BibTex RIS Cite

AHP-TOPSIS YÖNTEMİNE DAYALI TEDARİKÇİ SEÇİMİ UYGULAMASI

Year 2011, Issue: 13, 1 - 22, 07.06.2011

Aliye Supçiller , Ozan Çapraz

Abstract

Tedarikçi seçimi kararı bir
şirketin başarılı olabilmesi için çok önemlidir. Doğru tedarikçilerin
seçilmesi, şirketin satın alma maliyetlerini azaltacak, müşteri memnuniyetini
arttıracak ve rekabet yeteneğini geliştirecektir. Bu çalışmada tedarikçi
seçimi problemi ele alınmıştır. Çok kriterli karar verme yöntemlerinden AHP
ve TOPSIS yöntemleri birlikte bir işletmeye en uygun tedarikçinin seçilmesi
amacıyla uygulanmıştır. Çalışmada, literatür incelendiğinde yaygın olarak
kullanıldığı tespit edilen kalite, maliyet, teslimat ve hizmet kriterleri ana
kriterler olarak belirlenmiştir ve bunların alt kriterleri tanımlanmıştır.
AHP yöntemi ana kriterler ve alt kriterlerin önem derecesinin belirlenmesi
için, TOPSIS yöntemi ise tedarikçilerin sıralanması için kullanılmıştır. AHP
yönteminde kriter ağırlıkları ve tutarsızlık oranları Super Decisions 2.0.8
programı ile elde edilmiştir. TOPSIS yönteminin adımları için Microsoft Excel
2007 hesaplamalarından yararlanılmıştır. Çalışma sonunda en önemli kriter
“kalite” olarak belirlenmiş ve işletmenin mevcut tedarikçileri arasında “A2
tedarikçisi” en yüksek puana sahip tedarikçi olarak seçilmiştir.

