Research Article

Management of Fishing Ports on the Financial Performance of the Türkiye Fishery Sector; A Case of Fishing Ports in Hatay Province

Volume: 7 Number: 3 September 30, 2022
TR EN

Management of Fishing Ports on the Financial Performance of the Türkiye Fishery Sector; A Case of Fishing Ports in Hatay Province

Abstract

In this study, a comparative economic analysis was made on how financial performance can be measured and analyzed in four fishing port (Çevlik, Konacık, İskenderun and Dörtyol) in Hatay, Turkey. In order to measure the financial performance, the data were obtained from the database of the Provincial Directorate of Agriculture and Forestry and the Property Directorate, through one-to-one interviews with the operators of the fishing ports in 2017. At the end of the study, it has been determined that there are differences between the legal regulations and regulations related to the practical activities of the fishing port enterprises. In these differences, it can be clearly said that the operation of the fishing ports by the fishery cooperatives in the region does not provide the expected benefit from the fishing ports. The results showed that Dörtyol fishing port was to be the best fishing port in terms of financial performance, location and diversity of boats using the port.

Keywords

Economic analysis , Iskenderun Bay , port management

References

  1. Akar, Ö. (2017). Risk analysis for fishing ports in the province Hatay, İskenderun Technical University Institute of Science. İskenderun-Hatay, Turkey, 128 p. (In Turkish)
  2. Akar, Ö., Çalışır, V., Demirci A. & Şimşek, E. (2021). Effects of COVID-19 on fuel gas emissions from marine transportation. 4th Global Conference on Innovation in Marine Technology and The Future of Marine Transportation, 18-19 November 2021, Iskenderun-Hatay, Turkey, 90.
  3. Akar, Ö., Şimşek, E. & Demirci A. (2017). Economic analysis of fishing ports in the Iskenderun Bay, Hatay. International Advanced Researches & Engineering Congress, 16-18 November 2017, Omaniye, Turkey, 2229.
  4. Akgüç, Ö. (1995). Mali tablolar analizi, Muhasebe Enstitüsü Yayın No: 64, Muhasebe Enstitüsü Eğitim ve Araştırma Vakfı Yayın No: 16, Genişletilmiş 9. Baskı, İstanbul: Avcıol Basım Yayın. (In Turkish)
  5. Belen, S. (2012). Rehabilitation of Fishery Shelters, Dokuz Eylül University Institute of Science, İzmir, Turkey, 130 p. (In Turkish)
  6. Can, M. F. & Demirci, A. (2012). Fisheries management in Turkey. International Journal of Aquaculture, 2(8), 48-58. https://doi.org/10.5376/IJA.2012.02.0008
  7. Can, M. F., Demirci, A. & Demirci, S. (2006). Fisheries in Iskenderun Bay. Report of the ICES-FAO Working Group on Fishing Technology and Fish Behaviour (WGFTFB), 3-7 April 2006, İzmir, Turkey, 50.
  8. Can, M. F., Serpin, D. & Can, M. F. (2012). The current situation of small scale fisheries in Iskenderun Bay: A case of Iskenderun, Arsuz and Konacik. Atatürk Üniversitesi Veteriner Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(3), 167-175. (In Turkish)
  9. Can, M. F., Şimşek, E., Demirci, A., Demirci, S. & Akar, Ö. (2020). The evaluation of the early impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the export of fishery commodities of Turkey. Marine and Life Sciences, 2(1), 18-27.
  10. Demirci, A. & Karagüzel, M. (2018). The evaluation of fishing vessels fuel consumption and pollutions emissions in the İskenderun Bay. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 27(1), 508-514.
APA
Akar, Ö., Demirci, A., Şimşek, E., Mazlum, Y., & Demirci, S. (2022). Management of Fishing Ports on the Financial Performance of the Türkiye Fishery Sector; A Case of Fishing Ports in Hatay Province. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, 7(3), 281-288. https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1117772