BibTex RIS Cite

HUKUKİ ÇOĞULLUKTA İKTİDAR PROBLEMİ

Year 2014, Volume: 72 Issue: 1, 487 - 505, 13.06.2014

Duygu Hatipoğlu Aydın

References

  • Barzilai, Gad, Communities and Law: Politics and Cultures of Legal Identities, Michigan: The University of Michigan Press, 2003.
  • Barzilai, Gad, "Beyond Relativism: Where Is Political Power in Legal Pluralism?", Theoretical Inquiries in Law, C: 9, S: 2 (2008) s. 395-416.
  • Bayart, Jean-François, Kimlik Yanılsaması, Çev: Mehmet Moralı, İstan- bul: Metis, 1999.
  • Calaguas, Mark J., Fluet, Edward R. and Drost, Cristina M., “Legal Pluralism & Women's Rights: A Study in Post-Colonial Tanzania”, 3 Eylül 2006, http://ssrn.com/abstract=934668, 2 Ocak 2013.
  • Chevallier, Jaques, Hukuk Devleti, Çev: Ertuğrul Cenk Gürcan, Ankara: İmaj, 2010.
  • Çulhaoğlu, Metin, “Çoğulluk ve Çoğulculuk”, 15 Ekim 2010, BirGün, http://www.birgun.net/writer_index.php?category_code=1262359858&news_c ode=1287144396&year=2010&month=10&day=15#.UOSjmvl5MxA 2013. 2 Ocak
  • Dupret, Baudouin, “Legal Pluralism, Plurality of Laws, and Legal Practices: Theories, Critiques, and Praxiological Re-specification”, European Journal of Legal Studies, S: 1 (2007)
  • Jaques Chevallier, Hukuk Devleti, Çev: Ertuğrul Cenk Gürcan, Ankara: İmaj, 2010, s. Ibid., s. 64.
  • Barzilai, Beyond Relativism, s. 415-416.
  • Durand, Jean-Pierre, Marx'ın Sosyolojisi, Çev: Ali Aktaş, İstanbul: Biri- kim, 2000.
  • Fitzpatrick, Peter, “Law and Societies”, Osgoode Hall Law Journal, C: 22, S: 1 (1984), s. 115-138.
  • Forsyth, Miranda, A Bird That Flies With Two Wings: The Kastom and State Justice Systems in Vanuatu, Canberra: ANU, 2009.
  • Giddens, Anthony, Kapitalizm ve Modern Sosyal Teori, İstanbul: İletişim, 2010.
  • Greenhouse, Carol J., “Legal Pluralism and Cultural Difference: What is the Difference? A Response to Professor Woodman”, Journal of Legal Pluralism, C:42 (1998) 61-72.
  • Griffiths, Anne, “Legal Pluralism”, An Introduction to Law and Social Theory, Ed. Reza Banakar ve Max Travers, Oxford: Hart, 2002
  • Griffiths, John, "What is Legal Pluralism", Journal of Legal Pluralism, C: 24 (1986) s. 1-55.
  • Hardt, M., Negri, A., Ortak Zenginlik, Çev: Efla-Barış Yıldırım, İstanbul: Ayrıntı, 2011.
  • Harvey, David, Postmodernliğin Durumu, Çev: Sungur Savran, İstanbul: Metis, 1996.
  • Marx, Karl, Ekonomi Politiğin Eleştirisine Katkı, Çev: Sevim Belli, Ankara: Sol, 1993.
  • Merry, Sally E., “Legal Pluralism.”, Law & Society Review, C: 22, S: 5 (1988) s. 869-896.
  • Moore, Sally F., “Law and Social Change: The Semi-Autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Subject of Study”, Law & Society Review, C: 7, S: 1 (1972) s. 719-746.
  • Örücü, Esin, “Hukuk Sosyo-JKültürle Karşılaşınca: Kültürel Çoğulculuk, Hukusal Çoğulculuk ve Pragmatizm”, İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası, C: LXIX, S: 1 – 2 (2011) s. 79-90.
  • Örücü, Esin, “Kültürel Çeşitlilik ve Resmi Hukuk: Çok Kültürlülük ve Euroseptizm?”, Kültürel Bakış, C: 1, S: 1 (2011) s. 107-128.
  • Pasukanis, Evgeny B., Genel Hukuk Teorisi ve Marksizm, Çev: Onur Karahanoğulları, İstanbul: Birikim, 2002.
  • Pierson, Christopher, Modern Devlet, Çev: Neşet Kutlu, Burcu Erdoğan, İstanbul: Chiviyazıları, 2011.
  • Poggi, Gianfranco, Modern Devletin Gelişimi, Çev: Şule Kut, Binnaz Top- rak, İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi, 2009
  • Sancar, Mithat, “Şiddet, Şiddet Tekeli ve Hukuk Devleti”, Doğu Batı Der- gisi, S: 13 (2000) s. 25-44.
  • Tamanaha, Brian Z., “Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global”, Sydney Law Review, C: 30 (2008) s. 375-411.
  • Twining, William, “Normative and Legal Pluralism: A Global Perspective”, Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, C: 20 (2010) s. 473-517.
  • Üye, Saim, Teoride ve Pratikte Hukuki Çoğulluk, Ankara: Turhan, 2013.

