Research Article

Spatial Analysis of Land Uses and the Continuity of Pedestrian–Bicycle Routes in Coastal Corridor Planning: The Case of the City of Rize

Number: 2026 March 31, 2026
EN TR

Spatial Analysis of Land Uses and the Continuity of Pedestrian–Bicycle Routes in Coastal Corridor Planning: The Case of the City of Rize

Abstract

Urban coastal corridors are important spatial systems where the relationships between recreational uses, transportation infrastructure, and public open spaces become concentrated. This study aims to spatially evaluate land use types and the continuity of pedestrian and bicycle paths within the coastal corridor of Rize city center. The study area covers an approximately 15 km-long coastline located within the boundaries of the central district of Rize. ArcGIS-based spatial analyses, field inventory studies, and on-site observations were employed in the research. Land use types were analyzed using a supervised classification method; six recreational areas identified along the coast were evaluated in terms of their spatial and physical characteristics, accessibility levels, and the presence of pedestrian and bicycle paths. The findings indicate that settlement and transportation areas are dominant within the coastal corridor, while urban green areas exhibit a limited and fragmented distribution. The presence of uninterrupted pedestrian and bicycle paths along only 4.5 km of the approximately 15 km-long coastline restricts the functionality of the coastal corridor as a linear recreational system. Within the scope of the study, a planning proposal based on ensuring the continuity of pedestrian and bicycle paths was developed to address these spatial discontinuities.

Keywords

Land use , recreational areas , spatial analysis , urban coastal corridor , walking and cycling route continuity.

References

  1. Ahern, J. (2007). Green infrastructure for cities: The spatial dimension. Cities of the future: Towards integrated sustainable water and landscape management, 13, 267-283.
  2. Akın, A. (2020). Bursa ilinde ekolojik kent koridorları potansiyelinin ve değişiminin belirlenmesi. ArtGRID–Journal of Architecture Engineering and Fine Arts, 2(2), 87-97.
  3. Albrechts, L. (2001). In pursuit of new approaches to strategic spatial planning: A European perspective. International Planning Studies, 6(3), 293-310.
  4. Baltranaitė, E., Inácio, M., Pinto, L.V., Bogdziewicz, K., Rocha, J., Gomes, E., & Pereira, P. (2025). Tourism impacts on marine and coastal ecosystem services: A systematic review. Geography and Sustainability, 6(2), 100277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2025.100277
  5. Borst, H., Miedema, H., de Vries, S., Graham, J., & van Dongen, J. (2008). Relationships between street characteristics and perceived attractiveness for walking reported by elderly people. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(4), 353-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.02.010
  6. Brody, S.D. (2003). Are we learning to make better plans? A longitudinal analysis of plan quality associated with natural hazards. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23(2), 191-201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X03258635
  7. Brown, C., Corcoran, E., & Herkenrath, P. (2006). Marine and coastal ecosystems and human well- being: A synthesis report based on the findings of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.
  8. Collinge, S.K. (2009). Ecology of fragmented landscapes. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, USA, 340 p.
  9. Çakır, B. (2010). Urban coastal settlements: implementation of a coastal area assessment model in İskenderun case. Doktora Tezi, ODTÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  10. Çorbacı, Ö.L., Abay, G., Oğuztürk, T., & Üçok, M. (2020). Kentsel rekreasyonel alanlardaki bitki varlığı; Rize örneği. Düzce Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Ormancılık Dergisi, 16(2), 16-44.
APA
Sipahi, M., & Yılmaz, H. (2026). Spatial Analysis of Land Uses and the Continuity of Pedestrian–Bicycle Routes in Coastal Corridor Planning: The Case of the City of Rize. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, 2026. https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1866106