Does the Associations among Perceived Parental Monitoring, Cyberbullying, and Life Satisfaction of Adolescents Differ in Boys and Girls?

Abstract

The present study mainly aims to examine the relationship between perceived parental monitoring and life satisfaction during early and middle adolescence (aged between 12-18) and the mediating role of exposure to cyberbullying and cybervictimization in this relationship according to gender. Perceived parental monitoring refers to the knowledge of parents about the out-of-school and online activities of adolescents, whereas life satisfaction pertains to the level of satisfaction of students with their self, school, friends, family, and environment. The sample consisted of 1,395 (female: 52.5%; male: 47.5%) secondary school and high school students (M = 14.87, SD = 2.04). The participants completed a package of four self-report questionnaires, namely, a Demographic Information Form, the Parental Monitoring Scale, the Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale, and the Cyberbullying Scale in the classroom setting. As hypothesized, the results demonstrated that adolescents with perceived high levels of parental monitoring reported high levels of life satisfaction and low levels of cyberbullying. The results of structural equation modeling indicated that cybervictimization plays a partially mediating role in the positive relationship between parental monitoring and adolescent life satisfaction for both genders. However, cyberbullying partially mediates the relationship between parental monitoring and adolescent life satisfaction only in male adolescents. However, this mediating effect was not tested for the female participants due to the non-significance of the relationship between cyberbullying and life satisfaction. The relationship in this direction reveals that gender should be considered an important factor. In summary, these findings suggest that perceived parental monitoring plays a protective role in the general well-being of adolescents by reducing risky online behaviors, such as bullying in cyberspace.

Keywords

• Early and middle adolescence
• parental strategies
• parental monitoring
• cyberbullying
• cybervictimization
• well-being

Algılanan Ebeveyn İzlemesi, Siber Zorbalık ve Yaşam Doyumu Arasındaki İlişkiler Ergenin Cinsiyetine Göre Farklılaşıyor mu?

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın temel amacı ilk ve orta ergenlik döneminde algılanan ebeveyn izlemesi ile yaşam doyumu arasındaki ilişkiyi ve bu ilişkide siber zorbalığa maruz kalma ve siber zorbalık uygulamanın aracı rolünü ergenin cinsiyetine göre incelemektir. Algılanan ebeveyn izlemesi, ergenin okul dışı ve çevrimiçi aktiviteleri hakkında anne babasının bilgi sahibi olmasını ifade etmektedir. Yaşam doyumu ise benlik, okul, arkadaş, aile ve yaşanılan çevreden duyulan memnuniyeti kapsamaktadır. Çalışmanın örneklemini toplam 1395 (%52.5 kız ve %47.5 erkek) ortaokul ve lise öğrencisi (Ort.yaş = 14.87, S = 2.04) oluşturmuştur. Ergenlere Ebeveyn İzlemesi Ölçeği, Öğrenciler için Çok Boyutlu Yaşam Doyumu Ölçeği ve Sanal/Siber Zorbalık Ölçeği sınıf ortamında grup halinde uygulanmıştır. Bulgular, beklentiyle uyumlu biçimde, ebeveynlerinden daha fazla izleme algılayan ergenlerin daha yüksek düzeyde yaşam doyumu rapor ettiğini göstermiştir. Benzer şekilde, ebeveyn izlemesini daha yüksek algılayan ergenlerin daha düşük düzeyde siber zorbalık rapor ettikleri gözlenmiştir. Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli analiz sonuçlarına göre siber zorbalığa maruz kalmanın, hem kız hem de erkek ergenler için, ebeveyn izlemesi ile ergenin yaşam doyumu arasındaki pozitif yöndeki ilişkide kısmi aracı rol oynadığı görülmektedir. Öte yandan, sadece erkek ergenlerde ebeveyn izlemesi ile ergenin yaşam doyumu arasındaki ilişkide siber zorbalık uygulama kısmi aracı rol oynamaktadır. Ancak kızlarda siber zorbalık uygulama ile yaşam doyumu arasındaki ilişkinin anlamsız olmasından dolayı aracı etki test edilmemiştir. Elde edilen bu yöndeki ilişkiler, ergenin cinsiyetinin önemli bir faktör olarak ele alınması gerektiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Araştırmadan elde edilen bulgular genel olarak değerlendirildiğinde ise ergenlerde riskli davranışları azaltmada ve onların sağlıklı bireyler olarak yetişmelerinde anne babaların aktif izleme uygulamalarının rolünü vurgulayan görüşleri desteklemektedir.

