BibTex RIS Cite

-

Year 2013, Volume: 71 Issue: 1, 1430 - 1447, 16.08.2013

Abstract

S.O Johansson/A. Boland /K. Pysden/J. Ramberg/W. Tetley/D.G Schmitt, A Response to the Attempt To Clarify Certain Concerns Over The Rotterdam Rules, Published 5 August 2009, s.2,3,6. (www.comitemaritime.org/Uploads/Rotterdam%20 Rules/5RRules.pdf; 4.2.2012 tarihi itibari ile)

References

  • AMASYA S., Rotterdam Kurallarında (2008) Miktar Sözleşmesi, Legal Hukuk Dergisi, Yıl:8, Sayı 94.
  • ASARITOTIS, R., UNCITRAL (Draft) Convention on Contracts For the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly By Sea: Mandatory Rules And freedom of Contract, in: A.Antapassis/ L.Athanassiou/ E.Rosaeg (eds), Competition and Regulation in Shipping and Shipping Related Industries (Martinus Nijhoff 2009).
  • BERLINGIERI, F., Freedom of Contract under the Rotterdam Rules, Unif. L.Rev. [2009].
  • BRODIE P., Commercial Shipping Handbook, London 1999.
  • CLARK, J. and THOMSAN, J., “Exclusions of Liability”, Chapter 8 in: D.R.Thomas, The Carriage of Goods By Sea Under The Rotterdam Rules, 2010.
  • COLE, S., The Hague Rules 1921 Explained, London 1921.
  • CHANDLER III. G.F., A Comparison of COGSA, the Hague/Visby Rules and the Hamburg Rules, Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, Vol.15. No.2, April 1984.
  • DIAMOND, A., The Next Sea Carriage Convention, LMCLQ [2008].
  • DIAMOND A., The Rotterdam Rules, LMCLQ [2009], (DIAMOND, The Rotterdam Rules).
  • FALKANGER, T., Quantity Contracts:Transportation by Sea Without Reference to a Named Vessel, 21 Scandinavian Study Law, 1977.
  • GORTON L./IHRE R., A Practical Guide to Contracts of Affreightment and Hybrid Contracts, London 1985.
  • GORTON L./HILLENIUS P./IHRE R./SANDEVARN A., Shipbroking and Chartering Practice, 6th Edition, 2004.
  • HILL, C., Maritime Law, 2003.
  • HONKA, H., Scope of Application and Freedom of Contract, CMI- Colloquim on the Rotterdam Rules, Rotterdam, September 21 (2009), (HONKA, Scope of Application).
  • HONKA, H., “Validity of Contractual Terms”, Chapter 16 in: A.Ziegler/J.Schelin/S.Zunarelli (Editors), The Rotterdam Rules 2008, Kluwer Law 2010.
  • JOHANSSON, S.O./BOLAND A.B./ PYSDEN K./RAMBERG, J./TETLEY W./SCHMITT, D.G., A Response to the Attempt To Clarify Certain Concerns Over The Rotterdam Rules Published 5 August 2009 (www.comitemaritime.org/ Uploads/Rotterdam%20Rules/5RRules.pdf; 4.2.2012 tarihi itibari ile).
  • KENDER R./ ÇETİNGİL E./YAZICIOĞLU E., Deniz Ticaret Hukuku Te- mel Bilgiler Cilt 1, İstanbul, 2012.
  • LANNAN, K., The United Nations Convention on Contracts For the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea – A General Overview, Uni.L.Rev. [2009]-1/2.
  • LAUDIEN, B., Der Mengenvertrag im Deutschen Seefrachtrect, Ham- burg, 1992.
  • LORENZON, F., “Validity of Contractual Terms”, Chapter 16 in: Y. Baatz/ C. Debattista/F. Lorenzon/A. Serdy/ H. Staniland/M. Tsimplis, The Rotterdam Rules-A Practical Annotation, 2009.
  • PROSHANTO K.M./ABHINAYAN, B.B., A Legal and Economic Analysis of the Volume Contract Concept under the Rotterdam Rules: Selected Issues in Perspective, 40 J.Mar.L.&Com. [2009].
  • RAMBERG, J., Freedom of Contract in Maritime Law, LMCLQ [1993].
  • RAMBERG, J, The Vanishing Bill of Lading & the Hamburg Rules Carrier, 27 American Journal of Comparative Law.
  • SCHOENBAUM T., Admiralty and Maritime Law, Volume 1, 4th Edition.
  • STURLEY, M.F., The History of COGSA and the Hague Rules, Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, Vol.22, No.1, January 1991.
  • STURLEY, M.F., The History of the Hague Rules and the United States Carriage of Goods By Sea Act, Il Dritto Marittimo, 1991.
  • STURLEY, M./FUJITA, T./van der ZIEL, The Rotterdam Rules, Sweet & Maxwell, 2010
  • SÜZEL C./DAMAR D., Kısmen veya Tamamen Deniz Yoluyla Eşyanın Milletlerarası taşınması Sözleşmelerine İlişkin Birleşmiş Milletler Sözleşmesi (Rotterdam Kuralları), Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Dergisi, Cilt XXVI Sayı 2.
  • TASSEL, Y., Freedom of Contract and Public Order Relative To The Legal Effect Of The Hague-Visby Rules: Prospects of Englsh Law And Of French Law, in: A.Antapassis/ L.Athanassiou/ E.Rosaeg (eds), Competition and Regulation in Shipping and Shipping Related Industries (Martinus Nijhoff 2009).
  • TETLEY, W., Maritime Transportation, Vol. XII Law of Transport, International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, 2001.
  • TETTENBORN, A., “Freedom of Contract and the Rotterdam Rules: Framework For Negotiation or One-size-fits-all?”, in D.R.Thomas (Ed.), , The Carriage of Goods By Sea Under The Rotterdam Rules, London 2010.
  • THOMAS, D.R., ‘An Analysis of the Liability Regime of Carriers and Maritime Performing Parties’, in D.R. Thomas (Ed.), New Convention For The Carriage of Goods by Sea - Rotterdam Rules, Lawtext Publishing 2009.
  • THOMAS, D.R., The Emergence and Application of the Rotterdam Rules, in: D.R. Thomas (Ed.), The Carriage of Goods by Sea Under the Rotterdam Rules, London 2010.
  • TRAPPE, J., Entwicklungen im Charterrecht, Hamburg, 1985.
  • ÜLGENER, M.F., COA Tipi Navlun Mukaveleleri, İstanbul Barosu Dergisi Cilt 64, 1990.
  • ÜLGENER, M.F., Çarter Sözleşmeleri I, Genel Hükümler Sefer Çarteri Sözleşmesi, İstanbul 2010, (ÜLGENER, Çarter Sözleşmesi).
  • Van der ZIEL, G.J, The UNCITRAL/CMI Draft For a New Convention Relating to the Contract of Carriage By Sea, Transportrecht 7/8 2002.
  • WILLIAMS H., Chartering Documents, 4th Edition 1999.
  • YAZICIOĞLU, E., Hamburg Kuralları’na Göre Taşıyanın Sorumluluğu, İstanbul 2000.

