 2015). google scholar
78. Steinbach A, ‘Children’s and parents’ well-being in joint physical custody: A literature review’ (2019) 58 (2) Family Process 353-369. google scholar
79. Steinman SB, Zemmelman SE and Knoblauch TM, ‘A Study of parents who sought joint custody following divorce: who reaches agreement and sustains joint custody and who returns to court’ (1985) 24 (5) Journal of American Academy of Child Psychiatry 554-562. google scholar
80. Şanlı C, ‘Türk Hukukunda Çocukların Velayetine ve Korunmasına İlişkin Yabancı Mahkeme Kararlarının Tanınması ve Tenfizi [Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Child Custody and Child Protection Judgments under Turkish Law]’ (1996) 16 (1-2) Public and Private International Law Bulletin 71-82. google scholar
81. Şanlı C, Esen E and Ataman- Figanmeşe İ, Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk [Private International Law] (9th ed., Beta 2021). google scholar
82. Teziç E, Anayasa Hukuku [Constitutional Law] (Beta 2020). google scholar
83. Tiryakioğlu B, ‘Yabancı Mahkeme Kararlarının Tanınması ve Tenfizinde Kamu Düzenine Aykırılık [Violation of Public Policy in Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments] in S. B. Bozkurt (ed.) Yabancı
84. Mahkeme ve Hakem Kararlarının Tanınması ve Tenfizinde Güncel Gelişmeler [Current Developments in Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Courts and Arbitral Awards] (On İki Levha, 2018) 83-94. google scholar
85. Tiryakioğlu B, Yabancı Boşanma Kararlarının Türkiye’de Tanınması ve Tenfizi [Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Divorce Judgments in Turkey] (Ankara University Press 1976). google scholar
86. Usta S, Velayet Hukuku [Custody Law] (On İki Levha 2016). google scholar
87. Uzun TB, ‘Türk Medeni Kanunu’na Göre Velayetin Kullanılması ve Çocuğun Üstün Yararı İlkesi Doğrultusunda Boşanmada ve Evlilik Dışı İlişkide Birlikte Velayet Modeli’ [The Use of Custody in Turkish Civil Code and the Joint Custody in Divorce and Extramarital Relationship in Line with the Principle of the Best Interest of the Child] (2016) 6 (1) Hacettepe Law Review 135-166. google scholar
88. Yücel Y, Türk Medeni Hukukunda Boşanma Halinde Velâyet, Cocukla Kişisel İlişki Kurulması ve Çocuğun Soyadı [Custody in Case of Divorce in Turkish Civil Law, Personal Relationship with Children and Child’s Surname] (On İki Levha 2018). google scholar