HAS THE RECENT URBANIZATION IN TURKEY CHANGED THE NATURE OF TRADITIONAL PRIMARY GROUP RELATIONSHIP?

Namık Ayvalıoğlu

HAS THE RECENT URBANIZATION IN TURKEY CHANGED THE NATURE OF TRADITIONAL PRIMARY GROUP RELATIONSHIP?

Year 1987, Volume: 15 , 87 - 122, 14.12.2012

Namık Ayvalıoğlu

Keywords

-

Year 1987, Volume: 15 , 87 - 122, 14.12.2012

Namık Ayvalıoğlu

There are 0 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language	Turkish
Journal Section	Makaleler
Authors	Namık Ayvalıoğlu This is me
Publication Date	December 14, 2012
Submission Date	December 14, 2012
Published in Issue	Year 1987 Volume: 15

Cite

APA	Ayvalıoğlu, N. (2012). HAS THE RECENT URBANIZATION IN TURKEY CHANGED THE NATURE OF TRADITIONAL PRIMARY GROUP RELATIONSHIP?. Studies in Psychology, 15, 87-122.
AMA	Ayvalıoğlu N. HAS THE RECENT URBANIZATION IN TURKEY CHANGED THE NATURE OF TRADITIONAL PRIMARY GROUP RELATIONSHIP?. Studies in Psychology. February 2012;15:87-122.
Chicago	Ayvalıoğlu, Namık. “HAS THE RECENT URBANIZATION IN TURKEY CHANGED THE NATURE OF TRADITIONAL PRIMARY GROUP RELATIONSHIP?”. Studies in Psychology 15, February (February 2012): 87-122.
EndNote	Ayvalıoğlu N (February 1, 2012) HAS THE RECENT URBANIZATION IN TURKEY CHANGED THE NATURE OF TRADITIONAL PRIMARY GROUP RELATIONSHIP?. Studies in Psychology 15 87–122.
IEEE	N. Ayvalıoğlu, “HAS THE RECENT URBANIZATION IN TURKEY CHANGED THE NATURE OF TRADITIONAL PRIMARY GROUP RELATIONSHIP?”, Studies in Psychology, vol. 15, pp. 87–122, 2012.
ISNAD	Ayvalıoğlu, Namık. “HAS THE RECENT URBANIZATION IN TURKEY CHANGED THE NATURE OF TRADITIONAL PRIMARY GROUP RELATIONSHIP?”. Studies in Psychology 15 (February 2012), 87-122.
JAMA	Ayvalıoğlu N. HAS THE RECENT URBANIZATION IN TURKEY CHANGED THE NATURE OF TRADITIONAL PRIMARY GROUP RELATIONSHIP?. Studies in Psychology. 2012;15:87–122.
MLA	Ayvalıoğlu, Namık. “HAS THE RECENT URBANIZATION IN TURKEY CHANGED THE NATURE OF TRADITIONAL PRIMARY GROUP RELATIONSHIP?”. Studies in Psychology, vol. 15, 2012, pp. 87-122.
Vancouver	Ayvalıoğlu N. HAS THE RECENT URBANIZATION IN TURKEY CHANGED THE NATURE OF TRADITIONAL PRIMARY GROUP RELATIONSHIP?. Studies in Psychology. 2012;15:87-122.