Year 2014, Volume: 72 Issue: 1, 487 - 505, 13.06.2014

Duygu Hatipoğlu Aydın

References

  • Barzilai, Gad, Communities and Law: Politics and Cultures of Legal Identities, Michigan: The University of Michigan Press, 2003.
  • Barzilai, Gad, "Beyond Relativism: Where Is Political Power in Legal Pluralism?", Theoretical Inquiries in Law, C: 9, S: 2 (2008) s. 395-416.
  • Bayart, Jean-François, Kimlik Yanılsaması, Çev: Mehmet Moralı, İstan- bul: Metis, 1999.
  • Calaguas, Mark J., Fluet, Edward R. and Drost, Cristina M., “Legal Pluralism & Women's Rights: A Study in Post-Colonial Tanzania”, 3 Eylül 2006, http://ssrn.com/abstract=934668, 2 Ocak 2013.
  • Chevallier, Jaques, Hukuk Devleti, Çev: Ertuğrul Cenk Gürcan, Ankara: İmaj, 2010.
  • Çulhaoğlu, Metin, “Çoğulluk ve Çoğulculuk”, 15 Ekim 2010, BirGün, http://www.birgun.net/writer_index.php?category_code=1262359858&news_c ode=1287144396&year=2010&month=10&day=15#.UOSjmvl5MxA 2013. 2 Ocak
  • Dupret, Baudouin, “Legal Pluralism, Plurality of Laws, and Legal Practices: Theories, Critiques, and Praxiological Re-specification”, European Journal of Legal Studies, S: 1 (2007)
  • Jaques Chevallier, Hukuk Devleti, Çev: Ertuğrul Cenk Gürcan, Ankara: İmaj, 2010, s. Ibid., s. 64.
  • Barzilai, Beyond Relativism, s. 415-416.
  • Durand, Jean-Pierre, Marx'ın Sosyolojisi, Çev: Ali Aktaş, İstanbul: Biri- kim, 2000.
  • Fitzpatrick, Peter, “Law and Societies”, Osgoode Hall Law Journal, C: 22, S: 1 (1984), s. 115-138.
  • Forsyth, Miranda, A Bird That Flies With Two Wings: The Kastom and State Justice Systems in Vanuatu, Canberra: ANU, 2009.
  • Giddens, Anthony, Kapitalizm ve Modern Sosyal Teori, İstanbul: İletişim, 2010.
  • Greenhouse, Carol J., “Legal Pluralism and Cultural Difference: What is the Difference? A Response to Professor Woodman”, Journal of Legal Pluralism, C:42 (1998) 61-72.
  • Griffiths, Anne, “Legal Pluralism”, An Introduction to Law and Social Theory, Ed. Reza Banakar ve Max Travers, Oxford: Hart, 2002
  • Griffiths, John, "What is Legal Pluralism", Journal of Legal Pluralism, C: 24 (1986) s. 1-55.
  • Hardt, M., Negri, A., Ortak Zenginlik, Çev: Efla-Barış Yıldırım, İstanbul: Ayrıntı, 2011.
  • Harvey, David, Postmodernliğin Durumu, Çev: Sungur Savran, İstanbul: Metis, 1996.
  • Marx, Karl, Ekonomi Politiğin Eleştirisine Katkı, Çev: Sevim Belli, Ankara: Sol, 1993.
  • Merry, Sally E., “Legal Pluralism.”, Law & Society Review, C: 22, S: 5 (1988) s. 869-896.
  • Moore, Sally F., “Law and Social Change: The Semi-Autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Subject of Study”, Law & Society Review, C: 7, S: 1 (1972) s. 719-746.
  • Örücü, Esin, “Hukuk Sosyo-JKültürle Karşılaşınca: Kültürel Çoğulculuk, Hukusal Çoğulculuk ve Pragmatizm”, İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası, C: LXIX, S: 1 – 2 (2011) s. 79-90.
  • Örücü, Esin, “Kültürel Çeşitlilik ve Resmi Hukuk: Çok Kültürlülük ve Euroseptizm?”, Kültürel Bakış, C: 1, S: 1 (2011) s. 107-128.
  • Pasukanis, Evgeny B., Genel Hukuk Teorisi ve Marksizm, Çev: Onur Karahanoğulları, İstanbul: Birikim, 2002.
  • Pierson, Christopher, Modern Devlet, Çev: Neşet Kutlu, Burcu Erdoğan, İstanbul: Chiviyazıları, 2011.
  • Poggi, Gianfranco, Modern Devletin Gelişimi, Çev: Şule Kut, Binnaz Top- rak, İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi, 2009
  • Sancar, Mithat, “Şiddet, Şiddet Tekeli ve Hukuk Devleti”, Doğu Batı Der- gisi, S: 13 (2000) s. 25-44.
  • Tamanaha, Brian Z., “Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global”, Sydney Law Review, C: 30 (2008) s. 375-411.
  • Twining, William, “Normative and Legal Pluralism: A Global Perspective”, Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, C: 20 (2010) s. 473-517.
  • Üye, Saim, Teoride ve Pratikte Hukuki Çoğulluk, Ankara: Turhan, 2013.
There are 30 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Authors

