THE READINESS OF BANTING POLYTECHNIC’S AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE STUDENTS FOR ONLINE COMPOSITE REPAIR TEACHING AND LEARNING

Abstract

The swift progression of technology and the growing dependence on digital platforms in education have required the evolution of traditional teaching techniques into more adaptable, online-based options. Aircraft Maintenance Engineering is a field that necessitates extensive practical experience, especially in the repair of composite materials, an essential competency for aviation students. This study examines the readiness of students at Banting Polytechnic Selangor, Malaysia for the shift to online learning, with particular emphasis on composite repair education, a crucial component of their Aircraft Maintenance Engineering curriculum. The main goal is to evaluate students’ preparedness and perspectives regarding the transition from conventional in-person education to online formats, while pinpointing critical aspects that affect their adaptability. This study aims to investigate the degree to which contemporary digital learning tools and tactics correspond with the actual requirements of composite repair training and how educators might enhance online instruction for technical courses. A mixed-methodologies strategy was employed, combining qualitative and quantitative data collection methods. A standardized survey was administered to Aircraft Maintenance Engineering students at Banting Polytechnic Selangor, Malaysia, aimed at assessing their technical preparedness, motivation, self-regulation skills, and proficiency using digital learning tools. Furthermore, interviews were conducted with educators and industry representatives to provide insights into the opportunities and obstacles associated with online composite repair training. The gathered data were examined to discern trends and themes concerning students’ perspectives of online learning, their access to essential technologies, and their confidence in developing practical abilities via virtual platforms. This study investigates the influence of institutional support on online technical education and how policy modifications may enhance student engagement and skill development. The study’s findings reveal that although the majority of students have a basic comprehension of online learning tools and platforms, they encounter considerable difficulties in mastering specialized skills such as composite repair in a completely online environment. Identified key issues encompass insufficient hands-on practice chances, limited practical simulation tools, and disparate levels of student self-motivation. While students typically value the flexibility and accessibility of online education, some individuals voiced apprehensions over the efficacy of distant instruction in technical disciplines necessitating close engagement with materials and equipment. Moreover, differences in internet access and digital skills among students have resulted in inconsistencies in learning results, hence exacerbating the transition to online education. This research underscores the necessity for educational institutions, including Banting Polytechnic Selangor, to confront these problems by incorporating sophisticated digital technologies such as virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) to replicate real-world composite repair scenarios. Moreover, it underscores the necessity of improving students’ self-regulation abilities and offering adequate technological assistance to facilitate effective interaction with educational resources. It is essential to create hybrid learning models that integrate online theoretical training with in-person practical sessions to enhance skill acquisition. The study finds that although online learning offers considerable advantages in Aircraft Maintenance Engineering education, a customized strategy is crucial for effectively equipping students with specialized skills such as composite repair in a virtual setting. This research offers insights that can assist educators and policymakers in enhancing the delivery of technical education within the changing digital learning environment and aid in the formulation of more effective remote training methods for practical.

Keywords

• Digital Education
• Aviation Maintenance Engineering
• Composite Material Repair
• Student Readiness
• Virtual İnstructions

References

1. Al-Emran, M., Elsherif, H. M., & Shaalan, K. (2016). Investigating attitudes towards the use of mobile learning in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.033
2. Boeing. (n.d.). Boeing’s AR service strategy for maintenance training. Retrieved from https://fieldserviceusa.wbresearch.com/boeing-ar-technology-strategy-maintenance-training-transform-ty-u fieldserviceusa.wbresearch.com
3. Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (4th ed.). Wiley.
4. Composites Academy. (n.d.). Instructional learning tools and materials. https://www.composites-academy.com/Nos-Outils-Apprentissage​.
5. CompositesWorld. (2020). Composites Academy launches online training with hands-on exercises. https://www.compositesworld.com/articles/composites-academy-launches-online-training-with-hands-onexercises​.
6. Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2018). The use of mobile learning in higher education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.007
7. Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2017). Gamifying education: what is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain: a critical review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0042-5
8. Federal Aviation Administration. (2017). Recommended Part 147 curriculum for composites. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57718/dot_57718_DS1.pdf​.

9. FAA. (2017). Recommended Part 147 Curriculum for Composites. William J. Hughes Technical Center at actlibrary.tc.faa.gov
10. FAA. (2017). Advisory Circular AC147-3B. Certification and Operation of Aviation Maintenance and Technician Schools, Washington, D.C.: Government Publishing Office.
11. Gómez-Cambronero, Á., Miralles, I., Tonda, A.; Remolar, I. (2023) Immersive Virtual-Reality System for Aircraft Maintenance Education: A Case Study. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 5043. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13085043 (Accessed on 13 April 2025)
12. Haleema, A., Javaida, M., Qadri, M.A., Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Journal Sustainable Operations and Computers, Volume 3. Pages 275-285
13. Hobbs, A., et al. (2021). Maintenance of composite-based aircraft components and structures: A review. Collegiate Aviation Review International, 39(1), 115–127. https://ojs.library.okstate.edu/osu/index.php/CARI/article/download/8305/7648​.
14. Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: game-based methods and strategies for training and education. John Wiley & Sons.
15. Khasawneh, M.A.S. (2024). The Challenges Facing Vocational Education Online from the Teachers’ Perspectives. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching Vol. 13, No. 2; 2024
16. Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). BerrettKoehler Publishers.
17. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
18. Kumar, A., & Kumar, S. (2011). Virtual reality training integrated curriculum: An aircraft maintenance technology education perspective. International Journal of Engineering Education, 27(4), 778–787. https://www.ijee.ie/articles/Vol27-4/11_ijee2465ns.pdf​:contentReference[oaicite:15]{index=15}
19. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
20. Merriam, S. B., & Bierema, L. L. (2013). Adult learning: Linking theory and practice. Jossey-Bass.
21. Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090​ ;:contentReference[oaicite:14]{index=14}
22. Persınos, J. (2024). Demand Accelerates for Virtual Reality Training in Avionics. Global Avionics Round Up from Aircraft Value News (AVN) Virtual Trainer. October 3 2024.
23. Phillips, J. J., & Phillips, P. P. (2016). Handbook of training evaluation and measurement methods (4th ed.). Routledge.
24. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795​ ;:contentReference[oaicite:15]{index=15}
25. T. D. Rupasinghe, M. E. Kurz, C. Washburn and A. K. Gramopadhye. (2011). Virtual Reality Training Integrated Curriculum: An Aircraft Maintenance Technology (AMT) Education Perspective. International Journal of Engineering Education Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 778–788, 2011 0949-149X/91. Printed in Great Britain # 2011 TEMPUS Publications.
26. U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2003). Aviation safety: FAA needs to update the curriculum certification requirements for aviation mechanics. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-03-317.pdf GAO