Keywords

• İlk ve orta ergenlik
• ebeveynlik uygulamaları
• ebeveyn izlemesi
• sanal/siber zorbalık
• bireysel iyilik hali

References

1. Alvarez-Garcı'a, D., Perez, J. C. N., Gonzalez, A. D. ve Perez, C. R. (2015). Risk factors associated with cybervictimization in adolescence. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 15(3), 226-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.03.002 google scholar
2. Arıcak, O. T. (2009). Psychiatric symptomatology as a predictor of cyberbullying among university students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 34, 167-184. google scholar
3. Arsenio, W. F., Adams, E. ve Gold, J. (2009). Social information processing, moral reasoning, and emotion attributions: Relations with adolescents’ reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 80(6), 1739-1755. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01365.x google scholar
4. Baldry, A. C., Sorrentino, A. ve Farrington, D. P. (2019). Cyberbullying and cybervictimization versus parental supervision, monitoring and control of adolescents’ online activities. Children and Youth Services Review, 96, 302-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.11.058 google scholar
5. Barber, B. K. (1996). Parental psychological control: Revisiting a neglected construct. Child development, 67(6), 3296-3319. https://doi.org/.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01915.x google scholar
6. Barber, B. K., Stolz, H. E. ve Olsen, J. A. (2005). Parental support, psychological control, and behavioral control: Assessing relevance across time, culture, and method: IV. Assessing relevance across time: U.S. analyses and results. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 70(4), 26-57. https://doi.Org/10.1111/j.1540-5834.2005.00368.x google scholar
7. Bartolo, M. G., Palermiti, A. L., Servidio, R. ve Musso, P. (2019). Mediating processes in the relations of parental monitoring and school climate with cyberbullying: The role of moral disengagement. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 15(3), 568-594. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop. v15i3.1742 google scholar
8. Bayar, Y. ve Uçanok, Z. (2012). Okul sosyal iklimi ile geleneksel ve sanal zorbalık arasındaki ilişkiler: Genellenmiş akran algısının aracı rolü. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 70, 101- 114. https://doi. org/10.31828/tpd1300443320120000m000077 google scholar

