BibTex RIS Cite

ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE IN ACCEPTING AND ADAPTING TO INNOVATIONS: PERCEPTIONS OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE LECTURERS AT PREPARATORY UNITS AT UNIVERSITIES

Year 2015, Volume: 12 Issue: 1, 23 - 33, 15.06.2015

Asuman Cincioğlu

Abstract

One of the variables having an effect on the decision of accepting and adapting to innovations is the existent organizational culture of an institution. Organizational culture might potentially facilitate or impede the reception of new ideas and practices, which necessitates the process of investigating the relationship between the indicators of organizational culture and the intended change. These indicators might be to do with the management and staff structure, communication channels, and decision-making mechanisms at the related institutions. In this article, how the organizational culture of a school is identified, and the relationship between the structure of an organization and its attitude towards change and innovation will be discussed with reference to the perspectives revealed through the responses participants provided via research. The research was carried out with 342 lecturers working in English preparatory divisions of 5 public and 7 private universities in Istanbul in the academic year of 2010-2011. The results indicate that although some of the components of the organizational culture of the participating universities appear to be resistant to making changes and adopting innovations, such as the institutions’ having mechanistic structure, the organizations might be open to change and innovation with the other constituents like having open communication channels and participatory decision-making systems, which will allow the institutions to make the related innovation fit into their culture. 

