Research Article

Psychometric Properties of Turkish Compass of Shame Scale

Volume: 40 Number: 2 September 30, 2020
  • İrem Akıncı
  • Merve Cesur Atintaş *
TR EN

Psychometric Properties of Turkish Compass of Shame Scale

Abstract

The Compass of Shame Scale (CoSS) was developed to measure the ways individuals deal with shame. The scale consists of 48 items and four factors (withdrawal, attack other, attack-self, avoidance). This study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the Compass of Shame Scale (CoSS) in a Turkish sample. The sample consisted of 496 adults (137 male, 359 female) aged between 18 and 66 years. The data for test-retest analysis were collected from 76 participants two weeks after the first measurement. Participants were asked to complete the Compass of Shame Scale, Trait Shame and Guilt Scale, Trait Anger and Anger Expressions Inventory, Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, and a Demographic Form. In order to test the construct validity of CoSS an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with varimax rotation was conducted and its correlations with theoretically similar constructs were tested. The results of the factor analysis were compatible with the four-factor structure of the original scale. Regarding correlations, withdrawal, attack self, and attack other showed significant correlations with trait shame, anger, anger expressions, difficulties in emotion regulation, and depressive symptoms. Avoidance, however, had small but significant correlations with pride, anger, and internalized anger. These findings support the construct validity of the scale. The Cronbach’s alpha values for the internal consistency reliabilities of the factors were estimated and ranged between .71 and .89. The values calculated for test-retest reliability ranged from .71 to .80. In addition, significant gender differences were found for the withdrawal and attack self factors such that women scored significantly higher than men in these factors. These findings provided strong evidence for the reliability and validity of the Turkish CoSS.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahmed, E., & Braithwaite, V. (2004). “What, me ashamed?”: Shame management and school bullying. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41(3), 269-294. DOI: 10.1177/0022427804266547
  2. Alessandri, S. M., & Lewis, M. (1993). Parental evaluation and its relation to shame and pride in young children. Sex Roles, 29(5-6), 335-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289427
  3. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Carbin, M.G. (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review, 8(1), 77-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(88)90050-5
  4. Beck, A.T., Ward, C.H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4(6), 561-571. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.017101 20031004
  5. Bjureberg, J., Ljótsson, B., Tull, M. T., Hedman, E., Sahlin, H., Lundh, L. G., ... Gratz, K.L. (2016). Development and validation of a brief version of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale: the DERS-16. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 38(2), 284-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-015-9514-x
  6. Black, R. S. A., Curran, D., & Dyer, K. F. W. (2013). The impact of shame on the therapeutic alliance and intimate relationships. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69(6), 646-654. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.21959
  7. Boiger, M., Güngör, D., Karasawa, M., & Mesquita, B. (2014). Defending honour, keeping face: Interpersonal affordances of anger and shame in Turkey and Japan. Cognition & Emotion, 28(7), 1255-1269. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.881324
  8. Brown, J. (2004). Shame and domestic violence: Treatment perspectives for perpetrators from self-psychology and affect theory. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 19(1), 39-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681990410001640826

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

İrem Akıncı This is me
0000-0002-3093-9591
Türkiye

Merve Cesur Atintaş * This is me
0000-0002-0275-0097
Türkiye

Publication Date

September 30, 2020

Submission Date

July 27, 2019

Acceptance Date

February 7, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 40 Number: 2

APA
Akıncı, İ., & Cesur Atintaş, M. (2020). Psychometric Properties of Turkish Compass of Shame Scale. Studies in Psychology, 40(2), 361-383. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2019-0053
AMA
1.Akıncı İ, Cesur Atintaş M. Psychometric Properties of Turkish Compass of Shame Scale. Studies in Psychology. 2020;40(2):361-383. doi:10.26650/SP2019-0053
Chicago
Akıncı, İrem, and Merve Cesur Atintaş. 2020. “Psychometric Properties of Turkish Compass of Shame Scale”. Studies in Psychology 40 (2): 361-83. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2019-0053.
EndNote
Akıncı İ, Cesur Atintaş M (September 1, 2020) Psychometric Properties of Turkish Compass of Shame Scale. Studies in Psychology 40 2 361–383.
IEEE
[1]İ. Akıncı and M. Cesur Atintaş, “Psychometric Properties of Turkish Compass of Shame Scale”, Studies in Psychology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 361–383, Sept. 2020, doi: 10.26650/SP2019-0053.
ISNAD
Akıncı, İrem - Cesur Atintaş, Merve. “Psychometric Properties of Turkish Compass of Shame Scale”. Studies in Psychology 40/2 (September 1, 2020): 361-383. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2019-0053.
JAMA
1.Akıncı İ, Cesur Atintaş M. Psychometric Properties of Turkish Compass of Shame Scale. Studies in Psychology. 2020;40:361–383.
MLA
Akıncı, İrem, and Merve Cesur Atintaş. “Psychometric Properties of Turkish Compass of Shame Scale”. Studies in Psychology, vol. 40, no. 2, Sept. 2020, pp. 361-83, doi:10.26650/SP2019-0053.
Vancouver
1.İrem Akıncı, Merve Cesur Atintaş. Psychometric Properties of Turkish Compass of Shame Scale. Studies in Psychology. 2020 Sep. 1;40(2):361-83. doi:10.26650/SP2019-0053