Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2026, Volume: 13 Issue: 1 , 277 - 291 , 19.02.2026
https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1785376
https://izlik.org/JA92BP46LL

Abstract

References

  • Altuntas, S., Selim, S., Altuntas, F. (2022). A hierarchical clustering based panel data approach: A case study of regional incentives, International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2 (2), 100098, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100098. google scholar
  • Atalay, M. (2020). Tourism-based classification of Turkish provinces using cluster analysis. Tourism Economics and Management, 4(1), 22–38. google scholar
  • Bayram, C., & Ergül, İ. (2019). Human capital investments and income inequality: A provincial analysis for Turkey. Sosyoekonomi, 27(40), 167–184.google scholar
  • Çelik, Ş. (2010). Türkiye'de sağlık hizmetlerinin illere göre değerlendirilmesi: Kümeleme analizi uygulaması. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 10(1), 105–120. google scholar
  • Çilan, T., & Demirhan, H. (2018). Determining the development levels of provinces by using cluster analysis. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Elektronik Dergisi, 9(25), 68–84. google scholar
  • Cengiz, Ö., & Öztürk, A. (2012). Türkiye’de eğitim düzeylerine göre illerin kümelenmesi: K-ortalama analizi uygulaması. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 26(2), 1–16. google scholar
  • Dolu, A. & Kuvvetli, U. (2023). Türkiye’de Kentlerin Sosyo-Ekonomik Gelişmişlik Düzeylerinin Karşılaştırılması. International Journal of Public Finance. 8(1), 85 – 106. google scholar
  • Eren, H., & Ömürbek, N. (2019). Evaluation of healthcare performance in Turkey’s provinces: A cluster analysis approach. Journal of Business Research - Turk, 11(2), 1044–1059. google scholar
  • Gençoğlu, P. (2015). Assessment of provincial differences in healthcare service provision in Turkey. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, 18(2), 223–242.google scholar
  • Gürsoy, F., & Badur, B. (2022). Inter-provincial migration flows in Turkey: A network and clustering approach. Ege Academic Review, 22(2), 149–160.google scholar
  • Hamarat, B. (2009). Türkiye’de illerin sosyoekonomik yapılarına göre sınıflandırılması: Kümeleme analizi uygulaması. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2), 345–360. google scholar
  • Karabulut, Y., Yılmaz, H., & Çetin, T. (2018). Türkiye illerinin sosyo-ekonomik gelişmişlik düzeylerinin kümeleme analizi yöntemiyle incelenmesi. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 17(3), 949–965.google scholar
  • Kandemir, E., & Çelik, Ş. (2014). Türkiye’de hastane ve yatak kapasitesine göre illerin sınıflandırılması: Bulanık kümeleme analizi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 16(2), 251–266. google scholar
  • Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (2009). Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis. John Wiley & Sons. google scholar
  • Köse, A. (2019). Evaluation of statistical regions with hierarchical cluster analysis according to data on health service demand, production and capacity. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 1(23), 15–28. google scholar
  • OECD. (2023). Education policy outlook: Turkey 2023. OECD Publishing. google scholar
  • Özkubat, G., & Selim, S. (2019). Türkiye’de İllerin Sosyo-Ekonomik Gelişmişliği: Bir Mekânsal Ekonometrik Analiz. Alphanumeric Journal, 7(2), 449-470. google scholar
  • Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health. (2019). Turkey Health Statistics Yearbook 2019. https://www.saglik.gov.tr/TR,67115/saglik-istatistikleri-yilligi-2019.html google scholar
  • Servi, T., & Erişoğlu, Ü. (2020). Türkiye’deki Şehirlerin Sosyo-Ekonomik Gelişmişlik Düzeylerinin İstatistiksel Analizi. Al Farabi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(2), 174-186. google scholar
  • Şen, H., Çemrek, F., & Özaydın, Ö. (2006). Türkiye’deki İllerin Sosyo-Ekonomik Gelişmşlik Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi. Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(11), 155-171. google scholar
  • Şimşek, A. B. (2024). Provincial classification of healthcare services in Turkey: A density-based clustering approach. Health Systems and Policy Research, 11(1), 1–9. google scholar
  • Tansel, A., & Güngör, N. D. (1997). Educational composition of the Turkish workforce, 1988–1994. METU Studies in Development, 24(1), 1–29. google scholar
  • Tekin, B. (2015). Evaluation of primary healthcare services using cluster analysis. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(2), 309–330. google scholar
  • Tuncer, G. (2019). Türkiye’de Sosyo-Ekonomik Gelişmişliğin Mekansal Eşitsizliği. Ekonomi Maliye İşletme Dergisi, 2(2), 69-80. google scholar
  • Turkish Statistical Institute (TÜİK). (2024). Regional Statistics Database. https://data.tuik.gov.tr google scholar
  • Turkish Statistical Institute (TÜİK). (2023). Provincial level labour force statistics. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Provincial-Level-Labour-Force-Statistics-2023-53838 google scholar
  • Tüzüntürk, S. (2024). Clustering Turkish provinces based on educational attainment levels. Journal of Education and Research, 34(1), 55–72. google scholar
  • Ullmann, A., & Hennig, C. (2021). Stability and validation of clustering results: A comparative review. Journal of Classification, 38(1), 1–42. google scholar
  • Ünel, F.B. (2024). Türkiye’deki sosyo-ekonomik gelişmişlik endeksi (SEGE) ile sosyal, ekonomik, kültürel verilerin sıralı en küçük kareler yöntemi ile analiz edilmesi. Türkiye Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Dergisi, 6(1), 47-58. google scholar
  • United Nations Development Programme. (2023). Human Development Report 2023–2024: Breaking the gridlock—Reimagining cooperation in a polarized world. google scholar
  • United Nations. (n.d.). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda. google scholar
  • Wegmann, L., & Zipperling, J. (2021). How to choose a clustering algorithm: A framework for systematic algorithm selection. Data Science Journal, 20(1), 1–19.google scholar
  • Yavan, S., & Gazeloğlu, C. (2022). Yerel yönetimlerde cinsiyete duyarlı bütçelemenin hiyerarşik kümeleme analiziyle incelenmesi: Aydın ilçe belediyeleri örneği. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler, 31(1), 165-200. google scholar
  • Yıldırım, H. H., Kaya, S., & Ünal, E. (2020). Distribution and planning of health workforce in Turkey: A regional comparison. Health Policy and Planning, 35(5), 601–610. google scholar
  • Yılancı, V. (2010). Socioeconomic classification of Turkish provinces using fuzzy clustering. İktisat ve Finans Dergisi, 25(292), 45–62. google scholar
  • Yıldırım, U. T. (2025). Socio-Economic Development and Voter Preferences in Türkiye: The 28 May 2023 Presidential Election. Akademik Araştırmalar Ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD), 17(32), 165-180. google scholar
  • Yıldız, A. (2018). Classification of Turkish provinces according to basic health indicators using clustering analysis. Journal of Health and Society, 28(4), 77–91.google scholar