Keywords

AHP TOPSIS Tedarikçi Seçimi

References

  • Akdeniz, H.A., Turgutlu, T., (2007), Türkiye’de perakende sektöründe analitik hiyerarşik süreç yaklaşımıyla tedarikçi performans değerlendirilmesi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), s.1-17
  • Akman, G., Alkan, A., (2006/1), Tedarik zinciri yönetiminde bulanık AHP yöntemi kullanılarak tedarikçilerin performansının ölçülmesi: otomotiv yan sanayinde bir uygulama, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(9), s.23-46
  • Bagheri, F., Tarokh, M.J., (2010), A fuzzy approach for multi-ojective supplier selection, International Journal of Industrial Engineering & Production Research, 21(1), p.1-9
  • Boer, de L., Wegen, van der L., Telgen,J., (1998), Outranking methods in support of supplier selection, European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 4, p.109-118
  • Boran, F.E., Genç, S., Kurt, M., Akay, D., (2009), A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method, Expert Systems with Applications, 36, p.11363-11368
  • Chamodrakas, I., Batis, D., Martakos, D., (2010), Supplier selection in electronic marketplaces using satisficing and fuzzy AHP, Expert Systems with Applications, 37, p.490- 498
  • Chan, F.T.S., Chan, H.K., (2004), Development of the selection model-a case study in the advandec technology industry, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B-Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 218(12), p.1807-1824
  • Chan, F.T.S., Kumar, N., (2007), Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach, Omega, 35, p.417-431
  • Chan, F.T.S., Kumar, N., Tiwari, M.K., Lau, H.C.W., Choy, K.L., (2008), Global supplier selection: a fuzzy-AHP approach, International Journal of Production Research, 46(14), p.3825-3857
  • Chen, C.-T., Lin, C.-T., Huang, S.-F., (2006), A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management, International Journal of Production Economics, 102, p.289-301
  • Chou, S.-Y., Chang, Y.-H., (2008), A decision support system for supplier selection based on a strategy-aligned fuzzy SMART approach, Expert Systems with Applications, 34, p.2241-2253
  • Dağdeviren, M., Eren, T., (2001), Tedarikçi firma seçiminde analitik hiyerarşi prosesi ve 0-1 hedef programlama yöntemlerinin kullanılması, Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(2), s.41-52
  • Dağdeviren, M., Eraslan, E., Kurt, M., Dizdar, E.N., (2005), Tedarikçi seçimi probleminde analitik ağ süreci ile alternatif bir yaklaşım, Teknoloji, 8(2), s.115-122
  • Dağdeviren, M., Eraslan, E., (2008), PROMETHEE sıralama yöntemi ile tedarikçi seçimi, Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(1), s.69-75
  • Fazlollahtabar, H., Mahdavi, I., Ashoori, M.T., Kaviani, S., Mahdavi-Amiri, N., (2011), A multi-objective decision-making process of supplier selection and order allocation for multi-period scheduling in an electronic market, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 52, p.1039-1052
  • Ghodsypur, S.H., O’Brien, C., (1998), A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming, International Journal of Production Economics, 56-57, p.199-212
  • Güner, H., (2005), Bulanık AHP ve bir işletme için tedarikçi seçimi problemine uygulanması, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Endüstri Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 133 s.
  • Ho, W., (2008), Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications-A literature review, European Journal of Operational Research, 186, p.211-228
  • Ho, W., Xu, X., Dey, P.K., (2010), Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review, European journal of Operational Research, 202(1), p.16-24
  • Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., Ulukan, Z., (2003), Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP, Logistics Information Management, 16(6), p.382-394
  • Kirytopoulos, K., Leopoulos, V., Voulgaridou, D., (2008), Supplier selection in pharmaceutical industry an analytic network process approach, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 15(4), p.494-516
  • Kokangül, A., Susuz, Z., (2009), Integrated analytical hierarchy process and mathematical programming to supplier selection problem with quantity discount, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 33(3), p.1417-1429
  • Ku, C.-Y., Chang, C.-T., Ho, H.-P., (2010), Global supplier selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy goal programming, Qual Quant, 44, p.623-640
  • Lin, R.-H., (2009), An integrated FANP-MOLP for supplier evaluation and order allocation, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 33, p.2730-2736
  • Lin, C.-T., Chen, C.-B., Ting, Y.-C., (2010), An ERP model for supplier selection in electronics industry, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), p.1760-1765
  • Liu, F.-H.F., Hai., H.L., (2005), The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier, International Journal of Production Economics, 97(3), p.308-317
  • Lin, M.-C., Wang, C.-C., Chen, M.-S., Alec Chang, C., (2008), Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven product design process, Computers in Industry, 59, p.17-31
  • Madumjar, A., Sarkar, B., Madumjar, P.K., (2005), Determination of quality value of cotton fibre using hybrid AHP-TOPSIS method of multi-criteria decision-making, 96(5), p.303-309
  • Mendoza, A., (2007), Effective methodologies for supplier selection and order quantity allocation, The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School, Doctor of Philosopy, 174 p.
  • Mendoza, A., Santiago, E., Ravindran, A.R., (2008), A three-phase multicriteria method to the supplier selection problem, International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 15(2), p.195-210
  • Monjezi, M., Dehghani, H., Singh, T.N., Sayadi, A.R., Gholinejad, A., (2010), Application of TOPSISmethod for selecting the most appropriate blast design, Arabian Journal of Geosciences
  • Nydick, R.L., Hill, R.P., (1992), Using the analytic hierarchy process to structure the supplier selection procedure, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 28(2), p.31-36
  • Özdemir, A., (2010), Ürün grupları temelinde tedarikçi seçim probleminin ele alınması ve analitik hiyerarşi süreci ile çözülmesi, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 2(1), s.55-84
  • Paksoy, T., Güleş, H.K., (2006/4), Analytic hierarchy process for supplier selection problem in supply chain management: case study of a textile manufacturer firm, Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, p.100-109
  • Saaty, T.L., (1990), How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process, European Journal of Operational Research, 48, p.9-26
  • Saaty, T.L., (2008), Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process, International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), p.83-98
  • Saaty, T.L., Niemira, M.P., (2006), A framework for making a better decision, Research Review, 13(1)
  • Sanayei, A., Mousavi, S.F., Yazdankhah, A., (2010), Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment, Expert Systems with Applications, 37, p.24-30
  • Seçme, N., Özdemir, A.İ., (2008), Bulanık analitik hiyerarşi yöntemi ile çok kriterli stratejik tedarikçi seçimi: Türkiye örneği, Atatürk Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 22(2), s.175-191
  • Seydel, J., (2006), Data envelopment analysis for decision support, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 106(1), p.81-95
  • Shyjith, K., Ilangkumaran, M., Kumanan, S., (2008), Multi-criteria decision-making approach to evaluate optimum maintenance strategy in textile industry, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 14(4), p.375-386
  • Sipahioğlu, A., (2008), Analitik hiyerarşi süreci (AHP) ders notları, Osman Gazi Üniversitesi Endüstri Mühendisliği Bölümü
  • Şevkli, M., (2010), An application of the fuzzy ELECTRE method for supplier selection, International Journal of Production Research, 48(12), p.3393-3405
  • Tam, M.C.Y., Tummala, V.M.R., (2001), An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system, Omega, 29(2), p.171-182
  • Tsaur, S.-H., Chang, T.-Y., Yen, C.-H., (2002), The Evaluation of Airline Service Quality by Fuzzy MCDM, Tourism Management, 23, p.107-115
  • Ustasüleyman, T., (2009) Bankacılık sektöründe hizmet kalitesinin değerlendirilmesi: Ahs-Topsis Yöntemi, Bankacılar Dergisi, 69, s.33-43
  • Wang, J.-W., Cheng, C.-H., Kun-Cheng, H., (2009), Fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS for supplier selection, Applied Soft Computing, 9, p.377-386
  • Wang, G., Huang, S.H., Dismukes, J.P., (2004), Product-driven supply chain selection using integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology, International journal of Production Economics, 91(1), p.1-15
  • Xia, W., Wu, Z., (2007), Supplier selection with multiple criteria in volume discount environments, Omega, 35, p.494-504
  • Yahya, S., Kingsman, B., (1999), Vendor rating for an entrepreneur development programme: a case study using the analytic hierarchy process method, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 50, p.916-930
  • Yang, C.-C., Chen, B.-S., (2006), Supplier selection using combined analytical hierarchy process and grey relational analysis, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17(7), p.926-941
  • Yurdakul, M., İç, Y.T., (2003), Türk otomotiv firmalarının performans ölçümü ve analizine yönelik TOPSIS yöntemi kullanan bir örnek çalışma, Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(1), p.1-13
  • Yurdakul, M., İç, Y.T., (2005), Development of a performance measurement model for manufacturing companies using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches, International Journal of Production Research, 43(21), p.4609-4641

