Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Oligarchy as a Trade Union Default Setting: A Structural Re-examination of Union Democracy in Turkey

Year 2016, Issue: 71, 99 - 126, 28.12.2017

Abstract

From the earliest days of the labor movement, rank-and-file
members’ supposed democratic control over their trade unions has been a
constant problem due to certain sociological factors that reinforce oligarchy
in organizations, and the five-decade Turkish experience of free unionism has
proven to be no exception to this general tendency. This article first of all
discusses the basics of union democracy as a concept and clarifies the
fundamental difficulties for its consolidation. Secondly, it examines the
post-1982 Turkish context of unionism structurally and procedurally on the
issues of centralism, union organs, delegation and workplace representation,
and asserts that the union organizational structure in Turkey further
reinforces oligarchical rule, preventing the emergence of opposition and
leadership contention within large unions. It also discusses the current
structural provisions that support or hinder union democracy in a direct manner
under the Trade Unions and Collective Labor Agreements Act No. 6356 regime in
comparison to the former union laws. 

References

  • Cook, A. H. (1963). Union Democracy: Practice and Ideal. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Çelik, N., Canikoğlu, N., Canbolat, T. (2015). İş Hukuku Dersleri. 28. Bası. Beta Yayınları, İstanbul. Dahl, R. A. (1956). A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Demirdizen, D., Lordoğlu, K. (2013). Türkiye'de Sendika İçi Demokrasi ya da Bir İmkansızın Arayışı Mı? Sosyal Haklar Uluslararası Sempozyumu, pp. 223–241. Dereli, B. (1977). Teori ve Uygulama Yöniyle Türkiye’de Sendika-İçi Demokrasi Sorunu. Ph.D. Dissertation. Istanbul University. Dereli, T. (1998). Sendika İçi Demokrasi. Türkiye Sendikacılık Ansiklopedisi (Cilt 3). Kültür Bakanlığı ve Tarih Vakfı, İstanbul, pp. 23–26. Dereli, T. (2014). 6356 Sayılı Yeni Sendikalar ve Toplu İş Sözleşmesi Kanunu: Süreçler, Sorunlar ve Öneriler. Çimento İşverenleri Dergisi, 28/1, pp. 10–33. Deren-Yıldırım, N. (2001). Sendika-içi Demokrasi. Prof. Dr. Nuri Çelik'e Armağan. Beta Yayınları, İstanbul. Cilt II, pp. 1698–1726. Eaton, J. (2006). Union Democracy and Union Renewal: The CAW Public Review Board. Relations Industrielles, 61, 2, pp. 201–220. Edelstein, D. J., Warner, M. (1979). Comparative Union Democracy: Organization and Opposition in British and American Unions. New Jersey: Transaction Books. Esener, T., Gümrükçüoğlu, Y. B. (2014). Sendika Hukuku. Vedat Kitapçılık, İstanbul. Hurd, R. W. (2000). Professional Employees and Union Democracy: From Control to Chaos. Journal of Labor Research, 21, 1, pp. 103–115. Levi, M., Olson, D., Agnone, J., Kelly, D. (2009). Union Democracy Reexamined. Politics and Society, 37, 2, pp. 203–228. Lipset, S. M., Trow, M. A., Coleman, J. S. (1977). Union Democracy: The Internal Politics of the International Typographical Union. Garden City, NY: Free Press. Michels, R. (1915). Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York, NY: Hearst’s International Library Co. Sipahi, I. (2017). Scrutinizing Union Democracy: Organization and Opposition in Turkish Unions of the Post-1982 Context. Ph.D. Dissertation, 2nd Ed. Istanbul Bilgi University, Ana Basın Yayın. Slichter, S. (1947). The Government of Trade Unions. Challenge of Industrial Relations. Ithaca: N.Y.: Cornell University Press, pp. 100–101. Stepan-Norris, J. (1997). The Making of Union Democracy. Social Forces, University of North Carolina Press, 76, 2, pp. 475–510. Stepan-Norris, J., Zeitlin, M. (1995). Union Democracy, Radical Leadership and the Hegemony of Capital. American Sociological Review, 60, pp. 829–850. Strauss, G. (1991). Union Democracy. The State of the Unions. Madison Wise, Industrial Relations Research Association. Strauss, G. (2000). What’s Happening Inside U.S. Unions: Democracy and Union Politics. Journal of Labor Research, 21, 2, pp. 211–225. Summers, C. W. (2000). From Industrial Democracy to Union Democracy. Journal of Labor Research, 21, 1, pp. 3–14. Şahlanan, F. (1980). Sendikaların İşleyişinin Demokratik İlkelere Uygunluğu. Ph.D. Dissertation. Istanbul University. Şahlanan, F. (1995). Sendikalar Hukuku. İstanbul: Yılmaz Matbaacılık. Şahlanan, F. (2013). 6356 Sayılı Sendikalar ve Toplu İş Sözleşmesi Kanunun Sendikalara İlişkin Hükümlerin Değerlendirilmesi. Çalışma ve Toplum Dergisi, 2013/4, pp. 110–142. Tuncay, C., Kutsal, B. S. (2015). Toplu İş Hukuku. Beta Yayınları, İstanbul. Weber, M. (1946). Essays in Sociology (eds. Gerth H.H. and Mills C.W.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Year 2016, Issue: 71, 99 - 126, 28.12.2017

