Yükselen Ekonomilerde Teknolojik Yakınsama: Birim Kök Testleri ile Bir İnceleme

Abstract

Teknolojik gelişmeler, ülkelerin ekonomik büyümesinde ve kalkınmasında önemli rol oynamaktadır. Özellikle gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olan ülkeler arasındaki başta gelir olmak üzere sosyoekonomik faktörlerde yakınsamanın temelinde teknolojik gelişmeler yer almaktadır. Aynı zamanda gelişmekte olan ülkeler teknolojik yetenek düzeylerini geliştirerek lider ülkeleri yakalamayı hedeflemektedirler. Bu aşamada başta gelişmekte olan ülkeler olmak üzere ülkeler arasındaki teknolojik yakınsamanın incelenmesi önem arz etmektedir. Bu çalışmada on yükselen ekonomide teknolojik yakınsamanın olup olmadığının incelenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda patent sayıları, işgücü verimliliği ve toplam faktör verimliliği üzerinden teknolojik yakınsama Pesaran CADF ve SURADF birim kök testleri ile analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre, bazı ülkelerde yakınsama olsa da, ülkeler arasında genel olarak teknolojik yakınsama doğrulanamamaktadır.

Keywords

• Teknolojik gelişme
• Teknolojik yetenek
• Teknolojik yakınsama
• Yükselen ekonomiler ve Birim kök testi

Supporting Institution

Bulunmamaktadır.

Thanks

Bulunmamaktadır.

Technological Convergence in Emerging Economies: An Investigation with Unit Root Tests

Abstract

Technological developments play an important role in economic growth and development and form the basis in the convergence of socioeconomic factors between developed and developing countries, especially income. At the same time, developing countries aim to catch up with the leading countries by improving their technological capabilities, and examining the technological convergence between countries, especially developing countries, is essential at this stage. This study aims to examine whether technological convergence occurs in 10 emerging economies. For this purpose, the study analyzes technological convergence over the variables of number of patents, labor productivity, and total factor productivity using Pesaran’s (2007) cross-sectionally augmented Dickey-Fuller (CADF) and seemingly unrelated regression augmented Dickey-Fuller (SURADF) unit root tests. According to the results of the analysis, although there is convergence in some countries, it does not confirm in general technological convergence among the countries.

Keywords

• Technological development
• Technological capability
• Technological convergence
• Emerging economies
• Unit root test

References

1. Abramovitz, M. (1989). Thinking about growth And other essays on economic growth and welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
2. Albulescu, C., Oros, C., & Tiwari, A. (2017). Is there any convergence in health expenditures across EU countries?Economics Bulletin, 37(3), 2095-2101. hal-01981082 . google scholar
3. AlKathiri, N. (2022). Labour productivity growth and convergence in manufacturing: A nonparametric production frontier approach. Applied Economics, 54(4), 406-429. DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2021.1963410. google scholar
4. Apergis, N. (2015). Convergence in Public Expenditure Across a Sample of Emerging Countries: Evidence from Club Convergence. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 51(3) , 448-462. https://doi.org/10.1080/154049 6X.2015.1025670. google scholar
5. Apergis, N., & Payne, J. (2017). Per capita carbon dioxide emissions across U.S. states by sector and fossil fuel source: Evidence from club convergence tests. Energy Economics 63, 365-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. eneco.2016.11.027. google scholar
6. Apergis, N., Christou, C., & Hassapis, C. (2013). Convergence in public expenditures across EU countries: evidence from club convergence. Economics & Finance Research, 1, 45-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/216494 80.2013.86273. google scholar
7. Archibugi , D., & Pianta, M. (1996). Measuring technological Change through patents and innovation surveys. Technovation, 16(9), 451-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(96)00031-4. google scholar
8. Archibugi, D. (1992). Patenting as an indicator of technological innovation: a review. Science and Public Policy, 19(6), 357-368. DOI: 10.1093/spp/19.6.35. google scholar

