Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

AN ANALYSIS OF CANDIDATE TEACHERS’ VIEWS ON THE EFFECT OF TECHNOLOGY USE IN EDUCATION OVER CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT

Year 2016, Volume: 13 Issue: 3, 51 - 65, 29.12.2016

Abstract

Technology has been
developing rapidly in our age and it has influenced every aspect of our lives
as well as education and teaching. In our country, the use of technology for
education is considered to be the means of catching up with developed countries
by improving quality and a great deal of investment is made on this field.











The purpose of this
research is to determine the perspectives of candidate teachers towards how
educational technology affects classroom management, what its advantages and
disadvantages are, what sort of classroom management challenges they may
encounter, and so on.. The research was conducted on 336 students from the
Department of Primary Education at Hasan Ali Yücel Faculty of Education. The
personal information form and the questionnaire form prepared by the researcher
were used in this study as data collection tools. According to the research,
candidate teachers support the use of technology in education; they think that
the use of technology affects classroom management, the use of technology is a
factor that incurs concerns and the use of technology must be very well known
to achieve good classroom management. Additionally, they state that the use of
technology for education influences the communication and the atmosphere in the
class, it partially obstructs classroom control, undesired behaviors may vary
between classrooms where technology is used or not used, and the number of
students referred to the disciplinary committee will increase.

References

  • Balanskat, A., Blamire, R., & Kefala, S. (2006). The ICT impact report: A review of studies of ICT impact on schools in Europe. Brussels: European Schoolnet.
  • Baker, E. L. (2001). Technology: How do we know it works? In W. F. Heineke & L. Blasi (Eds.), Methods of evaluating educational technology (pp. 77-84). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  • Bentley, T., & Hargreaves, D. H. (2003). Learning futures: An English perspective on information and communication technologies in education. In H. F. O’Neil, Jr., & R. Perez (Eds.), Technology applications in education: A learning view (pp.341-360). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Bowman, J., Jr., Newman, D. L. & Masterson, J. (2001). Adopting educational technology: Implications for designing interventions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25(1), 81–94.
  • Cafoglu, Z. (1992). Sınıf yönetimi. Eğitim Dergisi, (Üç Aylık İlmi Dergi), 1, 152-160.
  • Callahan, W. P., & Switzer, T. J. (2001). Technology as facilitator of quality education: A model. In W. F. Heineke & L. Blasi (Eds.), Methods of evaluating educational technology (pp. 215-235). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  • Carroll, T. G. (2001). Do today’s evaluations meet the needs of tomorrows networked learning communities? In W. F. Heineke & L. Blasi (Eds.), Methods of evaluating educational technology (pp. 3-15). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  • Cetin, F., & Cetin, S. (2000). Ilkogretim okullarina sinif ogretmeni olarak atanan brans ogretmenlerinin meslekle ilgili sorunlari. Milli Egitim, 145, 58-62.
  • Edwards, C.H. (2000). Classroom discipline and management (5th. Ed.), New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Fu, J. S. (2013). ICT in education: a critical literature review and its implications, International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 9, (1), 112-125.
  • Goodman, P. S. (2002). Creating organization and technological change. In P. S. Goodman (Ed.), Technology enhanced learning: Opportunities for change (pp. 153-179). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Gulbahar, Y., & Guven, I. (2008). A survey on ICT usage and the perceptions of social studies teachers in Turkey. Educational Technology & Society, 11, 37-51.
  • Hofer, M., & Swan, K. O. (2008-2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge in action: A case study of a middle school digital documentary project. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41, 179–200.
  • Januszewski, A., & Molenda, M. (2008). Definition. In A. Januszewski & M. Molenda (Eds.), Educational technology (pp. 1-14). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Kahn, P. H., & Friedman, B. (1998). Control and power in educational computing. In H. Bromley & M. W. Apple (Eds.), Education, technology, power: Educational computing as a social practice (pp.157-173). Albany: SUNY Press.
  • Keser, H. (1995). Bilgisayarın ölçme-değerlendirme hizmetinde kullanımı. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 28, 249-261.
  • Lai, K.W. & Pratt, K. (2008). Positive to a degree: The effects of ICT use in New Zealand secondary schools, Computers in the Schools, 24(3-4) 95-109.
  • Lemlech, J. K. (1988). Classroom management: Methods and techniques for elementary and secondary teachers. New York: Longman.
  • Mendicino, M., Razzaq, L. & Heffernan, N. T. (2009). Comparison of traditional homework with computer supported homework. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41, 331-359.
  • Mistler-Jackson, M. & Songer, N. B. (2000). Student motivation and Internet technology: Are students empowered to learn science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 459–479.
  • Smeets, E., Mooij, T., Bamps, H., Bartolome, A., Lowyck, J., Redmond, D. & Steffens, K. (1999). The impact of information and communication technology on the teacher. Institute for Applied Social Sciences (ITS); University of Nijmegen; Nijmegen; The Netherlands.
  • Simon, H. A. (2002). Cooperation between education technology and learning theory to advance higher education in P.S. Goodman (Ed.), Technology enhanced learning: Opportunities for change (pp. 61-74). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Tiene, D., & Ingram, A. (2001). Exploring current issues in educational technology. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.
  • Usun, S. (2004). Factors affecting the application of information and communication technologies (ICT) in distance education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJDE), 5, 52-67.
  • Vosniadou, S., & Kollias, V. (2001). Information and communication technology and the problem of teacher training: myths, dreams, and the harsh reality. Themes in Education, 2(4), 341-365.
  • Yalçınkaya, M. (2005). Okul ve sınıf ortamı, In D. Ekiz & H. Durukan (Eds.), Öğretmenlik mesleğine giriş. (pp. 79-104). Istanbul: Lisans Yayıncılık.