ROTTERDAM KURALLARI’NIN “HACİM SÖZLEŞMELERİ”NE İLİŞKİN HÜKMÜYLE (M. 80) GELEN SÖZLEŞME ÖZGÜRLÜĞÜ: YENİ BİR DÖNEM MİDİR YOKSA LAHEY KURALLARI ÖNCESİNE DÖNÜŞ MÜDÜR

Year 2013, Volume: 71 Issue: 1, 1430 - 1447, 16.08.2013

Abstract

References

  • AMASYA S., Rotterdam Kurallarında (2008) Miktar Sözleşmesi, Legal Hukuk Dergisi, Yıl:8, Sayı 94.
  • ASARITOTIS, R., UNCITRAL (Draft) Convention on Contracts For the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly By Sea: Mandatory Rules And freedom of Contract, in: A.Antapassis/ L.Athanassiou/ E.Rosaeg (eds), Competition and Regulation in Shipping and Shipping Related Industries (Martinus Nijhoff 2009).
  • BERLINGIERI, F., Freedom of Contract under the Rotterdam Rules, Unif. L.Rev. [2009].
  • BRODIE P., Commercial Shipping Handbook, London 1999.
  • CLARK, J. and THOMSAN, J., “Exclusions of Liability”, Chapter 8 in: D.R.Thomas, The Carriage of Goods By Sea Under The Rotterdam Rules, 2010.
  • COLE, S., The Hague Rules 1921 Explained, London 1921.
  • CHANDLER III. G.F., A Comparison of COGSA, the Hague/Visby Rules and the Hamburg Rules, Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, Vol.15. No.2, April 1984.
  • DIAMOND, A., The Next Sea Carriage Convention, LMCLQ [2008].
  • DIAMOND A., The Rotterdam Rules, LMCLQ [2009], (DIAMOND, The Rotterdam Rules).
  • FALKANGER, T., Quantity Contracts:Transportation by Sea Without Reference to a Named Vessel, 21 Scandinavian Study Law, 1977.
  • GORTON L./IHRE R., A Practical Guide to Contracts of Affreightment and Hybrid Contracts, London 1985.
  • GORTON L./HILLENIUS P./IHRE R./SANDEVARN A., Shipbroking and Chartering Practice, 6th Edition, 2004.
  • HILL, C., Maritime Law, 2003.
  • HONKA, H., Scope of Application and Freedom of Contract, CMI- Colloquim on the Rotterdam Rules, Rotterdam, September 21 (2009), (HONKA, Scope of Application).
  • HONKA, H., “Validity of Contractual Terms”, Chapter 16 in: A.Ziegler/J.Schelin/S.Zunarelli (Editors), The Rotterdam Rules 2008, Kluwer Law 2010.
  • JOHANSSON, S.O./BOLAND A.B./ PYSDEN K./RAMBERG, J./TETLEY W./SCHMITT, D.G., A Response to the Attempt To Clarify Certain Concerns Over The Rotterdam Rules Published 5 August 2009 (www.comitemaritime.org/ Uploads/Rotterdam%20Rules/5RRules.pdf; 4.2.2012 tarihi itibari ile).
  • KENDER R./ ÇETİNGİL E./YAZICIOĞLU E., Deniz Ticaret Hukuku Te- mel Bilgiler Cilt 1, İstanbul, 2012.
  • LANNAN, K., The United Nations Convention on Contracts For the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea – A General Overview, Uni.L.Rev. [2009]-1/2.
  • LAUDIEN, B., Der Mengenvertrag im Deutschen Seefrachtrect, Ham- burg, 1992.
  • LORENZON, F., “Validity of Contractual Terms”, Chapter 16 in: Y. Baatz/ C. Debattista/F. Lorenzon/A. Serdy/ H. Staniland/M. Tsimplis, The Rotterdam Rules-A Practical Annotation, 2009.