Examining Education, Culture, Health, and Workforce Characteristics of Turkish Provinces: A Cluster-Based Analysis

Year 2026, Volume: 13 Issue: 1 , 277 - 291 , 19.02.2026
https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1785376
https://izlik.org/JA92BP46LL

Abstract

This study examines the education, culture, health, and workforce characteristics of Turkish provinces through a cluster-based analytical approach. Using data from the Turkish Statistical Institute (TUİK) and the Ministry of Health, we assess provincial-level performance across a diverse set of social development indicators. The clustering analysis identifies groups of provinces with similar profiles, highlighting regional disparities and patterns in the distribution of public services and labour market conditions. The results show that metropolitan provinces form a highly developed cluster characterised by strong economic capacity and population growth, while several clusters reflect structurally disadvantaged regions with low economic performance, negative net migration, and limited social infrastructure. In addition, some provinces exhibit relatively high education and cultural indicators despite weaker economic outcomes, underscoring the heterogeneous nature of regional development in Türkiye. Overall, the findings provide a nuanced spatial classification of provinces and offer policy-relevant insights for designing cluster-specific regional development strategies and more equitable resource allocation.

References

  • Altuntas, S., Selim, S., Altuntas, F. (2022). A hierarchical clustering based panel data approach: A case study of regional incentives, International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2 (2), 100098, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100098. google scholar
  • Atalay, M. (2020). Tourism-based classification of Turkish provinces using cluster analysis. Tourism Economics and Management, 4(1), 22–38. google scholar
  • Bayram, C., & Ergül, İ. (2019). Human capital investments and income inequality: A provincial analysis for Turkey. Sosyoekonomi, 27(40), 167–184.google scholar
  • Çelik, Ş. (2010). Türkiye'de sağlık hizmetlerinin illere göre değerlendirilmesi: Kümeleme analizi uygulaması. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 10(1), 105–120. google scholar
  • Çilan, T., & Demirhan, H. (2018). Determining the development levels of provinces by using cluster analysis. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Elektronik Dergisi, 9(25), 68–84. google scholar
  • Cengiz, Ö., & Öztürk, A. (2012). Türkiye’de eğitim düzeylerine göre illerin kümelenmesi: K-ortalama analizi uygulaması. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 26(2), 1–16. google scholar
  • Dolu, A. & Kuvvetli, U. (2023). Türkiye’de Kentlerin Sosyo-Ekonomik Gelişmişlik Düzeylerinin Karşılaştırılması. International Journal of Public Finance. 8(1), 85 – 106. google scholar
  • Eren, H., & Ömürbek, N. (2019). Evaluation of healthcare performance in Turkey’s provinces: A cluster analysis approach. Journal of Business Research - Turk, 11(2), 1044–1059. google scholar
  • Gençoğlu, P. (2015). Assessment of provincial differences in healthcare service provision in Turkey. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, 18(2), 223–242.google scholar
  • Gürsoy, F., & Badur, B. (2022). Inter-provincial migration flows in Turkey: A network and clustering approach. Ege Academic Review, 22(2), 149–160.google scholar
  • Hamarat, B. (2009). Türkiye’de illerin sosyoekonomik yapılarına göre sınıflandırılması: Kümeleme analizi uygulaması. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2), 345–360. google scholar
  • Karabulut, Y., Yılmaz, H., & Çetin, T. (2018). Türkiye illerinin sosyo-ekonomik gelişmişlik düzeylerinin kümeleme analizi yöntemiyle incelenmesi. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 17(3), 949–965.google scholar
  • Kandemir, E., & Çelik, Ş. (2014). Türkiye’de hastane ve yatak kapasitesine göre illerin sınıflandırılması: Bulanık kümeleme analizi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 16(2), 251–266. google scholar
  • Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (2009). Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis. John Wiley & Sons. google scholar
