BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2006, Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 123 - 137, 23.03.2012

Gökçe Kurt Derin Atay

Abstract

References

  • Atkinson, R. C. (1985). Mnemotechnics in second language learning. American Psychologist, 30, 821-28.
  • Chamot, A.U., & El-Dinary, P.B. (1999). Children's learning strategies in language immersion classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 83, 319ı 338.
  • Chamot A. U., & Kupper, L. (1989). Learning strategies in foreign instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 22,13-24.
  • Chamot, A. U., O'Malley, J . M., Kupper, L , & Impink-Hernandez, M. V. (1987). A study of learning strategies in foreign language instruction: First year report. Rosslyn, VA: InterAmerica Research Association.
  • Cohen, A. (1990). Language learning: Insights for learners, teachers, and researchers. New York. Newbury House.
  • Cohen, A. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Edinburgh: Pearson Education Ltd.
  • Franklin, L., Hodge, M. E. & Sasscer, M. F. (1997). Improving retention with strategy-based instruction., Inquiry, 1, 2, 21-27.
  • Gunning, P. (1997) The learning strategies of beginning ESL learners at the primary level. Unpublished master's thesis, Concordia University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  • Hsu, M. Y. & Huang, S. C. (2004). Elementary school students' strategy use: on gender and personality differences. In English Teachers' Association, ROC, The Proceedings of the 1 3t h International Symposium on English Teaching, (pp.444-451). Taipei: The Crane Publishing Ltd.
  • Kung, W.C. (2004). An Exploratory study on vocabulary learning strategies by Taiwanese EFL elementary school students. Unpublished master's thesis, National Taipei Teachers' College, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • English teaming Strategies used by Turkish &'' and 8"' Graders
  • Lee, K. O. (2003). The relationship of school year, sex and proficiency on the use of learning strategies in learning English of Korean junior high school students. Asian EFL Journal, 1-36.
  • Lan, L. R., & Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning strategy profiles of elementary school students in Taiwan. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 41 (4), 339-379.
  • Naiman, N.p Frohlich, M., Stern, H., & Todesco, A. (1978). The good language learner. Toronto: Ontario institute for Studies in Education.
  • Nunan, D. (1996). The effect of strategy training on student motivation, strategy knowledge, perceived utility and deployment. The English Center, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • O'Malley, J . M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
  • Oxford, R. L. (1992). The story of the SILL: Evaluation, use, reliability, and validity of the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning around the world. Tuscaloosa, AL: Univesity of Alabama.
  • Oxford, R.L. (1993). Instructional implications of gender differences in language learning styles and strategies. Applied Language Learning 4 (1 -2), 65-94.
  • Oxford, R. L., & Crookall, D. (1989). Research on language learning strategies: Methods, findings, and instructional issues. Modern Language Journal, 73,404-419.
  • Oxford, R.L, Park-Oh, Y., Ito, S., & Sumrall, M. (1993). Japanese by satellite: Effects of motivation, language learning styles and strategies, gender, course level, and previous language learning experience on Japanese language achievement. Foreign Language Annals 26 (3), 359-371.
  • Oxford, R. L., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. Modern Language Journal, 73, 292-300.
  • Rubin, J. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? Canadian Modern Journal Review, 31, 304-318.
  • Stern, H. H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? Canadian Modern Language Review, 31, 304-318.
  • Wenden, A., & Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies in language learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Year 2006, Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 123 - 137, 23.03.2012

Gökçe Kurt Derin Atay

Abstract

Dil öğrenme stratejileri üzerine yapılan çalışmaların çoğunluğunun
yetişkin öğrencilerle ve ana dilin İngilizce olduğu ortamlarda yapılmasına
rağmen, son yıllarda erken yaşta yabancı dil eğitimine verilen önem ve
öğrenme stratejilerinin dil öğrenimi üzerindeki ortaya konması, çocukların
strateji kullanımlarına ilişkin çalışmalara gösterilen ilginin artmasına neden
olmuştur. Bu araştırmanın amacı ilköğretim öğrencilerinin kullandığı dil
öğrenme stratejilerini belirlemek ve sınıf seviyesi ve cinsiyet gibi
değişkenlerle, kullanılan stratejiler arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektir.
Araştırmanın örneklemini 6. ve 8. sınıfta öğrenim gören 133 ilköğretim
öğrencisi oluşturmaktadır. Veriler öğrencilerin bilişsel, bilişüstü, duyuşsal,
sosyal, telafi ve hafıza stratejilerini ne ölçüde kullandıklarını ölçmek için
hazırlanan bir anket aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Araştırmanın sonuçları, sınıf
seviyesi İle öğrencilerin strateji kullanımları arasında anlamlı bir fark olduğunu göstermiştir. Ancak, cinsiyetin strateji kullanımı üzerine
istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir etkisi bulunamamıştır.

