My Continuing Journey from Logic to Computational Argumentation

Abstract

This paper begins with a brief account of how I started out as a young logician studying modal logic with the hope that it would be useful when applied to evaluating real examples of arguments found in natural language texts. The exposition moves on to relate how my interests shifted to the study of argumentation in informal logic, and from there to computational systems combining defeasible argumentation schemes with argument mapping (diagramming). The story ends by leading to recent collaborations with three young logicians and computer scientists who are continuing on the path of my journey.

Keywords

• Argumentation,informal logic,history of logic,future of logic

References

1. Gordon, T. F. (2010). The Carneades Argumentation Support System, in Dialectics, Dialogue and Argumentation, C. Reed and C. W. Tindale (eds.). London: College Publications, 145-156.
2. Gordon, T. F. & Walton, D. (2009). Proof Burdens and Standards, in Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, I. Rahwan and G. Simari (eds.). Dordrecht: Springer, 239-258.
3. Gordon, T. F., Friedrich, H. and Walton, D. (2018).Representing Argumentation Schemes with Constraint Handling Rules, Argument & Computation, 9(2), 91-119.
4. Hamblin, C. L. (1970). Fallacies. London: Methuen. Koszowy, M. and Walton, D. (2017). Profiles of Dialogue for Repairing Faults in Arguments from Expert Opinion, Logic and Logical Philosophy, 26, 1, 79-113.
5. Krabbe, E. C. W. (1999). Profiles of Dialogue. In J. Gerbrandy, M. Marx, M. de Rijke, & Y. Venema (Eds.), JFAK: Essays Dedicated to Johan van Benthem on the Occasion of his 50th Birthday (Vol. 3, pp. 25–36). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
6. Panisson, A. R., Sarkadi, S., McBurney, P., Parsons, S., and Bordini, R. H. (2018). On the Formal Semantics of Theory of Mind in Agent Communication, In 6th International Conference Agreement Technologies, AT 2018, Bergen, Norway, December 6-7, 2018, Revised Selected Papers, 18–32. https://nms.kcl.ac.uk/ simon.parsons/publications/conferences/at18a.pdf
7. Reed, C. and Norman, T. J., eds. (2004). Argumentation Machines: New Frontiers in Argument and Computation, Berlin: Springer.
8. Van Eemeren F. H. and Grootendorst, R. (2004), A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: the Pragma-dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

9. Walton, D. and Krabbe, E. C. W. (1995). Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. Albany: SUNY University Press, 1995.
10. Walton, D., Reed, C. and Macago, F. (2008). Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.