Keywords

-

References

  • Brown, R. (2004). School Culture and Organization: Lessons from Research and Experience. Retrieved from http://www.dpsk12.org/pdf/culture_organization.pdf
  • Brumfit, C.J. (1980). Problems and Principles in English Teaching. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  • Cincioğlu, A. (2012). Institutional Factors as a Component of Language Curriculum Development: Perspectives of English Preparatory Class Lecturers at Public and Private Universities in Istanbul. İstanbul Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul.
  • Claver, E. et al. (n.d.). Organizational Culture for Innovation and New Technological Behavior. Retrieved from http://rua.ua.es/dspace/bitstream/10045/1669/4/Organizational_culture_for_innovation.pdf?origin=publication_detail
  • Collet, V.S. (2012). The Gradual Increase of Responsibility Model: Coaching for Teacher Change. Literacy
  • Research and Instruction, 51, 27–47. Retrieved from
  • http://ehis.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=5&hid=5&sid=b3bd7590-1ec4-4d63
  • db-e455582a2114%40sessionmgr12
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). The Quiet Revolution: Rethinking Teacher Development. In R. Bernhardt et al. (Eds.), Curriculum Leadership: Rethinking Schools for the 21st Century (pp.9-19). New Jersey: Hampton Press.
  • Dunham, J. (1995). Developing Effective School Management. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Gargan, A.M. & Guare, R.E. (1998). Redirecting the Professional Development of School Administrators: Collaborative Approaches. In R. Bernhardt et al. (Eds.), Curriculum Leadership: Rethinking Schools for the 21st Century (pp.21-36). New Jersey: Hampton Press.
  • James, P. (2001). Teachers in Action: Tasks for In-service Language Teacher Education and Development.
  • Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003) Beyond Methods: Macrostrategies for Language Teaching. New Haven: Yale University.
  • Lindahl, R. (n.d.) The Role of Organizational Climate and Culture in the School Improvement Process: A Review of the Knowledge Base. Retrieved from: http://cnx.org/content/m13465/1.1/
  • Liu, Z. (2009). A Case Study on the Influence of Organizational Culture on Language Classroom. International Education Studies, 2/3, 114-119. Retrieved from: file:///C:/Users/oc/Downloads/3332-10030-1-PB.pdf
  • Lunenburg, F.C. (2011). Understanding Organizational Culture: A Key Leadership Asset. National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal, 29/4, 1-12. Retrieved from http://www.nationalforum.com/Electronic%20Journal%20Volumes/Luneneburg,%20Fred%20C%20Understanding%20Organizational%20Culture%20NFEASJ%20V29%20N4%202011.pdf
  • Murphy, D. (1999). Comment: Patrons, Clients, and Projects, ELT Journal, 53/3,217- 219.
  • Ng’ang’a, M.J. & Nyongesa, W.J. (2012). The Impact of Organisational Culture on Performance of Educational Institutions, International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3/8, 211-217. Retrieved from http://ijbssnet.com/journals/Vol_3_No_8_Special_Issue_April_2012/24.pdf
  • Rhodes, L.A. (1994). On the Road to Quality. In G.D. Doherty (Ed.), Developing Quality Systems in Education
  • (pp. 299-306). London and New York: Routledge.
  • Rice, M.F. (2004). Organizational Culture, Social Equity, and Diversity: Teaching Public Administration Education in the Postmodern Era. Retrieved from http://www.naspaa.org/initiatives/jpae/pdf/organizational.pdf
  • Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rotherham, A.J.& Willingham, D. (2009). 21st Century Skills: The Challenges Ahead. Educational Leadership, 67/1, 16-21. Retrieved from http: // vnweb.hwwilsonweb.com
  • Rowan, B. (1998). The Task Characteristics of Teaching: Implications for The Organizational Design of Schools. In R. Bernhardt et al. (Eds.), Curriculum Leadership: Rethinking Schools for the 21st Century (pp.37-54). New Jersey: Hampton Press.
  • Shawer, S.F. (2010). Classroom-Level Curriculum Development: Efl Teachers as Curriculum-Developers,
  • Curriculum-Makers and Curriculum-Transmitters, Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 173–184. Retrieved
  • from http://ehis.ebscohost.com/eds/detail?vid=7&hid=1&sid=a70eed8b-2f50-456e-8aa3
  • ab73295c7d1b%40sessionmgr15&bdata=Jmxhbmc9dHImc2l0ZT1lZHMtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#
  • b=edselp&AN=S0742051X09000821
  • Silman, F. et al. (2012). Organizational Culture at High Schools in TRNC: A Comparative Case Study. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal of Education). 42, 356-366. Retrieved from http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/english/abstracts/42/pdf/FATO%C5%9E%20S%C4%B0LMAN.pdf
  • Smith, R.(1995). Successful School Management. London and New York: Cassell.
  • Tahir, A. & Amin Qadir, S. (2012). Perspectives of Organizational Culture in Effective Teacher Socialization: A Study of Beginning English Teachers in Pakistan, Pakistaniaat: A Journal of Pakistan Studies, 4/2, 56-86. Retrieved from http://pakistaniaat.org/index.php/pak/article/viewFile/164/164
  • Tosi, H.L., Hamner, W.C.(Eds.). (1985). Organizational Behavior and Management. Ohio: Grid Publishing Company.
  • Uzel, F.E. (2002). An Assesment of the Curricular Change Process in Initiating Content Based Instruction in the
  • First-Year English Program at Bilkent University and Its Implications for Professional Development: A Case
  • Study. METU, Doctoral Thesis. Retrieved from http://tez2.yok.gov.tr/
  • Voogt, J. et al. (2011). Teacher Learning in Collaborative Curriculum Design. Teaching and Teacher Education,
  • , 1235-1244. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0742051X11000850

YENİLİKLERİN KABULÜ VE YENİLİKLERE UYUM SAĞLAMADA KURUM KÜLTÜRÜ: ÜNİVERSİTE HAZIRLIK BİRİMLERİNDEKİ İNGİLİZCE OKUTMANLARININ ALGISI

