Dalga Şekli Ters Çözümünden 3 Kasım 2002 Denali Depreminin Kaynak Mekanizma Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi ve Depreme İlişkin Coulomb Gerilme Değişiminin İncelenmesi

Year 2006, Volume: 19 Issue: 1, 113 - 120, 21.03.2012

Serkan Özçelik Ali Pınar

Abstract

Determination of Source Rupture Process of November, 3, 2002, Denali Earthquakefrom Waveform Inversion and Studying the Coulombs Stres Change Due to Earthquake

Keywords

Dalga şekli ters çözümü, Coulomb gerilme dağılımı, sismik etkinlik, Alaska, Denali fayı

References

• Anderson, G., and Ji C., 2003, Static stress transfer during the 2002 Nenana Mountain-Denali Fault, Alaska, earthquake sequence, Geophysıcal Research Letters, Vol. 30, No. 6, 1310, 2002
• Dreger, S.D., D.D. Oglesby, R. Harris, N. Ratchkovski and R. Hansen, 2004, Kinematic and dynamic rupture models of the November 3, 2002 Mw7.9 Denali, Alaska, earthqukae, Geophysical Res. Lett., Vol.31, LO4605.
• Eberhart – Phlips, D.E., et all., 2003, The 2002 Denali fault earthquake, Alaska: A large magnitude slippartitioned event, Science, 300, 1113-1118.
• Fletcher, H.J., 2002, Crustal Deformation in Alaska Measured Using the Global Positioning System, Ph.D. thesis, University of Alaska at Fairbanks, 257 pp.
• Grantz, A., 1966, Strike Slip Faults in alaska, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 267, pp.82.
• Jeffreys, H. and K. E. Bullen, 1958, Seismological Tables, Office Of The British Association, Burlington House, London.
• Kikuchi, M., and H. Kanamori, 1982, Inversion of complex body waves Bull. Seis. Soc. Am., 72,491506.
• Kikuchi, M., and H. Kanamori, 1991, Inversion complex body waves – III. Bull. Seis. Soc. Am., 81. 2335-2350.
• Kikuchi, M., H. Kanamori and K. Satake, 1993, Source Complexity Of The 1988 Armenian Earthquake: Evidence For A Slow After-Slip Event, J. Geophys. Res., Vol. 98, Pp. 15,797 - 15,808.
• Özacar, A.A.; S.L. Beck and D.H. Christensen., 2003, Source process of the 3 November 2002 Denali fault earthquake (Central Alaska) from teleseismic observations, Geophysical Res. Lett., Vol.30, No. 12, 1638.
• Özçelik, S., 2004, Derin Depremlerin (400 –670 km) Oluşum Mekanizmalarının Dalga Şekli Ters Çözüm Yöntemiyle Araştırılması, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2004, İstanbul.
• Özçelik, S. ve A. Pınar, 2005, Derin ve Büyük Depremlerin Kaynak Mekanizma Özellikleri, İ.Ü. Yerbilimleri Dergisi, C.18, S.1, 53-62, Y. 2005.
• Pınar, A., 1995, Rupture Process and Spectra of Some Major Turkish Earthquakes and Their Seismotectonic Implications, Bogazici University, Istanbul.
• Pinar, A., 1998, Source inversion of the October1,1995, Dinar earthquake (Ms=6.1):a rupture model with implications for seismotectonics in SW Turkey, Tectonophysics 292, 255-266.
• Ratchkovski, N.A., et. all., 2003, Aftershock sequences of the Mw 7.9 Denali Fault, Alaska, Earthquake of 3 November 2002 from Regional Seismic Network Data, Seismological Res. Lett., Vol.76,6, 743-751.
• Reasenberg, P. A., and R. W. Simpson, 1992, Response of regional seismicity to the static stress change produced by the Loma Prieta earthquake, Science, 255, 1687– 1690.
• Simpson, R. W., and P. A. Reasenberg, 1994, Earthquake-induced static-stress changes on central California faults, in The Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989—Tectonic Processes and Models, edited by R. W. Simpson, U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap., 1550-F, F55– F89.
• Tibi, R., G. Guenter and D.A. Wiens, 2003, Source Characteristics Of Large Deep Earthquakes: Constraint On The Faulting Mechanism At Great Depths, J. Geophys. Res., Vol. 108, No. B2, 2091.