9. Archibugi, D., & Coco, A. (2004). A New Indicator of Technological Capabilities for Developed and Developing Countries (ArCo). World Development 32(4), 629-654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.10.008. google scholar
10. Bakırtaş, T. (2014). Dünya’da ve Türkiye’de Ekonomik Kalkınma Küresel Kalkınma Odaklı Sorunlar Yeni Model Arayışları. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık. google scholar
11. Barro, R., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1997). Technological Diffusion, Convergence, and Growth. Journal of Economic Growth 2, 1-27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40215930. google scholar
12. Baumol, W. (1986). Productivity Growth, Convergence, and Welfare: What the Long-Run Data Show. The American Economic Review, 76(5), 1072-1085. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1816469. google scholar
13. Blanco, F., Delgado, F., & Presno, M. (2020). R&D expenditure in the EU: convergence or divergence? Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja 33(1), 1685-1710. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1756371. google scholar
14. Bozkurt, K. (2018). Teknolojik Yakınsama: OECD Ülkeleri İçin Bir Analiz. L. Aytemiz, E. Karayılmazlar içinde, Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimlerde Akademik Araştırmalar- V (s. 357-370). Ankara: Gece Kitaplığı. google scholar
15. Breuer, J., McNown, R., & Wallace, M. (2001). Misleading Inferences from Panel Unit-Root Tests with an Illustration from Purchasing Power Parity. Review of International Economics, 9 (3), 482-493. https://doi. org/10.1111/1467-9396.00294. google scholar
16. Breuer, J., McNown, R., & Wallace, M. (2002). Series-specific Unit Root Tests with Panel Data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 64 (5), 527-546. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.00276. google scholar
17. Byrne, J., Fazio, G., & Piacentino, D. (2009). Total Factor Productivity Convergence among Italian Regions: Some Evidence from Panel Unit Root Tests. Regional Studies 43(1), 63-76. https://doi. org/10.1080/00343400701654137. . google scholar
18. Caldas, J., Godinho, M., & Mamede, R. (2009). Simulating the prospects of technological catching us. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 18(6), 565-586. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590802233651. . google scholar
19. Camilla, M., Serlenga, L., & Shin, Y. (2013). Globalisation and technological convergence in the EU. J Prod Anal 40, 15-29. DOI 10.1007/s11123-012-0308-9. google scholar
20. Castellanos-Sosa, F. (2020). Labor Productivity Convergence in Mexico, . International Journal of Political Economy, 49 (3), 243-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2020.1824733. google scholar
21. Cavenaile, L., & Dubois, D. (2011). An empirical analysis of incomeconvergence in the European Union. Applied Economics Letters, 18, 1705-1708. DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2011.560104. google scholar
22. Caviggioli, F. (2016). Technology fusion: Identification and analysis of the drivers of technology convergence using patent data. Technovation 55-56, 22-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016lj.technovation.2016.04.003. google scholar
23. Co, C., & Wohar, M. (2004). Technological convergence among US regions and states. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 13(2), 101-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590410001628107. google scholar
24. Ferreiro, J., Garcia-Del-Valle, M., & Gomez, C. (2009). Is the composition of public expenditures converging in EMU countries? Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 31(3), 459-484. DOI 10.2753/PKE0160-3477310305. google scholar
25. Fischer, R., & Serra, S. (1996). Income Convergence within and between Countries. International Economic Review, 37(3), 531-551. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2527440. google scholar
26. FRED. (2023, 01 03). Economic Data. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/searchresults?st=factor+productivity adresinden alındı google scholar
27. ILO. (2023, 01 03). Statistics on Labour Productivity. https://ilostat.ilo.org/topics/labour-productivity/ adresinden alındı google scholar
28. Jungmittag, A. (2005). Innovations, Technological Specialisation and Economic Convergence in the EU. S. Welfens, and A. Wziatek-Kubiak içinde, Structural Change and Exchange Rate Dynamics The Economics of EU Eastern Enlargement (s. 171-199). Berlin: Springer . google scholar
29. Kathuria, V., & Oh, K. (2018). ICT access: Testing for convergence across countries. The Information Society 34(3), 166-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2018.1438549. . google scholar
30. Lall, S. (1992). Technological Capabilities and Industrialisation. World Development, 20(2), 165-186. https://doi. org/10.1016/0305-750X(92)90097-F. google scholar
31. Lall, S. (1998). Technological Capabilities in Emerging Asia,. Oxford Development Studies, 26(2), 213-243. https:// doi.org/10.1080/13600819808424154. google scholar
32. Leonida, L., Petraglia, C., & Murillo-Zamorano, L. (2004). Total factor productivity and the convergence hypothesis in the Italian regions. Applied Economics, 36(19), 2187-2193. DOI: 10.1080/0003684042000282506. google scholar
33. Lim, L., & McAleer, M. (2004). Convergence and catching up in ASEAN: a comparative analysis. Applied Economics, 36(2), 137-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/0003684042000174038. . google scholar
34. Makkonen, T. (2015). National innovation system capabilities among leader and follower countries: widening gaps or global convergence? Innovation and Development, 5(1), 113-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/215793 0X.2014.992818. . google scholar
35. Narayan, S. (2007). Do health expenditures ‘catch-up’? Evidence from OECD countries. Health Econ. 16(10), 9931008. DOI: 10.1002/hec.1196. google scholar
36. Nghiem, S., & Connelly, L. (2017). Convergence and determinants of health expenditures in OECD countries. Health Economics Review 7(29), 2-11. DOI 10.1186/s13561-017-0164-. google scholar
37. Pesaran, M. (2007). A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross-Section Dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics 22(2), 265-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951. . google scholar
38. Rey, S., & Montouri, B. (1999). US Regional Income Convergence: A Spatial Econometric Perspective. Regional Studies, 33(2), 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409950122945. google scholar
39. Sedgley, N. (1998). Technology gaps, economic growth and convergence across US states, . Applied Economics Letters, 5(1), 55-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/758540128. google scholar
40. Strazicich, M., & List, J. (2003). Are CO 2 Emission Levels Converging Among Industrial Countries? Environmental andResource Economics 24, 263-271. https://doi.Org/10.1023/A:1022910701857. google scholar
41. Taymaz, E. (2001). Ulusal Yenilik Sistemi Türkiye İmalat Sanayiinde Teknolojik Değişim ve Yenilik Süreçleri. Ankara: TÜBİTAK / TTGV / DİE. google scholar
42. Turganbayev, Y. (2017). Total factor productivity convergence across the Kazakh regions. Post-Communist Economies, 29(2), 182-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2016.1267975. google scholar
43. Ulucak, R. (2018). Çevre Kalitesi Açısından Yakınsama Hipotezine Yeni Bir Bakış: Ekolojik Ayak İzi ve Kulüp Yakınsamaya Dayalı Ampirik Bir Analiz. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18(4), 29-38. https:// doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.552674. google scholar
44. Utku-İsmihan, F. (2019). Knowledge, technological convergence and economic growth: a dynamic panel data analysis of Middle East and North Africa and Latin America. Quality & Quantity 53, 713-733. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11135-018-0785-7. google scholar
45. Ünsal, E. (2007). İktisadi Büyüme. Ankara: İmaj Yayıncılık. google scholar
46. WIPO. (2023, 01 13). WIPO IP Statistics Data Center. https://www3.wipo.int/ipstats/index.htm?tab=patent adresinden alındı google scholar
47. World Bank. (2022, 12 08). World Bank Country and Lending Groups. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/ knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups adresinden alındı google scholar