JİNEKOLOJİDE ROBOTİK CERRAHİ

Gazi Yıldırım

JİNEKOLOJİDE ROBOTİK CERRAHİ

Abstract

Son dekadda laparoskopideki gelişmeler jinekolojik prosedürlerde inanılmaz ilerlemelere neden olmuştur. Ancak bu sistem, stabil olmayan kamera platformu, laparoskopik aletlerin düzlemdeki sınırlı hareketleri, iki boyutlu görüntü, cerrah için kötü ergonomik pozisyon gibi birçok dezavantajı da birlikte getirmiştir. Bu nedenle artık ilgi robotik cerrahinin sundukları nedeniyle ona yönelmiştir. Son zamanlarda robotik sistemler birçok jinekolojik cerrahi prosedüründe uygulanmaya başlanmıştır. Bu derleme, da Vinci® robotik sistemi tanıtarak robotların jinekolojik cerrahide kullanımlarını, avantaj ve dezavantajlarını değerlendirecektir.

Keywords

Robotik cerrahi, Da Vinci, jinekolojik cerrahi, laparoskopi

References

Nezhat CR, Burrell MO, Nezhat FR, Benigno BB, Welander CE. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pelvic node dissection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 166:864-865.
Nezhat C, Hood J, Winer W, Nexhat F, Crowgey SR, Garrison CP. Videolaseroscopy and laser laparoscopy in gynaecology.Br J Hosp Med. 1987; 38:219-24.
Nezhat C, Nezhat F, Nezhat C. Operative laparoscopy. videolaseroscopy. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1994; 734:433
Satava RM. Virtual reality, telesurgery, and the new world order of medicine. J Image Guid Surg. 1995; :12-6.
Schlag PM, Moesta KT, Rakovsky S, Graschew G. Telemedicine: the new must for surgery.Arch Surg. ; 134:1216-21.
Ballantyne GH. Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring: review of early clinical results. Surg Endosc 2002; 10: 1389–1402.
Kavoussi LR, Moore RG, Adams JB, Partin AW. Comparison of Robotic Versus Human Laparoscopic Camera Control. J. Urol 1995; 154:2134-2136.
Stylopoulos N, Rattner D. Robotics and ergonomics. Surg Clin North Am 2003; 6:1321-1337.

