Mapping Digital Advances: A Comprehensive Digitalization Index for Analyzing OECD Economies

Abstract

The digitalization phenomenon is defined as the adoption and widespread use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) by households, businesses, and the government as the main actors in the economy. Considering its transformative role in economic growth, innovation, and reducing inequality, digitalization has become a key dynamic of modern economies. In this context, this study proposes a novel composite index—the Digital Progress Index (DPI)—to evaluate the digitalization levels of OECD countries from 2010 to 2020. The DPI builds upon the conceptual framework of the World Bank’s Digital Adoption Index (DAI), adapting its three-dimensional structure that covers households, businesses, and government. To uncover country-specific patterns, cluster analysis is employed, classifying OECD countries into less developed, developing, and developed groups based on their DPI scores. This classification offers valuable insight into the role of digital transformation in shaping socio-economic structures. JEL Classification : O31 , O33 , C43

Keywords

• digitalization
• digital economy
• OECD
• composite index
• cluster analysis

References

1. Acemoğlu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2016). The race between machine and man: Implications of technology for growth, factor shares and employment. NBER Working Paper, American Economic Review, 108(6), 1488–1542. doi:10.3386/w22252 google scholar
2. Adams, S., & Akobeng, E. (2021). ICT, governance and inequality in Africa. Telecommunications Policy, 45(10), 1–13. doi:10.1016/ j.telpol.2021.102198 google scholar
3. Almeida, F., Santos, J. D., & Monteiro, J. A. (2020). The challenges and opportunities in the digitalization of companies in a post-COVID-19 World. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 48(3), 97–103. doi:10.1109/EMR.2020.3013206 google scholar
4. Asongu, S. A., & Odhiambo, N. M. (2019). How enhancing information and communication technology has affected inequality in Africa for sustainable development: An empirical investigation. Sustainable Development, 27(4), 647–656. doi:10.1002/sd.1929 google scholar
5. Bandura, R. (2008). A survey of composite indices measuring country performance: 2008 update. Retrieved from New York: google scholar
6. Bánhidi, Z., Dobos, I., & Nemeslaki, A. (2020). What the overall Digital Economy and Society Index reveals: A statistical analysis of the DESI EU28 dimensions. Regional Statistics, 10(2), 42–62. doi:10.15196/RS100209 google scholar
7. Bawden, D. (2001). Information and digital literacies: a review of concepts. Journal of Documentation, 57(2), 218–259. doi:10.1108/ eum0000000007083 google scholar
8. Berman, S. J. (2012). Digital transformation: opportunities to create new business models. Strategy & Leadership, 40(2), 16–24. doi:10.1108/10878571211209314 google scholar

