Prognostic Value of the HALP Score in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Treated With First-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy
Abstract
Objective: Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) demonstrates substantial clinical heterogeneity, and outcomes may vary despite similar treatment approaches. The hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet (HALP) score has emerged as a potential prognostic biomarker reflecting nutritional, inflammatory, and immune status. This study evaluated the prognostic significance of HALP in patients with mUC treated with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.
Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients with metastatic or unresectable urothelial carcinoma who received first-line platinum-based chemotherapy at a single center between january 2015 and december 2023. HALP scores were calculated using baseline laboratory parameters obtained before treatment initiation. Patients were stratified according to the median HALP value. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint, and progression-free survival (PFS) was the secondary end point. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan – Meier and Cox regression methods.
Results: A total of 118 patients were included. The median HALP value was 24; 64 patients were classified as low HALP and 54 as high HALP. Patients with low HALP had significantly poorer outcomes. Median PFS was 4.90 months in the low HALP group and 7.67 months in the high HALP group. Median OS was 5.82 and 20.33 months, respectively (p<0.001). In multivariable analysis, low HALP and age ≥ 65 years remained independently associated with worse OS.
Conclusion: Low HALP score was associated with worse survival outcomes in patients with mUC receiving first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. As an easily obtainable laboratory-based index, HALP may provide additional prognostic information beyond conventional clinical factors.
Keywords
- metatatic urothelial carcinoma
- inflammation
- HALP score
- prognosis
- overall survival
- platinum-based chemotherapy
Project Number
References
- von der Maase H, Hansen SW, Roberts JT, Dogliotti L, Oliver T, Moore MJ, et al. Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in advanced or metastatic bladder cancer: Results of a large, randomized, multinational, multicenter, phase III study. J Clin Oncol 2000;18(17):3068-77. google scholar
- von der Maase H, Sengelov L, Roberts JT, Ricci S, Dogliotti L, Oliver T, et al. Long- term survival results of a randomized trial comparing gemcitabine plus cisplatin, with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, plus cisplatin in patients with bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005;23(21):4602-8. google scholar
- Bellmunt J, Choueiri TK, Fougeray R, Schutz FA, Salhi Y, Winquist E, et al. Prognostic factors in patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract experiencing treatment failure with platinum-containing regimens. J Clin Oncol 2010;28(11):1850-5. google scholar
- Sonpavde G, Manitz J, Gao C, Tayama D, Kaiser C, Hennessy D, et al. Five-factor prognostic model for survival of post-platinum patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma receiving PD-L1 inhibitors. J Urol 2020;204(6):1173-9. google scholar
- Lu H, Ouyang W, Huang C. Inflammation, a key event in cancer development. Mol Cancer Res 2006;4(4):221-33. google scholar
- Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sica A, Balkwill F. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature 2008;454(7203):436-44. google scholar
- Rink M, Sharifi N, Fritsche HM, Aziz A, Miller F, Kluth LA, et al. Impact of preoperative anemia on oncologic outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy. J Urol 2014;191(2):316-22. google scholar
- Huang J, Wang Y, Yuan Y, Chen Y, Kong W, Chen H, et al. Preoperative serum pre-albumin as an independent prognostic indicator in patients with localized upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy. Oncotarget 2017;8(22):36772-9. google scholar
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Clinical Oncology
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Fatih Atalah
*
0000-0002-5664-7853
Türkiye
Akgün Karakök
0009-0001-9876-3932
Türkiye
Aydın Acarbay
0000-0002-9446-9293
Türkiye
İsmail Nazlı
0000-0001-7495-3996
Türkiye
Onur Alkan
0000-0002-8558-1654
Türkiye
Okan Aydın
0000-0002-9516-992X
Türkiye
Mehmet Beşiroğlu
0000-0002-1171-8320
Türkiye
Mahmut Gümüş
0000-0003-3550-9993
Türkiye
Publication Date
August 14, 2026
Submission Date
March 21, 2026
Acceptance Date
June 3, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 89 Number: 3