A Break For Art: Evaluation of the Conflicts Between Trademark Rights and the Freedom of Artistic Expression Considering Turkish and European Union Regulations

Abstract

The repealed Regulation (EU) 2015/2424 on the Community Trade Mark introduced a specific rule to safeguard the freedom of artistic expression against trademark rights. According to this rule stated in Recital 21 of the EU Trade Mark Regulation 2017/1001 and Recital 27 of the EU Trade Mark Directive 2015/2436, which are currently in force, the use of a trademark by third parties for the purpose of artistic expression should be considered as fair, provided that it is in accordance with honest practices in industrial and commercial matters. In Turkish law, there is no special provision regarding the issue. However, since this rule is explicitly mentioned in the referred EU regulations that were taken into consideration during the legislative process of Industrial Property Code no. 6769, it is possible to adopt the same approach for our law system. In addition, the general prerequisites required for trademark infringement and fair use exceptions may help to safeguard the freedom of artistic expression. On the other hand, it is unclear whether these provisions are adequate to fully protect the freedom of artistic expression. In particular, it may be quite challenging to safeguard freedom of expression against the extended protection granted to well-known trademarks. In this respect, based on US, EU and Turkish law, legal regulations that can be applied in cases of conflict between freedom of artistic expression and trademark rights and whether they are adequate to safeguard the artistic expressions are evaluated in this study.

Keywords

• Freedom of Expression
• Trademark Rights
• Fair Use
• Trademark Infringement
• Honest Practices

References

1. Andreacola S, ‘Expressive Genericity: Trademarks as Language in the Pepsi Generation’ (2001) 12(1) Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 26-31 google scholar
2. Arıkan Ö, ‘Revisiting the Conflict Between the European Trade Mark Rights and Parallel Importation’ (2015) (64), Rekabet Dergisi 3-26 google scholar
3. Arkan S, ‘Marka Hakkına Tecavüz-İşaretin Markasal Olarak Kullanılması Zorunluluğu?’ (2000) 20(3) BATİDER 5-13 google scholar
4. Ayhan R, Çağlar H, Yıldız B and İmirlioğlu D, Sınai Mülkiyet Hukuku (Adalet 2021) google scholar
5. Babür Tosun N and Burak Dereli A, ‘Reklamda Parodi Kullanımının Marka İmajına Etkisi’ (2016) 12(46) Marmara Üniversitesi Öneri Dergisi 321-338 google scholar
6. Başbüyük İ, Marka Hakkının İhlalinden Doğan Cezai Sorumluluk (2nd edn, Adalet 2018) google scholar
7. Bohaczewski M, ‘Conflicts Between Trade Mark Rights and Freedom of Expression Under EU Trade Mark Law: Reality or Illusion?’ (2020) 51 International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 856-877google scholar
8. Bozkurt B, ‘Markanın Dürüst Kullanımı’ (Master’s Thesis, Ankara University Institute of Social Sciences 2020) google scholar

