BibTex RIS Cite

DEVLETLER HUSUSİ HUKUKUNDA BAĞLAMA KAİDELERİNİN TESPİTİNDE UYGULANAN YENİ BİR METOD

Year 1969, Volume: 35 Issue: 1-4, 231 - 248, 13.07.2011

Aysel Çelikel

Abstract

ÖZET

Keywords

-

Year 1969, Volume: 35 Issue: 1-4, 231 - 248, 13.07.2011

Aysel Çelikel

Abstract

There are 0 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Hususi Hukuk
Authors

Aysel Çelikel

Publication Date July 13, 2011
Published in Issue Year 1969 Volume: 35 Issue: 1-4

Cite

APA Çelikel, A. (2011). DEVLETLER HUSUSİ HUKUKUNDA BAĞLAMA KAİDELERİNİN TESPİTİNDE UYGULANAN YENİ BİR METOD. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty, 35(1-4), 231-248.
AMA Çelikel A. DEVLETLER HUSUSİ HUKUKUNDA BAĞLAMA KAİDELERİNİN TESPİTİNDE UYGULANAN YENİ BİR METOD. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty. July 2011;35(1-4):231-248.
Chicago Çelikel, Aysel. “DEVLETLER HUSUSİ HUKUKUNDA BAĞLAMA KAİDELERİNİN TESPİTİNDE UYGULANAN YENİ BİR METOD”. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty 35, no. 1-4 (July 2011): 231-48.
EndNote Çelikel A (July 1, 2011) DEVLETLER HUSUSİ HUKUKUNDA BAĞLAMA KAİDELERİNİN TESPİTİNDE UYGULANAN YENİ BİR METOD. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty 35 1-4 231–248.
IEEE A. Çelikel, “DEVLETLER HUSUSİ HUKUKUNDA BAĞLAMA KAİDELERİNİN TESPİTİNDE UYGULANAN YENİ BİR METOD”, Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty, vol. 35, no. 1-4, pp. 231–248, 2011.
ISNAD Çelikel, Aysel. “DEVLETLER HUSUSİ HUKUKUNDA BAĞLAMA KAİDELERİNİN TESPİTİNDE UYGULANAN YENİ BİR METOD”. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty 35/1-4 (July 2011), 231-248.
JAMA Çelikel A. DEVLETLER HUSUSİ HUKUKUNDA BAĞLAMA KAİDELERİNİN TESPİTİNDE UYGULANAN YENİ BİR METOD. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty. 2011;35:231–248.
MLA Çelikel, Aysel. “DEVLETLER HUSUSİ HUKUKUNDA BAĞLAMA KAİDELERİNİN TESPİTİNDE UYGULANAN YENİ BİR METOD”. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty, vol. 35, no. 1-4, 2011, pp. 231-48.
Vancouver Çelikel A. DEVLETLER HUSUSİ HUKUKUNDA BAĞLAMA KAİDELERİNİN TESPİTİNDE UYGULANAN YENİ BİR METOD. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty. 2011;35(1-4):231-48.