Year 2011, Issue: 13, 1 - 22, 07.06.2011

Aliye Supçiller , Ozan Çapraz

Abstract

References

  • Akdeniz, H.A., Turgutlu, T., (2007), Türkiye’de perakende sektöründe analitik hiyerarşik süreç yaklaşımıyla tedarikçi performans değerlendirilmesi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), s.1-17
  • Akman, G., Alkan, A., (2006/1), Tedarik zinciri yönetiminde bulanık AHP yöntemi kullanılarak tedarikçilerin performansının ölçülmesi: otomotiv yan sanayinde bir uygulama, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(9), s.23-46
  • Bagheri, F., Tarokh, M.J., (2010), A fuzzy approach for multi-ojective supplier selection, International Journal of Industrial Engineering & Production Research, 21(1), p.1-9
  • Boer, de L., Wegen, van der L., Telgen,J., (1998), Outranking methods in support of supplier selection, European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 4, p.109-118
  • Boran, F.E., Genç, S., Kurt, M., Akay, D., (2009), A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method, Expert Systems with Applications, 36, p.11363-11368
  • Chamodrakas, I., Batis, D., Martakos, D., (2010), Supplier selection in electronic marketplaces using satisficing and fuzzy AHP, Expert Systems with Applications, 37, p.490- 498
  • Chan, F.T.S., Chan, H.K., (2004), Development of the selection model-a case study in the advandec technology industry, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B-Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 218(12), p.1807-1824
  • Chan, F.T.S., Kumar, N., (2007), Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach, Omega, 35, p.417-431
  • Chan, F.T.S., Kumar, N., Tiwari, M.K., Lau, H.C.W., Choy, K.L., (2008), Global supplier selection: a fuzzy-AHP approach, International Journal of Production Research, 46(14), p.3825-3857
  • Chen, C.-T., Lin, C.-T., Huang, S.-F., (2006), A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management, International Journal of Production Economics, 102, p.289-301
  • Chou, S.-Y., Chang, Y.-H., (2008), A decision support system for supplier selection based on a strategy-aligned fuzzy SMART approach, Expert Systems with Applications, 34, p.2241-2253
  • Dağdeviren, M., Eren, T., (2001), Tedarikçi firma seçiminde analitik hiyerarşi prosesi ve 0-1 hedef programlama yöntemlerinin kullanılması, Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(2), s.41-52
  • Dağdeviren, M., Eraslan, E., Kurt, M., Dizdar, E.N., (2005), Tedarikçi seçimi probleminde analitik ağ süreci ile alternatif bir yaklaşım, Teknoloji, 8(2), s.115-122
  • Dağdeviren, M., Eraslan, E., (2008), PROMETHEE sıralama yöntemi ile tedarikçi seçimi, Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(1), s.69-75
  • Fazlollahtabar, H., Mahdavi, I., Ashoori, M.T., Kaviani, S., Mahdavi-Amiri, N., (2011), A multi-objective decision-making process of supplier selection and order allocation for multi-period scheduling in an electronic market, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 52, p.1039-1052
  • Ghodsypur, S.H., O’Brien, C., (1998), A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming, International Journal of Production Economics, 56-57, p.199-212
  • Güner, H., (2005), Bulanık AHP ve bir işletme için tedarikçi seçimi problemine uygulanması, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Endüstri Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 133 s.
  • Ho, W., (2008), Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications-A literature review, European Journal of Operational Research, 186, p.211-228
  • Ho, W., Xu, X., Dey, P.K., (2010), Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review, European journal of Operational Research, 202(1), p.16-24
  • Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., Ulukan, Z., (2003), Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP, Logistics Information Management, 16(6), p.382-394
  • Kirytopoulos, K., Leopoulos, V., Voulgaridou, D., (2008), Supplier selection in pharmaceutical industry an analytic network process approach, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 15(4), p.494-516
  • Kokangül, A., Susuz, Z., (2009), Integrated analytical hierarchy process and mathematical programming to supplier selection problem with quantity discount, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 33(3), p.1417-1429
  • Ku, C.-Y., Chang, C.-T., Ho, H.-P., (2010), Global supplier selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy goal programming, Qual Quant, 44, p.623-640
  • Lin, R.-H., (2009), An integrated FANP-MOLP for supplier evaluation and order allocation, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 33, p.2730-2736
  • Lin, C.-T., Chen, C.-B., Ting, Y.-C., (2010), An ERP model for supplier selection in electronics industry, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), p.1760-1765
  • Liu, F.-H.F., Hai., H.L., (2005), The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier, International Journal of Production Economics, 97(3), p.308-317
