IMPACT OF THE PROXIMAL FRACTURE STARTING ORIGIN ON THE REDUCTION QUALITY AND COMPLICATIONS IN AO/OTA 31-A2 INTERTROCHANTERIC FEMORAL FRACTURES TREATED WITH PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL ANTIROTATION

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the impact of the proximal fracture starting location relative to the tip of the greater trochanter on the reduction quality and complication rates in patients with AO/OTA 31-A2 intertrochanteric femoral fractures (IFFs) treated with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA). Material and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 125 patients diagnosed with unstable AO/OTA 31-A2 IFFs treated by PFNA. The fractures were categorised into two subtypes based on the location of the proximal starting point of the fracture line rela tive to the tip of the greater trochanter: subtype 1 (medial or at the tip of the greater trochanter) or subtype 2 (lateral). The quality of reduction was assessed using the Baumgaertner reduction quality criteria, and complication rates, including lateral cortex fractures and blade cut-outs, were compared between the groups. Results: Patients whose fractures originated medially (subtype 1) demonstrated significantly better reduction quality (78% good re duction) compared with those with lateral starting points (subtype 2) (30% good reduction). Additionally, the lateral cortex fracture rate was significantly higher in subtype 2 (16%) than in subtype 1 (0%) (p<0.001). The blade cut-out rate was also higher in subtype 2 (11%) than in subtype 1 (2%) (p = 0.042)." Conclusion: For subtype 1 fractures, the classical trochanteric entry point for PFNA is effective, whereas a more medial entry point is recommended for subtype 2 fractures to prevent loss of reduction, reduce the risk of lateral cortical fractures, and decrease the likelihood of cut-out complications.

Keywords

• Complication
• Fracture Starting Point
• Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA)
• Reduction Quality
• Unstable In tertrochanteric Femoral Fractures

PROKSİMAL FEMUR ÇİVİSİ ANTİROTASYON İLE TEDAVİ EDİLEN AO/OTA 31-A2 INTERTROKANTERİK FEMUR KIRIKLARINDA PROKSİMAL KIRIK BAŞLANGIÇ KONUMUNUN REDÜKSİYON KALİTESİ VE KOMPLİKASYONLARI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Proksimal Femural Çivi Antirotasyon (PFNA) ile tedavi edilen AO/OTA 31-A2 intertrokanterik femur kırığı (IFF) olan hastalarda büyük trokanterin ucuna göre proksimal kırık başlangıç yerinin redüksiyon kalitesi ve komplikasyon oranları üzerindeki etkisini araştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: PFNA ile tedavi edilen stabil olmayan AO/ OTA 31-A2 IFF tanılı 125 hasta üzerinde retrospektif bir analiz yapılmıştır. Kırıklar, kırık hattının proksimal başlangıç noktasının büyük trokanterin ucuna göre konumuna göre iki alt tipte kategorize edildi: alt tip 1 (medial veya büyük trokanterin ucunda) veya alt tip 2 (lateral). RedüksiyoKırıkları medialden başlayan hastaların (alt tip 1) redükn kalitesi Baumgaertner redüksiyon kalitesi kriterleri kullanılarak değerlendirildi ve lateral korteks kırıkları ve bıçak (blade) cut-out dahil olmak üzere komplikasyon oranları gruplar arasında karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Kırıkları medialden başlayan hastaların (alt tip 1) redüksiyon kalitesi (%78 iyi redüksiyon) lateralden başlayanlara (alt tip 2) kıyasla (%30 iyi redüksiyon) anlamlı derecede daha iyiydi. Ayrıca, lateral korteks kırığı oranı alt tip 2′de (%16) alt tip 1′e (%0) göre anlamlı derecede yüksekti (p<0,001). bıçak (blade) cut-out oranı da alt tip 2′de (%11) alt tip 1′e (%2) kıyasla daha yüksekti (p=0,042). Sonuç: Alt tip 1 kırıklarda, PFNA için klasik trokanterik giriş noktası etkili olurken, alt tip 2 kırıklarda redüksiyon kaybını önlemek, lateral kortikal kırık riskini azaltmak ve cut-out komplikasyonları olasılığını azaltmak için daha medial bir giriş noktası önerilir.

