Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

İşyeri Dedikodusunun Çok Boyutluluğu (Çalışanların Dedikodu Algıları Üzerine Bir Araştırma)

Year 2015, Issue: 68, 89 - 103, 22.12.2017

Abstract

Bu makalenin amacı,
çalışanlar arasında dedikodu algısının boyutlarına ilişkin İstanbul’da
gerçekleştirilen bir araştırmanın sonuçlarını ortaya koymaktır.
Özetle, bulgular, çalışanların dedikoduyu
dört farklı boyutta algıladıklarını göstermiştir: (1) ahlakilik, (2)
arkadaşlık, (3) bilgi edinme, (4) husumet. İkinci olarak, işyerinde dedikodu
davranışından kaçınmanın en önemli belirleyicisinin ahlaki tutum faktörü olduğu
tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, sonuçlar, kadın deneklerin erkeklere göre dedikodu
davranışına daha meyilli olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Nihayet, ahlaki tutum puanı
ile eğitim düzeyi arasında güçlü bir ilişki olduğu saptanmıştır

References

  • Baker, Jane S., and Jones, Merrill A., “The Poison Grapevine: How Destructive Are Gossip and Rumor in The Workplace?”, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 7 (1), 1996: 75-86. Berkos, Kristen Marie, The Effects of Message Direction and Sex Differences on the Interpretation of Workplace Gossip, Ph. D Theses, Louisiana State University, Louisiana, 2003. Cowan, Alexander, “Gossip and Street Culture in Early Modern Venice”, Journal of Early Modern History, 12 (3-4), 2008: 313-333. Dunbar, Robin, “Gossip in Evolutionary Perspective. Review of General Psychology”, 8 (2), 2004: 100-110. Eder, Donna and Enke, Janet Lynne, “The Structure of Gossip: Opportunities and Constraints on Collective Expression among Adolescents”, American Sociological Review, 56 (4), 1991: 494-508. Ellwardt, Lea and Steglich, Christian and Wittek, Rafael, “The Co-evolution of Gossip and Friendship at Work: Studying the Dynamics of Multiplex Social Networks”, Social Networks, 34 (4), 2012: 623-633. Ellwardt, Lea, Gossip in Organizations: A Social Network Study, Ph.D Theses, University of Groningen, Nederland, 2011. Farley, Sally D. and Timme, Diane R. and Hart, Jason W., “On Coffee Talk and Break-Room Chatter: Perceptions of Women Who Gossip in the Workplace”, The Journal of Social Psychology, 150 (4), 2010: 361-368. Feinberg, Matthew and Willer, Robb and Stellar, Jennifer and Keltner, Dacher, “The Virtues of Gossip: Reputational Information Sharing as Prosocial Behavior”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102 (5), 2012: 1015-1030. Foster, Eric K., “Research on Gossip: Taxonomy, Methods, and Future Directions”, Review of General Psychology Copyright 2004 by the Educational Publishing Foundation, 8 (2), 2004: 78–99. Grosser, Travis and Kidwell, Virginie Lopez, and Labianca, Giuseppe Joe, “A Social Network Analysis of Positive and Negative Gossip in Organizational Life”, Group and Organization Management, 35 (2), 2010: 177-212. Hess, Nicole H. and Hagen, Edward H., Informational Warfare: Coalitional Gossiping as a Strategy for Within-Group Aggression, Study Paper (No: 113), Washington State University, Vancouver, 2009. Kartch, Falon, An Ethnographic Examination of Gossip in a Small Organization: Coalitions and Conflict Escalation, Master Degree Theses, Northern Illinois University, Illinois, 2009. Kurland, Nancy B. and Pelled, Lisa Hope, “Passing the Word: Toward a Model of Gossip and Power in the Workplace”, Academy of Management Review, 25 (2), 2000: 428-438. Litman, Jordan A. and Pezzo, Mark V., “Dimensionality of Interpersonal Curiosity”, Personality and Individual Differences, 43 (6), 2007: 1448-1459. Litman, Jordan A. and Pezzo, Mark V., “Individual Differences in Attitudes towards Gossip”, Personality and Individual Differences, 38 (4), 2005: 963–980. Mills, Colleen, “Experiencing Gossip: The Foundations for a Theory of Embedded Organizational Gossip”, Group & Organization Management, 35 (2), 2010: 213–240. Nicholson, Nigel, “The New Word on Gossip”, Psychology Today, 34, 2001: 41-45. Rosenthal, Marilynn, “Where Rumor Raged”, Transaction, 8 (4), 1971: 34–43. Sharpsteen, Donald J., A Motivational-Emotional Model of Gossip, Ph.D Theses, University of Denver, Colorado, 1988. Taylor, Elycia M., Gossip as an Interpersonal Communication Phenomenon, Master Degree Theses, West Virginia University, Virginia, 2009. Vajda, Peter, “Why People Gossip in the Workplace”, Helium Where Knowledge Rules, www.helium.com, December 11, 2007. Waddington, Kathryn and Michelson, Grant, “Analysing Gossip to Reveal and Understand Power Relationships, Political Action and Reaction to Change Inside Organizations”, Electronic Journal of Radical Organisation Theory, www.mngt.waikato.ac.nz/ejrot, 2007. Wert, Sarah R. and Salovey, Peter, “A Social Comparison Account of Gossip”, Review of General Psychology, 8 (2), 2004: 122–137. Young, Randall Curtis, There is Nothing Idle about It: Deference and Dominance in Gossip as a Function of Role, Personality, and Social Context, Ph. D Theses, University of California, Berkeley, 2001.
Year 2015, Issue: 68, 89 - 103, 22.12.2017