  • PROSHANTO K.M./ABHINAYAN, B.B., A Legal and Economic Analysis of the Volume Contract Concept under the Rotterdam Rules: Selected Issues in Perspective, 40 J.Mar.L.&Com. [2009].
  • RAMBERG, J., Freedom of Contract in Maritime Law, LMCLQ [1993].
  • RAMBERG, J, The Vanishing Bill of Lading & the Hamburg Rules Carrier, 27 American Journal of Comparative Law.
  • SCHOENBAUM T., Admiralty and Maritime Law, Volume 1, 4th Edition.
  • STURLEY, M.F., The History of COGSA and the Hague Rules, Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, Vol.22, No.1, January 1991.
  • STURLEY, M.F., The History of the Hague Rules and the United States Carriage of Goods By Sea Act, Il Dritto Marittimo, 1991.
  • STURLEY, M./FUJITA, T./van der ZIEL, The Rotterdam Rules, Sweet & Maxwell, 2010
  • SÜZEL C./DAMAR D., Kısmen veya Tamamen Deniz Yoluyla Eşyanın Milletlerarası taşınması Sözleşmelerine İlişkin Birleşmiş Milletler Sözleşmesi (Rotterdam Kuralları), Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Dergisi, Cilt XXVI Sayı 2.
  • TASSEL, Y., Freedom of Contract and Public Order Relative To The Legal Effect Of The Hague-Visby Rules: Prospects of Englsh Law And Of French Law, in: A.Antapassis/ L.Athanassiou/ E.Rosaeg (eds), Competition and Regulation in Shipping and Shipping Related Industries (Martinus Nijhoff 2009).
  • TETLEY, W., Maritime Transportation, Vol. XII Law of Transport, International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, 2001.
  • TETTENBORN, A., “Freedom of Contract and the Rotterdam Rules: Framework For Negotiation or One-size-fits-all?”, in D.R.Thomas (Ed.), , The Carriage of Goods By Sea Under The Rotterdam Rules, London 2010.
  • THOMAS, D.R., ‘An Analysis of the Liability Regime of Carriers and Maritime Performing Parties’, in D.R. Thomas (Ed.), New Convention For The Carriage of Goods by Sea - Rotterdam Rules, Lawtext Publishing 2009.
  • THOMAS, D.R., The Emergence and Application of the Rotterdam Rules, in: D.R. Thomas (Ed.), The Carriage of Goods by Sea Under the Rotterdam Rules, London 2010.
  • TRAPPE, J., Entwicklungen im Charterrecht, Hamburg, 1985.
  • ÜLGENER, M.F., COA Tipi Navlun Mukaveleleri, İstanbul Barosu Dergisi Cilt 64, 1990.
  • ÜLGENER, M.F., Çarter Sözleşmeleri I, Genel Hükümler Sefer Çarteri Sözleşmesi, İstanbul 2010, (ÜLGENER, Çarter Sözleşmesi).
  • Van der ZIEL, G.J, The UNCITRAL/CMI Draft For a New Convention Relating to the Contract of Carriage By Sea, Transportrecht 7/8 2002.
  • WILLIAMS H., Chartering Documents, 4th Edition 1999.
  • YAZICIOĞLU, E., Hamburg Kuralları’na Göre Taşıyanın Sorumluluğu, İstanbul 2000.
There are 39 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Private Law
Authors