  • Lin, M.-C., Wang, C.-C., Chen, M.-S., Alec Chang, C., (2008), Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven product design process, Computers in Industry, 59, p.17-31
  • Madumjar, A., Sarkar, B., Madumjar, P.K., (2005), Determination of quality value of cotton fibre using hybrid AHP-TOPSIS method of multi-criteria decision-making, 96(5), p.303-309
  • Mendoza, A., (2007), Effective methodologies for supplier selection and order quantity allocation, The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School, Doctor of Philosopy, 174 p.
  • Mendoza, A., Santiago, E., Ravindran, A.R., (2008), A three-phase multicriteria method to the supplier selection problem, International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 15(2), p.195-210
  • Monjezi, M., Dehghani, H., Singh, T.N., Sayadi, A.R., Gholinejad, A., (2010), Application of TOPSISmethod for selecting the most appropriate blast design, Arabian Journal of Geosciences
  • Nydick, R.L., Hill, R.P., (1992), Using the analytic hierarchy process to structure the supplier selection procedure, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 28(2), p.31-36
  • Özdemir, A., (2010), Ürün grupları temelinde tedarikçi seçim probleminin ele alınması ve analitik hiyerarşi süreci ile çözülmesi, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 2(1), s.55-84
  • Paksoy, T., Güleş, H.K., (2006/4), Analytic hierarchy process for supplier selection problem in supply chain management: case study of a textile manufacturer firm, Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, p.100-109
  • Saaty, T.L., (1990), How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process, European Journal of Operational Research, 48, p.9-26
  • Saaty, T.L., (2008), Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process, International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), p.83-98
  • Saaty, T.L., Niemira, M.P., (2006), A framework for making a better decision, Research Review, 13(1)
  • Sanayei, A., Mousavi, S.F., Yazdankhah, A., (2010), Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment, Expert Systems with Applications, 37, p.24-30
  • Seçme, N., Özdemir, A.İ., (2008), Bulanık analitik hiyerarşi yöntemi ile çok kriterli stratejik tedarikçi seçimi: Türkiye örneği, Atatürk Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 22(2), s.175-191
  • Seydel, J., (2006), Data envelopment analysis for decision support, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 106(1), p.81-95
  • Shyjith, K., Ilangkumaran, M., Kumanan, S., (2008), Multi-criteria decision-making approach to evaluate optimum maintenance strategy in textile industry, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 14(4), p.375-386
  • Sipahioğlu, A., (2008), Analitik hiyerarşi süreci (AHP) ders notları, Osman Gazi Üniversitesi Endüstri Mühendisliği Bölümü
  • Şevkli, M., (2010), An application of the fuzzy ELECTRE method for supplier selection, International Journal of Production Research, 48(12), p.3393-3405
  • Tam, M.C.Y., Tummala, V.M.R., (2001), An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system, Omega, 29(2), p.171-182
  • Tsaur, S.-H., Chang, T.-Y., Yen, C.-H., (2002), The Evaluation of Airline Service Quality by Fuzzy MCDM, Tourism Management, 23, p.107-115
  • Ustasüleyman, T., (2009) Bankacılık sektöründe hizmet kalitesinin değerlendirilmesi: Ahs-Topsis Yöntemi, Bankacılar Dergisi, 69, s.33-43
  • Wang, J.-W., Cheng, C.-H., Kun-Cheng, H., (2009), Fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS for supplier selection, Applied Soft Computing, 9, p.377-386
  • Wang, G., Huang, S.H., Dismukes, J.P., (2004), Product-driven supply chain selection using integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology, International journal of Production Economics, 91(1), p.1-15
  • Xia, W., Wu, Z., (2007), Supplier selection with multiple criteria in volume discount environments, Omega, 35, p.494-504
  • Yahya, S., Kingsman, B., (1999), Vendor rating for an entrepreneur development programme: a case study using the analytic hierarchy process method, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 50, p.916-930
  • Yang, C.-C., Chen, B.-S., (2006), Supplier selection using combined analytical hierarchy process and grey relational analysis, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17(7), p.926-941
  • Yurdakul, M., İç, Y.T., (2003), Türk otomotiv firmalarının performans ölçümü ve analizine yönelik TOPSIS yöntemi kullanan bir örnek çalışma, Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(1), p.1-13
  • Yurdakul, M., İç, Y.T., (2005), Development of a performance measurement model for manufacturing companies using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches, International Journal of Production Research, 43(21), p.4609-4641
There are 53 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Aliye Supçiller

