İran Ceza Hukuku Sisteminde Özel Hayatın Korunması

Year 2018, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 197 - 219, 28.12.2018

Mansour Rahmdel

Abstract

.

Keywords

Right, privacy, Iran

The Right to Privacy in the Iranian Criminal Justice System

Abstract

That the individual shall have full protection in person and in property is a core principle of a reasonable life. In some societies this principle is ignored in different ways. At times, government brings some security excuses. “In these societies, the old forms of the right to privacy are seldom known by people, let alone the new forms.” 

Despite kinds of inattention in these societies, we can see some aspects of the right to privacy, we can see people that pay attention to this right. They respect this right and try to develop its concept. They are trying to get some sanctions for its infringement. So, it has been found necessary from time to time to redefine the exact nature and extent of such protections. Political, social, and economic changes entail the recognition of new rights. So, gradually, the scope of these rights has broadened; and now the right to life has come to mean the right to enjoy life. The right to safety and the right to liberty secure the exercise of extensive civil privileges. The present paper, which uses an analytical method, considers the situation of Iranian criminal justice. 

Keywords

Right, privacy, Iran

References

• Ashouri M, Criminal procedure (First Volume Samt Publications 2016).
• Ashworth A, Principles of Criminal Law (Tony Honore & Joseph Raz eds, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1992) 302.
• Bennet C J, Regulating Privacy (Cornel University Press 1992).
• Bakırman Demiral B, ‘The Protection of Trade, Banking, and Customer Secrets in Turkish Criminal Law’ (2017) 5(2) Journal of Penal Law and Criminology.
• Erbaş R, ‘The Tension between Genome Privacy and Criminal Justice in the Wake of DNA Databases’ (2017) 5(2) Journal of Penal Law and Criminology .
• Ernst M L, Schwartz A U, Privacy (The Macmillan Company 1962).
• Ettienne P, ‘The Right to Privacy in French Law’ in Basils Markesinis (eds), (Clarendon Press Oxford 1998).
• Evan H, Your Right to Privacy (2nd edn, South Illinois University Press 1999).
• Froomkin A M, ‘The Death of Privacy?’ (2000) 52 SLR.
• “Freedom of Expression And The Right to Privacy” Strasbourg Conference Reports 23 September 1999 (1999).
• Guido A, ‘Protection of Privacy in Italian Law’ in Basils (edn) Protecting Privacy, (Oxford University Press, 1999).
• Hofstadter S H, The Right of Privacy (Central Book Company 1964).
• Katouzian N, Iranian Civil Code in the current law Order (Dadgostar Publishing 1998).
• Maureen S & Nutcases S, Human Rights (Sweet & Maxwell 2002).
• Neil B, Privacy A, ‘Challenge for the Next Century’ in Basils Markesinis (eds), Protecting Privacy (Clarendon Press 1998).
• Samuelson P, ‘Privacy as Intellectual Property?’ (2000) 52, SLR.
• Pad A, Private Criminal Law, (First Volume, Tehran University Publishing 1973).
• Council of Europe 1973 Report of the committee of experts on human rights to the committee of ministers on the right to respect for privacy, Strasbourg.
• Rubenfeld J, ‘The Right of Privacy’ (1989) 102 HLR 707,807.
• Tulkens F, ‘Freedom of expression and information in a democratic society and the right to privacy under the European Convention on Human Rights: a comparative look at Articles 8 and 10 of the Convention in the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, in Freedom of expression and the right to privacy’ (Strasbourg Conference 23 September 1999).
• Wasby S L. Introduction: Civil Liberties and policy making. (1976) In S. L. Wasby (Ed.), Civil Liberties (pp. ix-xiv). London: Southern Illinois University Press.