Keywords

Dil Öğrenme Stratejileri İngilizcenin Yabancı Dil Olarak Öğretimi Çocuklara Dil Öğretimi Cinsiyet Sınıf Seviyesi

References

  • Atkinson, R. C. (1985). Mnemotechnics in second language learning. American Psychologist, 30, 821-28.
  • Chamot, A.U., & El-Dinary, P.B. (1999). Children's learning strategies in language immersion classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 83, 319ı 338.
  • Chamot A. U., & Kupper, L. (1989). Learning strategies in foreign instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 22,13-24.
  • Chamot, A. U., O'Malley, J . M., Kupper, L , & Impink-Hernandez, M. V. (1987). A study of learning strategies in foreign language instruction: First year report. Rosslyn, VA: InterAmerica Research Association.
  • Cohen, A. (1990). Language learning: Insights for learners, teachers, and researchers. New York. Newbury House.
  • Cohen, A. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Edinburgh: Pearson Education Ltd.
  • Franklin, L., Hodge, M. E. & Sasscer, M. F. (1997). Improving retention with strategy-based instruction., Inquiry, 1, 2, 21-27.
  • Gunning, P. (1997) The learning strategies of beginning ESL learners at the primary level. Unpublished master's thesis, Concordia University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  • Hsu, M. Y. & Huang, S. C. (2004). Elementary school students' strategy use: on gender and personality differences. In English Teachers' Association, ROC, The Proceedings of the 1 3t h International Symposium on English Teaching, (pp.444-451). Taipei: The Crane Publishing Ltd.
  • Kung, W.C. (2004). An Exploratory study on vocabulary learning strategies by Taiwanese EFL elementary school students. Unpublished master's thesis, National Taipei Teachers' College, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • English teaming Strategies used by Turkish &'' and 8"' Graders
  • Lee, K. O. (2003). The relationship of school year, sex and proficiency on the use of learning strategies in learning English of Korean junior high school students. Asian EFL Journal, 1-36.
  • Lan, L. R., & Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning strategy profiles of elementary school students in Taiwan. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 41 (4), 339-379.
  • Naiman, N.p Frohlich, M., Stern, H., & Todesco, A. (1978). The good language learner. Toronto: Ontario institute for Studies in Education.
  • Nunan, D. (1996). The effect of strategy training on student motivation, strategy knowledge, perceived utility and deployment. The English Center, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • O'Malley, J . M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
  • Oxford, R. L. (1992). The story of the SILL: Evaluation, use, reliability, and validity of the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning around the world. Tuscaloosa, AL: Univesity of Alabama.
  • Oxford, R.L. (1993). Instructional implications of gender differences in language learning styles and strategies. Applied Language Learning 4 (1 -2), 65-94.
  • Oxford, R. L., & Crookall, D. (1989). Research on language learning strategies: Methods, findings, and instructional issues. Modern Language Journal, 73,404-419.
  • Oxford, R.L, Park-Oh, Y., Ito, S., & Sumrall, M. (1993). Japanese by satellite: Effects of motivation, language learning styles and strategies, gender, course level, and previous language learning experience on Japanese language achievement. Foreign Language Annals 26 (3), 359-371.
  • Oxford, R. L., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. Modern Language Journal, 73, 292-300.
  • Rubin, J. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? Canadian Modern Journal Review, 31, 304-318.
  • Stern, H. H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? Canadian Modern Language Review, 31, 304-318.
  • Wenden, A., & Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies in language learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Year 2006, Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 123 - 137, 23.03.2012