9. Brennen, J. S., & Kreiss, D. (2016). Digitalization: The International Encyclopedia of Communication. Theory and Philosophy, 1–11. doi:10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect111 google scholar
10. Butt, J. (2020). A Conceptual Framework to Support Digital Transformation in Manufacturing Using an Integrated Business Process Management Approach. Designs, 4(3), 17. doi:10.3390/designs4030017 google scholar
11. Cámara, N., & Tuesta, D. (2017). DiGiX: the digitization index. BBVA Bank, Economic Research Department, 17(3). google scholar
12. Chowdhury, S., & Squire, L. (2006). Setting weights for aggregate indices: An application to the commitment to development index and human development index. The Journal of Development Studies, 42(5), 761–771. doi:10.1080/00220380600741904 google scholar
13. Ciarli, T., Kenney, M., Massini, S., & Piscitello, L. (2021). Digital technologies, innovation, and skills: Emerging trajectories and challenges. Research Policy, 50(7), 104289. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2021.104289 google scholar
14. CISCO. (2019). CISCO Digital Readiness Index 2019 Report. Retrieved from google scholar
15. DESI. (2022). Digital Economy and Society Index 2022: Methodological Note. Retrieved from google scholar
16. Gobble, M. M. (2018). Digitalization, digitization, and innovation. Research-Technology Management, 61(4), 56–59. doi:10.1080/08956308.2018.1471280 google scholar
17. Gorenšek, T., & Kohont, A. (2019). Conceptualization of digitalization: Opportunities and challenges for organizations in the Euro- Mediterranean area. International journal of Euro-Mediterranean studies, 12(2), 93–115. google scholar
18. Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., Tasiou, M., & Torrisi, G. (2019). On the methodological framework of composite indices: A review of the issues of weighting, aggregation, and robustness. Social indicators research, 141, 61–94. doi:10.1007/s11205-017-1832-9 google scholar
19. Habibi, F., & Zabardast, M. A. (2020). Digitalization, education and economic growth: A comparative analysis of Middle East and OECD countries. Technology in Society, 63, 101370. google scholar
20. Henriette, E., Feki, M., & Boughzala, I. (2015). The shape of digital transformation: A systematic literature review. google scholar
21. Jing, A. H. Y., Ab-Rahim, R., & Ismail, F. (2019). Information and communication technology (ICT) and income inequality in ASEAN-5 countries. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(9), 359–373. doi:10.6007/IJARBSS/v9- i9/6303 google scholar
22. Katz, R., Koutroumpis, P., & Martin Callorda, F. (2014). Using a digitization index to measure the economic and social impact of digital agendas. info, 16(1), 32–44. doi:10.1108/info-10-2013-0051 google scholar
23. Kavadias, S., Ladas, K., & Loch, C. (2016). The transformative business model. Harvard business review, 94(10), 91–98. google scholar
24. Koch, T., & Windsperger, J. (2017). Seeing through the network: Competitive advantage in the digital economy. Journal of Organization Design, 6, 1–30. doi:10.1186/s41469-017-0016-z google scholar
25. Korzhyk, O., Gomes, J. V., & João, G. (2024). Similarities and differences between digitalization indexes. Journal of Economic Analysis, 3(3), 138–160. doi:10.58567/jea03030008 google scholar
26. Krieger-Boden, C., & Sorgner, A. (2018). Labor market opportunities for women in the digital age. Economics, 12(1), 20180028. doi:10.5018/ economics- ejournal.ja.2018-28 google scholar
27. Kuhn, A., Schwabe, A., Boomgarden, H., Brandl, L., Stocker, G., Lauer, G., . . . Krause-Wolters, M. (2024). Who gets lost? How digital academic reading impacts equal opportunity in higher education. new media & society, 26(2), 1034–1055. doi:10.1177/14614448211072306 google scholar
28. Lindgren, I., Madsen, C. Ø., Hofmann, S., & Melin, U. (2019). Close encounters of the digital kind: A research agenda for the digitalization of public services. Government information quarterly, 36(3), 427–436. google scholar
29. Maiti, D., & Awasthi, A. (2020). ICT exposure and the level of wellbeing and progress: a cross country analysis. Social indicators research, 147(1), 311–343. doi:10.1007/s11205-019-02153-5 google scholar
30. Manoff, M. (2006). The materiality of digital collections: Theoretical and historical perspectives. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 6(3), 311–325. google scholar
31. Mazziotta, M., & Pareto, A. (2013). Methods for constructing composite indices: One for all or all for one? Rivista italiana di economia, demografia e statistica, 67, 67–80. google scholar
32. Mazzone, D. M. (2014). Digital or death: digital transformation: the only choice for business to survive smash and conquer: Smashbox Consulting Inc. google scholar
33. Myovella, G., Karacuka, M., & Haucap, J. (2020). Digitalization and economic growth: A comparative analysis of Sub-Saharan Africa and OECD economies. Telecommunications Policy, 44(2), 101856. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101856 google scholar
34. Nath, S. V., Dunkin, A., Chowdhary, M., & Patel, N. (2020). Industrial Digital Transformation: Accelerate digital transformation with business optimization, AI, and Industry 4.0. Birmingham: Packt Publishing Ltd. google scholar
35. Nga Ndjobo, P. M., & Ngah Otabela, N. (2023). Can income inequality be affected by the interaction between ICTs and human capital?: The evidence from developing countries. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 21(1), 235–264. doi:10.1007/s40953-022-00336- google scholar
