Investigation of Bioleaching Kinetics of Valuable Metals in Boron Waste
Abstract
This study utilized boron waste containing significant amounts of valuable metals as a secondary resource for metal recovery. Critical metals-lithium (Li), rubidium (Rb), and cesium (Cs)-identified in the boron waste were extracted via bioleaching using the fungus Aspergillus niger (A. niger). Biological methods such as bioleaching are considered low-cost and environmentally friendly and are particularly effective for metal recovery from secondary resources due to their efficiency in processing low-grade materials. Under the optimal conditions-31 days of incubation in a growth medium with A. niger using a shaking incubator at 30 °C and 125 rpm-bioleaching efficiencies of 78.67 % for Li, 37.44 % for Rb, and 30.47 % for Cs were achieved. To identify the rate-controlling mechanisms during bioleaching, two kinetic models based on the Shrinking Core Model (SCM) were applied. The kinetic analysis revealed that the leaching of all three metals was primarily governed by surface chemical reactions rather than diffusion through a product layer, as indicated by higher correlation coefficients. The presence of two kinetic stages for Li suggests an initial low-reactivity period followed by an accelerated dissolution stage as the reaction progressed. The rate constants (k) for the chemical control model were 0.0019-0.0238 day⁻¹ for Li, 0.0042 day⁻¹ for Rb, and 0.0034 day⁻¹ for Cs, indicating that Li reached higher rate constants and exhibited the highest apparent reactivity among the studied alkali metals.
Keywords
Bioleaching, Boron waste, Critical metal, Shrinking Core Model
Supporting Institution
Project Number
Ethical Statement
Thanks
References
- Bahaloo-Horeh, N., & Mousavi, S.M. (2017). Waste management of heavy metals. Waste Management, 60, 666.
- Baniasadi, M., Vakilchap, F., Bahaloo-Horeh, N., Mousavi, S.M., & Farnaud, S. (2019). Advances in bioleaching as a sustainable method for metal recovery from e-waste: A review. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 76, 75-90.
- Bharadwaj, A., & Ting, Y.P. (2013). Bioleaching of spent hydrotreating catalyst by thermophilic and mesophilic acidophiles: Effect of decoking. Advanced Materials Research, 825, 280.
- Bin, W., Yuanhui, J., Jianping, Z., Chang, L., & Xiaohua, L. (2008). Research progress on separations of rubidium and cesium from saline. Journal of Nanjing University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 5, 104-110.
- Bosecker, K. (1997). Bioleaching: Metal solubilization by microorganisms. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 20(3-4), 591-604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574- 6976.1997.tb00340.x
- Butterman, W.C., & Reese, R.G. (2003). Rubidium: Mineral commodity profiles. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 03-045.
- Chaves, C., Pereira, E., Ferreira, P., & Dias, A.G. (2021). Concerns about lithium extraction: A review and application for Portugal. The Extractive Industries and Society, 8, 100928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2021.100928
- Colmer, A.R., & Hinkle, M.E. (1947). The role of microorganisms in acid mine drainage: A preliminary report. Science, 106, 253-256.
- Demirbaş, A. (1998). Recycling of lithium from borogypsum by leaching with water and leaching kinetics. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 25, 125-131.
- Ertan, B. (2020). Chlorination roasting process for extraction of valuable metals in boron clays. Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 26, 1267.