Abstract

References

  • Cook, A. H. (1963). Union Democracy: Practice and Ideal. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Çelik, N., Canikoğlu, N., Canbolat, T. (2015). İş Hukuku Dersleri. 28. Bası. Beta Yayınları, İstanbul. Dahl, R. A. (1956). A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Demirdizen, D., Lordoğlu, K. (2013). Türkiye'de Sendika İçi Demokrasi ya da Bir İmkansızın Arayışı Mı? Sosyal Haklar Uluslararası Sempozyumu, pp. 223–241. Dereli, B. (1977). Teori ve Uygulama Yöniyle Türkiye’de Sendika-İçi Demokrasi Sorunu. Ph.D. Dissertation. Istanbul University. Dereli, T. (1998). Sendika İçi Demokrasi. Türkiye Sendikacılık Ansiklopedisi (Cilt 3). Kültür Bakanlığı ve Tarih Vakfı, İstanbul, pp. 23–26. Dereli, T. (2014). 6356 Sayılı Yeni Sendikalar ve Toplu İş Sözleşmesi Kanunu: Süreçler, Sorunlar ve Öneriler. Çimento İşverenleri Dergisi, 28/1, pp. 10–33. Deren-Yıldırım, N. (2001). Sendika-içi Demokrasi. Prof. Dr. Nuri Çelik'e Armağan. Beta Yayınları, İstanbul. Cilt II, pp. 1698–1726. Eaton, J. (2006). Union Democracy and Union Renewal: The CAW Public Review Board. Relations Industrielles, 61, 2, pp. 201–220. Edelstein, D. J., Warner, M. (1979). Comparative Union Democracy: Organization and Opposition in British and American Unions. New Jersey: Transaction Books. Esener, T., Gümrükçüoğlu, Y. B. (2014). Sendika Hukuku. Vedat Kitapçılık, İstanbul. Hurd, R. W. (2000). Professional Employees and Union Democracy: From Control to Chaos. Journal of Labor Research, 21, 1, pp. 103–115. Levi, M., Olson, D., Agnone, J., Kelly, D. (2009). Union Democracy Reexamined. Politics and Society, 37, 2, pp. 203–228. Lipset, S. M., Trow, M. A., Coleman, J. S. (1977). Union Democracy: The Internal Politics of the International Typographical Union. Garden City, NY: Free Press. Michels, R. (1915). Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York, NY: Hearst’s International Library Co. Sipahi, I. (2017). Scrutinizing Union Democracy: Organization and Opposition in Turkish Unions of the Post-1982 Context. Ph.D. Dissertation, 2nd Ed. Istanbul Bilgi University, Ana Basın Yayın. Slichter, S. (1947). The Government of Trade Unions. Challenge of Industrial Relations. Ithaca: N.Y.: Cornell University Press, pp. 100–101. Stepan-Norris, J. (1997). The Making of Union Democracy. Social Forces, University of North Carolina Press, 76, 2, pp. 475–510. Stepan-Norris, J., Zeitlin, M. (1995). Union Democracy, Radical Leadership and the Hegemony of Capital. American Sociological Review, 60, pp. 829–850. Strauss, G. (1991). Union Democracy. The State of the Unions. Madison Wise, Industrial Relations Research Association. Strauss, G. (2000). What’s Happening Inside U.S. Unions: Democracy and Union Politics. Journal of Labor Research, 21, 2, pp. 211–225. Summers, C. W. (2000). From Industrial Democracy to Union Democracy. Journal of Labor Research, 21, 1, pp. 3–14. Şahlanan, F. (1980). Sendikaların İşleyişinin Demokratik İlkelere Uygunluğu. Ph.D. Dissertation. Istanbul University. Şahlanan, F. (1995). Sendikalar Hukuku. İstanbul: Yılmaz Matbaacılık. Şahlanan, F. (2013). 6356 Sayılı Sendikalar ve Toplu İş Sözleşmesi Kanunun Sendikalara İlişkin Hükümlerin Değerlendirilmesi. Çalışma ve Toplum Dergisi, 2013/4, pp. 110–142. Tuncay, C., Kutsal, B. S. (2015). Toplu İş Hukuku. Beta Yayınları, İstanbul. Weber, M. (1946). Essays in Sociology (eds. Gerth H.H. and Mills C.W.). New York: Oxford University Press.
There are 1 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

