BÖBREK TAŞLARININ CERRAHİ TEDAVİSİ: BİR EĞİTİM ARAŞTIRMA HASTANESİ ÜROLOJİ KLİNİĞİNDEKİ CERRAHİ YÖNTEM TERCİHLERİ

Abstract

Bu çalışmada kliniğimizde son 5 yıl içerisinde böbrek taşı olan hastalardaki cerrahi yöntem tercihlerimizi özetlemeyi amaçladık. Çalışmamızda 2009-2014 yılları arasında kliniğimizde böbrek taşı tanısı ile perkütan nefrolitotomi PNL , açık nefrolitotomi ve retrograd intrarenal cerrahi RİRC yapılan ve kayıtlarına ulaşabildiğimiz toplam 494 hasta dahil edildi. Hastaların demografik özellikleri, perioperatif veriler, postoperatif başarı oranları ve komplikasyonlar not edildi. Hastaların 428’ine %86 PNL, 41’ine %8 RİRC ve 25’ine %6 ise açık nefrolitotomi yapıldığı tespit edildi. Hastaların yaş ortancası PNL, RİRC ve açık nefrolitotomi yapılan gruplarda sırasıyla 51 , 47 ve 44 olarak tespit edildi. Ortalama taş yükü PNL yapılan hastalarda 2.4 cm2, RİRC yapılan hastalarda 1.4 cm2 ve açık nefrolitotomi yapılan hastalarda ise 3.2 cm2 olarak izlendi. Ortalama floroskopi süresi PNL’de 3.4 dk ve RİRC yapılan grupta 1.8 dk olarak tespit edildi. Ortalama operasyon süresi PNL’de 107 dk, RİRC yapılan grupta 64 dk ve açık nefrolitotomi gerçekleştirilen hastalarda ise 78 dk olarak tespit edildi. Hastanede kalış süreleri PNL, RİRC ve açık nefrolitotomi yapılan hastalarda sırasıyla 3.4, 1.1 ve 3.7 gün olarak izlendi. PNL yapılan hastalardan 98’ine %22.8 ve açık nefrolitotomi yapılan hastalardan 6’sına %24 postoperatif dönemde kan transfüzyonu yapılırken, RİRC yapılan hastalardan hiçbirinde kan transfüzyonu ihtiyacı olmadı. PNL grubunda 87 %20 , açık nefrolitotomi grubunda 3 %12 ve RİRC grubunda 2 hastada %5 ≥5mm rezidü taş izlendi. Böbrek taşlarının cerrahi tedavisinde kliniğimizde en sık kullanılan yöntem PNL’dir. Uygun hastalarda daha kısa operasyon ve hastanede yatış süresi ile RİRC avantajlı bir cerrahi yöntemdir. Açık nefrolitotomi minimal invazif yöntemlerin gelişmesi ile giderek daha nadir başvurulan bir cerrahi seçenek haline gelmiştir

Keywords

• PNL,ürolitiazis,retrograd intrarenal cerrahi,nefrolitotomi

SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF RENAL STONES: SURGICAL METHOD PREFERENCES IN AN EDUCATION AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL UROLOGY CLINIC

Abstract

In the recent study we aimed to summarize our surgical management preferences in patients with renal stones in our clinic during the last 5 years. 494 renal stone patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy PNL , open nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery RIRS in our clinic between 2009 and 2014 were included. Demographic characteristics, perioperative data, postoperative success rates and complications were noted. 428 86% , 41 8% and 25 6% patients underwent PNL, RIRS and open nephrolithotomy respectively. Median age was 51 , 47 and 44 years in patients who underwent PNL, RIRS and open nephrolithotomy respectively. Mean stone burden was 2.4 cm2, 1.4 cm2 and 3.2 cm2 in PNL, RIRS and open nephrolithotomy groups respectively. Mean operation time was 107, 64 and 78 minutes in PNL, RIRS and open nephrolithotomy groups respectively. Mean hospitalization time was 3.4, 1.1 and 3.7 days in PNL, RIRS and open nephrolithotomy groups respectively. Postoperative blood transfusion was required in 98 22.8% and 6 24% patients in PNL and open nephrolithotomy groups respectively. None of the patients required blood transfusion in RIRS group. Residual fragments ≥ 5mm were observed in 87 20% , 3 12% and 2 5% patients in PNL, open nephrolithotomy and RIRS groups respectively. The most preferred surgical option for renal stones is PNL in our clinic. RIRS is an advantageous surgical procedure with relatively lower operation and hospitalization times. Open nephrolithotomy is rarely preferred with improvements in minimal invasive surgical procedures