Ozan Çapraz This is me

Publication Date June 7, 2011
Published in Issue Year 2011 Issue: 13

Cite

APA Supçiller, A., & Çapraz, O. (2011). AHP-TOPSIS YÖNTEMİNE DAYALI TEDARİKÇİ SEÇİMİ UYGULAMASI. Istanbul University Econometrics and Statistics E-Journal(13), 1-22.
AMA Supçiller A, Çapraz O. AHP-TOPSIS YÖNTEMİNE DAYALI TEDARİKÇİ SEÇİMİ UYGULAMASI. Istanbul University Econometrics and Statistics e-Journal. June 2011;(13):1-22.
Chicago Supçiller, Aliye, and Ozan Çapraz. “AHP-TOPSIS YÖNTEMİNE DAYALI TEDARİKÇİ SEÇİMİ UYGULAMASI”. Istanbul University Econometrics and Statistics E-Journal, no. 13 (June 2011): 1-22.
EndNote Supçiller A, Çapraz O (June 1, 2011) AHP-TOPSIS YÖNTEMİNE DAYALI TEDARİKÇİ SEÇİMİ UYGULAMASI. Istanbul University Econometrics and Statistics e-Journal 13 1–22.
IEEE A. Supçiller and O. Çapraz, “AHP-TOPSIS YÖNTEMİNE DAYALI TEDARİKÇİ SEÇİMİ UYGULAMASI”, Istanbul University Econometrics and Statistics e-Journal, no. 13, pp. 1–22, June 2011.
ISNAD Supçiller, Aliye - Çapraz, Ozan. “AHP-TOPSIS YÖNTEMİNE DAYALI TEDARİKÇİ SEÇİMİ UYGULAMASI”. Istanbul University Econometrics and Statistics e-Journal 13 (June 2011), 1-22.
JAMA Supçiller A, Çapraz O. AHP-TOPSIS YÖNTEMİNE DAYALI TEDARİKÇİ SEÇİMİ UYGULAMASI. Istanbul University Econometrics and Statistics e-Journal. 2011;:1–22.
MLA Supçiller, Aliye and Ozan Çapraz. “AHP-TOPSIS YÖNTEMİNE DAYALI TEDARİKÇİ SEÇİMİ UYGULAMASI”. Istanbul University Econometrics and Statistics E-Journal, no. 13, 2011, pp. 1-22.
Vancouver Supçiller A, Çapraz O. AHP-TOPSIS YÖNTEMİNE DAYALI TEDARİKÇİ SEÇİMİ UYGULAMASI. Istanbul University Econometrics and Statistics e-Journal. 2011(13):1-22.