36. Nguyen, V. B. (2022). Does digitalization widen income inequality? A comparative assessment for advanced and developing economies. google scholar
37. South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 17(2), 154–171. doi:10.2478/jeb-2022-0021 google scholar
38. OECD. (2008). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: OECD Publishing. google scholar
39. OECD. (2020). Going Digital integrated policy framework. Retrieved from google scholar
40. Pearce-Moses, R., & Baty, L. A. (2005). A glossary of archival and records terminology (Vol. 2013). Chicago: Society of American Archivists Chicago, IL. google scholar
41. Pérez-Ortega, J., Almanza-Ortega, N. N., Vega-Villalobos, A., Pazos-Rangel, R., Zavala-Díaz, C., & Martínez-Rebollar, A. (2019). The K-means algorithm evolution. Introduction to data science and machine learning, 69–90. doi:10.5772/intechopen.85447 google scholar
42. Plan, T. E. C. s. D. S. (2022). European Commission Digital Strategy: Next Generation Digital Commission. Retrieved from google scholar
43. Ragnarsson, K. H. (2022). Internet Platforms and Freedom of Expression in Constitution-Making. In S. Hindelang & A. Moberg (Eds.), YSEC Yearbook of Socio-Economic Constitutions 2021: Triangulating Freedom of Speech (pp. 59–90). Switzerland: Springer. google scholar
44. Richmond, K., & Triplett, R. E. (2018). ICT and income inequality: a cross-national perspective. International Review of Applied Economics, 32(2), 195–214. doi:10.1080/02692171.2017.1338677 google scholar
45. Rohm, A., D. Kaltcheva, V., & R. Milne, G. (2013). A mixed-method approach to examining brand-consumer interactions driven by social media. Journal of research in Interactive Marketing, 7(4), 295–311. doi:10.1108/JRIM-01-2013-0009 google scholar
46. Sabbagh, K., Friedrich, R., El-Darwiche, B., Singh, M., Ganediwalla, S., & Katz, R. (2012). Maximizing the impact of digitization. The global information technology report, 2012, 121–133. google scholar
47. Salzman, J. (2003). Methodological choices encountered in the construction of composite indices of economic and social well-being. Ottawa: Centre for the study of living standards. google scholar
48. Schallmo, D. R., & Williams, C. A. (2018). Digital transformation now!: Guiding the successful digitalization of your business model. Cham: Springer. google scholar
49. Sjödin, D. R., Parida, V., Leksell, M., & Petrovic, A. (2018). Smart Factory Implementation and Process Innovation: A Preliminary Maturity Model for Leveraging Digitalization in Manufacturing Moving to smart factories presents specific challenges that can be addressed through a structured approach focused on people, processes, and technologies. Research-Technology Management, 61(5), 22– 31. doi:10.1080/08956308.2018.1471277 google scholar
50. Smallenbroek, O., Caperna, G., & Papadimitriou, E. (2023). JRC Statistical Audit of the ICT Development Index. Retrieved from Luxembourg: google scholar
51. Tchamyou, V. S., Asongu, S. A., & Odhiambo, N. M. (2019). The role of ICT in modulating the effect of education and lifelong learning on income inequality and economic growth in Africa. African Development Review, 31(3), 261–274. doi:10.1111/1467-8268.12388 google scholar
52. Tutak, M., & Brodny, J. (2022). Business digital maturity in Europe and its implication for open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(1), 27. doi:10.3390/joitmc8010027 google scholar
53. Ullah, A., Dogan, M., Pervaiz, A., Bukhari, A. A. A., Akkus, H. T., & Dogan, H. (2024). The impact of digitalization, technological and financial innovation on environmental quality in OECD countries: Investigation of N-shaped EKC hypothesis. Technology in Society, 77(C), 102484. google scholar
54. Venter, E. (2019). Challenges for meaningful interpersonal communication in a digital era. HTS: Theological Studies, 75(1), 1–6. google scholar
55. Verina, N., & Titko, J. (2019). Digital transformation: conceptual framework. Paper presented at the Proc. of the Int. Scientific Conference “Contemporary Issues in Business, Management and Economics Engineering. google scholar
56. Vidruska, R. (2016). The digital economy & society index and network readiness index: Performance of Latvia on European Union Arena. New challenges of economic and business development–2016, 901–916. google scholar
57. Wang, J., & Xu, Y. (2023). Digitalization, income inequality, and public health: Evidence from developing countries. Technology in Society, 73, 102210. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102210 google scholar
58. Westerman, G., Calméjane, C., Bonnet, D., Ferraris, P., & McAfee, A. (2011). Digital Transformation: A roadmap for billion-dollar organiza- tions. MIT Center for digital business and capgemini consulting, 1(1–68). google scholar
59. Wierzchoń, S. T., & Kłopotek, M. A. (2018). Modern algorithms of cluster analysis (Vol. 34): Springer. google scholar
60. Williams, K. S. (2005). On-line anonymity, deindividuation and freedom of expression and privacy. Penn St. L. Rev., 110, 687. google scholar
61. World Bank. (2016). Digital Adoption Index (DAI): Measuring the global spread of digital technologies. google scholar
62. Yin, Z. H., & Choi, C. H. (2023). Does digitalization contribute to lesser income inequality? Evidence from G20 countries. Information Technology for Development, 29(1), 61–82. doi:10.1080/02681102.2022.2123443 google scholar
63. Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Research commentary—the new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research. Information systems research, 21(4), 724–735. google scholar