Nezhat C, Saberi NS, Shahmohamady B, Nezhat F. Robotic-assisted surgery. JSLS. 2006;10:317-20.
Farr Nezhat, Gazi Yıldırım. Jinekolojide Yeni Bir Çağın Başlangıcı: Robotik Cerrahi. 6. Ulusal Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Kongresi. 14-19 Mayıs 2008- Belek, Antalya.
Datta MS, Yildirim G, Rahaman J, Hagopian G, Chuang L, Nezhat FR. Robotic Gynecologic Surgery in a Fellowship Training Program: An Initial Experience. The 36th Global Congress of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. November 13-17, 2007.
Marriot Wardman Park, Washington DC, USA. Corcione F, Esposito C, Cuccurullo D, Settembre A, Miranda M, Amato F, Pirozzi F, Caiazzo P. Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Preliminary experience Surg Endosc 2005; : 117-119.
Ferguson JL, Beste TM, Nelson KH, Daucher JA. Making the Transition From Standard Gynecologic Laparoscopy to Robotic Laparoscopy. JSLS 2004; :326-328.
Hubens G, Coveliers H, Balliu L, Ruppert M, Vaneerdeweg W. A performance study comparing manual and robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery using the da Vinci system. Surg Endosc 2003; :1595-9
Sarle R, Tewari A, Shrivastava A, Peabody J, Menon M. Surgical robotics and laparoscopic training drills. J Endourol 2004;18:63-7.
Hanly EJ, Marohn MR, Bachman SL, Talamini MA, Hacker SO, Howard RS, et al. Multiservice laparoscopic surgical training using the da Vinci surgical system. Am J Surg 2004; 187:309 -15.
Guru KA, Kuvshinoff BW, Pavlov-Shapiro S, Bienko MB, Aftab MN, Brady WE,Mohler JL. Impact of robotics and laparoscopy on surgical skills: A comparative study. J Am Coll Surg. 2007; 204:96
Margossian H, Garcia-Ruiz A, Falcone T, Goldberg JM, Attaran M, Miller JH, Gagner M. Robotically assisted laparoscopic tubal anastomosis in a porcine model: a pilot study. Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. ; 8:69-73. Mettler L, Ibrahim M, Jonat W. One year of experience working with the aid of a robotic assistant (the voice-controlled optic holder AESOP) in gynaecological endoscopic surgery. Hum Reprod. , 13:2748-50.
Falcone T, Goldberg J, Garcia-Ruiz A, Margossian H, Stevens L. Full robotic assistance for laparoscopic tubal anastomosis: a case report. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1999; 9:107-13.
Falcone T, Goldberg JM, Margossian H, Stevens L. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis: a human pilot study. Fertil Steril 2000; :1040-2. Margossian H, laparoscopic hysterectomy and adnexal surgery. J
Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2001; 11:161-5.
Diaz-Arrastia C, Jurnalov C, Gomez G, Townsend C Jr. Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer- enhanced surgical robot. Surg Endosc. 2002; 16:1271
T.Robotically assisted Degueldre M, Vandromme J, Huong PT, Cadiere GB. Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a feasibility study. Fertil Steril 2000; :1020 -3.
DiMarco DS, Chow GK, Gettman MT, Elliott DS. Robot-assisted treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. Urology 2004; :373-6.
Advincula AP, Song A, Burke W, Reynolds RK. Preliminary laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2004; 11:511- 8.
Dharia SP, Falcone T. Robotics in reproductive medicine. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:1-11.
Nezhat C, Lavie O, Lemyre M, Unal E, Nezhat CH, Nezhat F. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: scientific dream or reality? Fertil Steril. ; 23. [Epub ahead of print]. Field JB, Benoit MF, Dinh TA, Diaz-Arrastia C. Computer-enhanced robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Surg Endosc 2007;21: 244–246.
Magrina JF. Robotic surgery in gynecology. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2007;28:77–82.
Yildirim G, Datta MS, , Steiner N, Nezhat FR. Robotic Technique for Radical Hysterectomy and Bilateral Presentation. AAGL. The 36th Global Congress of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. November 13-17, Marriot Wardman Park, Washington DC, USA. Datta MS, Yildirim G, Zakhazansky K, Nagaresheth N, Chuang L, Nezhat FR. Laparoscopic vs. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: A Visual Comparison. AAGL. The 36th Global Congress of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. November 13-17, 2007. Marriot Wardman Park, Washington DC, USA.
Datta MS, Chuang L, Yildirim G, Zakhazansky K, Nezhat FR, Steiner N, Gretz H, Nagaresheth N, Rahaman J. A comparison of Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for Gynecologic Malignancy Treatment in a Fellowship Training Program. AAGL. The 36th Global Congress of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. November 13-17, 2007. Marriot Wardman Park, Washington DC, USA.
Boggess J. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: evolution of a new surgical paradigm. J Robotic Surg ; 1:31–37. Magrina JF, Kho RM, Weaver AL, Montero RP, Magtibay comparison laparotomy.Gynecol Oncol. 2008; 109:86-91.
Sereno S, Mutter D, Dallemagne B, Smith CD, Marescaux J. Telementoring for minimally invasive surgical training by wireless robot. Surg Innov. 2007; :184-91. A Case PM. Robotic with laparoscopy and

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Gazi Yıldırım This is me

Publication Date

December 19, 2011

Submission Date

December 19, 2011

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2009 Volume: 72 Number: 4

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA86AR27BU

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Yıldırım, G. (2011). JİNEKOLOJİDE ROBOTİK CERRAHİ. Journal of Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, 72(4), 143-149. https://izlik.org/JA86AR27BU

AMA

1.Yıldırım G. JİNEKOLOJİDE ROBOTİK CERRAHİ. İst Tıp Fak Derg. 2011;72(4):143-149. https://izlik.org/JA86AR27BU

Chicago

Yıldırım, Gazi. 2011. “JİNEKOLOJİDE ROBOTİK CERRAHİ”. Journal of Istanbul Faculty of Medicine 72 (4): 143-49. https://izlik.org/JA86AR27BU.

EndNote

Yıldırım G (December 1, 2011) JİNEKOLOJİDE ROBOTİK CERRAHİ. Journal of Istanbul Faculty of Medicine 72 4 143–149.

IEEE

[1]G. Yıldırım, “JİNEKOLOJİDE ROBOTİK CERRAHİ”, İst Tıp Fak Derg, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 143–149, Dec. 2011, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA86AR27BU

ISNAD

Yıldırım, Gazi. “JİNEKOLOJİDE ROBOTİK CERRAHİ”. Journal of Istanbul Faculty of Medicine 72/4 (December 1, 2011): 143-149. https://izlik.org/JA86AR27BU.

JAMA

1.Yıldırım G. JİNEKOLOJİDE ROBOTİK CERRAHİ. İst Tıp Fak Derg. 2011;72:143–149.

MLA

Yıldırım, Gazi. “JİNEKOLOJİDE ROBOTİK CERRAHİ”. Journal of Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, vol. 72, no. 4, Dec. 2011, pp. 143-9, https://izlik.org/JA86AR27BU.

Vancouver

1.Gazi Yıldırım. JİNEKOLOJİDE ROBOTİK CERRAHİ. İst Tıp Fak Derg [Internet]. 2011 Dec. 1;72(4):143-9. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA86AR27BU