TÜRK BANKACILIK SEKTÖRÜ TARAFINDAN ALINAN SENDİKASYON KREDİLERİNDE SPREADİ BELİRLEYEN FAKTÖRLER

Abstract

Sendikasyon kredilerinde uygulanan faiz oranı iki bölümden oluşmak- tadır. Birinci bölüm, baz olarak alınan, Libor ya da Euribor gibi uluslara- rası kabul görmüş değişken bir faiz oranı iken, ikinci bölüm bu baz oranı- nın üzerine eklenen ve uluslararası literatürde spread olarak adlandırılan sabit bir faiz oranıdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı Türkiye’de faaliyet gösteren bankalar tarafından 2003-2012 yılları arasında alınmış olan sendikasyon kredilerinde, spreadin belirlenmesinde etkisi olan değişkenlerin neler ol- duğunun tespit edilmesidir. Spread üzerinde belirleyici olduğu düşünülen değişkenler beş ayrı grupta ele alınmıştır: küresel, makroekonomik, borçlu, sözleşme ve sendikasyon grubu değişkenleri. Elde edilen sonuçlar küre- sel finansal koşullardaki değişimlerin spreadi belirlemede etkili olduğu- nu; çoğunlukla yabancı bankalardan oluşan borç verenlerin, sendikasyon kredilerinin Türk bankacılık sektörü ve Türkiye’nin yurtdışı borçlanması içerisindeki payının oldukça sınırlı olmasına rağmen, fiyatlamada makro- ekonomik koşulları da dikkate aldıklarını göstermektedir. Ayrıca, borçluya ait özelliklerin de spread üzerinde etkili olduğu, kredi özelindeki sözleşme koşullarının ve sendikasyon grubunun yapısına dair değişkenlerin ise belir- leyici olmadıkları sonucuna varılmıştır. 

Keywords

• spread,sendikasyon kredileri,kredi fiyatlaması,bankalar

DETERMINANTS OF SPREAD ON SYNDICATED LOANS TO THE TURKISH BANKING SECTOR

Abstract

The interest rate charged on a syndicated loan consists of two parts: a floating base rate, which is usually an internationally recognized benchmark rate such as Libor or Euribor and a fixed interest rate spread over the base rate. The aim of this study is to analyze the determinants of spread on the syndicated loans granted between 2003 and 2012 to the banks operating in Turkey. The variables that are thought to be effective are investigated  in five groups: global, macroeconomic, barrower, loan and syndicate variables. The results show that changes in the global financial conditions have a significant impact on the spread and lenders that mostly consist of foreign banks, take macroeconomic factors into consideration when they determine the spread, even though the share of syndicated loans in Turkish banking sector and Turkey’s total foreign debt is very low. It is also found that while barrower characteristics have a significant effect on spread, loan specific factors and the structure of the syndicate are insignificant.

 

Keywords

• spread,syndicated loans,loan pricing,banks

References

1. Ağca, Ş. ve Celasun O. (2012), “Sovereign debt and corporate borrowing costs in emerging markets,” Journal of International Economics, 88(2012): 198–208.
2. Altunbaş, Y. ve Gadanecz, B. (2004), “Developing country economic structure and the pricing of syndicated credits,” Journal of Develeopment Studies, 40(5): 143-173.
3. Angbazo, L.A., Mei, J., ve Saunders, A. (1998), “Credit spreads in the market for highly leveraged transaction loans,” Journal of Banking & Finance, 22 (1998): 1249-1282.
4. Barbosa, L. ve Ribeiro N. (2007), “Determinants of Spreads in Syndicated Loans to Euro Area Corporates,” Banco de Portugal Economic Bulletin, 65-78.
5. Bharath, S.T., Dahiya S., Saunders A., ve Srinivasan, A. (2011), “Lending Relationships and Loan Contract Terms,” The Review of Financial Studies, 24 (4) : 1141-1203.
6. Boehmer E. ve Megginson W.L. (1990), “Determinants of Secondary Market Prices for Developing Country Syndicated Loans,” The Journal of Finance, 45(5): 1517-1540.
7. Booth, J. R. (1992), “Contract Costs, Bank Loans, and the Cross-Monitoring Hypothesis,” Journal of Financial Economics, 31: 25-41.
8. Bosch, O. (2006), “Information Asymmetry and the Pricing of Private Debt – Evidence from European Syndicated Loans,” EFA 2007 Ljubljana Meetings Paper, Ljubljana, Slovenia, August, 22-25, 2007.

