BODY AND BREAST: SHAPE, VOLUME AND IDENTITY

Abstract

The female breast is a multifaceted anatomical and symbolic structure that has attracted interest across anthropology, art, and medicine throughout history. The concept of the “ideal breast” remains subjective and shaped by temporal, cultural, and individual factors. In both aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery, it is essential to acknowledge that patients and surgeons may hold differing expectations. Furthermore, the natural asymmetry of the human body challenges the notion of perfect symmetry, shifting the surgical goal towards achieving optimal similarity rather than absolute equality. From a morphological perspective, breast shape is evaluated in relation to the chest wall and spine, with ideal proportions frequently defined as a 45/55 distribution between the upper and lower poles. Nipple-areola complex positioning and size ratios are also critical to aesthetic outcomes. In terms of volume, excessively small and large breasts can disrupt body harmony and impact self-perception and social interaction. Surgical planning should therefore be tailored to align patient expectations with anatomical feasibility. Beyond anatomical considerations, the breast holds profound psychosocial significance, contributing to perceptions of femininity, sexuality, and identity. Mastectomy, particularly when not accompanied by reconstruction, can trigger deep psychological distress. Regardless of age or cultural background, each woman’s relationship with her breasts is deeply personal and must be respected. The surgeon’s role extends beyond technical expertise to include empathy and shared decision-making, ensuring that the patient is fully informed and empowered in choosing the most suitable reconstructive option.

Keywords

• Anatomy
• Breast cancer
• Brest shape
• Breast volume
• Sexual identity

References

1. Brody GS. The perfect breast: is it attainable? Does it exist? : LWW; 2004. p. 1500-03.
2. Hsia HC, Thomson JG. Differences in breast shape preferences between plastic surgeons and patients seeking breast augmentation. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2003;112(1):312-20.
3. Smith Jr DJ, Palin Jr WE, Katch VL, Bennett JE. Breast volume and anthropomorphic measurements: normal values. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 1986;78(3):331-35.
4. Lee HJ, Ock JJ. An ideal female breast shape in balance with the body proportions of Asians. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open 2019;7(9).
5. Liu Y-J, Thomson JG. Ideal anthropomorphic values of the female breast: correlation of pluralistic aesthetic evaluations with objective measurements. Annals of Plastic Surgery 2011;67(1):7-11.
6. Mallucci P, Branford O. Concepts in aesthetic breast dimensions: analysis of the ideal breast. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery 2012;65(1):8-16.
7. Mallucci P, Branford OA. Population analysis of the perfect breast: a morphometric analysis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2014;134(3):436-47.
8. Swanson E. Ideal breast shape: women prefer convexity and upper pole fullness. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2015;135(3):641e-43e.

9. Lewin R, Amoroso M, Plate N, Trogen C, Selvaggi G. The aesthetically ideal position of the nipple–areola complex on the breast. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2016;40(5):724-32.
10. Hauben DJ, Adler N, Silfen R, Regev D. Breast–areola–nipple proportion. Annals of Plastic Surgery 2003;50(5):510-13.
11. Broer PN, Juran S, Walker ME, Ng R, Weichman K, Tanna N, et al. Aesthetic breast shape preferences among plastic surgeons. Annals of Plastic Surgery 2015;74(6):639-44.
12. Tantleff‐Dunn S. Biggest Isn’t Always Best: The Effect of Breast Size on Perceptions of Women. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2002;32(11):2253-65.
13. Furnham A, Dias M, McClelland A. The role of body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, and breast size in judgments of female attractiveness. Sex Roles 1998;39(3):311-26.
14. Webb C, Jacox N, Temple-Oberle C. The making of breasts: Navigating the symbolism of breasts in women facing cancer. Plastic Surgery 2019;27(1):49-53.
15. Chan L. Body image and the breast: the psychological wound. Journal of Wound Care 2010;19(4):133-38.
16. Piot‐Ziegler C, Sassi ML, Raffoul W, Delaloye JF. Mastectomy, body deconstruction, and impact on identity: A qualitative study. British Journal of Health Psychology 2010;15(3):479-510.
17. Alinejad Mofrad S, Fernandez R, Lord H, Alananzeh I. The impact of mastectomy on Iranian women’s sexuality and body image: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Supportive Care in Cancer 2021;29(10):5571-80.