9. Bolger, K. E. ve Patterson, C. J. (2001). Developmental pathways from child maltreatment to peer rejection. Child Development, 72(2), 549-568. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00296 google scholar
10. Boniel-Nissim, M., Tabak, I., Mazur, J., Borraccino, A., Brooks, F., Gommans, R.... ve Finne, E. (2015). Supportive communication with parents moderates the negative effects of electronic media use on life satisfaction during adolescence. International Journal of Public Health, 60(2), 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-014-0636-9 google scholar
11. Bowler, L., Knobel, C. ve Mattern, E. (2015). From cyberbullying to well-being: A narrative-based participatory approach to values-oriented design for social media. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(6), 1274-1293. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23270 google scholar
12. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1999). Environments in developmental perspective: Theoretical and operational models. S. L. Friedman ve T. D. Wachs (Ed.), Measuring environment across the life span: Emerging methods and concepts içinde (s. 3-28). American Psychological Association. https://doi. org/10.1037/10317-001 google scholar
13. Burnukara, P. (2009). İlk ve orta ergenlikte geleneksel ve sanal akran zorbalığına ilişkin betimsel bir inceleme (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara. google scholar
14. Burnukara, P. ve Uçanok, Z. (2012). Okul ortamı ve sanal ortamda meydana gelen akran zorbalığı ne ölçüde örtüşüyor? Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 27(69), 81-100. https://doi.org/10.31828/ tpd1300443320120000m000084 google scholar
15. Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M. ve Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79(5), 1185-1229. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x google scholar
16. Caspi, A. ve Gorsky, P. (2006). Online deception: Prevalence, motivation, and emotion. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(1), 54-59. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9.54 google scholar
17. Chang, F. C., Chiu, C. H., Miao, N. F., Chen, P. H., Lee, C. M., Chiang, J. T. ve Pan, Y. C. (2015). The relationship between parental mediation and Internet addiction among adolescents, and the association with cyberbullying and depression. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 57, 21-28. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.11.013 google scholar
18. Darling, N. ve Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 487-496. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.113.3.487 google scholar
19. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E. ve Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276 google scholar
20. Duy, B. ve Yıldız, M. A. (2020). Investigation of the psychometric properties of the Turkish adaptation of positivity scale for adolescents and young adults. Psikoloji Çalışmaları, 40(1), 1-18. https://doi. org/10.26650/SP2018-0017 google scholar
21. Elsaesser, C., Russell, B., Ohannessian, C. M. ve Patton, D. (2017). Parenting in a digital age: A review of parents’ role in preventing adolescent cyberbullying. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 35, 6272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.06.004 google scholar
22. Erdur-Baker, Ö. ve Kavşut, F. (2007). Akran zorbalığının yeni yüzü: Siber zorbalık. Eurasian Journal ofEducational Research, 27, 31-42. google scholar
23. Espelage, D. L., Bosworth, K. ve Simon, T. R. (2001). Short-term stability and prospective correlates of bullying in middle-school students: An examination of potential demographic, psychosocial, and environmental influences. Violence and Victims, 16(4), 411-426. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.16.4.411 google scholar
24. Finnegan, R. A., Hodges, E. V. E. ve Perry, D. G. (1998). Victimization by peers: Associations with children’s reports of mother-child interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1076-1086. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.1076 google scholar
25. Flaspohler, P. D., Elfstrom, J. L., Vanderzee, K. L., Sink, H. E. ve Birchmeier, Z. (2009). Stand by me: The effects of peer and teacher support in mitigating the impact of bullying on quality of life. Psychology in the Schools, 46(7), 636-649. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20404 google scholar
26. Floros, G. D., Siomos, K. E., Fisoun, V., Dafouli, E. ve Geroukalis, D. (2013). Adolescent online cyberbullying in Greece: The impact of parental online security practices, bonding, and online impulsiveness. Journal of School Health, 83(6), 445-453. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12049 google scholar
27. Galambos, N. L., Barker, E. T. ve Almeida, D. M. (2003). Parents do matter: Trajectories of change in externalizing and internalizing problems in early adolescence. Child development, 74(2), 578-594. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.7402017 google scholar
28. Hau, K. T. ve Marsh, H. W. (2004). The use of item parcels in structural equation modelling: Non-normal data and small sample sizes. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 57(2), 327-351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.2004.tb00142.x google scholar
29. Hawk, S. T., Hale, W. W., Raaijmakers, Q. A. W. ve Meeus, W. (2008). Adolescents’ perceptions of privacy invasion in reaction to parental solicitation and control. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 28(4), 583-608. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431608317611 google scholar
30. Hemphill, S. A. ve Heerde, J. A. (2014). Adolescent predictors of young adult cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among Australian youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55(4), 580-587. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.04.014 google scholar