  • Köse, A. (2019). Evaluation of statistical regions with hierarchical cluster analysis according to data on health service demand, production and capacity. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 1(23), 15–28. google scholar
  • OECD. (2023). Education policy outlook: Turkey 2023. OECD Publishing. google scholar
  • Özkubat, G., & Selim, S. (2019). Türkiye’de İllerin Sosyo-Ekonomik Gelişmişliği: Bir Mekânsal Ekonometrik Analiz. Alphanumeric Journal, 7(2), 449-470. google scholar
  • Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health. (2019). Turkey Health Statistics Yearbook 2019. https://www.saglik.gov.tr/TR,67115/saglik-istatistikleri-yilligi-2019.html google scholar
  • Servi, T., & Erişoğlu, Ü. (2020). Türkiye’deki Şehirlerin Sosyo-Ekonomik Gelişmişlik Düzeylerinin İstatistiksel Analizi. Al Farabi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(2), 174-186. google scholar
  • Şen, H., Çemrek, F., & Özaydın, Ö. (2006). Türkiye’deki İllerin Sosyo-Ekonomik Gelişmşlik Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi. Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(11), 155-171. google scholar
  • Şimşek, A. B. (2024). Provincial classification of healthcare services in Turkey: A density-based clustering approach. Health Systems and Policy Research, 11(1), 1–9. google scholar
  • Tansel, A., & Güngör, N. D. (1997). Educational composition of the Turkish workforce, 1988–1994. METU Studies in Development, 24(1), 1–29. google scholar
  • Tekin, B. (2015). Evaluation of primary healthcare services using cluster analysis. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(2), 309–330. google scholar
  • Tuncer, G. (2019). Türkiye’de Sosyo-Ekonomik Gelişmişliğin Mekansal Eşitsizliği. Ekonomi Maliye İşletme Dergisi, 2(2), 69-80. google scholar
  • Turkish Statistical Institute (TÜİK). (2024). Regional Statistics Database. https://data.tuik.gov.tr google scholar
  • Turkish Statistical Institute (TÜİK). (2023). Provincial level labour force statistics. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Provincial-Level-Labour-Force-Statistics-2023-53838 google scholar
  • Tüzüntürk, S. (2024). Clustering Turkish provinces based on educational attainment levels. Journal of Education and Research, 34(1), 55–72. google scholar
  • Ullmann, A., & Hennig, C. (2021). Stability and validation of clustering results: A comparative review. Journal of Classification, 38(1), 1–42. google scholar
  • Ünel, F.B. (2024). Türkiye’deki sosyo-ekonomik gelişmişlik endeksi (SEGE) ile sosyal, ekonomik, kültürel verilerin sıralı en küçük kareler yöntemi ile analiz edilmesi. Türkiye Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Dergisi, 6(1), 47-58. google scholar
  • United Nations Development Programme. (2023). Human Development Report 2023–2024: Breaking the gridlock—Reimagining cooperation in a polarized world. google scholar
  • United Nations. (n.d.). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda. google scholar
  • Wegmann, L., & Zipperling, J. (2021). How to choose a clustering algorithm: A framework for systematic algorithm selection. Data Science Journal, 20(1), 1–19.google scholar
  • Yavan, S., & Gazeloğlu, C. (2022). Yerel yönetimlerde cinsiyete duyarlı bütçelemenin hiyerarşik kümeleme analiziyle incelenmesi: Aydın ilçe belediyeleri örneği. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler, 31(1), 165-200. google scholar
  • Yıldırım, H. H., Kaya, S., & Ünal, E. (2020). Distribution and planning of health workforce in Turkey: A regional comparison. Health Policy and Planning, 35(5), 601–610. google scholar
  • Yılancı, V. (2010). Socioeconomic classification of Turkish provinces using fuzzy clustering. İktisat ve Finans Dergisi, 25(292), 45–62. google scholar
  • Yıldırım, U. T. (2025). Socio-Economic Development and Voter Preferences in Türkiye: The 28 May 2023 Presidential Election. Akademik Araştırmalar Ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD), 17(32), 165-180. google scholar
  • Yıldız, A. (2018). Classification of Turkish provinces according to basic health indicators using clustering analysis. Journal of Health and Society, 28(4), 77–91.google scholar
There are 37 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Policy of Treasury
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Elif Mutlu 0009-0004-1034-0567

