FISH CONSUMPTION PATTERNS OF URBAN HOUSEHOLDS IN HATAY, TURKEY

Year 2014, Volume: 1 Issue: 2, 0 - , 13.03.2015

Bekir Demirtaş Erdal Dağıstan M. Göksel Akpınar Cengiz Sayın

https://izlik.org/JA74DA84SJ

Abstract

Although Turkey has a long coastline and a good deal of inland waters, its potential is not fully utilized in terms of fish production and consumption. Fish consumption in Turkey is 7 kg per capita, which is far below that of the world of 18,4 kg per capita. This study was conducted in Hatay, Turkey and included 43 districts. The data of the 412 surveys were collected using the face to face interview. Effects of various demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of consumers on fish consumption were analysed. Accordingly, some demographic and socioeconomic characteristics such as marriage, monthly income and spending for food had a significant impact on fish consumption.

Keywords

-

References

• Aydin H, Dilek MK, Aydin K, 2011, Trends in fish and fishery products consumption in Turkey, Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 11, 499-506.
• Churchill GA, 1995, Marketing research: Methodologial foundations, The Dryden Press, Harcourt Brace College Publishers, Sixth Edition. 1070.
• Erdal E, Esengün K, 2008, Tokat ilinde balık tüketimini etkileyen faktörlerin logit model ile analizi, E.Ü. Su Ürünleri Dergisi 25, 203-209.
• FAO, 2012, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Fishery and aquaculture statistics 2010, FAO Yearbook. Rome, Italy, FAO Puplication: ISSN 2070-6057,107.
• FAO, 2013, Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations, The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2012, Rome, Italy, FAO Puplication: ISSN 0081-4538, 209.
• Feng W, Jian Z, Weisong M, Zetian F, Xiaoshuan Z, 2009, Consumers’ perception towards quality and safety of fishery products, Beijing, China, Food Control 20, 918-922.
• Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, 2005, Applied Logistic Regression. Second Edition, New York, USA, A Willey-Interscience Publication, 369.
• Knap R, 2011, Trends and factors of development of the world consumption of fish and fishery products, Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia 10, 213-227.
• Myrland Ø, Trondsen, T, Johnston RS, Lund E, 2000, Determinants of seafood consumption in Norway: lifestyle, revealed preferences, and barriers to consumption, Food Quality and Preference 11, 169-188.
• Pieniak Z, Kolodziejczyk M, Kowrygo B, Verbeke W, 2011, Consumption patterns and labelling of fish and fishery products in Poland after the EU accession, Food Control 22, 843-850.
• Saygı H, Hekimo€lu MA, 2011, Affecting the factors of fishery products consumption in Turkey, Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 10, 87-91.
• SPO, 2007, Fishing report of the special comission. State Planning Organization, 9. Development Plan (2007-2013), Ankara, Turkey. DPT 2719, ÖÐK: 671, 127.
• TEAE, 2007, Çipura-Levrek,Tarımsal Ekonomi Araþtırma Enstitüsü, Bakıþ. Ankara, 9, 4.
• Trondsen T, Braaten T, Lund E, Eggen AE, 2004, Health and seafood consumption patterns among women aged 45-49 years. Norwegian seafood consumption study, Food Quality and Preferences 15, 117-128.
• TÜÐK, 2013, Fishery statistics 2012, Ankara, Turkey Statistics Corporation, Publication No: 4119, 59.
• Vanhonacker F, Pieniak Z, Verbeke W, 2013, European consumer image of farmed fish, wild fish, seabass and seabream. Aquaculture International 21, 1017-1033.
• Verbeke W, Vackier I, 2005, Individual determinants of fish consumption: application of the theory of planned behaviour, Appetite 44, 67-82.