31. Hilooğlu, S. (2009). İlköğretim ikinci kademe öğrencilerinin zorbaca davranışlarını yordamada sosyal beceri ve yaşam doyumunun rolü (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Çukurova Üniversitesi, Adana. google scholar
32. Hong, J. S. ve Espelage, D. L. (2012). A review of research on bullying and peer victimization in school: An ecological system analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(4), 311-322. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.03.003 google scholar
33. Hong, J. S., Lee, J., Espelage, D. L., Hunter, S. C., Patton, D. U. ve Rivers Jr, T. (2016). Understanding the correlates of face-to-face and cyberbullying victimization among US adolescents: A social-ecological analysis. Violence and Victims, 31(4), 638-663. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-15-00014 google scholar
34. Hoskins, D. H. (2014). Consequences of parenting on adolescent outcomes. Societies, 4(3), 506-531. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc4030506 google scholar
35. Hu, L. ve Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https:// doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 google scholar
36. Huebner, E. S. (1994). Preliminary development and validation of a multidimensional life satisfaction scale for children. Psychological Assessment, 6(2), 149-158. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.2.149 google scholar
37. Huebner, E. S. (2004). Research on assessment of life satisfaction of children and adolescents. Social Indicators Research, 66(1-2), 3-33. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SOCI.0000007497.57754.e3 google scholar
38. Irmak, S. ve Kuruüzüm, A. (2008). Turkish validity examination of The Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale. Social Indicators Research, 92, 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9284-x google scholar
39. Jacobson, K. C. ve Crockett, L. J. (2000). Parental monitoring and adolescent adjustment: An ecological perspective. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 10(1), 65-97. https://doi.org/10.1207/ SJRA1001_4 google scholar
40. Jöreskog, K. G. ve Sörbom, D. (1999). LISREL 8. Chicago: Scientific Software International. google scholar
41. Juvonen, J. ve Gross, E. F. (2008). Extending the school grounds?—Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health, 78(9), 496-505. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00335.x google scholar
42. Kakihara, F., Tilton-Weaver, L., Kerr, M. ve Stattin, H. (2010). The relationship of parental control to youth adjustment: Do youths’ feelings about their parents play a role? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(12), 1442-1456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-009-9479-8 google scholar
43. Karlıer-Soydaş, D. ve Uçanok, Z. (2014). Ergenlerin bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerini kullanım özellikleri sanal ortamda zorbalığa dahil olmayı açıklıyor mu? Çocuk ve Gençlik Ruh Sağlığı Dergisi, 21(1), 17-32. google scholar
44. Kerr, M. ve Stattin, H. (2000). What parents know, how they know it, and several forms of adolescent adjustment: Further support for a interpretation of monitoring. Developmental Psychology, 36(3), 366-380. https://doi.Org/10.1037/0012-1649.36.3.366 google scholar
45. Knoester, C., Haynie, D. L. ve Stephens, C. M. (2006). Parenting practices and adolescents’ friendship networks. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 1247-1260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00326.x google scholar
46. Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N. ve Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618 google scholar
47. Kumpulainen, K., Rasanen, E. ve Puura, K. (2001). Psychiatric disorders and the use of mental health services among children involved in bullying. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 27(2), 102-110. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.3 google scholar
48. Laible, D. J. ve Carlo, G. (2004). The differential relations of maternal and paternal support and control to adolescent social competence, self-worth, and sympathy. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19(6), 759-782. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558403260094 google scholar
49. Laird, R. D., Zeringue, M. M. ve Lambert, E. S. (2018). Negative reactions to monitoring: Do they undermine the ability of monitoring to protect adolescents? Journal of Adolescence, 63, 75-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.12.007 google scholar
50. Larson, R. W., Richards, M. H., Moneta, G., Holmbeck, G. ve Duckett, E. (1996). Changes in adolescents’ daily interactions with their families from ages 10 to 18: Disengagement and transformation. Developmental Psychology, 32(4), 744-754. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.32.4.744 google scholar
51. Lereya, S. T., Samara, M. ve Wolke, D. (2013). Parenting behavior and the risk of becoming a victim and a bully/victim: A meta-analysis study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 37(12), 1091-1108. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.03.001 google scholar
52. Liu, D., Chen, D. ve Brown, B. B. (2020). Do parenting practices and child disclosure predict parental knowledge? A meta-analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(1), 1-16. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10964-019-01154-4 google scholar
53. Livingstone, S. ve Bober, M. (2004). UK children go online: surveying the experiences of young people and their parents [online]. London: LSE Research Online. Erişim: 7 Mayıs 2020, http://eprints.lse. ac.uk/395/ google scholar
54. Livingstone, S. ve Helsper, E. (2007). Taking risks when communicating on the internet: The role of offline social-psychological factors in young people’s vulnerability to online risks. Information, Communication and Society, 10(5), 619-643. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180701657998 google scholar