Serhat Peker 0000-0002-6876-3982

Ümit Kuvvetli 0000-0002-9567-3675

Submission Date September 16, 2025
Acceptance Date December 16, 2025
Publication Date February 19, 2026
DOI https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1785376
IZ https://izlik.org/JA92BP46LL
Published in Issue Year 2026 Volume: 13 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Mutlu, E., Peker, S., & Kuvvetli, Ü. (2026). Examining Education, Culture, Health, and Workforce Characteristics of Turkish Provinces: A Cluster-Based Analysis. İktisat Politikası Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(1), 277-291. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1785376
AMA 1.Mutlu E, Peker S, Kuvvetli Ü. Examining Education, Culture, Health, and Workforce Characteristics of Turkish Provinces: A Cluster-Based Analysis. JEPR. 2026;13(1):277-291. doi:10.26650/JEPR1785376
Chicago Mutlu, Elif, Serhat Peker, and Ümit Kuvvetli. 2026. “Examining Education, Culture, Health, and Workforce Characteristics of Turkish Provinces: A Cluster-Based Analysis”. İktisat Politikası Araştırmaları Dergisi 13 (1): 277-91. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1785376.
EndNote Mutlu E, Peker S, Kuvvetli Ü (February 1, 2026) Examining Education, Culture, Health, and Workforce Characteristics of Turkish Provinces: A Cluster-Based Analysis. İktisat Politikası Araştırmaları Dergisi 13 1 277–291.
IEEE [1]E. Mutlu, S. Peker, and Ü. Kuvvetli, “Examining Education, Culture, Health, and Workforce Characteristics of Turkish Provinces: A Cluster-Based Analysis”, JEPR, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 277–291, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.26650/JEPR1785376.
ISNAD Mutlu, Elif - Peker, Serhat - Kuvvetli, Ümit. “Examining Education, Culture, Health, and Workforce Characteristics of Turkish Provinces: A Cluster-Based Analysis”. İktisat Politikası Araştırmaları Dergisi 13/1 (February 1, 2026): 277-291. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1785376.
JAMA 1.Mutlu E, Peker S, Kuvvetli Ü. Examining Education, Culture, Health, and Workforce Characteristics of Turkish Provinces: A Cluster-Based Analysis. JEPR. 2026;13:277–291.
MLA Mutlu, Elif, et al. “Examining Education, Culture, Health, and Workforce Characteristics of Turkish Provinces: A Cluster-Based Analysis”. İktisat Politikası Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol. 13, no. 1, Feb. 2026, pp. 277-91, doi:10.26650/JEPR1785376.
Vancouver 1.Elif Mutlu, Serhat Peker, Ümit Kuvvetli. Examining Education, Culture, Health, and Workforce Characteristics of Turkish Provinces: A Cluster-Based Analysis. JEPR. 2026 Feb. 1;13(1):277-91. doi:10.26650/JEPR1785376