İmre Sipahi This is me

Publication Date December 28, 2017
Submission Date May 8, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2016 Issue: 71

Cite

APA Sipahi, İ. (2017). Oligarchy as a Trade Union Default Setting: A Structural Re-examination of Union Democracy in Turkey. Journal of Social Policy Conferences(71), 99-126.
AMA Sipahi İ. Oligarchy as a Trade Union Default Setting: A Structural Re-examination of Union Democracy in Turkey. Journal of Social Policy Conferences. December 2017;(71):99-126.
Chicago Sipahi, İmre. “Oligarchy As a Trade Union Default Setting: A Structural Re-Examination of Union Democracy in Turkey”. Journal of Social Policy Conferences, no. 71 (December 2017): 99-126.
EndNote Sipahi İ (December 1, 2017) Oligarchy as a Trade Union Default Setting: A Structural Re-examination of Union Democracy in Turkey. Journal of Social Policy Conferences 71 99–126.
IEEE İ. Sipahi, “Oligarchy as a Trade Union Default Setting: A Structural Re-examination of Union Democracy in Turkey”, Journal of Social Policy Conferences, no. 71, pp. 99–126, December 2017.
ISNAD Sipahi, İmre. “Oligarchy As a Trade Union Default Setting: A Structural Re-Examination of Union Democracy in Turkey”. Journal of Social Policy Conferences 71 (December 2017), 99-126.
JAMA Sipahi İ. Oligarchy as a Trade Union Default Setting: A Structural Re-examination of Union Democracy in Turkey. Journal of Social Policy Conferences. 2017;:99–126.
MLA Sipahi, İmre. “Oligarchy As a Trade Union Default Setting: A Structural Re-Examination of Union Democracy in Turkey”. Journal of Social Policy Conferences, no. 71, 2017, pp. 99-126.
Vancouver Sipahi İ. Oligarchy as a Trade Union Default Setting: A Structural Re-examination of Union Democracy in Turkey. Journal of Social Policy Conferences. 2017(71):99-126.