Gökçe Kurt Derin Atay

Abstract

References

  • Atkinson, R. C. (1985). Mnemotechnics in second language learning. American Psychologist, 30, 821-28.
  • Chamot, A.U., & El-Dinary, P.B. (1999). Children's learning strategies in language immersion classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 83, 319ı 338.
  • Chamot A. U., & Kupper, L. (1989). Learning strategies in foreign instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 22,13-24.
  • Chamot, A. U., O'Malley, J . M., Kupper, L , & Impink-Hernandez, M. V. (1987). A study of learning strategies in foreign language instruction: First year report. Rosslyn, VA: InterAmerica Research Association.
  • Cohen, A. (1990). Language learning: Insights for learners, teachers, and researchers. New York. Newbury House.
  • Cohen, A. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Edinburgh: Pearson Education Ltd.
  • Franklin, L., Hodge, M. E. & Sasscer, M. F. (1997). Improving retention with strategy-based instruction., Inquiry, 1, 2, 21-27.
  • Gunning, P. (1997) The learning strategies of beginning ESL learners at the primary level. Unpublished master's thesis, Concordia University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  • Hsu, M. Y. & Huang, S. C. (2004). Elementary school students' strategy use: on gender and personality differences. In English Teachers' Association, ROC, The Proceedings of the 1 3t h International Symposium on English Teaching, (pp.444-451). Taipei: The Crane Publishing Ltd.
  • Kung, W.C. (2004). An Exploratory study on vocabulary learning strategies by Taiwanese EFL elementary school students. Unpublished master's thesis, National Taipei Teachers' College, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • English teaming Strategies used by Turkish &'' and 8"' Graders
  • Lee, K. O. (2003). The relationship of school year, sex and proficiency on the use of learning strategies in learning English of Korean junior high school students. Asian EFL Journal, 1-36.
  • Lan, L. R., & Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning strategy profiles of elementary school students in Taiwan. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 41 (4), 339-379.
  • Naiman, N.p Frohlich, M., Stern, H., & Todesco, A. (1978). The good language learner. Toronto: Ontario institute for Studies in Education.
  • Nunan, D. (1996). The effect of strategy training on student motivation, strategy knowledge, perceived utility and deployment. The English Center, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • O'Malley, J . M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
  • Oxford, R. L. (1992). The story of the SILL: Evaluation, use, reliability, and validity of the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning around the world. Tuscaloosa, AL: Univesity of Alabama.
  • Oxford, R.L. (1993). Instructional implications of gender differences in language learning styles and strategies. Applied Language Learning 4 (1 -2), 65-94.
  • Oxford, R. L., & Crookall, D. (1989). Research on language learning strategies: Methods, findings, and instructional issues. Modern Language Journal, 73,404-419.
  • Oxford, R.L, Park-Oh, Y., Ito, S., & Sumrall, M. (1993). Japanese by satellite: Effects of motivation, language learning styles and strategies, gender, course level, and previous language learning experience on Japanese language achievement. Foreign Language Annals 26 (3), 359-371.
  • Oxford, R. L., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. Modern Language Journal, 73, 292-300.
  • Rubin, J. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? Canadian Modern Journal Review, 31, 304-318.
  • Stern, H. H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? Canadian Modern Language Review, 31, 304-318.
  • Wenden, A., & Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies in language learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
There are 25 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Gökçe Kurt This is me

Derin Atay This is me

Publication Date March 23, 2012
Published in Issue Year 2006 Volume: 3 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Kurt, G., & Atay, D. (2012). HAYEF Journal of Education, 3(2), 123-137.
AMA Kurt G, Atay D. HAYEF Journal of Education. March 2012;3(2):123-137.
Chicago Kurt, Gökçe, and Derin Atay. HAYEF Journal of Education 3, no. 2 (March 2012): 123-37.
EndNote Kurt G, Atay D (March 1, 2012) HAYEF Journal of Education 3 2 123–137.
IEEE G. Kurt and D. Atay, HAYEF Journal of Education, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 123–137, 2012.
ISNAD Kurt, Gökçe - Atay, Derin. HAYEF Journal of Education 3/2 (March 2012), 123-137.
JAMA Kurt G, Atay D. HAYEF Journal of Education. 2012;3:123–137.
MLA Kurt, Gökçe and Derin Atay. HAYEF Journal of Education, vol. 3, no. 2, 2012, pp. 123-37.
Vancouver Kurt G, Atay D. HAYEF Journal of Education. 2012;3(2):123-37.