Keywords

• PNL,retrograde intrarenal surgery,urolithiasis,nephrolithotomy

References

1. ) Tefekli A, Tok A, Altundere F, Barut M, Berberoglu Y, Müslümanoğlu AY. Üriner sistem taş hastalarında yaşam tarzı ve beslenme alışkanlıkları. Türk Üroloji Dergisi 2005; (1):113-8.
2. ) Vahlensieck EW, Bach D, Hesse A. Incidence, prevalence and mortality of urolithiasis in the German Federal Republic. Urol Res. 1982;10(4):161-4.
3. ) Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE, Nakada SY, Pearle MS, Wolf JS Jr. Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol. 2005;173(6):1991-2000.
4. ) Segura JW, Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Dretler SP, Kahn RI, Lingeman JE, et al. Ureteral stones clinical guidelines panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. The American Urological Association. J Urol. 1997 ;158(5):1915-21.
5. ) Tiselius HG, Alken P, Buck C, Galluci M, Knoll T, Sarica K, Türk C: Guidelines on urolithiasis, European Association of Urology, 2008
6. ) Kane CJ, Bolton DM, Stoller ML. Current indications for open stone surgery in an endourology center. Urology. 1995;45(2):218-21.
7. ) Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, Sarica K, Skolarikos A, Straub M, et al. Urolithiasis. EAU Guideline 2013:1-100
8. ) Gürbüz C, Öztürk Mİ, Koca O, Yıldırım A, Ateş F, Eryıldırım B, ve ark. Böbrek taşı tedavisinde güncel durum: İstanbul’dan kesitsel bir tarama. Turkish Journal of Urology ; 37(3): 252-6

9. ) Hasun R, Ryan PC, Marberger M. Percutaneous coagu-lum nephrolithotripsy: a new approach. Br J Urol ; 57(6): 605-9. ) Michaels EK, Fowler JE Jr., Manino M. Bacteriuria following ESWL of infected stones. J Urol. 1988;140(2): 6.
10. ) Lingeman JE, Coury TA, Newman DM, Kahnoski RJ, Mertz JH, Mosbaugh PG, et al. Comparison of results and morbidity of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol. 1987; 138(3): 90.
11. ) Clayman RV, Mcdougall EM, Nakada SY. Endourology of the upper urinary tract: percutaneous renal and ureteral procedures. Wals PC, Retik AB, Vaughan EJ, Wein AJ, eds. Campbell’s urology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, ;2789-874.
12. ) Michel MS, Trojan T, Rasweiler J. Complications in percutaneus nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2007; 51(4): 906.
13. ) Gupta R, Kumar A, Kapoor R et al: Prospective evaluation of safety and efficacy of the supracostal approach for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BJU Int. 2002; 90(9): 13.
14. ) Hadar H and Gadoth N: Positional relations of colon and kidney determined by perirenal fat. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984; 143(4): 773-6.
15. ) Sherman JL, Hopper KD, Greene AJ et al: The retrorenal colon on computed tomography: a normal variant. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1985; 9(2): 339-41.
16. ) Lee WJ, Smith AD, Cubelli V et al: Complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987 ;148(1): 177-80.
17. ) Duvdevani M, Razvi H, Sofer M et al: Third prize: contemporary percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: 1585 procedures in 1338 consecutive patients. J Endourol. 2007; (8): 824-9.
18. ) Akpınar H, Tüfek İ, Atuğ F, Sevinç C, Kural AR. Alt kalis taşlarının tedavisinde retrograd intrarenal cerrahi. Turkish J Urology 2009; 35: 108-12
19. ) Wong MY. Flexible ureteroscopy is the ideal choice to manage a 1.5 cm diameter lower pole stone. J Endourol. 2008; 22(9): 1845-6.
20. ) Fabrizio MD, Behari A, Bagley DH. Ureteroscopic management of intrarenal calculi. J Urol. 1998; 159(4): 43.
21. ) Gould DL. Holmium:YAG laser and its use in the treatment of urolithiasis: our first 160 cases. J Endourol. ; 12(1): 23-6. ) Stern JM, Yiee J, Park S. Safety and efficacy of ureteral access sheaths. J Endourol. 2007; 21(2): 119-23.
22. ) Abrahams HM, Stoller ML. The argument against the routine use of ureteral access sheaths. Urol Clin North Am. ; 31(1): 83-7. ) Kourambas J, Byrne RR, Preminger GM. Does a ureteral access sheath facilitate ureteroscopy? J Urol. 2001; 165(3): 93.
23. ) Fuchs GJ, Fuchs AM. Flexible endoscopy of the upper urinary tract. A new minimally invasive method for diagnosis and treatment. Urologe A. 1990; 29(6): 313-20.
24. ) Honeck P, Wendt-Nordahi G, Krombach P, Bach T, Hacker A, Alken P, et al. Does open stone surgery still play a role in the treatment of urolithiasis? Data of a primary urolithiasis center. J Endourol. 2009; 23(7): 1209-12.
25. ) Paik ML, Resnick MI. Is there a role for open stone surgery? Urol Clin North Am. 2000; 27(2): 323-31.
26. ) Wolf JS, Clayman RV. Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. What is its role in 1997? Urol Clin North Am. 1997; 24(1): 43-58.
27. ) Snyder JA, Smith AD. Staghorn calculi. Percutaneous extraction versus anathrophic nephrolithotomy. J Urol. ; 136(2): 351-4. ) Rassweiler JJ, Renner C, Eisenberger FI. Management of staghorn calculi: Critical analysis after 250 cases. Braz J Urol 2000; 26: 463-78.
28. ) Honeck P, Wendt-Nordahi G, Krombach P, Bach T, Hacker A, Alken P, et al. Does open stone surgery still play a role in the treatment of urolithiasis? Data of a primary urolithiasis center. J Endourol. 2009; 23(7): 1209-12.
29. ) Paik ML, Wainstein MA, Spirnak P, Hample N, Resnick MI. Current indications for open stone surgery in the treatment of renal and ureteral calculi. J Urol. 1998; 159(2): 8.