BibTex RIS Cite

ATTITUDES TO AUDIT RISK MODEL AND MATERIALITY: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY

Year 2010, Issue: 1, 130 - 136, 20.01.2012

Abstract

ÖZET
Denetim sürecinin toplanan kanıttan önemli derecede etkilenmektedir,bir baska deyisle yeterli ve uygun denetim kanıtının toplanması uygun bir denetim görüsü verilmesinde en önemli unsurdur. Bir denetim sözlesmesinde
toplanacak kanıtın miktarı bulgu riskine bağlıdır. Bu nedenle,
denetim risk modelinin kullanılması ve planlama asamasında önemliliğin belirlenmesi denetimin etkin ve verimli sekilde yürütülmesinde önemli rol oynamaktadır.
Bu çalısmanın amacı Türkiye'de bağımsız denetçilerin denetim risk modeli ve önemlilik hakkındaki tutumlarını incelemektir. Bu amaçla Türkiye'deki deneyimli denetçiler üzerinde bir anket çalısması yapılmıstır. Bu çalısma denetim risk modelinin Türkiye'de çok fazla bilinmediğini ve uygulanmadığını, ancak denetçilerin risk odaklı yaklasım uygulamaya istekli olduklarını ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar kelimeler: Denetim, denetim risk modeli, önemlilik, Türk denetçiler

References

  • Arens, Alvin A., Loebbecke, James K., (1997). Auditing, (7th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Chang, She-I, Tsai, C.F., Shih, D.H., Hwang, C.L, (2008). The development of audit detection risk assessment system: Using the fuzzy theory and audit risk model. Expert Systems with Applica- tions,35, 1053-1067.
  • Chewning, E.G. & Higgs, J.L., (2000). A meta-analysis of materiality studies. Advances in Accounting, 17, 65-90.
  • DeZoort, T., Harrison, P., Taylor, M., (2006). Accountabil- ity and auditors’materiality judgements: The effects of differential pressure strength on conservatism, variability, and effort. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31, 373-390.
  • Eilifsen, A., Messier, W.F., Glover, S.M., Prawitt, D.F., (2006) Auditing&Assurance Services: International Edition, Finland: McGraw Hill.
  • Hayes, R., Dassen, R., Schilder, A., Wallage, P., (2005) Principles of Auditing: An Introduction to International Standards on Auditing, (2nd ed.). England: Prentice-Hall.
  • Porter, B., Simon, J., Hatherly, D., (2008) Principles of Ex- ternal Auditing, (3rd ed.). England: John Wiley&Sons.
  • Ritchie, B. & Khorwatt, E., (2007). The attitude of Libyan auditors to inherent control risk assessment. The British Accounting Review, 39, 39-59.
  • Soltani, B., (2007). Auditing: An International Approach, England: Prentice-Hall.
  • Thomas, C.William; Henke, Emerson O., (1986). Auditing: Theory and Practice, (2nd ed.). Kent Publishing.
Year 2010, Issue: 1, 130 - 136, 20.01.2012

Abstract

References

  • Arens, Alvin A., Loebbecke, James K., (1997). Auditing, (7th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Chang, She-I, Tsai, C.F., Shih, D.H., Hwang, C.L, (2008). The development of audit detection risk assessment system: Using the fuzzy theory and audit risk model. Expert Systems with Applica- tions,35, 1053-1067.
  • Chewning, E.G. & Higgs, J.L., (2000). A meta-analysis of materiality studies. Advances in Accounting, 17, 65-90.
  • DeZoort, T., Harrison, P., Taylor, M., (2006). Accountabil- ity and auditors’materiality judgements: The effects of differential pressure strength on conservatism, variability, and effort. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31, 373-390.
  • Eilifsen, A., Messier, W.F., Glover, S.M., Prawitt, D.F., (2006) Auditing&Assurance Services: International Edition, Finland: McGraw Hill.
  • Hayes, R., Dassen, R., Schilder, A., Wallage, P., (2005) Principles of Auditing: An Introduction to International Standards on Auditing, (2nd ed.). England: Prentice-Hall.
  • Porter, B., Simon, J., Hatherly, D., (2008) Principles of Ex- ternal Auditing, (3rd ed.). England: John Wiley&Sons.
  • Ritchie, B. & Khorwatt, E., (2007). The attitude of Libyan auditors to inherent control risk assessment. The British Accounting Review, 39, 39-59.
  • Soltani, B., (2007). Auditing: An International Approach, England: Prentice-Hall.
  • Thomas, C.William; Henke, Emerson O., (1986). Auditing: Theory and Practice, (2nd ed.). Kent Publishing.
There are 10 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Abdurrahman Altıntaş

Publication Date January 20, 2012
Published in Issue Year 2010 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Altıntaş, A. (2012). ATTITUDES TO AUDIT RISK MODEL AND MATERIALITY: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi(1), 130-136.
AMA Altıntaş A. ATTITUDES TO AUDIT RISK MODEL AND MATERIALITY: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. January 2012;(1):130-136.
Chicago Altıntaş, Abdurrahman. “ATTITUDES TO AUDIT RISK MODEL AND MATERIALITY: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY”. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, no. 1 (January 2012): 130-36.
EndNote Altıntaş A (January 1, 2012) ATTITUDES TO AUDIT RISK MODEL AND MATERIALITY: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 1 130–136.
IEEE A. Altıntaş, “ATTITUDES TO AUDIT RISK MODEL AND MATERIALITY: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY”, Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, no. 1, pp. 130–136, January 2012.
ISNAD Altıntaş, Abdurrahman. “ATTITUDES TO AUDIT RISK MODEL AND MATERIALITY: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY”. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 1 (January 2012), 130-136.
JAMA Altıntaş A. ATTITUDES TO AUDIT RISK MODEL AND MATERIALITY: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2012;:130–136.
MLA Altıntaş, Abdurrahman. “ATTITUDES TO AUDIT RISK MODEL AND MATERIALITY: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY”. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, no. 1, 2012, pp. 130-6.
Vancouver Altıntaş A. ATTITUDES TO AUDIT RISK MODEL AND MATERIALITY: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2012(1):130-6.