Year 2015, Volume: 12 Issue: 1, 23 - 33, 15.06.2015

Asuman Cincioğlu

Abstract

Yeniliklerin kabul edilmesi kararına ve yeniliklere uyum sağlamaya etki eden değişkenlerden biri mevcut kurum kültürüdür. Kurum kültürü yeni düşünce ve uygulamaların kabulünü kolaylaştırabilir ya da engelleyebilir; bu, kurum kültürünün göstergeleri ve planlanan değişim arasındaki ilişkiyi inceleme sürecini gerektirir. Bu göstergeler, ilgili kurumlardaki yönetim ve personel yapısı, iletişim kanalları ve karar alma mekanizmaları ile ilgili olabilir. Bu makalede, bir okulun kurum kültürünün nasıl belirlendiği ve kurumun yapısı ile değişim ve yeniliğe karşı tutumu arasındaki ilişki, bir araştırma yoluyla katılımcıların sağladığı cevaplar ile ortaya çıkan bakış açısına gönderme yapılarak tartışılmaktadır. Araştırma, 2010-2011 akademik yılında İstanbul’daki 5 devlet ve 7 özel üniversitenin İngilizce hazırlık birimlerinde çalışan 342 okutman ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Sonuçlar, katılımcı üniversitelerin kurum kültürlerinin bazı bileşenlerinin- mekanik yapıya sahip olmaları gibi-değişiklikler yapmaya ve yenilikleri benimsemeye karşı direnç gösteriyor görünmesine rağmen kurumların ilgili yeniliği kendi kültürlerine yerleştirmelerine olanak sağlayacak diğer bileşenleri ile- iletişim kanallarının açık olması ve karar alma sistemlerinin katılımcı olması gibi- değişim ve yeniliğe açık olabileceklerini göstermektedir