Duygu Hatipoğlu Aydın

Publication Date June 13, 2014
Published in Issue Year 2014 Volume: 72 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Hatipoğlu Aydın, D. (2014). HUKUKİ ÇOĞULLUKTA İKTİDAR PROBLEMİ. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty, 72(1), 487-505. https://izlik.org/JA92XL33PC
AMA 1.Hatipoğlu Aydın D. HUKUKİ ÇOĞULLUKTA İKTİDAR PROBLEMİ. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty. 2014;72(1):487-505. https://izlik.org/JA92XL33PC
Chicago Hatipoğlu Aydın, Duygu. 2014. “HUKUKİ ÇOĞULLUKTA İKTİDAR PROBLEMİ”. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty 72 (1): 487-505. https://izlik.org/JA92XL33PC.
EndNote Hatipoğlu Aydın D (June 1, 2014) HUKUKİ ÇOĞULLUKTA İKTİDAR PROBLEMİ. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty 72 1 487–505.
IEEE [1]D. Hatipoğlu Aydın, “HUKUKİ ÇOĞULLUKTA İKTİDAR PROBLEMİ”, Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 487–505, June 2014, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA92XL33PC
ISNAD Hatipoğlu Aydın, Duygu. “HUKUKİ ÇOĞULLUKTA İKTİDAR PROBLEMİ”. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty 72/1 (June 1, 2014): 487-505. https://izlik.org/JA92XL33PC.
JAMA 1.Hatipoğlu Aydın D. HUKUKİ ÇOĞULLUKTA İKTİDAR PROBLEMİ. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty. 2014;72:487–505.
MLA Hatipoğlu Aydın, Duygu. “HUKUKİ ÇOĞULLUKTA İKTİDAR PROBLEMİ”. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty, vol. 72, no. 1, June 2014, pp. 487-05, https://izlik.org/JA92XL33PC.
Vancouver 1.Hatipoğlu Aydın D. HUKUKİ ÇOĞULLUKTA İKTİDAR PROBLEMİ. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty [Internet]. 2014 June 1;72(1):487-505. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA92XL33PC