Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

The First Indictable Stage of Crime in Turkish Criminal Law*

Year 2015, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 265 - 274, 16.06.2015

Abstract

References

  • Adalet Bakanlığı, Türk Ceza Kanunu Madde Gerekçeleri,
  • www.ceza-bb.adalet.gov.tr/mevzuat/maddegerekce.doc(Online 15.10.2014)
  • Adem Sözüer, Suça Teşebbüs, İstanbul, 1994.
  • Bahri Öztürk, Mustafa Ruhan Erdem, Uygulamalı Ceza Hukuku ve Emni- yet Tedbirleri Hukuku, 9. Baskı, Ankara, 2006.
  • DoğanSoyaslan Teşebbüs Suçu, İstanbul, 1994.
  • Hakan Hakeri, Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, 14. Baskı, Ankara, 2012.
  • İzzet Özgenç, Türk Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, 8. Bası, Ankara, 2013.
  • Mahmut Koca – İlhan Üzülmez, Türk Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, 7. Baskı, Ankara, 2014.
  • Mehmet Emin Artuk – Ahmet Gökçen – Ahmet Caner Yenidünya, Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, 7. Baskı, Ankara, 2013.
  • Nevzat Toroslu, Ceza Hukuku Genel Kısım, Ankara, 2005.
  • Sulhi Dönmezer – Sahir Erman, Nazari ve Tatbiki Ceza Hukuku Genel Kısım, C.:1, 12. Baskı, İstanbul, 1997.
  • Sulhi Dönmezer, Teşebbüste Hazırlık ve İcra Hareketleri Tefriki, İÜHFM, C.:VIII, İstanbul, 1942.
  • The Ministry of Justice, Turkish Penal Code (English Version),
  • http://www.justice.gov.tr/basiclaws/Criminal_Code.pdf (Online 14.10.2014)
  • Turkish Supreme Court (Yargıtay) 1st Criminal Section, Decision No: 2008/6351, Date: 31.07.2008
  • Turkish Supreme Court (Yargıtay) Penal Plenary Session, Decision No: 2012/209, Date 22.05.2012.

The First Indictable Stage of Crime in Turkish Criminal Law*

Year 2015, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 265 - 274, 16.06.2015

Abstract

It is very hard to generate a set of criteria to separate preparatory from executive acts. This fact can be considered as a necessity. At the same time this also reflects the vulnerability of the legality principle. The distinction between preparatory acts and the executive acts is one of the most controversial issues in modern criminal law. In Turkish Penal Code, the sole criterion regarding the beginning of executive acts is reflected in Art. 35 which states”A person who (directly) acts”. This in fact is not a clear formulation and unable to answer the question of when exactly the executive acts start. Therefore, the Turkish courts, especially the Supreme Court (Yargıtay), are inspiring from the Turkish doctrine which takes advantages of various theories below, adopts and updates new measures and criteria to separate preparatory acts from executive ones

References

  • Adalet Bakanlığı, Türk Ceza Kanunu Madde Gerekçeleri,
  • www.ceza-bb.adalet.gov.tr/mevzuat/maddegerekce.doc(Online 15.10.2014)
  • Adem Sözüer, Suça Teşebbüs, İstanbul, 1994.
  • Bahri Öztürk, Mustafa Ruhan Erdem, Uygulamalı Ceza Hukuku ve Emni- yet Tedbirleri Hukuku, 9. Baskı, Ankara, 2006.
  • DoğanSoyaslan Teşebbüs Suçu, İstanbul, 1994.
  • Hakan Hakeri, Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, 14. Baskı, Ankara, 2012.
  • İzzet Özgenç, Türk Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, 8. Bası, Ankara, 2013.
  • Mahmut Koca – İlhan Üzülmez, Türk Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, 7. Baskı, Ankara, 2014.
  • Mehmet Emin Artuk – Ahmet Gökçen – Ahmet Caner Yenidünya, Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, 7. Baskı, Ankara, 2013.
  • Nevzat Toroslu, Ceza Hukuku Genel Kısım, Ankara, 2005.
  • Sulhi Dönmezer – Sahir Erman, Nazari ve Tatbiki Ceza Hukuku Genel Kısım, C.:1, 12. Baskı, İstanbul, 1997.
  • Sulhi Dönmezer, Teşebbüste Hazırlık ve İcra Hareketleri Tefriki, İÜHFM, C.:VIII, İstanbul, 1942.
  • The Ministry of Justice, Turkish Penal Code (English Version),
  • http://www.justice.gov.tr/basiclaws/Criminal_Code.pdf (Online 14.10.2014)
  • Turkish Supreme Court (Yargıtay) 1st Criminal Section, Decision No: 2008/6351, Date: 31.07.2008
  • Turkish Supreme Court (Yargıtay) Penal Plenary Session, Decision No: 2012/209, Date 22.05.2012.
There are 16 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Law in Context
Journal Section Türk-Alman-Macar Hukuku Karşılaştırmalı Hukuk Semineri = Bosporus Seminar Comparative Criminal Law Workshop
Authors

M. Buhari Çetinkaya This is me

Publication Date June 16, 2015
Submission Date June 16, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2015 Volume: 3 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Çetinkaya, M. B. (2015). The First Indictable Stage of Crime in Turkish Criminal Law*. Ceza Hukuku Ve Kriminoloji Dergisi, 3(1), 265-274.
AMA Çetinkaya MB. The First Indictable Stage of Crime in Turkish Criminal Law*. Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi. June 2015;3(1):265-274.
Chicago Çetinkaya, M. Buhari. “The First Indictable Stage of Crime in Turkish Criminal Law*”. Ceza Hukuku Ve Kriminoloji Dergisi 3, no. 1 (June 2015): 265-74.
EndNote Çetinkaya MB (June 1, 2015) The First Indictable Stage of Crime in Turkish Criminal Law*. Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi 3 1 265–274.
IEEE M. B. Çetinkaya, “The First Indictable Stage of Crime in Turkish Criminal Law*”, Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 265–274, 2015.
ISNAD Çetinkaya, M. Buhari. “The First Indictable Stage of Crime in Turkish Criminal Law*”. Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi 3/1 (June 2015), 265-274.
JAMA Çetinkaya MB. The First Indictable Stage of Crime in Turkish Criminal Law*. Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi. 2015;3:265–274.
MLA Çetinkaya, M. Buhari. “The First Indictable Stage of Crime in Turkish Criminal Law*”. Ceza Hukuku Ve Kriminoloji Dergisi, vol. 3, no. 1, 2015, pp. 265-74.
Vancouver Çetinkaya MB. The First Indictable Stage of Crime in Turkish Criminal Law*. Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi. 2015;3(1):265-74.