Evcil Kuş Yetiştiriciliğinde Yuva Yapımına Müdahale Edilmeli mi?

Year 2025, Volume: 10 Issue: 2, 126 - 131

Arda Onur Özkök , Gözde Kılınç

https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1619540

Abstract

Üreme mevsiminde evcil ötücü kuşlardan mümkün olduğunca çok yavru elde edilmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Ancak yuva yapımında kullanılan yuva malzemesinin yetersizliği ve yuva yapımında kuşların bireysel yetenekleri üreme mevsiminin başarısını doğrudan etkilemektedir. Bu çalışmada aynı yuva malzemesini kullanarak iki grup dişi Gloster kanaryasının yaptığı yuvalar değerlendirilmiş, döllenmiş yumurtaların çıkış oranları ve yavruların gelişimi üzerine etkileri değerlendirilmiştir. Bu amaçla 1.grupta (T-1) 4, 2.grupta (T-2) 4 olmak üzere toplam 8 adet dişi kanarya kullanıldı. Kızgınlık gösteren dişi kuşlar suni tohumlama ile tohumlanarak yumurta çıkış oranları değerlendirilmiştir. Grup T-1'deki yuvalara yuva yapımı sırasında müdahale edilmemiş, Grup T-2'deki yuvalara ise yuva yapımı sırasında müdahale edilmiş ve döllenmiş yumurtaların çıkış oranları gözlenmiştir. T-2 grubunun T-1 grubuna göre daha başarılı olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. Yuva yapımı sırasında kuşların yuvalarında gözlenen eksikliklerin belli bir oranda giderilmesiyle daha fazla yavru elde edilmesi mümkün olabilir. Bu çalışmanın amacı eşit şartlarda tohumlanan dişi kuşların yuvalarına yapılan müdahalelerin kuluçka süreci ve yumurtadan çıkma oranına olan etkilerini belirlemektir.

Keywords

Kanarya kuşu, yuva materyali, yuva müdahalesi, suni tohumlama

Should Nest Construction Be İntervened İn Domestic Bird Breeding?

Abstract

The aim is to get as many offspring as possible from domestic songbirds during the breeding season. However, the inadequacy of the nest material used during nest construction and the individual abilities of the birds in nest construction directly affect the success of the breeding season. In this study, the nests built by two groups of female Gloster canaries using the same nest material were evaluated, and the effects on the hatching rates of fertile eggs and the development of offspring were evaluated. For this purpose, 8 female canaries were used, 4 in 1st group (T-1) and 4 in 2nd group (T-2). Female birds showing estrus were artificially inseminated, and the hatching rates of the eggs were evaluated. The nests of Group T-1 were not intervened in the nests, and the nests of Group T-2 were intervened in the nest during construction, and the hatching rates of fertile eggs were observed. It was concluded that the T-2 group was more successful than the T-1 group. It may be possible to obtain more offspring by eliminating the deficiencies observed in the nests of the birds during nest construction to a certain extent. The aim of this study is to determine the effects of interventions made to the nests of female birds inseminated under equal conditions on the incubation process and the hatching rate.