Abstract

References

  • Baker, Jane S., and Jones, Merrill A., “The Poison Grapevine: How Destructive Are Gossip and Rumor in The Workplace?”, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 7 (1), 1996: 75-86. Berkos, Kristen Marie, The Effects of Message Direction and Sex Differences on the Interpretation of Workplace Gossip, Ph. D Theses, Louisiana State University, Louisiana, 2003. Cowan, Alexander, “Gossip and Street Culture in Early Modern Venice”, Journal of Early Modern History, 12 (3-4), 2008: 313-333. Dunbar, Robin, “Gossip in Evolutionary Perspective. Review of General Psychology”, 8 (2), 2004: 100-110. Eder, Donna and Enke, Janet Lynne, “The Structure of Gossip: Opportunities and Constraints on Collective Expression among Adolescents”, American Sociological Review, 56 (4), 1991: 494-508. Ellwardt, Lea and Steglich, Christian and Wittek, Rafael, “The Co-evolution of Gossip and Friendship at Work: Studying the Dynamics of Multiplex Social Networks”, Social Networks, 34 (4), 2012: 623-633. Ellwardt, Lea, Gossip in Organizations: A Social Network Study, Ph.D Theses, University of Groningen, Nederland, 2011. Farley, Sally D. and Timme, Diane R. and Hart, Jason W., “On Coffee Talk and Break-Room Chatter: Perceptions of Women Who Gossip in the Workplace”, The Journal of Social Psychology, 150 (4), 2010: 361-368. Feinberg, Matthew and Willer, Robb and Stellar, Jennifer and Keltner, Dacher, “The Virtues of Gossip: Reputational Information Sharing as Prosocial Behavior”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102 (5), 2012: 1015-1030. Foster, Eric K., “Research on Gossip: Taxonomy, Methods, and Future Directions”, Review of General Psychology Copyright 2004 by the Educational Publishing Foundation, 8 (2), 2004: 78–99. Grosser, Travis and Kidwell, Virginie Lopez, and Labianca, Giuseppe Joe, “A Social Network Analysis of Positive and Negative Gossip in Organizational Life”, Group and Organization Management, 35 (2), 2010: 177-212. Hess, Nicole H. and Hagen, Edward H., Informational Warfare: Coalitional Gossiping as a Strategy for Within-Group Aggression, Study Paper (No: 113), Washington State University, Vancouver, 2009. Kartch, Falon, An Ethnographic Examination of Gossip in a Small Organization: Coalitions and Conflict Escalation, Master Degree Theses, Northern Illinois University, Illinois, 2009. Kurland, Nancy B. and Pelled, Lisa Hope, “Passing the Word: Toward a Model of Gossip and Power in the Workplace”, Academy of Management Review, 25 (2), 2000: 428-438. Litman, Jordan A. and Pezzo, Mark V., “Dimensionality of Interpersonal Curiosity”, Personality and Individual Differences, 43 (6), 2007: 1448-1459. Litman, Jordan A. and Pezzo, Mark V., “Individual Differences in Attitudes towards Gossip”, Personality and Individual Differences, 38 (4), 2005: 963–980. Mills, Colleen, “Experiencing Gossip: The Foundations for a Theory of Embedded Organizational Gossip”, Group & Organization Management, 35 (2), 2010: 213–240. Nicholson, Nigel, “The New Word on Gossip”, Psychology Today, 34, 2001: 41-45. Rosenthal, Marilynn, “Where Rumor Raged”, Transaction, 8 (4), 1971: 34–43. Sharpsteen, Donald J., A Motivational-Emotional Model of Gossip, Ph.D Theses, University of Denver, Colorado, 1988. Taylor, Elycia M., Gossip as an Interpersonal Communication Phenomenon, Master Degree Theses, West Virginia University, Virginia, 2009. Vajda, Peter, “Why People Gossip in the Workplace”, Helium Where Knowledge Rules, www.helium.com, December 11, 2007. Waddington, Kathryn and Michelson, Grant, “Analysing Gossip to Reveal and Understand Power Relationships, Political Action and Reaction to Change Inside Organizations”, Electronic Journal of Radical Organisation Theory, www.mngt.waikato.ac.nz/ejrot, 2007. Wert, Sarah R. and Salovey, Peter, “A Social Comparison Account of Gossip”, Review of General Psychology, 8 (2), 2004: 122–137. Young, Randall Curtis, There is Nothing Idle about It: Deference and Dominance in Gossip as a Function of Role, Personality, and Social Context, Ph. D Theses, University of California, Berkeley, 2001.
There are 1 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Tekin Akgeyik This is me