Ecehan Yeşilova Aras This is me

Publication Date August 16, 2013
Published in Issue Year 2013 Volume: 71 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Yeşilova Aras, E. (2013). ROTTERDAM KURALLARI’NIN “HACİM SÖZLEŞMELERİ”NE İLİŞKİN HÜKMÜYLE (M. 80) GELEN SÖZLEŞME ÖZGÜRLÜĞÜ: YENİ BİR DÖNEM MİDİR YOKSA LAHEY KURALLARI ÖNCESİNE DÖNÜŞ MÜDÜR. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty, 71(1), 1430-1447.
AMA Yeşilova Aras E. ROTTERDAM KURALLARI’NIN “HACİM SÖZLEŞMELERİ”NE İLİŞKİN HÜKMÜYLE (M. 80) GELEN SÖZLEŞME ÖZGÜRLÜĞÜ: YENİ BİR DÖNEM MİDİR YOKSA LAHEY KURALLARI ÖNCESİNE DÖNÜŞ MÜDÜR. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty. August 2013;71(1):1430-1447.
Chicago Yeşilova Aras, Ecehan. “ROTTERDAM KURALLARI’NIN ‘HACİM SÖZLEŞMELERİ’NE İLİŞKİN HÜKMÜYLE (M. 80) GELEN SÖZLEŞME ÖZGÜRLÜĞÜ: YENİ BİR DÖNEM MİDİR YOKSA LAHEY KURALLARI ÖNCESİNE DÖNÜŞ MÜDÜR”. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty 71, no. 1 (August 2013): 1430-47.
EndNote Yeşilova Aras E (August 1, 2013) ROTTERDAM KURALLARI’NIN “HACİM SÖZLEŞMELERİ”NE İLİŞKİN HÜKMÜYLE (M. 80) GELEN SÖZLEŞME ÖZGÜRLÜĞÜ: YENİ BİR DÖNEM MİDİR YOKSA LAHEY KURALLARI ÖNCESİNE DÖNÜŞ MÜDÜR. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty 71 1 1430–1447.
IEEE E. Yeşilova Aras, “ROTTERDAM KURALLARI’NIN ‘HACİM SÖZLEŞMELERİ’NE İLİŞKİN HÜKMÜYLE (M. 80) GELEN SÖZLEŞME ÖZGÜRLÜĞÜ: YENİ BİR DÖNEM MİDİR YOKSA LAHEY KURALLARI ÖNCESİNE DÖNÜŞ MÜDÜR”, Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 1430–1447, 2013.
ISNAD Yeşilova Aras, Ecehan. “ROTTERDAM KURALLARI’NIN ‘HACİM SÖZLEŞMELERİ’NE İLİŞKİN HÜKMÜYLE (M. 80) GELEN SÖZLEŞME ÖZGÜRLÜĞÜ: YENİ BİR DÖNEM MİDİR YOKSA LAHEY KURALLARI ÖNCESİNE DÖNÜŞ MÜDÜR”. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty 71/1 (August 2013), 1430-1447.
JAMA Yeşilova Aras E. ROTTERDAM KURALLARI’NIN “HACİM SÖZLEŞMELERİ”NE İLİŞKİN HÜKMÜYLE (M. 80) GELEN SÖZLEŞME ÖZGÜRLÜĞÜ: YENİ BİR DÖNEM MİDİR YOKSA LAHEY KURALLARI ÖNCESİNE DÖNÜŞ MÜDÜR. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty. 2013;71:1430–1447.
MLA Yeşilova Aras, Ecehan. “ROTTERDAM KURALLARI’NIN ‘HACİM SÖZLEŞMELERİ’NE İLİŞKİN HÜKMÜYLE (M. 80) GELEN SÖZLEŞME ÖZGÜRLÜĞÜ: YENİ BİR DÖNEM MİDİR YOKSA LAHEY KURALLARI ÖNCESİNE DÖNÜŞ MÜDÜR”. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty, vol. 71, no. 1, 2013, pp. 1430-47.
Vancouver Yeşilova Aras E. ROTTERDAM KURALLARI’NIN “HACİM SÖZLEŞMELERİ”NE İLİŞKİN HÜKMÜYLE (M. 80) GELEN SÖZLEŞME ÖZGÜRLÜĞÜ: YENİ BİR DÖNEM MİDİR YOKSA LAHEY KURALLARI ÖNCESİNE DÖNÜŞ MÜDÜR. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty. 2013;71(1):1430-47.