Research Article

Exploring the Potential of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens N33 in Biocontrol

Volume: 10 Number: 4 July 31, 2025
TR EN

Exploring the Potential of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens N33 in Biocontrol

Abstract

The use of biocontrol agents instead of synthetic chemicals in the control of plant diseases and post-harvest preservation of fruits, vegetables and cereals has gained great momentum given their numerous advantages. In the present study, the antifungal activity of Bacillus amiyloliquefaciens N33 strain isolated from lettuce was tested in vitro against Penicillium citrinum, P. expansum, P. verrucosum, P. digitatum, P. paneum, Fusarium graminearum and Aspergillus fumigatus. The strain showed a high activity against all tested fungi and the inhibition rate ranged between 60.3-94.2%. The highest activity was observed against P. digitatum (94.2%) and P. expansum (82.5%), which caused significant postharvest losses in fruits. In addition, N33 showed a higher activity against F. graminearum, P. digitatum, P. expansum and P. paneum than the synthetic fungicide. The findings indicate that B. amiyloliquefaciens N33 can be a broad spectrum biological control agent against different fungal species.

Keywords

Aspergillus, Bacillus, Biocontrol, Fusarium, Penicillium

References

  1. Abbas, A., & Yli-Mattila, T. (2022). Biocontrol of Fusarium graminearum, a causal agent of Fusarium head blight of wheat, and deoxynivalenol accumulation: From in vitro to in planta. Toxins, 14(5), 299. DOI: 10.3390/toxins14050299
  2. Albayrak, Ç.B. (2019). Bacillus Species as Biocontrol Agents for Fungal Plant Pathogens. In: Islam, M., Rahman, M., Pandey, P., Boehme, M., Haesaert, G. (eds) Bacilli and Agrobiotechnology: Phytostimulation and Biocontrol. Bacilli in Climate Resilient Agriculture and Bioprospecting. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3- 030-15175-1_13
  3. Avan, M., Albastawisi, E.M., Levent, Y.D., İşlek, S., & Kotan, R. (2024). Evaluation of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens TV‐17C as a potential biocontrol agent for controlling postharvest Penicillium digitatum on orange. Journal of Phytopathology, 172(3), e13345. DOI: 10.1111/jph.13345
  4. Baard, V., Bakare, O.O., Daniel, A.I., Nkomo, M., Gokul, A., Keyster, M., & Klein, A. (2023). Biocontrol potential of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus tequilensis against four Fusarium species. Pathogens, 12(2), 254. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12020254
  5. Calvo, H., Marco, P., Blanco, D., Oria, R., & Venturini, M.E. (2017). Potential of a new strain of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens BUZ-14 as a biocontrol agent of postharvest fruit diseases. Food microbiology, 63, 101- 110. DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2016.11.004
  6. Chen, K., Tian, Z., Luo, Y., Cheng, Y., & Long, C.A. (2018). Antagonistic activity and the mechanism of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens DH-4 against citrus green mold. Phytopathology, 108(11), 1253-1262. DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO-01-17-0032-R
  7. Cruz-Martín, M., Mena, E., Acosta-Suárez, M., Pichardo, T., Rodriguez, E., & Alvarado-Capó, Y. (2020). Protein compounds of Bacillus subtilis with in vitro antifungal activity against Pseudocercospora fijiensis (Morelet). Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 51, 265-269. DOI: 10.1007/s42770-019-00136-9
  8. Dadrasnia, A., Usman, M.M., Omar, R., Ismail, S., & Abdullah, R. (2020). Potential use of Bacillus genus to control of bananas diseases: Approaches toward high yield production and sustainable management. Journal of King Saud University-Science, 32(4), 2336-2342. DOI: 10.1016/j.jksus.2020.03.011
  9. Deguine, J.P., Aubertot, J.N., Flor, R.J., Lescourret, F., Wyckhuys, K.A., & Ratnadass, A. (2021). Integrated pest management: good intentions, hard realities. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 41(3), 38. DOI: 10.1007/s13593-021-00689-w
  10. Dikbaş, N., Uçar, S., Tozlu, E., Kotan, M.Ş., & Kotan, R. (2023). Antifungal activity of partially purified bacterial chitinase against Alternaria alternata. Erwerbs-obstbau, 65(4), 761-766. DOI: 10.1007/s10341-022-00716-4
APA
Uçar, S., Alım, Ş., Dikbaş, N., & Kökten, K. (2025). Exploring the Potential of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens N33 in Biocontrol. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, 10(4), 360-365. https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1689328
AMA
1.Uçar S, Alım Ş, Dikbaş N, Kökten K. Exploring the Potential of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens N33 in Biocontrol. JAES. 2025;10(4):360-365. doi:10.35229/jaes.1689328
Chicago
Uçar, Sevda, Şeyma Alım, Neslihan Dikbaş, and Kağan Kökten. 2025. “Exploring the Potential of Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens N33 in Biocontrol”. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences 10 (4): 360-65. https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1689328.
EndNote
Uçar S, Alım Ş, Dikbaş N, Kökten K (July 1, 2025) Exploring the Potential of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens N33 in Biocontrol. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences 10 4 360–365.
IEEE
[1]S. Uçar, Ş. Alım, N. Dikbaş, and K. Kökten, “Exploring the Potential of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens N33 in Biocontrol”, JAES, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 360–365, July 2025, doi: 10.35229/jaes.1689328.
ISNAD
Uçar, Sevda - Alım, Şeyma - Dikbaş, Neslihan - Kökten, Kağan. “Exploring the Potential of Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens N33 in Biocontrol”. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences 10/4 (July 1, 2025): 360-365. https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1689328.
JAMA
1.Uçar S, Alım Ş, Dikbaş N, Kökten K. Exploring the Potential of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens N33 in Biocontrol. JAES. 2025;10:360–365.
MLA
Uçar, Sevda, et al. “Exploring the Potential of Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens N33 in Biocontrol”. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, vol. 10, no. 4, July 2025, pp. 360-5, doi:10.35229/jaes.1689328.
Vancouver
1.Sevda Uçar, Şeyma Alım, Neslihan Dikbaş, Kağan Kökten. Exploring the Potential of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens N33 in Biocontrol. JAES. 2025 Jul. 1;10(4):360-5. doi:10.35229/jaes.1689328