Research Article

The Factual and Ontological Roots of Psychological Misconceptions: A Study on University Students in İstanbul

Volume: 45 Number: 2 August 21, 2025
EN TR

The Factual and Ontological Roots of Psychological Misconceptions: A Study on University Students in İstanbul

Abstract

Speculations about psychology are widespread and difficult to reduce. Based on this, several studies have already examined the underlying reasons behind holding misconceptions about psychology. In previous studies, cognitive thinking styles were considered the ontological roots of misconceptions, whereas the media and education were considered the factual roots of misconceptions about psychology. However, as a limitation of past research, a smaller number of studies have investigated the interactions between the factual and ontological roots of misconceptions in holding misbeliefs about psychology. In this pre-registered study (N = 598), we aimed to delve deeper into the associations between analytical thinking tendencies, printed, visual, and social media usage, and education (psychology major [n = 350] vs. other majors [n = 248]). The findings showed that psychology students, compared to students from other majors, had fewer misconceptions. Additionally, higher levels of analytical thinking tendency were correlated with holding fewer misconceptions. Moreover, the results showed that there were no significant interactions between psychology education and analytical thinking tendency. Furthermore, there were negative relationships between misconceptions and the usage of print, social, and visual media. In addition, the significant moderator role of analytical thinking tendency was evident in the link between the usage of printed media and held misconceptions. Overall, the present research might shed light on future work aiming to reduce the spread of misconceptions about psychology by indicating the contributions of both ontological and factual sources of misconceptions in holding less erroneous beliefs about psychological concepts.

Keywords

References

  1. Aarnio, K., & Lindeman, M. (2005). Paranormal beliefs, education, and thinking styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(7), 1227-1236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.04.009 google scholar
  2. Amsel, E. (2011). Hypothetical thinking in adolescence: Its nature, development, and applications. In Adolescence: Vulnerabilities and opportunities (pp. 86–113). Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  3. Bahçekapili, H. G., & Yilmaz, O. (2017). The relation between different types of religiosity and analytic cognitive style. Personality and Individual Differences, 117, 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.013 google scholar
  4. Bailin, S. (2002). Critical thinking and science education. Science and Education, 11(4), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016042608621. google scholar
  5. Benjamin L. T., Cavell T. A., & Shallenberger W. R. (1984). Staying with initial answers on objective tests: Is it a myth? Teaching of Psychology, 11, 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/009862838401100303 google scholar
  6. Bensley, D. A., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2017). Psychological misconceptions: Recent scientific advances and unresolved issues. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(4), 377-382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628315603059 google scholar
  7. Bensley, D. A., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Powell, L. A. (2014). A new measure of psychological misconceptions: Relations with academic background, critical thinking, and acceptance of paranormal and pseudoscientific claims. Learning and Individual Differences, 36, 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.07.009 google scholar
  8. Brown, L. T. (1983). Some more misconceptions about psychology among introductory psychology students. Teaching of Psychology, 10(4), 207-210. doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top1004_4 google scholar

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Social Psychology

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

August 21, 2025

Submission Date

August 31, 2023

Acceptance Date

June 24, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 45 Number: 2

APA
Aktaş, B., Yıldız, Z., & Kumova, F. (2025). The Factual and Ontological Roots of Psychological Misconceptions: A Study on University Students in İstanbul. Studies in Psychology, 45(2), 176-191. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2023-1353103
AMA
1.Aktaş B, Yıldız Z, Kumova F. The Factual and Ontological Roots of Psychological Misconceptions: A Study on University Students in İstanbul. Studies in Psychology. 2025;45(2):176-191. doi:10.26650/SP2023-1353103
Chicago
Aktaş, Büşra, Zeynep Yıldız, and Filiz Kumova. 2025. “The Factual and Ontological Roots of Psychological Misconceptions: A Study on University Students in İstanbul”. Studies in Psychology 45 (2): 176-91. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2023-1353103.
EndNote
Aktaş B, Yıldız Z, Kumova F (August 1, 2025) The Factual and Ontological Roots of Psychological Misconceptions: A Study on University Students in İstanbul. Studies in Psychology 45 2 176–191.
IEEE
[1]B. Aktaş, Z. Yıldız, and F. Kumova, “The Factual and Ontological Roots of Psychological Misconceptions: A Study on University Students in İstanbul”, Studies in Psychology, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 176–191, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.26650/SP2023-1353103.
ISNAD
Aktaş, Büşra - Yıldız, Zeynep - Kumova, Filiz. “The Factual and Ontological Roots of Psychological Misconceptions: A Study on University Students in İstanbul”. Studies in Psychology 45/2 (August 1, 2025): 176-191. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2023-1353103.
JAMA
1.Aktaş B, Yıldız Z, Kumova F. The Factual and Ontological Roots of Psychological Misconceptions: A Study on University Students in İstanbul. Studies in Psychology. 2025;45:176–191.
MLA
Aktaş, Büşra, et al. “The Factual and Ontological Roots of Psychological Misconceptions: A Study on University Students in İstanbul”. Studies in Psychology, vol. 45, no. 2, Aug. 2025, pp. 176-91, doi:10.26650/SP2023-1353103.
Vancouver
1.Büşra Aktaş, Zeynep Yıldız, Filiz Kumova. The Factual and Ontological Roots of Psychological Misconceptions: A Study on University Students in İstanbul. Studies in Psychology. 2025 Aug. 1;45(2):176-91. doi:10.26650/SP2023-1353103