Keywords

Kurum Kültürü Kurumsal Yapı Karar Alma Mekanizmaları Eğitim Kurumlarında Yenilik

References

  • Brown, R. (2004). School Culture and Organization: Lessons from Research and Experience. Retrieved from http://www.dpsk12.org/pdf/culture_organization.pdf
  • Brumfit, C.J. (1980). Problems and Principles in English Teaching. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  • Cincioğlu, A. (2012). Institutional Factors as a Component of Language Curriculum Development: Perspectives of English Preparatory Class Lecturers at Public and Private Universities in Istanbul. İstanbul Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul.
  • Claver, E. et al. (n.d.). Organizational Culture for Innovation and New Technological Behavior. Retrieved from http://rua.ua.es/dspace/bitstream/10045/1669/4/Organizational_culture_for_innovation.pdf?origin=publication_detail
  • Collet, V.S. (2012). The Gradual Increase of Responsibility Model: Coaching for Teacher Change. Literacy
  • Research and Instruction, 51, 27–47. Retrieved from
  • http://ehis.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=5&hid=5&sid=b3bd7590-1ec4-4d63
  • db-e455582a2114%40sessionmgr12
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). The Quiet Revolution: Rethinking Teacher Development. In R. Bernhardt et al. (Eds.), Curriculum Leadership: Rethinking Schools for the 21st Century (pp.9-19). New Jersey: Hampton Press.
  • Dunham, J. (1995). Developing Effective School Management. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Gargan, A.M. & Guare, R.E. (1998). Redirecting the Professional Development of School Administrators: Collaborative Approaches. In R. Bernhardt et al. (Eds.), Curriculum Leadership: Rethinking Schools for the 21st Century (pp.21-36). New Jersey: Hampton Press.
  • James, P. (2001). Teachers in Action: Tasks for In-service Language Teacher Education and Development.
  • Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003) Beyond Methods: Macrostrategies for Language Teaching. New Haven: Yale University.
  • Lindahl, R. (n.d.) The Role of Organizational Climate and Culture in the School Improvement Process: A Review of the Knowledge Base. Retrieved from: http://cnx.org/content/m13465/1.1/
  • Liu, Z. (2009). A Case Study on the Influence of Organizational Culture on Language Classroom. International Education Studies, 2/3, 114-119. Retrieved from: file:///C:/Users/oc/Downloads/3332-10030-1-PB.pdf
  • Lunenburg, F.C. (2011). Understanding Organizational Culture: A Key Leadership Asset. National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal, 29/4, 1-12. Retrieved from http://www.nationalforum.com/Electronic%20Journal%20Volumes/Luneneburg,%20Fred%20C%20Understanding%20Organizational%20Culture%20NFEASJ%20V29%20N4%202011.pdf
  • Murphy, D. (1999). Comment: Patrons, Clients, and Projects, ELT Journal, 53/3,217- 219.
  • Ng’ang’a, M.J. & Nyongesa, W.J. (2012). The Impact of Organisational Culture on Performance of Educational Institutions, International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3/8, 211-217. Retrieved from http://ijbssnet.com/journals/Vol_3_No_8_Special_Issue_April_2012/24.pdf
  • Rhodes, L.A. (1994). On the Road to Quality. In G.D. Doherty (Ed.), Developing Quality Systems in Education
  • (pp. 299-306). London and New York: Routledge.
  • Rice, M.F. (2004). Organizational Culture, Social Equity, and Diversity: Teaching Public Administration Education in the Postmodern Era. Retrieved from http://www.naspaa.org/initiatives/jpae/pdf/organizational.pdf
  • Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rotherham, A.J.& Willingham, D. (2009). 21st Century Skills: The Challenges Ahead. Educational Leadership, 67/1, 16-21. Retrieved from http: // vnweb.hwwilsonweb.com
  • Rowan, B. (1998). The Task Characteristics of Teaching: Implications for The Organizational Design of Schools. In R. Bernhardt et al. (Eds.), Curriculum Leadership: Rethinking Schools for the 21st Century (pp.37-54). New Jersey: Hampton Press.
  • Shawer, S.F. (2010). Classroom-Level Curriculum Development: Efl Teachers as Curriculum-Developers,
  • Curriculum-Makers and Curriculum-Transmitters, Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 173–184. Retrieved
  • from http://ehis.ebscohost.com/eds/detail?vid=7&hid=1&sid=a70eed8b-2f50-456e-8aa3
  • ab73295c7d1b%40sessionmgr15&bdata=Jmxhbmc9dHImc2l0ZT1lZHMtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#
  • b=edselp&AN=S0742051X09000821
  • Silman, F. et al. (2012). Organizational Culture at High Schools in TRNC: A Comparative Case Study. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal of Education). 42, 356-366. Retrieved from http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/english/abstracts/42/pdf/FATO%C5%9E%20S%C4%B0LMAN.pdf
  • Smith, R.(1995). Successful School Management. London and New York: Cassell.
  • Tahir, A. & Amin Qadir, S. (2012). Perspectives of Organizational Culture in Effective Teacher Socialization: A Study of Beginning English Teachers in Pakistan, Pakistaniaat: A Journal of Pakistan Studies, 4/2, 56-86. Retrieved from http://pakistaniaat.org/index.php/pak/article/viewFile/164/164
  • Tosi, H.L., Hamner, W.C.(Eds.). (1985). Organizational Behavior and Management. Ohio: Grid Publishing Company.
  • Uzel, F.E. (2002). An Assesment of the Curricular Change Process in Initiating Content Based Instruction in the
  • First-Year English Program at Bilkent University and Its Implications for Professional Development: A Case
  • Study. METU, Doctoral Thesis. Retrieved from http://tez2.yok.gov.tr/
  • Voogt, J. et al. (2011). Teacher Learning in Collaborative Curriculum Design. Teaching and Teacher Education,
  • , 1235-1244. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0742051X11000850