55. Low, S. ve Espelage, D. (2013). Differentiating cyber bullying perpetration from non-physical bullying: Commonalities across race, individual, and family predictors. Psychology of Violence, 3(1), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030308 google scholar
56. Lyubomirsky, S., King, L. ve Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803-855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803 google scholar
57. Meter, D. J. ve Bauman, S. (2018). Moral disengagement about cyberbullying and parental monitoring: Effects on traditional bullying and victimization via cyberbullying involvement. Journal of Early Adolescence, 38(3), 303-326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431616670752 google scholar
58. Mitchell, K. J., Wolak, J. ve Finkelhor, D. (2008). Are blogs putting youth at risk for online sexual solicitation or harassment? Child Abuse & Neglect, 32(2), 277-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. chiabu.2007.04.015 google scholar
59. Moore, P. M., Huebner, E. S. ve Hills, K. J. (2012). Electronic bullying and victimization and life satisfaction in middle school students. Social Indicators Research, 107(3), 429-447. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11205-011-9856-z google scholar
60. Morrison, G. M., Robertson, L., Laurie, B. ve Kelly, J. (2002). Protective factors related to antisocial behavior trajectories. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 277-290. https://doi.org/10.1002/ jclp.10022 google scholar
61. Myers, D. G. ve Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy? Psychological Science, 6(1), 10-19. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00298.x google scholar
62. Navarro, R., Ruiz-Oliva, R., Larranaga, E. ve Yubero, S. (2015). The impact of cyberbullying and social bullying on optimism, global and school-related happiness and life satisfaction among 10-12-year-old schoolchildren. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 10, 15-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-013-9292-0 google scholar
63. Navarro, R., Serna, C., Martmez, V ve Ruiz-Oliva, R. (2013). The role of Internet use and parental mediation on cyberbullying victimization among Spanish children from rural public schools. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(3), 725-745. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10212-012-0137-2 google scholar
64. Nocentini, A., Fiorentine, G., Di Paola, L. ve Menesini, E. (2018). Parents, family characteristics and bullying behavior: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 41-50. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.07.010 google scholar
65. Noom, M. J., Dekovic, M. ve Meeus, W. H. (1999). Autonomy, attachment and psychosocial adjustment during adolescence: A double-edged sword? Journal of Adolescence, 22(6), 771-783. https://doi. org/10.1006/jado.1999.0269 google scholar
66. Olweus, D. (2013). School bullying: Development and some important challenges. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 751-780. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185516 google scholar
67. Palfrey J. ve Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. Basic Civitas Books: New York. google scholar
68. Patterson, G. R. ve Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1984). The correlation of family management practices and delinquency. Child Development, 55(4) 1299-1307. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129999 google scholar
69. Perren, S., Gutzwiller-Helfenfmger, E., Malti, T. ve Hymel, S. (2012). Moral reasoning and emotion attributions of adolescent bullies, victims, and bully-victims. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30(4), 511-530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02059.x google scholar
70. Pettit, G. S., Laird, R. D., Dodge, K. A., Bates, J. E. ve Criss, M. M. (2001). Antecedents and behaviour-problem outcomes of parental monitoring and psychological control in early adolescence. Child Development, 72(2), 583-598. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00298 google scholar
71. Piko, B. F. ve Hamvai, C. (2010). Parent, school and peer-related correlates of adolescents’ life satisfaction. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(10), 1479-1482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. childyouth.2010.07.007 google scholar
72. Raskauskas, J. ve Stoltz, A. D. (2007). Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 43, 564-575. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.564 google scholar
73. Sasson, H. ve Mesch, G. (2014). Parental mediation, peer norms and risky online behavior among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 32-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.025 google scholar
74. Satorra, A. ve Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. A. von Eye ve C. C. Clogg (Ed.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research içinde (s. 399-419). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. google scholar
75. Sayıl, M., Kındap, Y., Bayar, Y., Bayraktar, F., Kurt, D. Tığrak, A. ve Yaban, H. (2012). Ergenlik döneminde ebeveynlik ve ergenin psikososyal uyumu. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayınları. google scholar
76. Schiffrin, H. H., Liss, M., Miles-McLean, H., Geary, H. A., Erchull, A. J. ve Tashner, T. (2014). Helping or hovering? The effects of helicopter parenting on college students’ well-being. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23(3), 548-557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-013-9716-3 google scholar
77. Shapka, J. D. ve Law, D. M. (2013). Does one size fit all? Ethnic differences in parenting behaviors and motivations for adolescent engagement in cyberbullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(5), 723-738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9928-2 google scholar
78. Smetana, J. G. (1997). Parenting and the development of social knowledge reconceptualized: A social domain analysis. J. E. Grusec ve L. Kuczynski (Ed.), Parenting and children’s internalization of values: A handbook of contemporary theory içinde (s. 162-192). John Wiley & Sons Inc. google scholar