Keywords

• Komplikasyon
• kırık başlangıç noktası
• proksimal femoral çivi antirotasyonu (PFNA)
• redüksiyon kalitesi
• stabil olmayan intertrokanterik femur kırıkları

References

1. Kumar P, Rajnish RK, Sharma S, Dhillon MS. Proximal femoral nailing is superior to hemiarthroplasty in AO/OTA A2 and A3 intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Int Orthop 2020;44(4):623-33. google scholar
2. Evans EM. The treatment of trochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1949;31(2):190-203. google scholar
3. Müller ME. The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1990. google scholar
4. Macheras GA, Koutsostathis SD, Galanakos S, Kateros K, Papadakis SA. Does PFNA II avoid lateral cortex impingement for unstable peritrochanteric fractures? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012;470(11):3067-76. google scholar
5. Zeng C, Wang YR, Wei J, Gao SG, Zhang FJ, Sun ZQ, et al. Treatment of trochanteric fractures with proximal femoral nail antirotation or dynamic hip screw systems: a meta-analysis. J Int Med Res. 2012;40(3):839-51. google scholar
6. Kokoroghiannis C, Aktselis I, Deligeorgis A, Fragkomichalos E, Papadimas D, Pappadas I. Evolving concepts of stability and intramedullary fixation of intertrochanteric fractures–a review. Injury 2012;43(6):686-93. google scholar
7. Duramaz A, Ilter MH. The impact of proximal femoral nail type on clinical and radiological outcomes in the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures: a comparative study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2019;29(7):1441-9. google scholar
8. Anastopoulos G, Chissas D, Dourountakis J, Ntagiopoulos PG, Magnisalis E, Asimakopoulos A, et al. Computer-assisted three-dimensional correlation between the femoral neck-shaft angle and the optimal entry point for antegrade nailing. Injury 2010;41(3):300-5 google scholar

9. Ansari Moein C, Ten Duis H, Oey P, De Kort G, Van der Meulen W, Van der Werken C. Intramedullary femoral nailing through the trochanteric fossa versus greater trochanter tip: a randomized controlled study with in-depth functional outcome results. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2011;37(6):615-22. google scholar
10. Mallya S, Kamath SU, Annappa R, Nazareth NE, Kamath K, Tyagi P. The results of unstable ıntertrochanteric femur fracture treated with proximal femoral nail antirotation with respect to different greater trochanteric entry points. Adv Orthop 2020;2020(1):2834816. google scholar
11. Windolf M, Braunstein V, Dutoit C, Schwieger K. Is a helical shaped implant a superior alternative to the Dynamic Hip Screw for unstable femoral neck fractures? A biomechanical investigation. Clin Biomech 2009;24(1):59-64. google scholar
12. Strauss E, Frank J, Lee J, Kummer FJ, Tejwani N. Helical blade versus sliding hip screw for treatment of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures: a biomechanical evaluation. Injury 2006;37(10):984-9. google scholar
13. Xu Y, Geng D, Mao H, Zhu X, Yang H. A comparison of the proximal femoral nail antirotation device and dynamic hip screw in the treatment of unstable pertrochanteric fracture. J Int Med Res 2010;38(4):1266-75. google scholar
14. Xie Y, Dong Q, Xie Z. Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) and hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of elderly intertrochanteric fractures. Acta Orthop Belg 2019;85(2):199-204. google scholar
15. Gardenbroek TJ, Segers MJ, Simmermacher RK, Hammacher ER. The proximal femur nail antirotation: an identifiable improvement in the treatment of unstable pertrochanteric fractures? J Trauma 2011;71(1):169-74. google scholar
16. Liu W, Liu J, Ji G. Comparison of clinical outcomes with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus InterTAN nail for intertrochanteric femoral fractures: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 2020;15:1-15. google scholar
17. Shin WC, Seo JD, Lee SM, Moon NH, Lee JS, Suh KT. Radiographic outcomes of osteosynthesis using proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) system in intertrochanteric femoral fracture: has PFNA II solved all the problems? Hip Pelvis 2017;29(2):104-12. google scholar
18. Fogagnolo F, Kfuri M, Paccola CAJ. Intramedullary fixation of pertrochanteric hip fractures with the short AO-ASIF proximal femoral nail. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004;124:31-7. google scholar
19. Johnson LJ, Cope MR, Shahrokhi S, Tamblyn P. Measuring tip apex distance using a picture archiving and communication system (PACS). Injury 2008;39(7):786-90. google scholar
20. Gausepohl T, Pennig D, Koebke J, Harnoss S. Antegrade femoral nailing: an anatomical determination of the correct entry point. Injury 2002;33(8):701-5. google scholar
21. Moein CA, Verhofstad M, Bleys R, Van der Werken C. Soft tissue injury related to choice of entry point in antegrade femoral nailing: piriform fossa or greater trochanter tip. Injury 2005;36(11):1337-42. google scholar
22. Andruszkow H, Frink M, Frömke C, Matityahu A, Zeckey C, Mommsen P, et al. Tip apex distance, hip screw placement, and neck shaft angle as potential risk factors for cut-out failure of hip screws after surgical treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Int Orthop 2012;36:2347-54. google scholar
23. Hsueh KK, Fang CK, Chen CM, Su YP, Wu HF, Chiu FY. Risk factors in cutout of sliding hip screw in intertrochanteric fractures: an evaluation of 937 patients. Int Orthop 2010;34:1273-6. google scholar
24. Yam M, Chawla A, Kwek E. Rewriting the tip apex distance for the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation. Injury 2017;48(8):1843-7. google scholar