Year 2015, Volume: 12 Issue: 1, 23 - 33, 15.06.2015

Asuman Cincioğlu

Abstract

References

  • Brown, R. (2004). School Culture and Organization: Lessons from Research and Experience. Retrieved from http://www.dpsk12.org/pdf/culture_organization.pdf
  • Brumfit, C.J. (1980). Problems and Principles in English Teaching. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  • Cincioğlu, A. (2012). Institutional Factors as a Component of Language Curriculum Development: Perspectives of English Preparatory Class Lecturers at Public and Private Universities in Istanbul. İstanbul Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul.
  • Claver, E. et al. (n.d.). Organizational Culture for Innovation and New Technological Behavior. Retrieved from http://rua.ua.es/dspace/bitstream/10045/1669/4/Organizational_culture_for_innovation.pdf?origin=publication_detail
  • Collet, V.S. (2012). The Gradual Increase of Responsibility Model: Coaching for Teacher Change. Literacy
  • Research and Instruction, 51, 27–47. Retrieved from
  • http://ehis.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=5&hid=5&sid=b3bd7590-1ec4-4d63
  • db-e455582a2114%40sessionmgr12
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). The Quiet Revolution: Rethinking Teacher Development. In R. Bernhardt et al. (Eds.), Curriculum Leadership: Rethinking Schools for the 21st Century (pp.9-19). New Jersey: Hampton Press.
  • Dunham, J. (1995). Developing Effective School Management. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Gargan, A.M. & Guare, R.E. (1998). Redirecting the Professional Development of School Administrators: Collaborative Approaches. In R. Bernhardt et al. (Eds.), Curriculum Leadership: Rethinking Schools for the 21st Century (pp.21-36). New Jersey: Hampton Press.
  • James, P. (2001). Teachers in Action: Tasks for In-service Language Teacher Education and Development.
  • Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003) Beyond Methods: Macrostrategies for Language Teaching. New Haven: Yale University.
  • Lindahl, R. (n.d.) The Role of Organizational Climate and Culture in the School Improvement Process: A Review of the Knowledge Base. Retrieved from: http://cnx.org/content/m13465/1.1/
  • Liu, Z. (2009). A Case Study on the Influence of Organizational Culture on Language Classroom. International Education Studies, 2/3, 114-119. Retrieved from: file:///C:/Users/oc/Downloads/3332-10030-1-PB.pdf
  • Lunenburg, F.C. (2011). Understanding Organizational Culture: A Key Leadership Asset. National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal, 29/4, 1-12. Retrieved from http://www.nationalforum.com/Electronic%20Journal%20Volumes/Luneneburg,%20Fred%20C%20Understanding%20Organizational%20Culture%20NFEASJ%20V29%20N4%202011.pdf
  • Murphy, D. (1999). Comment: Patrons, Clients, and Projects, ELT Journal, 53/3,217- 219.
  • Ng’ang’a, M.J. & Nyongesa, W.J. (2012). The Impact of Organisational Culture on Performance of Educational Institutions, International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3/8, 211-217. Retrieved from http://ijbssnet.com/journals/Vol_3_No_8_Special_Issue_April_2012/24.pdf
  • Rhodes, L.A. (1994). On the Road to Quality. In G.D. Doherty (Ed.), Developing Quality Systems in Education
  • (pp. 299-306). London and New York: Routledge.
  • Rice, M.F. (2004). Organizational Culture, Social Equity, and Diversity: Teaching Public Administration Education in the Postmodern Era. Retrieved from http://www.naspaa.org/initiatives/jpae/pdf/organizational.pdf
  • Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rotherham, A.J.& Willingham, D. (2009). 21st Century Skills: The Challenges Ahead. Educational Leadership, 67/1, 16-21. Retrieved from http: // vnweb.hwwilsonweb.com
  • Rowan, B. (1998). The Task Characteristics of Teaching: Implications for The Organizational Design of Schools. In R. Bernhardt et al. (Eds.), Curriculum Leadership: Rethinking Schools for the 21st Century (pp.37-54). New Jersey: Hampton Press.
  • Shawer, S.F. (2010). Classroom-Level Curriculum Development: Efl Teachers as Curriculum-Developers,
  • Curriculum-Makers and Curriculum-Transmitters, Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 173–184. Retrieved
  • from http://ehis.ebscohost.com/eds/detail?vid=7&hid=1&sid=a70eed8b-2f50-456e-8aa3
  • ab73295c7d1b%40sessionmgr15&bdata=Jmxhbmc9dHImc2l0ZT1lZHMtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#
  • b=edselp&AN=S0742051X09000821
  • Silman, F. et al. (2012). Organizational Culture at High Schools in TRNC: A Comparative Case Study. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal of Education). 42, 356-366. Retrieved from http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/english/abstracts/42/pdf/FATO%C5%9E%20S%C4%B0LMAN.pdf
  • Smith, R.(1995). Successful School Management. London and New York: Cassell.
  • Tahir, A. & Amin Qadir, S. (2012). Perspectives of Organizational Culture in Effective Teacher Socialization: A Study of Beginning English Teachers in Pakistan, Pakistaniaat: A Journal of Pakistan Studies, 4/2, 56-86. Retrieved from http://pakistaniaat.org/index.php/pak/article/viewFile/164/164
  • Tosi, H.L., Hamner, W.C.(Eds.). (1985). Organizational Behavior and Management. Ohio: Grid Publishing Company.
  • Uzel, F.E. (2002). An Assesment of the Curricular Change Process in Initiating Content Based Instruction in the
  • First-Year English Program at Bilkent University and Its Implications for Professional Development: A Case
  • Study. METU, Doctoral Thesis. Retrieved from http://tez2.yok.gov.tr/
  • Voogt, J. et al. (2011). Teacher Learning in Collaborative Curriculum Design. Teaching and Teacher Education,
  • , 1235-1244. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0742051X11000850
There are 39 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Asuman Cincioğlu