Keywords

Artificial insemination, canary bird, nest material, nest intervention

References

• Bach, R.A.K., Brann, M. & Aime, M.C. (2022). Viability of fungal rhizomorphs used in bird nest construction in tropical rainforests. Symbiosis, 87(2), 175-179. DOI: 10.1007/s13199-022- 00856-x
• Bakst, M.R. & Cecil, H.C. (1997). Techniques for semen evaluation, semen storage, and fertility determination. In: Poultry Science Association, 2nd edn, Murray R. Bakst & Julie A. Long, Buffalo, Minnesota, p. 11-15.
• Biddle, L. E., Broughton, R. E., Goodman, A. M., & Deeming, D. C. (2018). Composition of bird nests is a species-specific characteristic. Avian Biology Research, 11(2), 132-153. DOI: 10.3184/175815618x15222318755467
• Biddle, L.E., Dickinson, A.M., Broughton, R.E., Gray, L.A., Bennett, S.L., Goodman, A.M., & Deeming, D.C. (2019). Construction materials affect the hydrological properties of bird nests. Journal of Zoology, 309(3), 161-171. DOI: 10.1111/jzo.12713
• Breen, A.J., Healy, S.D. & Guillette, L.M. (2021). Reproductive consequences of material use in avian nest construction. Behavioural Processes, 193, 104507. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2021.104507
• Chiver, I., Ball, G.F., Lallemand, F., Vandries, L.M., Plumier, J.P., Cornil, C.A. & Balthazart, J. (2022). Photoperiodic control of singing behavior and reproductive physiology in male Fife fancy canaries. Hormones and Behavior, 143, 105194 DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2022.105194
• Cramer, E.R., Rowe, M., Eroukhmanoff, F., Lifjeld, J.T., Sætre, G.P. & Johnsen, A. (2019). Measuring sperm swimming performance in birds: effects of dilution, suspension medium, mechanical agitation, and sperm number. Journal of Ornithology, 160, 1053-1063. DOI: 10.1007/s10336-019-01672-9
• Cramer, E.R., Grønstøl, G., Maxwell, L., Kovach, A.I. & Lifjeld, J.T. (2021). Sperm length divergence as a potential prezygotic barrier in a passerine hybrid zone. Ecology and Evolution, 11(14), 9489-9497. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7768
• Deeming, D.C. (2011). Importance of nest type on the regulation of humidity in bird nests. Avian Biology Research, 4(1), 23-31. DOI: 10.3184/175815511X13013963263739
• Deeming, D.C. (2023). A review of the roles materials play in determining functional properties of bird nests. Acta Ornithologica, 58(1), 1-28. DOI: 10.3161/00016454AO2023.58.1.001
• Esin, B., Kaya, C., Akar, M. & Çevik, M. (2024). Investigation of the protective effects of different forms of selenium in freezing dog semen: Comparison of nanoparticle selenium and sodium selenite. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 59(6), e14652. DOI: 10.1111/rda.14652
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.G. & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
• Healy, S.D., Tello-Ramos, M.C. & Hébert, M. (2023). Bird nest building: visions for the future. In Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (Vol. 378, Issue 1884). Royal Society Publishing. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0157
• IBM Corp. (2011): IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY Järvinen, P., Kluen, E. & Brommer, J.E. (2017). Low heritability of nest construction in a wild bird. Biology Letters, 13(10), 20170246. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2017.0246
• Jessel, H.R., Aharoni, L., Efroni, S. & Bachelet, I. (2019). A modeling algorithm for exploring the architecture and construction of bird nests. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 14772. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-51478-1
• Lamprecht, I., & Schmolz, E. (2004). Thermal investigations of some bird nests. Thermochimica Acta, 415(1-2), 141-148. DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2003.08.029
• Mayer, P.M., Smith, L.M., Ford, R.G., Watterson, D.C., McCutchen, M.D. & Ryan, M.R. (2009). Nest construction by a ground-nesting bird represents a potential trade-off between egg crypticity and thermoregulation. Oecologia, 159(4), 893-901. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-008- 1266-9
• Mennerat, A., Perret, P. & Lambrechts, M.M. (2009). Local individual preferences for nest materials in a passerine bird. PLoS ONE, 4(4), e5104. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005104
• Özkök, A.O. (2022). Semen collection from small breed birds and some parameters related to passerine bird semen. International Journal of Science Letters, 4(1), 220-225. DOI: 10.38058/ijsl.1052705
• Sonnenberg, B.R., Branch, C.L., Benedict, L.M., Pitera, A.M. & Pravosudov, V.V. (2020). Nest construction, ambient temperature and reproductive success in a cavity-nesting bird. Animal Behaviour, 165, 43-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.04.011
• Tello-Ramos, M.C., Sugasawa, S., Dibia, M. & King, H. (2022). Tools, behavior, and materials: What should we learn from animal nest construction?. In Biomimicry for materials, design and habitats. Elsevier, 183-214p. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12- 821053-6.00014-X
• Walsh, P.T., Hansell, M., Borello, W.D. & Healy, S.D. (2013). Are elaborate bird nests built using simple rules? Avian Biology Research, 6(2), 157-162. DOI: 10.3184/175815513X13629302805186
• Yang, Y., Zhang, Y., Ding, J., Ai, S., Guo, R., Bai, X. & Yang, W. (2019). Optimal analysis conditions for sperm motility parameters with a CASA system in a passerine bird, Passer montanus. Avian Research, 10(1), 1-10. DOI: 10.1186/s40657- 019-0174-5.