BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2008, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 89 - 113, 24.03.2012

Abstract

Bu çalışmada sıklıkla tartıştan bir sorun olan "başarı farkı" Chicago
şehrine ait ISAT (Illinois Standardized Achievement Test) puanlarının
ışığında incelenmiştir, "Başarı farkı" bundan başka "başarı farkı oluşum
süreci" terimi kullanılarak yeniden gözden geçirilmiştir. Tablolar ve
figürlerde gösterilen Chicago'daki 10 okul bölgesindeki 5. sınıf beyaz ve
Afrika kökenli Amerikalı öğrencilerin Matematik ve Okuma testi puanları
"başarı farkı oluşum sürecinin" farklı ortaya çıkış şekillerini göstermektedir.
Örnekleme dahil edilecek okullar, temsil ediciliği garanti altına almak
amacıyla sözkunusu okulların her birinin etnik bileşimi dikkate alınarak
seçilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, "başarı farkı oluşum süreci" okulun bulunduğu
bölgeye bağlı olarak değişme göstermiştir.

References

  • Abma.T.A., & Stake, R. (2001). Stake's Responsive Evaluation: Core Ideas and Evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation.
  • Cronbach, L.J. and associates. (1980). Toward Reform of Program Evaluation. San Francisco: Josey-Bass
  • Easton, VJ., & McColl, M.H. (n.d). Statistic Glossary. Retrieved May 28, 2004, from http://www.cas.lancs.ac.Uk/glossary_v1.1/main.html
  • Ke, l-Chung. (2003).Contextuaiizing the Achievement Gap between White and Black in Champaign. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Lee, J. (1998). State policy correlates of the achievement gap among racial and social groups, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 24, 137-152.
  • The Achievement Gap Production Process Benveen Black and While Students in Chicago ~\~\3
  • Madaus, G. (eds.) and et al. (1983). Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation, USA: Kluwer Publishing.
  • Patton, M.Q. (1988) Six Honest Serving Men for Evaluation, Studies in Educational Evaluation. v14, n3, pp. 301-30.
  • Russ-Eft, D., & Preskill, H. (2001). Evaluation in Organizations. MA: Perseus Publishing.
  • Schwandt, T.A. (2002). Evaluation Practice Reconsidered. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Scriven, M. (1986). New Frontiers of Evaluation. Evaluation Practice v 7, pp. 7ı 44.
  • Stake, R.E. (1975). Program evaluation, particularly responsive evaluation. Kalamazoo: Evaluation Center, College of Education, Western Michigan University.
  • Stake, R. (2004). Stake and responsive evaluation. In M. C. Alkin (ed.) Evaluation Roots (pp. 203-217). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Year 2008, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 89 - 113, 24.03.2012

Abstract

References

  • Abma.T.A., & Stake, R. (2001). Stake's Responsive Evaluation: Core Ideas and Evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation.
  • Cronbach, L.J. and associates. (1980). Toward Reform of Program Evaluation. San Francisco: Josey-Bass
  • Easton, VJ., & McColl, M.H. (n.d). Statistic Glossary. Retrieved May 28, 2004, from http://www.cas.lancs.ac.Uk/glossary_v1.1/main.html
  • Ke, l-Chung. (2003).Contextuaiizing the Achievement Gap between White and Black in Champaign. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Lee, J. (1998). State policy correlates of the achievement gap among racial and social groups, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 24, 137-152.
  • The Achievement Gap Production Process Benveen Black and While Students in Chicago ~\~\3
  • Madaus, G. (eds.) and et al. (1983). Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation, USA: Kluwer Publishing.
  • Patton, M.Q. (1988) Six Honest Serving Men for Evaluation, Studies in Educational Evaluation. v14, n3, pp. 301-30.
  • Russ-Eft, D., & Preskill, H. (2001). Evaluation in Organizations. MA: Perseus Publishing.
  • Schwandt, T.A. (2002). Evaluation Practice Reconsidered. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Scriven, M. (1986). New Frontiers of Evaluation. Evaluation Practice v 7, pp. 7ı 44.
  • Stake, R.E. (1975). Program evaluation, particularly responsive evaluation. Kalamazoo: Evaluation Center, College of Education, Western Michigan University.
  • Stake, R. (2004). Stake and responsive evaluation. In M. C. Alkin (ed.) Evaluation Roots (pp. 203-217). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
There are 13 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Nihat Gürel Kahveci This is me

Nihat Kahveci This is me

Publication Date March 24, 2012
Published in Issue Year 2008 Volume: 5 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Kahveci, N. G., & Kahveci, N. (2012). HAYEF Journal of Education, 5(1), 89-113.
AMA Kahveci NG, Kahveci N. HAYEF Journal of Education. March 2012;5(1):89-113.
Chicago Kahveci, Nihat Gürel, and Nihat Kahveci. HAYEF Journal of Education 5, no. 1 (March 2012): 89-113.
EndNote Kahveci NG, Kahveci N (March 1, 2012) HAYEF Journal of Education 5 1 89–113.
IEEE N. G. Kahveci and N. Kahveci, HAYEF Journal of Education, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 89–113, 2012.
ISNAD Kahveci, Nihat Gürel - Kahveci, Nihat. HAYEF Journal of Education 5/1 (March 2012), 89-113.
JAMA Kahveci NG, Kahveci N. HAYEF Journal of Education. 2012;5:89–113.
MLA Kahveci, Nihat Gürel and Nihat Kahveci. HAYEF Journal of Education, vol. 5, no. 1, 2012, pp. 89-113.
Vancouver Kahveci NG, Kahveci N. HAYEF Journal of Education. 2012;5(1):89-113.