Research Article

Messianic Legitimacy: the case of Ahmadiyya and Mahdiyya Movements

Number: 35 December 31, 2016
  • Kayhan Ali Özaykal
EN TR

Messianic Legitimacy: the case of Ahmadiyya and Mahdiyya Movements

Abstract

The Ahmadiyya and Mahdiyya are contemporary Islamic messianic movements emerging in the late nineteenth century during a period of general Muslim discontent. This study aims to see how the respective leaders of these two movements, Ghulam Ahmad and Muhammad Ahmad, sought to legitimize their claims while addressing the problems they perceived to exist in their societies. It is found that the originality and magnitude of Ghulam Ahmad’s messianic message, which aimed to address the claims of Christian missionaries as well as other religious groups by  drawing on the example of the prophet Jesus for legitimacy and the abolishment of jihad, made the movement relatively inflexible doctrinally, but with focus on proselytization gained greater global influence. Muhammad Ahmad’s message and practice, by contrast, though highly unorthodox in its treatment of prophetic hadith, emulated to a greater degree the example of Prophet Muhammad, was more humble in its claims, and achieved relatively greater domestic popularity and doctrinal flexibility, paving the way for eventual political power in Sudan.

Keywords

References

  1. Abbot, Freeland, Islam and Pakistan. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1968
  2. Ahmad, Mirza Bashir-ud-din Mahmud, Invitation to Ahmadiyyat: being a statement of beliefs, a rationale of claims, and an invitation, on behalf of the Ahmadiyya Movement for the propagation and rejuvenation of Islam. London; Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1980
  3. Ibn al-Arabi, Muhyi al-Din, Kitab al-futuhat al-makkiyya. 5 vols. ed. 'Uthman Yahya. Cairo: Maktaba al-'Arabiyya, 1972.
  4. Al-Asar al-Kamila li’l-Imam al-Mahdi, ed. Muhammad Ibrahim Abu Salim, I-VII, Khartoum: Jamiat al-Khartoum, 1990-1991
  5. Brush, S. E., ‘Ahmadiyyat in Pakistan: Rabwah and the Ahmadis’, Muslim World 45 (1955): 145-171
  6. Burke, Edmund, Lapidus, Ira M., (eds). Islam, Politics, and Social Movements. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1988
  7. Al-Bursawi, Tafsir ruh al-bayan, Vol. 7 Matbaa Uthmaniyya, A.H. 1330
  8. Campbell, Sandra ‘Millennial Messiah and Religious Restorer: Reflections on the Early Islamic Understanding of the Term Mahdi’, Jusur 11 (1995): 1-11

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Religious Studies

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Kayhan Ali Özaykal This is me
Türkiye

Publication Date

December 31, 2016

Submission Date

July 26, 2017

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2016 Number: 35

APA
Özaykal, K. A. (2016). Messianic Legitimacy: the case of Ahmadiyya and Mahdiyya Movements. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Theology, 35, 217-256. https://izlik.org/JA23NS93CA
AMA
1.Özaykal KA. Messianic Legitimacy: the case of Ahmadiyya and Mahdiyya Movements. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Theology. 2016;(35):217-256. https://izlik.org/JA23NS93CA
Chicago
Özaykal, Kayhan Ali. 2016. “Messianic Legitimacy: The Case of Ahmadiyya and Mahdiyya Movements”. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Theology, nos. 35: 217-56. https://izlik.org/JA23NS93CA.
EndNote
Özaykal KA (December 1, 2016) Messianic Legitimacy: the case of Ahmadiyya and Mahdiyya Movements. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Theology 35 217–256.
IEEE
[1]K. A. Özaykal, “Messianic Legitimacy: the case of Ahmadiyya and Mahdiyya Movements”, Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Theology, no. 35, pp. 217–256, Dec. 2016, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA23NS93CA
ISNAD
Özaykal, Kayhan Ali. “Messianic Legitimacy: The Case of Ahmadiyya and Mahdiyya Movements”. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Theology. 35 (December 1, 2016): 217-256. https://izlik.org/JA23NS93CA.
JAMA
1.Özaykal KA. Messianic Legitimacy: the case of Ahmadiyya and Mahdiyya Movements. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Theology. 2016;:217–256.
MLA
Özaykal, Kayhan Ali. “Messianic Legitimacy: The Case of Ahmadiyya and Mahdiyya Movements”. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Theology, no. 35, Dec. 2016, pp. 217-56, https://izlik.org/JA23NS93CA.
Vancouver
1.Kayhan Ali Özaykal. Messianic Legitimacy: the case of Ahmadiyya and Mahdiyya Movements. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Theology [Internet]. 2016 Dec. 1;(35):217-56. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA23NS93CA