Research Article

Morphological Variation of Pelodytes caucasicus Boulenger, 1896 (Anura: Pelodytidae) from Turkey

Volume: 6 Number: 4 December 31, 2021
Tuğba Ergül Kalaycı *, Kafiye Gümüşsoy , Çiğdem Gül
TR EN

Morphological Variation of Pelodytes caucasicus Boulenger, 1896 (Anura: Pelodytidae) from Turkey

Abstract

The Parsley frog is represented by single species from Anatolia which is called Pelodytes caucasicus. This species is categorized as a near threatened in the conservation list and has very limited distribution along the North East Black Sea and its populations have been poorly studied. In this study, we analyzed morphological variation of 59 specimens from different localities from Anatolia (Artvin; Karagöl, Rize; Çat and Trabzon; Hıdırnebi) unraveled the differences among P. caucasicus populations. For this purpose, we used multivariate analysis such as principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA). Although there was considerable overlap among morphological variation of localities according to PCA analysis, slight differences were observed in LDA analysis. In PCA analysis, the HW, HL, and SVL are primarily discriminating characters for P. caucasicus. In LDA analysis, the NL, HW, and HL are primarily discriminating characters. This study will contribute to the limited data of P. caucasicus and enlarge the knowledge of geographic variation for P. caucasicus in Anatolia.

Keywords

Caucasian , P. caucasicus , morphometric differences , Turkey

References

  1. Arikan, H., Atatür, M. K., & Tosunoğlu, M. (2003). A study on the blood cells of the Caucasus Frog, Pelodytes caucasicus. Zoology in the Middle East, 30(1), 43-47.
  2. Arıkan, H., Tosunoğlu, M., Atatür, M.K., & Göçmen, B. (2007). Some Comments of the Breeding Biology of Pelodytes caucasicus Boulenger, 1896 (Anura: Pelodytidae) from Uzungöl, Northeast Anatolia. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 31, 53-64.
  3. Babik, W., & Rafiński, J. (2000). Morphometric differentiation of the moor frog (Rana arvalis Nilss.) in Central Europe. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 38(4), 239-247.
  4. Erişmiş, U.C., Arıkan, H., Konuk, M., & Guarino, F.M. (2009). Age Structure and Growth in Caucasian Parsley Frog Pelodytes caucasicus (Boulenger, 1896) from Turkey. Russian Journal of Herpetology, 16(1), 19-26.
  5. Franzen, M. (1999). Verbreitung und Ökologie von Pelodytes caucasicus Boulenger, 1896 in der Türkei (Distribution and Ecology of Pelodytes caucasicus Boulenger, 1896 in Turkey). Salamandra, 35(1), 1-18.
  6. Kaya, U., Tuniyev, B., Tuniyev, S., Kuzmin, S., Tarkhnishvili, D., Tuniyev, B., Papaenfuss, T., Sparreboom, M., Ugurtas, I., Anderson, S., Eken, G., Kiliç, T.,& Gem, E. (2009). Pelodytes caucasicus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2009: International Union for Conservation of Nature. http://www.IUCN.org. International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN). 2021. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2021
  7. Litvinchuk, S.N. &. Kidov, A.A. (2018). Distribution and conservation status of the Caucasian parsley frog, Pelodytes caucasicus (Amphibia: Anura). Nature Conservation Research Заповедная наука, 3(S1), 51-60.
  8. R Core Team (2021). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing
  9. Rivas, J., Quiero, A., Penna, M., & Velásquez, N. A. (2018). Body-size variation across environmental gradients in an ectothermic organism: An intraspecific approach to ecogeographic patterns. Herpetologica, 74(3), 191-198.
  10. Rivera, G. (2008). Ecomorphological variation in shell shape of the freshwater turtle Pseudemys concinna inhabiting different aquatic flow regimes. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 48(6), 769-787.
APA
Ergül Kalaycı, T., Gümüşsoy, K., & Gül, Ç. (2021). Morphological Variation of Pelodytes caucasicus Boulenger, 1896 (Anura: Pelodytidae) from Turkey. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, 6(4), 712-716. https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1028338