Ekotasarım Stratejileri ile Pop-Art Sandalye Tasarımlarının Karbon Ayak İzinin Azaltılması

Year 2024, , 676 - 686, 31.12.2024

Çağrı Uludüz , Serkan Sipahi , Neslihan Kulözü

https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1514795

Abstract

Endüstriyel ürünlerin karbon ayak izini tasarım aşamasından itibaren azaltmak, uygulayıcılar ve akademisyenler için modern bir endişe konusudur. Endüstriyel tasarım bağlamında eko-tasarım yaklaşımı, ürün yaşam döngüsünün erken aşamalarından itibaren çevresel etkiyi en aza indirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Yaşam Döngüsü Değerlendirmesi (YDD), çevresel etkileri değerlendirmek için geniş çapta kullanılan ve beşikten mezara metaforuna dayanan bir metodolojidir. Bu makalenin amacı, YDD'nin ürünlerin tasarım aşamasındaki karbon ayak izlerini nasıl ve ne ölçüde azaltabileceğini belirlemektir. Araştırma, dokuz pop-art sandalye tasarımı üzerinden gerçekleştirilen bir çoklu vaka çalışmasıdır. Çalışmada, karbon ayak izlerini azaltmaya yönelik eko-tasarım stratejileri temelinde özgün tasarımlar irdelenmiş; karbon ayak izlerinin hesaplanmasında CCaLC yazılımından yararlanılmıştır. Çalışmadan elde edilen bulgular; vintage özellikleri, estetik değerleri ve işlevselliği koruyarak bile anlamlı bir karbon ayak izi azalımı sağlanabileceğini göstermektedir. Çalışma, ekotasarım stratejileri sayesinde tasarım ürünlerinin, performansını tehlikeye atmadan, karbon ayak izlerinin önemli ölçüde azaltılabileceğinin mümkün olduğu sonucuna ulaşmaktadır.

Keywords

Ekotasarım, yaşam döngüsü değerlendirmesi (ydd), karbon ayak izi, sandalye tasarımı, pop-art

Reducing Carbon Footprint of Pop-Art Chair Designs By Ecodesign Strategies

Abstract

Reducing the footprint of industrial pieces since the design stage is a modern concern of practitioners and scholars. In the context of industrial design, the ecodesign approach aims at minimizing environmental impact from the early stages of the product lifecycle. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a widely used methodology to evaluate environmental impacts, relying on the cradle-to-grave metaphor. The purpose of this article is to identify how and to what extent LCA can reduce the carbon footprints of products in the early stage, the design. The research method is the multiple case study. The research object is a set of nine pop-art chairs. The CCaLC software supported the study. The study reviewed the original designs aiming at reducing carbon footprints by relying on eco-design strategies. The findings show that expressive reduction can be achieved, even by preserving vintage features, aesthetic values, and usefulness. The study concludes that is possible, owing to eco-design strategies, to significantly reduce the carbon footprints of design products without jeopardizing performance.

Keywords

Ecodesign, life cycle analysis (lca), carbon footprint, chair design, pop-art.