Publication Date December 22, 2017
Submission Date January 30, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2015 Issue: 68

Cite

APA Akgeyik, T. (2017). İşyeri Dedikodusunun Çok Boyutluluğu (Çalışanların Dedikodu Algıları Üzerine Bir Araştırma). Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi(68), 89-103.
AMA Akgeyik T. İşyeri Dedikodusunun Çok Boyutluluğu (Çalışanların Dedikodu Algıları Üzerine Bir Araştırma). Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi. December 2017;(68):89-103.
Chicago Akgeyik, Tekin. “İşyeri Dedikodusunun Çok Boyutluluğu (Çalışanların Dedikodu Algıları Üzerine Bir Araştırma)”. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, no. 68 (December 2017): 89-103.
EndNote Akgeyik T (December 1, 2017) İşyeri Dedikodusunun Çok Boyutluluğu (Çalışanların Dedikodu Algıları Üzerine Bir Araştırma). Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi 68 89–103.
IEEE T. Akgeyik, “İşyeri Dedikodusunun Çok Boyutluluğu (Çalışanların Dedikodu Algıları Üzerine Bir Araştırma)”, Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, no. 68, pp. 89–103, December 2017.
ISNAD Akgeyik, Tekin. “İşyeri Dedikodusunun Çok Boyutluluğu (Çalışanların Dedikodu Algıları Üzerine Bir Araştırma)”. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi 68 (December 2017), 89-103.
JAMA Akgeyik T. İşyeri Dedikodusunun Çok Boyutluluğu (Çalışanların Dedikodu Algıları Üzerine Bir Araştırma). Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi. 2017;:89–103.
MLA Akgeyik, Tekin. “İşyeri Dedikodusunun Çok Boyutluluğu (Çalışanların Dedikodu Algıları Üzerine Bir Araştırma)”. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, no. 68, 2017, pp. 89-103.
Vancouver Akgeyik T. İşyeri Dedikodusunun Çok Boyutluluğu (Çalışanların Dedikodu Algıları Üzerine Bir Araştırma). Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi. 2017(68):89-103.