79. Smetana, J. G. (2017). Current research on parenting styles, dimensions, and beliefs. Current Opinion in Psychology, 15, 19-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.02.012 google scholar
80. Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S. ve Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying, its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 376-385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x google scholar
81. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. google scholar
82. S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology içinde (s. 290-312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association. https://doi.org/10.2307/270723 google scholar
83. Spriggs, A. L., Iannotti, R. J., Nansel, T. R. ve Haynie, D. L. (2007). Adolescent bullying involvement and perceived family, peer and school relations: Commonalities and differences across race/ethnicity. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(3), 283-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.04.009 google scholar
84. Stattin, H. ve Kerr, M. (2000). Parental monitoring: A reinterpretation. Child Development, 71(4), 1072-1085. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00210 google scholar
85. Steinberg, L. ve Silk, J. S. (2002). Parenting adolescents. M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Children and parenting içinde (s. 103-133). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. https://doi. org/10.4324/9780429440847 google scholar
86. Suldo, S. M. ve Huebner, E. S. (2004). The role of life satisfaction in the relationship between authoritative parenting dimensions and adolescent problem behavior. Social Indicators Research, 66(1-2), 165195. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SOCI.0000007498.62080.1e google scholar
87. Sun, L., Tang, Y. ve Zuo, W. (2020). Coronavirus pushes education online. Nature Materials, 19(6), 687-687. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-0678-8 google scholar
88. Topçu, Ç. (2008). The relationship of cyberbullying to empathy, gender, traditional bullying, internet use and adult monitoring (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara. google scholar
89. Topçu, Ç., Erdur-Baker, Ö. ve Çapa-Aydın Y. (2008). Examination of cyberbullying experiences among Turkish students from different school types. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(6), 643-648. https:// doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0161 google scholar
90. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu [TÜİK] (2019). Bilgi Toplumu İstatistikleri, 2004-2019. Erişim: 13 Mayıs 2020, TÜİK Ağ Sayfası: http://tuik.gov.tr/UstMenu.do?metod=temelist google scholar
91. Türkileri İnselöz, N. ve Uçanok, Z. (2013). Ergenlerde sanal zorbalik: Nedenler, duygular ve baş etme yollarinin niteliksel analizi. Türk Psikoloji Yazilari, 16(32), 20-44. https://doi.org/ 10.31828/ tpy1301996120130000m000086 google scholar
92. Valois, R. F., Kerr, J. C. ve Huebner, S. E. (2012) Peer victimization and perceived life satisfaction among early adolescents in the United States. American Journal of Health Education, 43(5), 258268. https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2012.10599244 google scholar
93. Wachs, S. (2012). Moral disengagement and emotional and social difficulties in bullying and cyberbullying: Differences by participant role. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 17(3-4), 347-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2012.704318 google scholar
94. White, F. A. (1996). Parent-adolescent communication and adolescent decision-making. Journal of Family Studies, 2(1), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.5172/jfs.2.1.41 google scholar
95. White, F. A. ve Matawie, K. M. (2004). Parental morality and family processes as predictors of adolescent morality. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 13(2), 219-233. https://doi.org/10.1023/ B:JCFS.0000015709.81116.ce google scholar
96. Williams, K. ve Guerra, N. G. (2007). Prevalence and predictors of internet bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.018 google scholar
97. Wolak, J., Mitchell, K. J. ve Finkelhor, D. (2007). Does online harassment constitute bullying? An exploration of online harassment by known peers and online-only contacts. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.019 google scholar
98. Wright, M. F. (2017). Adolescents’ perceptions of popularity-motivated behaviors, characteristics, and relationships in cyberspace and cyber aggression: The role of gender. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 20(6), 355-361. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0693 google scholar
99. Ybarra, M. L. (2004). Linkages between depressive symptomatology and internet harassment among young regular internet users. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(2), 247-257. https://doi. org/10.1089/109493104323024500 google scholar
100. Ybarra, M. L. ve Mitchell, K. J. (2004). Online aggressor/targets, aggressors and targets: A comparison of associated youth characteristics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(7), 1308-1316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00328.x google scholar
101. Ybarra, M. L., Mitchell, K. J., Wolak, J. ve Finkelhor, D. (2006). Examining characteristics and associated distress related to internet harassment: Findings from the second youth Internet safety survey. Pediatrics, 118(4), e1169-e1177. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-0815 google scholar
102. You, S., Furlong, M. J., Felix, E., Sharkey, J. D., Tanigawa, D. ve Green, J. G. (2008). Relations among school connectedness, hope, life satisfaction, and bully victimization. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 446-460. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20308 google scholar