References

• Alderson, S., Ball, R. & Barber, E. (2006). Pioneers: Products from Phaidon design classics: 1,2,3. Phaidon Press, Londra.
• Anonymous. (2018). Chair: 500 designs that matter. Phaidon Publishing, London.
• Antmen, A. (2009). 20. yüzyıl batı sanatında akımlar. Sel Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
• Barca, S. (2011). Energy, property, and the industrial revolution narrative. Ecological Economics, 70(7), 1309-1315. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.012
• Borchardt, M., Sellitto, M.A., Pereira, G.M. & Gomes, L.P. (2012). Eco-design case studies for furniture companies using the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 19(8), 330-340.
• Bovea, M.D. & Vidal, R. (2004). Materials selection for sustainable product design: A case study of wood- based furniture eco-design. Materials & Design, 25(2), 111-116. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2003.09.018
• Cinar, H. (2005). Eco-design and furniture: Environmental impacts of wood-based panels, surface and edge finishes. Forest Products Journal, 55(11), 27-33.
• Cordella, M. & Hidalgo, C. (2016). Analysis of key environmental areas in the design and labelling of furniture products: Application of a screening approach based on a literature review of LCA studies. Sustainable Production & Consumption, 8: 64-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2016.07.002
• Cordero, M. P., & Poler, R. (2012). Eco-Design in the furniture and wood-processing sector in Spain: Benefits and constraints. In Industrial Engineering: Innovative Networks, 147-155p. Springer London, Londra. DOI: 10.1007/978-1- 4471-2321-7_17
• European Commission. (2016). Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/lifecycle assessment.html. (24 Aralık 2020). Fiell, C. & Fiell, P. (2019). 100 Ideas that changed design. Laurence King Publishing, Londra.
• Finnveden, G., Hauschild, M.Z., Ekvall, T., Guinée, J., Heijungs, R., Hellweg, S., Koehler, A., Pennington, D. & Suh, S. (2009). Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(1), 1-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018
• Guinee, J.B., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., Zamagni, A., Masoni, P., Buonamici, R., Ekvall, T. & Rydberg, T. (2011). Life cycle assessment: Past, present, and future. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(1), 90-96. DOI: 10.1021/es101316v
• Gonzalez-Garcia, S., Gasol, C.M., Lozano, R.G., Moreira, M.T., Gabarrell, X., Rieradevalli Pons, J. & Feijoo, G. (2011). Assessing the global warming potential of wooden products from the furniture sector to improve their ecodesign. Science of The Total Environment, 410-411, 16-25. DOI: 0.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.09.059
• Gonzalez-Garcia, S., Garcia Lozano, R., Moreira, M.T., Gabarrell, X., Rieradevall i Pons, J., Feijoo, G. & Murphy, R.J. (2012). Eco- innovation of a wooden childhood furniture set: An example of environmental solutions in the wood sector. Science of The Total Environment, 426, 318-326. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.077
• Hahnel, G., Whyte, A. & Biswas, W.K. (2021). A comparative life cycle assessment of structural flooring systems in Western Australia. Journal of Building Engineering, 35, 102109. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.102109
• Hartini, S., Wicaksono, P.A., Prastawa, H., Hadyan, A.F. & Sriyanto. (2019). The environmental impact assessment of furniture production process using the life cycle assessment. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science & Engineering, 598(1), 012078. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/598/1/012078 Hill, M.K. (2020). Understanding environmental pollution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Iritani, D.R., Silva, D.A.L., Saavedra, Y.M.B., Grael, P.F.F. & Ometto, A.R. (2015). Sustainable strategies analysis through Life Cycle Assessment: A case study in a furniture industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 308-318. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.029
• ISO14040. (2006). International standard. Environmental management-life cycle assessment-principles and framework; International Organization for Standardization.
• ISO14044. (2006). International Standard. Environmental management-life cycle assessment-requirements and guidelines; International Organization for Standardization.
• Jeswani, H.K., Smith, R.W. & Azapagic, A. (2013). Energy from waste: Carbon footprint of incineration and landfill biogas in the UK. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18(1), 218-229. DOI: 10.1007/s11367-012-0441- 8