9. Bosch, O. ve Steffen, S. (2011), “On syndicate composition, corporate structure and the certification effect of credit ratings,” Journal of Banking & Finance, 35 (2011): 290-299.
10. Carey, M. ve Nini, G. (2007), “Is the corporate loan market globally integrated? A pricing puzzle,” Journal of Finance, 62(6): 2969–3007.
11. Champagne, C. ve Coggins, F. (2012), “Common information asymmetry factors in syndicated loan structures,” Journal of Banking & Finance, 36 (2012): 1437–1451.
12. Christodoulakis, G.A. ve Olupeka, T. (2010), “Pricing and momentum of syndicated credit in Europe,” Omega, 38 (2010): 325–332.
13. Coleman, A.D.F., Esho, N., ve Sharpe, I.G. (2006), “Does bank monitoring influence loan contract terms?,” Journal of Financial Services Research, 30 (2): 177–198.
14. Dennis, S.A, Nandy, D., ve Sharpe, I.G. (2000), “The Determinants of Contract Terms in Bank Revolving Credit Agreements,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35: 87-110.
15. Diamond D.W. (1991), “Debt Maturity Structure and Liquidity Risk,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(3): 709-737.
16. Do, V. ve Vu T. (2010), “The Effects of Reputation and Relationships on Lead Banks’ Certification Roles,” Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 20 (2010): 475-489.
17. Eichengreen, B. ve Mody A. (2000), “Lending booms, reserves and the sustainability of short-term debt: inferences from the pricing of syndicated bank loans,” Journal of Development Economics, 63 (2000): 5–44.
18. Flannery, M. (1986), “Asymmetric Information and Risky Debt Maturity Choice,” Journal of Finance, 41: 19-37.
19. Focarelli, D., Pozzolo, A., ve Casolaro, L. (2008), “The pricing effect of certi cation on syndicated loans,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 55(2): 335–349.
20. Fons, J.S. (1994), “Using default rates to model the term structure of credit risk,” Financial Analysts Journal, 50(5): 25–32.
21. Fungacovai, Z., Godlewski C.J., ve Weill, L. (2011), “Asymmetric Information and Loan Spreads in Russia Evidence from Syndicated Loans,” Eastern European Economics, 49(1): 13-29.
22. Gottesman, A. ve Roberts, G.S. (2004), “Maturity and Loan Pricing,” Financial Review, 39: 55-77.
23. Harjoto, M., Mullineaux, D.J., ve Yi, H. (2006), “A Comparison of Syndicated Loan Pricing at Investment and Commercial Banks,” Financial Management, 35(4): 49-70.
24. Haselmann, R. ve Wachtel, P. (2011), “Foreign banks in syndicated loan markets,” Journal of Banking & Finance, 35 (2011) 2679–2689.
25. Hubbard, R.G., Kuttner, K.N., ve Palia, D.N. (2002), “Are There Bank Effects in Borrowers’ Costs of Funds? Evidence from a Matched Sample of Borrowers and Banks,” Journal of Business, 75(4): 559-581.
26. Ivashina, V. (2009), “Asymmetric Information Effects on Loan Spreads,” Journal of Financial Economics, 92 (2009): 300–319.
27. Kim, M., Surroca J., ve Tribo J.A. (2014), “Impact of ethical behavior on syndicated loan rates,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 38 (2014): 122-144.
28. Kleimeier, S. ve Megginson W.L. (2000), “Are project finance loans different from other syndicated credits?,” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 13(1): 75-87.
29. Lee, S.W., Kwag. S-W., Mullineaux, D.J., ve Park, K. (2010), “Financial distress, information asymmetry, and syndicate structure: Evidence from Japanese borrowers,” Finance Research Letters, 7(2010): 119–126.
30. Lim J., Minton, B.A., ve Weisbach, M.S. (2014), “Syndication Loan Spreads and The Composition of The Syndicate,” Journal of Financial Economics, 111(2014): 45-69.
31. McCahery, J.A. ve Schwienbacher, A. (2010), “Bank Reputation in the Private Debt Market,” Journal of Corporate Finance, 16 (2010): 498- 515.
32. Nandy, D.K. ve Shao, P. (2008), “Institutional Investment in Syndicated Loans,” Erişim Tarihi: Ekim 2015 UBC Winter Finance Conference Paper, Whistler, British Columbia, March, 7-9 2008.
33. Nini, G. (2004), “The Value of Financial Intermediaries: Empirical Evidence From Syndicated Loans to Emerging Market Barrowers,” Federal Reserve, International Finance Discussion Papers No 820.
34. Saunders, A. ve Steffen, S. (2011), “The Costs of Being Private: Evidence from the Loan Market,” Review of Financial Studies, 24 (12): 4091- 4122.
35. Thomson Reuters (2012), “Global Syndicated Loans Review Managing Underwriters Full Year 2012,” (Çevirimiçi) http//dmi.thomsonreuters. com/Content/Files/4Q2012_Global_ Syndicated_Loans_Review.pdf, 10 Ekim 2016.
36. Thomson Reuters (2015), “Global Syndicated Loans Review Managing Underwriters Full Year 2015,” (Çevirimiçi) http://dmi.thomsonreuters. com/Content/Files/4Q2014_Global_ Syndicated_Loans_Review.pdf, 10 Ekim 2016.
37. Türk Dil Kurumu, Güncel Türkçe Sözlük, (Çevirimiçi) http://tdk.gov.tr/ index.php?option= com_gts&arama=gts&guid=TDK.GTS.5612b14c873234.12018392, 10 Ekim 2016.