An Analysis of Candidate Teachers’ Views On the Effect of Technology Use in Education Over Classroom Management

Year 2016, Volume: 13 Issue: 3, 51 - 65, 29.12.2016

Abstract

Technology has
been developing rapidly in our age and it has influenced every aspect of our lives
as well as education and teaching. In our country, the use of technology for
education is considered to be the means of catching up with developed countries
by improving quality and a great deal of investment is made on this field.



The purpose of
this research is to determine the perspectives of candidate teachers towards
how educational technology affects classroom management, what its advantages
and disadvantages are, what sort of classroom management challenges they may
encounter, and so on.. The research was conducted on 336 students from the
Department of Primary Education at Hasan Ali Yücel Faculty of Education. The
personal information form and the questionnaire form prepared by the researcher
were used in this study as data collection tools. According to the research,
candidate teachers support the use of technology in education; they think that
the use of technology affects classroom management, the use of technology is a
factor that incurs concerns and the use of technology must be very well known
to achieve good classroom management. Additionally, they state that the use of
technology for education influences the communication and the atmosphere in the
class, it partially obstructs classroom control, undesired behaviors may vary
between classrooms where technology is used or not used, and the number of
students referred to the disciplinary committee will increase.

References

  • Balanskat, A., Blamire, R., & Kefala, S. (2006). The ICT impact report: A review of studies of ICT impact on schools in Europe. Brussels: European Schoolnet.
  • Baker, E. L. (2001). Technology: How do we know it works? In W. F. Heineke & L. Blasi (Eds.), Methods of evaluating educational technology (pp. 77-84). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  • Bentley, T., & Hargreaves, D. H. (2003). Learning futures: An English perspective on information and communication technologies in education. In H. F. O’Neil, Jr., & R. Perez (Eds.), Technology applications in education: A learning view (pp.341-360). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Bowman, J., Jr., Newman, D. L. & Masterson, J. (2001). Adopting educational technology: Implications for designing interventions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25(1), 81–94.
  • Cafoglu, Z. (1992). Sınıf yönetimi. Eğitim Dergisi, (Üç Aylık İlmi Dergi), 1, 152-160.
  • Callahan, W. P., & Switzer, T. J. (2001). Technology as facilitator of quality education: A model. In W. F. Heineke & L. Blasi (Eds.), Methods of evaluating educational technology (pp. 215-235). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  • Carroll, T. G. (2001). Do today’s evaluations meet the needs of tomorrows networked learning communities? In W. F. Heineke & L. Blasi (Eds.), Methods of evaluating educational technology (pp. 3-15). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  • Cetin, F., & Cetin, S. (2000). Ilkogretim okullarina sinif ogretmeni olarak atanan brans ogretmenlerinin meslekle ilgili sorunlari. Milli Egitim, 145, 58-62.
  • Edwards, C.H. (2000). Classroom discipline and management (5th. Ed.), New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Fu, J. S. (2013). ICT in education: a critical literature review and its implications, International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 9, (1), 112-125.
  • Goodman, P. S. (2002). Creating organization and technological change. In P. S. Goodman (Ed.), Technology enhanced learning: Opportunities for change (pp. 153-179). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Gulbahar, Y., & Guven, I. (2008). A survey on ICT usage and the perceptions of social studies teachers in Turkey. Educational Technology & Society, 11, 37-51.
  • Hofer, M., & Swan, K. O. (2008-2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge in action: A case study of a middle school digital documentary project. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41, 179–200.
  • Januszewski, A., & Molenda, M. (2008). Definition. In A. Januszewski & M. Molenda (Eds.), Educational technology (pp. 1-14). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Kahn, P. H., & Friedman, B. (1998). Control and power in educational computing. In H. Bromley & M. W. Apple (Eds.), Education, technology, power: Educational computing as a social practice (pp.157-173). Albany: SUNY Press.
  • Keser, H. (1995). Bilgisayarın ölçme-değerlendirme hizmetinde kullanımı. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 28, 249-261.
  • Lai, K.W. & Pratt, K. (2008). Positive to a degree: The effects of ICT use in New Zealand secondary schools, Computers in the Schools, 24(3-4) 95-109.
  • Lemlech, J. K. (1988). Classroom management: Methods and techniques for elementary and secondary teachers. New York: Longman.
  • Mendicino, M., Razzaq, L. & Heffernan, N. T. (2009). Comparison of traditional homework with computer supported homework. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41, 331-359.
  • Mistler-Jackson, M. & Songer, N. B. (2000). Student motivation and Internet technology: Are students empowered to learn science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 459–479.
  • Smeets, E., Mooij, T., Bamps, H., Bartolome, A., Lowyck, J., Redmond, D. & Steffens, K. (1999). The impact of information and communication technology on the teacher. Institute for Applied Social Sciences (ITS); University of Nijmegen; Nijmegen; The Netherlands.
  • Simon, H. A. (2002). Cooperation between education technology and learning theory to advance higher education in P.S. Goodman (Ed.), Technology enhanced learning: Opportunities for change (pp. 61-74). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Tiene, D., & Ingram, A. (2001). Exploring current issues in educational technology. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.
  • Usun, S. (2004). Factors affecting the application of information and communication technologies (ICT) in distance education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJDE), 5, 52-67.
  • Vosniadou, S., & Kollias, V. (2001). Information and communication technology and the problem of teacher training: myths, dreams, and the harsh reality. Themes in Education, 2(4), 341-365.
  • Yalçınkaya, M. (2005). Okul ve sınıf ortamı, In D. Ekiz & H. Durukan (Eds.), Öğretmenlik mesleğine giriş. (pp. 79-104). Istanbul: Lisans Yayıncılık.
There are 26 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Lütfü İlgar