• Klinpikul, N., & Srichandr, P. (2009). Status of eco- design in Thai furniture industry. Key Engineering Materials, 419-420: 769-772. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.419-420.769 Kulözü-Uzunboy, N. & Sipahi, S. (2020). Mimaride karbon ayak izini azaltmaya yönelik uygulamalı bir ders deneyimi. Journal of International Social Research, 13(73), 517-525.
• Kulözü-Uzunboy, N. & Kocabaş, A. (2021). Aydınlanma ekseninde insan-çevre iliskisinde yasanan degisime odaklanılarak modernitenin çevresel sonuçlarının kentlesme ve planlama ile birlikte irdelenmesi. Sürdürülebilir Çevre Dergisi, 1(2), 13-24.
• Landeta‐Manzano, B., Arana‐Landín, G., RuizdeArbulo, P. & DíazdeBasurto, P. (2016). Longitudinal analysis of the eco‐design management standardization process in furniture companies. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(5), 1356-1369. DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12479
• Mirabella, N., Castellani, V. & Sala, S. (2014). LCA for assessing environmental benefit of eco-design strategies and forest wood short supply chain: A furniture case study. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19(8), 1536-1550. DOI: 10.1007/s11367-014-0757-7
• Medeiros, D.L., Tavares, A.O. do C., Raposo, A.L.Q.R. e S. & Kiperstok, A. (2017). Life cycle assessment in the furniture industry: The case study of an office cabinet. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 22(11), 1823- 1836. DOI: 10.1007/s11367-017-1370-3
• Olagunju, B.D. & Olanrewaju, O.A. (2020). Comparison of life cycle assessment tools in cement production. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 31(4). DOI: 10.7166/31-4-2317
• Olkowicz, M. & Grzegorzewska, E. (2014). Eco-design as a strategic way to competitiveness in global markets for furniture family-owned MSMEs. Journal of Intercultural Management, 6(4-1), 203-214. DOI: 10.2478/joim-2014-0046
• Parikka-Alhola, K. (2008). Promoting environmentally sound furniture by green public procurement. Ecological Economics, 68(1-2), 472-485. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.05.004
• Paul, B.D. (2008). A History Of The Concept Of Sustainable Development: Literature Review, The Annals Of The University Of Oradea. Economic Sciences Series, 17, 576-580.
• Pereira, D., Cunha, S.K. da. & Pereira, L. (2018). Ecodesign in the furniture industry: opportunities and challenges for organizational insertion. Ambiente & Sociedade, 21, 1-17. DOI: 10.1590/1809-4422asoc0079r1vu18l1ao
• Schramm, A., Richter, F. & Götze, U. (2020). Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment for manufacturing – analysis of existing approaches. Procedia Manufacturing, 43, 712-719. DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.115
• Sellitto, M.A., Luchese, J., Bauer, J.M., Saueressig, G.G. & Viegas, C.V. (2017). Ecodesign practices in a furniture industrial cluster of southern brazil: From incipient practices to improvement. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy & Management, 19(01), 1750001.
• Sı̇pahı̇, M. & Yilmaz, H. (2022). Planning experience on the factors affecting the physical land use change and temporal change in the Eastern Black Sea coastal settlements; the case of Çayeli. Journal of Anatolian Environmental & Animal Sciences, 7(4), 397-405. DOI: 10.35229/jaes.1153664
• Sipahi, S. & Kulözü-Uzunboy, N. (2021). A study on reducing the carbon footprint of architectural buildings based on their materials under the guidance of eco-design strategies. Clean Technologies & Environmental Policy, 23(3), 991-1005. DOI: 10.1007/s10098-020-02009-4
• Stearns, P.N. (2020). The industrial revolution in world history. Routledge, New York.
• van Hemel, C. (1998). Ecodesign empirically explored: Design for environment in Dutch small and medium sized enterprises. University of Technology, Doktora Tezi. Delft, Hollanda.
• van Hemel, C. & Cramer, J. (2002). Barriers and stimuli for ecodesign in SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10(5), 439-453. DOI: 10.1016/s0959- 6526(02)00013-6
• Wenker, J.L., Richter, K. & Rüter, S. (2017). A methodical approach for systematic life cycle assessment of wood‐based furniture. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 22(4), 671-685. DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12581
• Williamson, J.G. (2002). Coping with city growth during the British industrial revolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Xiong, X., Ma, Q., YingyingYuan, Wu, Z. & Zhang, M. (2020). Current situation and key manufacturing considerations of green furniture in China: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 267, 121957. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121957.