9. Burrel R and Gangjee D, ‘Trade Marks and Freedom of Expression: A Call For Caution’, (The University of Queensland, TC Beirne School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Research Paper No. 10-05, 2010) google scholar
10. Büyükkılıç G, ‘Avrupa Birliği ve Türk Marka Hukuku Doktrini ve Yargı Kararları Işığında Dürüst Kullanım Savunmasının Koşullarına İlişkin Bazı Tespit ve Değerlendirmeler’ (2023) 9(2) Ticaret ve Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku Dergisi 199-218 google scholar
11. Büyükkılıç G, Marka Hukukunda Tanınmış Markanın Sulandırmaya Karşı Korunması (On İki Levha 2019)google scholar
12. Çamlıbel Taylan E, Marka Hakkının Kullanımıyla Paralel İthalatın Önlenmesi (Seçkin 2001) google scholar
13. Chiampi Ohly DD, ‘Trademark Protection Versus Parodic Use in Commerce: A Comparative Analysis of the US Approach Post Jack Daniel’s Properties v VIP Products and the German Likelihood of Confusion Analysis’ (2024) 73(3) GRUR International 198-209google scholar
14. Çolak U, Türk Marka Hukuku (5th edn, On İki Levha 2023) google scholar
15. Denicola RC, ‘Trademarks as Speech: Constitutional Implications of the Emerging Rationales for the Protection of Trade Symbols’ (1982) 1982(2) Wisconsin Law Review 158-207 google scholar
16. Doğan Alkan G, ‘Marka Tecavüzü vs. İfade Özgürlüğü - Türk Hukukundaki Durum & Ikea Uyuşmazlığının Değerlendirilmesi - Bölüm II’ (IPR Gezgini, 2024) https://iprgezgini.org/tag/ifade-ozgurlugu/#_ftnref6 accessed 2 February 2025 google scholar
17. Gulasekaram P, ‘Policing the Border Between Trademarks and Free Speech: Protecting Unauthorized Trademark Use in Expressive Works’ (2005) 80(4), Washington Law Review 887-942 google scholar
18. Karmutoğlu B, ‘Avrupa Birliği Adalet Divanı Kararları Işığında Tescilli Markalara İlişkin Olarak Üçüncü Kişiler Tarafından Gerçekleştirilen ve Ayırt Edici Nitelikte Olmayan Kullanımların Marka Hakkının Kapsamı ve İstisnaları Çerçevesinde Değerlendirilmesi’ (2024) 10(1) Ticaret ve Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku Dergisi 119-138google scholar
19. Karsay E, Lagarde L and Prentoulis N, ‘When Trade Mark Rights Meet Free Speech’ (2014) 243 Managing Intellectual Property 16-18 google scholar
20. Kur A and Senftleben M, European Trademark Law A Commentary (Oxford University Press 2017) google scholar
21. Lemley MA, ‘Fame, Parody, and Policing in Trademark Law’ (2019) (1) Michigan State Law Review 1-21 google scholar
22. Lopez MC, ‘Should European Trade Mark Law Include an Explicit Parody Exception as a Limitation to Trade Mark Rights?’ A Focus on Consumers of Trade Marks With Reputation’ (Master’s Thesis, Uppsala University Department of Law 2019) google scholar
23. Oğuz A, ‘Yargı Kararları Işığında Tanınmış Marka İtirazında Haklı Sebep Kavramı’ (2018) 9(1) İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 419-444 google scholar
24. Olson A, ‘Dilution by Tarnishment: An Unworkable Cause of Action in Cases of Artistic Expression’ (2012) 53 Boston College Law Review 693-736 google scholar
25. Özbey Ö, ‘Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi Işığında İfade Özgürlüğü Kısıtlamaları’ (2013) 62(1) Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 93-146 google scholar
26. Sakulin W, ‘Dilution and Freedom of Expression in Europe’ in Daniel R. Bereskin (ed.) Trademark Dilution and Free Riding, (Edward Elgar Publishing 2023) 467-516 google scholar
27. Sakulin W, ‘Trademark Protection and Freedom of Expression: An Inquiry Into the Conflict Between Trademark Rights and Freedom of Expression Under, European, German and Dutch Law’ (PhD Thesis, University of Amsterdam Faculty of Law 2010) google scholar
28. Senftleben M, ‘Function Theory and International Exhaustion - Why Is İt Wise to Confine the Double Identity Rule to Cases Affecting the Origin Function’ (2014) 36(8) European Intellectual Property Review 518-524 google scholar
29. Senftleben M, ‘Robustness Check: Evaluating and Strengthening Artistic Use Defences in EU Trademark Law’ (2022) 53(4) International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 567-603 google scholar
30. Senftleben M, ‘The Perfect Match: Civil Law Judges and Open-Ended Fair Use Provision’ (2017) 33(1) American University International Law Review 231-286google scholar
31. Soysal T, ‘Markanın İnternet Ortamında Eleştiri Amaçlı Kullanımı: Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin 9 Ocak 2019 Tarihli Naif Şaşma Kararı Çerçevesinde Bir Değerlendirme’ (2019) 11(40) Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi 53-111google scholar
32. Tekinalp Ü, ‘Markanın Üçüncü Kişi Tarafından Kullanılması’ Prof. Dr. Oğuz İmregün’e Armağan (Beta 1998) 633-644 google scholar
33. Uzunallı S, Marka Hukuku (2nd edn, Adalet 2021)google scholar
34. Yasaman H and Yasaman Z, SMK Şerhi (Ayoğlu T, Yusufoğlu Bilgin F, Memiş Kartal P and Yüksel SH) Sınai Mülkiyet Kanunu Şerhi, C. III (Seçkin 2021)google scholar
35. Yasaman H and Yasaman Z, SMK Şerhi (Ayoğlu T, Yusufoğlu Bilgin F, Memiş Kartal P and Yüksel SH) Sınai Mülkiyet Kanunu Şerhi, C. II (Seçkin 2021) google scholar
36. Yatağan Özkan Ç, ‘Markayla Şaka Olur mu? Marka Parodilerinin Hukuka Uygunluğu Üzerine Düşünceler’ Prof. Dr. Sabih Arkan’a Armağan (On İki Levha 2019) 1349-1383 google scholar
37. Yıldırım Y, AİHM Kararlarında İfade Özgürlüğü ve İtibarın Korunması Hakkı (Adalet 2023) google scholar
38. Yıldız B, ‘Tanınmış Markalarda Haklı Sebep Def’i -Özellikle Avrupa Birliği Adalet Divanı Kararları Işığında Bir Değerlendirme-‘(2018) 39(4) Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Dergisi 945-966 google scholar
39. Zelechowski L, ‘Invoking Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Competition in Trade Mark Infringement Disputes: Legal Mechanisms for Striking a Balance’ (2018) 19(1) ERA Forum 115-135 google scholar