Publication Date December 29, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016 Volume: 13 Issue: 3

Cite

APA İlgar, L. (2016). AN ANALYSIS OF CANDIDATE TEACHERS’ VIEWS ON THE EFFECT OF TECHNOLOGY USE IN EDUCATION OVER CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT. HAYEF Journal of Education, 13(3), 51-65.
AMA İlgar L. AN ANALYSIS OF CANDIDATE TEACHERS’ VIEWS ON THE EFFECT OF TECHNOLOGY USE IN EDUCATION OVER CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT. HAYEF Journal of Education. December 2016;13(3):51-65.
Chicago İlgar, Lütfü. “AN ANALYSIS OF CANDIDATE TEACHERS’ VIEWS ON THE EFFECT OF TECHNOLOGY USE IN EDUCATION OVER CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT”. HAYEF Journal of Education 13, no. 3 (December 2016): 51-65.
EndNote İlgar L (December 1, 2016) AN ANALYSIS OF CANDIDATE TEACHERS’ VIEWS ON THE EFFECT OF TECHNOLOGY USE IN EDUCATION OVER CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT. HAYEF Journal of Education 13 3 51–65.
IEEE L. İlgar, “AN ANALYSIS OF CANDIDATE TEACHERS’ VIEWS ON THE EFFECT OF TECHNOLOGY USE IN EDUCATION OVER CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT”, HAYEF Journal of Education, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 51–65, 2016.
ISNAD İlgar, Lütfü. “AN ANALYSIS OF CANDIDATE TEACHERS’ VIEWS ON THE EFFECT OF TECHNOLOGY USE IN EDUCATION OVER CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT”. HAYEF Journal of Education 13/3 (December 2016), 51-65.
JAMA İlgar L. AN ANALYSIS OF CANDIDATE TEACHERS’ VIEWS ON THE EFFECT OF TECHNOLOGY USE IN EDUCATION OVER CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT. HAYEF Journal of Education. 2016;13:51–65.
MLA İlgar, Lütfü. “AN ANALYSIS OF CANDIDATE TEACHERS’ VIEWS ON THE EFFECT OF TECHNOLOGY USE IN EDUCATION OVER CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT”. HAYEF Journal of Education, vol. 13, no. 3, 2016, pp. 51-65.
Vancouver İlgar L. AN ANALYSIS OF CANDIDATE TEACHERS’ VIEWS ON THE EFFECT OF TECHNOLOGY USE IN EDUCATION OVER CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT. HAYEF Journal of Education. 2016;13(3):51-65.