Research Article

Electron Microscopic and Morphometric Analysis of Wistar Rat Sperm

Volume: 9 Number: 2 June 30, 2024
EN TR

Electron Microscopic and Morphometric Analysis of Wistar Rat Sperm

Abstract

The aim of the study is to image and morphologically examine epididymal sperm in Wistar rats with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The material of the study was epididymal sperm taken from three Wistar Rats. Routine fixation was performed on the obtained epididymal sperm using 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution. Morphometric measurements of sperm were carried out using scanning electron microscopy. The study focused on examining various regions of the sperm, including the head, midpiece, and the remainder of the flagellar segment. Measurements were taken into account in semen that preserved its integrity in different fields. Measurements of these regions were made with the ImageJ program. As a result of the measurements, it was determined that the average head length of rat semen was 7.821 ± 0.844 μm, the average total flagellum length was 168.549 ± 9.19 μm and the average flagellum/head ratio was 21.550 and the flagellum was quite long. It was observed that the measurements of the rat sperm used in the study were consistent with the measurements of other rat sperm. When the studies were examined, it was concluded that rat sperm has an extremely long flagellum compared to its body size. The morphological differences of the sperms revealed will be a guide for experimental studies.

Keywords

Electron Microscope , Morphology , Rat sperm

References

  1. Avidor-Reiss, T., Khire, A., Fishman, E. L. & Jo, K. H. (2015). Atypical centrioles during sexual reproduction. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 3, 21.
  2. Cummins, J.M. & Woodall, P.F. (1985). On mammalian sperm dimensions. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 75, 153-175.
  3. Davis, R.O., Gravance, C.G., Thal, D.M. & Miller, M.G. (1994). Automated analysis of toxicantinduced changes in rat sperm head morphometry. Reproductive Toxicity, 8(6), 521-529.
  4. Demirci, B., Kandil, B., Yüksel, S. & Gültiken, M. E. (2023). Morphological structure of rat tongue using light and scanning electron microscopy. Microscopy Research and Technique, 86(1), 75- 83.
  5. Devireddy, R.V., Swanlund, D.J., Roberts, K.P. & Bischof, J.C. (1999). Subzero water permeability parameters of mouse spermatozoa in the presence of extracellular ice and cryoprotective agents. Biology of Reproduction, 61, 764-775.
  6. Dibal, N.I., Garba, S. H. & Jacks, T.W. (2020). Morphological assessment of epididymal sperm in Wistar rats using different histological stains. Acta Veterinaria Eurasia, 46(3), 132-137.
  7. Eddy, E. M., Toshimori, K., & O'Brien, D. A. (2003). Fibrous sheath of mammalian spermatozoa. Microscopy research and technique, 61(1), 103- 115.
  8. Firman, R.C. & Simmons, L.W. (2010). Experimental evolution of sperm quality via postcopulatory sexual selection in house mice. Evolution, 64, 1245-1256.
  9. Gage, M.J.G. (1998). Mammalian sperm morphometry. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences, 265, 97-103.
  10. Gomendio, M. & Roldan, E.R.S. (1991). Sperm size and sperm competition in mammals. Proceeding of the Royal Society London Series B, 243, 181-185.
APA
Demirci, E. (2024). Electron Microscopic and Morphometric Analysis of Wistar Rat Sperm. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, 9(2), 157-161. https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1440801