Publication Date June 15, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2015 Volume: 12 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Cincioğlu, A. (2015). ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE IN ACCEPTING AND ADAPTING TO INNOVATIONS: PERCEPTIONS OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE LECTURERS AT PREPARATORY UNITS AT UNIVERSITIES. HAYEF Journal of Education, 12(1), 23-33.
AMA Cincioğlu A. ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE IN ACCEPTING AND ADAPTING TO INNOVATIONS: PERCEPTIONS OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE LECTURERS AT PREPARATORY UNITS AT UNIVERSITIES. HAYEF Journal of Education. June 2015;12(1):23-33.
Chicago Cincioğlu, Asuman. “ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE IN ACCEPTING AND ADAPTING TO INNOVATIONS: PERCEPTIONS OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE LECTURERS AT PREPARATORY UNITS AT UNIVERSITIES”. HAYEF Journal of Education 12, no. 1 (June 2015): 23-33.
EndNote Cincioğlu A (June 1, 2015) ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE IN ACCEPTING AND ADAPTING TO INNOVATIONS: PERCEPTIONS OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE LECTURERS AT PREPARATORY UNITS AT UNIVERSITIES. HAYEF Journal of Education 12 1 23–33.
IEEE A. Cincioğlu, “ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE IN ACCEPTING AND ADAPTING TO INNOVATIONS: PERCEPTIONS OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE LECTURERS AT PREPARATORY UNITS AT UNIVERSITIES”, HAYEF Journal of Education, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 23–33, 2015.
ISNAD Cincioğlu, Asuman. “ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE IN ACCEPTING AND ADAPTING TO INNOVATIONS: PERCEPTIONS OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE LECTURERS AT PREPARATORY UNITS AT UNIVERSITIES”. HAYEF Journal of Education 12/1 (June 2015), 23-33.
JAMA Cincioğlu A. ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE IN ACCEPTING AND ADAPTING TO INNOVATIONS: PERCEPTIONS OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE LECTURERS AT PREPARATORY UNITS AT UNIVERSITIES. HAYEF Journal of Education. 2015;12:23–33.
MLA Cincioğlu, Asuman. “ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE IN ACCEPTING AND ADAPTING TO INNOVATIONS: PERCEPTIONS OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE LECTURERS AT PREPARATORY UNITS AT UNIVERSITIES”. HAYEF Journal of Education, vol. 12, no. 1, 2015, pp. 23-33.
Vancouver Cincioğlu A. ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE IN ACCEPTING AND ADAPTING TO INNOVATIONS: PERCEPTIONS OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE LECTURERS AT PREPARATORY UNITS AT UNIVERSITIES. HAYEF Journal of Education. 2015;12(1):23-3.
 Download Cover Image