Research Article

Comparative morphological, fruit anatomical and micromorphological studies of two Trinia species

Volume: 50 Number: 1 April 1, 2020
  • Özlem Çetin *
  • Mustafa Çelik
  • Taner Özcan
EN

Comparative morphological, fruit anatomical and micromorphological studies of two Trinia species

Abstract

Background and Aims: The aim of the present study was to review and compare the morphological, micromorphological, and anatomical characteristics between Trinia scabra Boiss. & Noe and T. glauca (L.) Dumort. Methods: The fruit micromorphologies were examined using scanning electron microscopy. For anatomical studies, the Paraffin method was used. Transverse sections were cut using a rotary microtome and then were stained with safranin. Results: Expanded descriptions, phenologies, geographic distributions, and photos of the T. scabra and T. glauca are provided and the differences between the two species are discussed. The morphological, micromorphological, and anatomical characteristics of T. glauca and T. scabra are presented. Fruit anatomy is the best discriminating characteristic between the two species, which is entirely different in each. There is one vallecular vitta and there are two commissural vittae in T. scabra, but one to three vallecular vittae and one to two commissural vittae in T. glauca. The vittae are relatively large in T. scabra but small in T. glauca. There are no sclerenchyma cells toward the end of the ribs in T. scabra although they are found toward the end of the ribs in T. glauca. Also, the presence of T. leiogona C.A.Mey in Turkey has been reported by Grossgeim in Flora Kavkaza and confirmed our study.

Keywords

References

  1. • Aizpuru, I., Aseginolaza, C., Uribe-Echebarría, P. M., Urrutia, P., & Zorrakin, I. (1999). Claves Fl. País Vasco. Servicio Central de Publicaciones del Gobierno Vasco. Vitoria-Gasteiz
  2. • Ajani, Y., Ajani, A., Cordes, J. M., Watson, M. F., & Downie, S. R (2008). Phylogenetic analysis of nrDNA ITS sequences reveals relationships within five groups of Iranian Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae. Taxon, 57, 383–401.
  3. • Boissier, E. (1872). Trinia Hoffm. In E. Boissier (Ed.), Flora orientalis, (Vol. 2, pp. 852–853). Geneva, Switzerland: H. Georg.
  4. • Brummit, R. K., & Powell, C. E. (1992). Authors of plant names. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
  5. • de Candolle, A. P. (1830). Umbelliferae. In A. P. de Candolle (Ed.) Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis (Vol. 4, pp. 55– 250). Paris, France: Treüttel & Würtz.
  6. • Cannon, J. F. M. (1968). Trinia Hoffm. In T. G. Tutin, V. H. Heywood, N. A. Burges, D. M. Moore, D. H. Valentine, S. M. Walters & D. A. Webb (Eds.), Flora Europaea, (Vol 2, pp. 350–351). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  7. • Downie, S. R., Spalik, K., Katz-Downie, D. S., & Reduron, J. P. (2010). Major clades within Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae as inferred by phylogenetic analysis of nrDNA ITS sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 128, 111–136.
  8. • Fedoronchuk, N. M. (1978). The study of fruit anatomy of some species of Trinia, Rumia and Ledebouriella (Apiaceae) for the aims of their systematics. Botanicheskiizhurnal, 63(8), 1102–1120.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Özlem Çetin * This is me
0000-0003-2886-3409
Türkiye

Mustafa Çelik This is me
0000-0002-2708-9944
Türkiye

Publication Date

April 1, 2020

Submission Date

January 28, 2019

Acceptance Date

November 5, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 50 Number: 1

APA
Çetin, Ö., Çelik, M., & Özcan, T. (2020). Comparative morphological, fruit anatomical and micromorphological studies of two Trinia species. İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy, 50(1), 21-27. https://izlik.org/JA53CR45AP
AMA
1.Çetin Ö, Çelik M, Özcan T. Comparative morphological, fruit anatomical and micromorphological studies of two Trinia species. iujp. 2020;50(1):21-27. https://izlik.org/JA53CR45AP
Chicago
Çetin, Özlem, Mustafa Çelik, and Taner Özcan. 2020. “Comparative Morphological, Fruit Anatomical and Micromorphological Studies of Two Trinia Species”. İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy 50 (1): 21-27. https://izlik.org/JA53CR45AP.
EndNote
Çetin Ö, Çelik M, Özcan T (April 1, 2020) Comparative morphological, fruit anatomical and micromorphological studies of two Trinia species. İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy 50 1 21–27.
IEEE
[1]Ö. Çetin, M. Çelik, and T. Özcan, “Comparative morphological, fruit anatomical and micromorphological studies of two Trinia species”, iujp, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 21–27, Apr. 2020, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA53CR45AP
ISNAD
Çetin, Özlem - Çelik, Mustafa - Özcan, Taner. “Comparative Morphological, Fruit Anatomical and Micromorphological Studies of Two Trinia Species”. İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy 50/1 (April 1, 2020): 21-27. https://izlik.org/JA53CR45AP.
JAMA
1.Çetin Ö, Çelik M, Özcan T. Comparative morphological, fruit anatomical and micromorphological studies of two Trinia species. iujp. 2020;50:21–27.
MLA
Çetin, Özlem, et al. “Comparative Morphological, Fruit Anatomical and Micromorphological Studies of Two Trinia Species”. İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy, vol. 50, no. 1, Apr. 2020, pp. 21-27, https://izlik.org/JA53CR45AP.
Vancouver
1.Özlem Çetin, Mustafa Çelik, Taner Özcan. Comparative morphological, fruit anatomical and micromorphological studies of two Trinia species. iujp [Internet]. 2020 Apr. 1;50(1):21-7. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA53CR45AP