ULUSLARARASI SERMAYE HAREKETLİLİĞİ ALTINDA POLİTİKA KARIŞIMLARI VE PARTİZAN IRAKSAMALAR

Abstract

ÖZET

Bretton Woods sisteminin çöküşü ile birlikte sermaye hareketlerinin serbestleşmesi

uluslararası ekonomik sistem açısından yeni bir dönemin başlamasına sebep

olmuştur. Bu çerçevede, uluslararası sermaye hareketliliğinin iktisat politikalarının

belirlenmesinde oynadığı rol de giderek önem kazanmıştır. Finansal piyasalarda

görülen liberalleşmenin ülkeler arası farklılıkları ortadan kaldırarak iktisat politikalarında

yakınsamaya yol açması ve iç politika otonomisini sınırlaması beklenen

bir durumdur. Ancak dış politika yakınsaması üzerine yapılan teorik ve ampirik çalışmalar,

dış politika ıraksaması ya da iç politika otonomisini destekler nitelikteki

bulguların daha güçlü olduğuna işaret etmektedir. Bu çalışmada, uluslararası sermaye

hareketliliği altında politika karışımlarının nasıl belirlendiği üzerinde durularak

hükümetlerin para ve maliye politikası tercihlerinin, politika ıraksamalarına

yol açabildiği hususu, David H. Bearce'ın teorik yaklaşımı çerçevesinde açıklanmaya

çalışılmaktadır. Bu bağlamda, politika ıraksamalarında partizan-ideolojik faktörlerin

rolü üzerinde durularak konuya ilişkin teorik bir inceleme yapılması amaçlanmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Uluslararası sermaye hareketliliği, politika karışımları,

hükümet partizanlığı, politika ıraksaması.

POLICY MIXES AND PARTISAN DIVERGENCES UNDER

INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL MOBILITY

ABSTRACT

The collapse of the Bretton Woods system and liberalization of capital movements

have led to begin a new era for international economic system. In this respect,

the role of international capital mobility on the determination of economic

policies has increasingly gained importance. It is expected that liberalization in financial

markets leads to convergence in economic policies by removing intercountry

differences and limits domestic policy autonomy. However, the theoretical

and empirical studies on external policy convergence indicate that the evidence on

external policy divergence or domestic policy autonomy is much stronger. In this

study, we concentrate on how the policy mixes are determined under international

capital mobility and try to explain within David H. Bearce's theoretical approach

how the monetary and fiscal policy choices of governments result in policy divergences.

In this context, we aim to make a theoretical review by clarifying the role of

partisan-ideological factors on policy divergences.

Keywords: International capital mobility, policy mixes, government partisanship,

policy divergence.

Keywords

• Uluslararası sermaye hareketliliği, politika karışımları, hükümet partizanlığı, politika ıraksaması

References

1. Bearce, David H . (2002), "Monetary Divergence: Domestic Political Institutions and the Policy Autonomy-Exchange Rate Stability Trade-off, Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 194ı 220.
2. Bearce, David H. (2007), Monetary Divergence: Domestic Policy Autonomy in the Post-Bretton Woods Era, The University of Michigan Press.
3. Broz, J. Lawrence and Jeffry A. Frieden (2001), "The Political Economy O f International Monetary Relations", Annual Review of Political Science, No. 4, pp. 317-343.
4. Cusack, Thomas R. (1997), "Partisan Politics and Public Finance: Changes in Public Spending i n the Industrialized Democracies, 1955-1989", Public 3, pp. 792-827. Choice, Vol. 91, Issue 3-4, pp. 375-95.
5. Drezner, Daniel W. (2001), "Globalization and Policy Convergence", International Studies Review, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 53-78.
6. Fleming, Marcus (1962), "Domestic Financial Policies under Fixed and under Floating Exchange Rates", IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 369-80.
7. Frieden, Jeffry A. (1991), "Invested Interests: The Politics of National Economic Policies i n a World of Global Finance", International Organization, Economy", American Journal of Political Science, Vol. Volume 45, Issue 4, pp. 425-51. 43, No. 4, pp. 1003-1027.
8. Garrett, Geoffrey (1995), "Capital Mobility, Trade, and the Domestic Politics of Economic Policy", International Organization, Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 657ı 87.

9. Garrett, Geoffrey (1998), "Global Markets and National Politics: Collision Course or Virtuous Circle?", International Organization, 52: 4, pp. 787ı 824.
10. Garrett, Geoffrey (2000), "Capital mobility, Exchange rates and fiscal policy i n the global economy", Review of International Political Economy, 7:1, pp. 153-170.
11. Garrett, Geoffrey and Peter Lange (1991), "Political Responses to Interdependence: What's "Left" for the Left?", International Organization, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 539-564.
12. Gowa, Joanne (1988), "Public Goods and Political Institutions: Trade and Monetary Policy Processes in the United States", International Organization, Volume 42, No. 1, pp. 15-32.
13. Hallerberg, Mark (2002), "Veto Players and the Choice of Monetary Institutions", International Organization, 56: 4, pp. 775-802.
14. Hibbs, Jr., Douglas A. (1977), "Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy", The American Political Science Review, Vol. 71, No.4, pp. 1467-1487.
15. Iversen, Torben and David Soskice (1999), "Monetary Integration, Partisanship, and
16. Lange, Peter and Geoffrey Garrett (1985), "The Politics of Growth: Strategic Interaction and Economic Performance i n the Advanced Industrial Democracies, 1974-1980", The Journal of Politics, Volume 47, Issue
17. Moses, Jonathon W. (1994), "Abdication from National Policy Autonomy: What's Left to Leave", Politics and Society, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp. 125-48.
18. Mundell, Robert A. (1963), "Capital Mobility and Stabilization Policy under Fixed and Flexible Exchange Rates", Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 475-85.
19. Oatley, Thomas (1999), "How Constraining is Capital Mobility? The Partisan Hypothesis i n an Open
20. Reinhart, Carmen M . , and Kenneth S. Rogoff (2004), "The Modern History of Exchange Rate Arrangements: A Reinterpretation", Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 119 (1), pp. 1—48.
21. Rose, Andrew K. (1994), "Exchange Rate Volatility, Monetary Policy, and Capital Mobility: Empirical Evidence on the Holy Trinity", NBER Working Paper Series, No: 4630.
22. Tinbergen, Jan (1952), On the Theory of Economic Policy, North-Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam.
23. Webb, Michael C. (1991), "International Economic Structures, Government Interests, and International Coordination of Macroeconomic Adjustment Policies", International Organization, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 309-342.