Static and Dynamic Revealed Comparative Advantage: A Comparative Analysis of Turkey and Russia

Öz

With respect to bilateral trade between Turkey and Russia, static and dynamic RCA was calculated for 14 ‘common sectors’, in which Russia and Turkey exported similar quantities of goods to the rest of the world. The static RCA is indicative of the fact that Turkey is more advantageous than Russia at both bilateral and global levels. However; an analysis of dynamic RCA for the 14 common sectors revealed that while Turkey has dynamic comparative advantage for six sectors, Russia has dynamic comparative advantage for 11 sectors. Despite the fact that Russia is more disadvantageous than Turkey in static terms, it has more sectors falling under the rising star category in dynamic terms. In this context the results of this study could be used to develop new fiscal policies to improve both static and dynamic sectorial comparative advantage. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Trade,Revealed Comparative Advantage,Balassa Index

Kaynakça

1. Akgüngör S., Barbaros R.F., Kumral N. (2002), Competitiveness of the Turkish Fruit and Vegetable Processing Industry in the European Union Market Source: Russian & East European Finance and Trade, Vol. 38, No. 3 (May - Jun., 2002), pp. 34-53
2. Balassa, B. (1965), Trade Liberalization and Revealed Comparative Advantage, The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 33,pp. 99-123.
3. Balassa B. (1982) Development Strategies in Semi-Industrialized Economies, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
4. Balassa B. (1989), Comparative Advantage, Trade Policy and Economic Development, Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York.
5. Edwards S. (1993) “Openness, Trade Liberalization, and Growth in Developing Countries,” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 31, no 3,pp. 1358-93.
6. Edwards L. and W. Schoer (2002) “Measures of Competitiveness: A Dynamic Approach to South Africa‟s Trade Performance in the 1990s”, The South African Journal of Economics, 70(6),pp.1008-1046.
7. Erkan B. (2012), Determining With The Indices Of Revealed Comparative Advantage Of Countries’ Comparative Export Performances: A Case Study For Turkey And Syria. ZKU Journal of Social Sciences, Volume 8, Number 15,pp.197-202
8. Erkan B., Sarıçoban K. (2014), Comparative Analysis of the Competitiveness in the Export of Science-Based Goods Regarding Turkey and the EU+13 Countries, International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 5, No. 8(1);pp.117-130

9. Erlat G., Erlat H. (2005), Do Turkish Exports Have Comparative Advantage With Respect To The European Union Market, 1990-2000 Topics in Middle Eastern and North African Economies, electronic journal, Volume 7,pp.1-19
10. Ekmen-Özçelik S., Erlat G., (2013) Turkey’s Comparative Advantages and Dynamic Market Positioning in the EU market An Analysis by Extensive and Intensive Margins, Topics in Middle E astern and African Economies Vol. 15, No. 2,186-211
11. Ferman, M., Akgüngör S., Yüksel A.H. (2004), “Türkiye’nin İhracat Rekabet Gücü ve Sürdürülebilirliği: Avrupa Birliği Pazarında Rakip Ülkeler ve Türkiye Açısından Bir Karşılaştırma”, 2004 Türkiye İktisat Kongresi, İzmir, pp.4-29
12. Greenaway D., Milner C. (1986), The Economics of Intra-Industry Trade, Basil Blackwell Ltd., UK, Basil Blackwell Inc., USA.
13. Greenaway, D. and C. Milner (1993), Trade and Industrial Policy in Developing Countries: A Manual of Policy Analysis, The Macmillan Press, esp. Part IV Evaluating Comparative Advantage,pp.181-208.
14. Grossman G.M., Helpman E.(1991), “Trade, Knowledge Spillowers and Growth”, European Economic Review, Vol: 35, 1991;pp.517-526.
15. Gül E., Kamaci A. (2012) Effects of International Trade on Growth: A Panel Data Analyses. International Journal of Alanya Faculty of Business. 2012, Vol:4, No:3, pp.81-91
16. Hufbauer, C.G., Chilas J.C. (1974) Specialization by Industrial Countries: Extent and Consequences” in H. Giersch (ed.): The International Division of Labour: Problems and Perspectives. International Symposium. Tubingen, Germany: J.C.B. Mohr,pp. 3-38.
17. Ishchukova N., Smutka L. (2013), Revealed Comparative Advantage Of Russian Agricultural Exports, Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 2013, LXI, No. 4, pp. 941–952.
18. İnce, M., Demir H.M. (2007), Comparative Advantage and Competitiveness: The Case of Turkey and Germany”, Review of Social, Economic and Business Studies, 5/6, 2007, pp. 149-171.
19. Kösekahyaoğlu L., Özdamar G. (2011), Türkiye, Çin Ve Hindistan’in Sektörel Rekabet Gücü Üzerine Karşilaştirmali Bir İnceleme, Uludağ Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi Uludağ Journal of Economy and Society Cilt/Vol. XXX, Sayı/No. 2, 2011, pp. 29-49 Liesner H.H. (1958), “The European Common Market and British Industry”, Economic Journal, 68,pp.302-316.
20. Raghuramapatruni R. (2015) Revealed Comparative Advantage and Competitiveness: A Study on BRICS Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review 2015, 5:5,pp.1-7
21. Özdamar G., Albeni M. (2011), A Research On The Foreign Trade Competitiveness Of Automotive Industry Of Turkey, Journal of Süleyman Demirel University Institute of Social Sciences Vol.(1),No:3,pp.193-216
22. Schwab K. The World Competitiveness Report 2015-2016.pp.17
23. Serin V., Civan A. (2008), Revealed Comparative Advantage and Competitiveness. A Case Study for Turkey towards the EU Competitiveness of Turkish Fruit and Vegetable Sectors in EU Market. Journal of Economic and Social Research 10(2) 2008,pp. 25-41
24. Simsek N., Seymen D., Utkulu U. (2010) Turkey’s Competitiveness In The Eu Market: A Comparison Of Different Trade Measures,Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi,, Vol.12,No:2,pp.107-139
25. Utkulu U., Seymen D. (2004), Revealed Comparative Advantage and Competitiveness. Evidence for Turkey vis-à-vis EU/15. presented at the European Trade Study Group 6th Annual Conference, ETSG 2004, Nottingham, September ,pp.1-26
26. Tabata S. (2006)., Observations on Changes in Russia's Comparative Advantage, 1994-2005, Eurasian Geography and Economics, 47:6, 2006, pp. 747-759
27. Vollrath, T.L. (1991), A Theoretical Evaluation of Alternative Trade Intensity Measures of Revealed Comparative Advantage”, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 130, pp.265-279
28. Westin P. (1998) Comparative Advantage and Characteristics of Russia's Trade with the European Union, Bank of Finland, Institute for Economies in Transition, Review of Economies in Transition 2/98,pp.1-33
29. Yılmaz B. (2002), “Turkey‟s Competitiveness in the European Union. A Comparison of Greece, Portugal, Spain and the EU/12/15”, Russian and East European Finance and Trade, 38(3), pp.54-72.
30. Yılmaz B., (2003) “Turkey’s Competitiveness in the European Union: A Comparison with Five Candidate Countries – Bulgaria, The Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania – and the EU15”, Ezoneplus Working Paper, No.12,pp.1-20 Yılmaz B., Ergun S.J. (2003), “The Foreign Trade Pattern and Foreign Trade Specialization of Candidates of the European Union”, Ezoneplus Working Paper, No.19,pp.1-30 World Competitiveness Report 2015 [http://reports.weforum.org/global-competitiveness-report-2015-2016/, accessed 18.05.2016