Estimation of the compression strength and surface roughness of the as-built SLS components using weibull distribution

Abstract

Selective laser sintering (SLS) is a process of fabrication of three-dimensional structures by fus- ing powder particles using a guided laser source. The uncertainty in the mechanical properties of the SLS parts fabricated at the same time and with the same process parameters can affect the repeatability of the SLS process. A vast difference in the mechanical properties of the con- currently processed parts can lower the production quality of the batch. Therefore, the param- eters are required to be design based on the most probable outcome of the desired properties. Weibull distribution is one such statistical-based probability distribution method to measure the likelihood of the occurrence of a value of any random variable falling within a particular range of values. Here, the Weibull distribution was used to measure the relative likelihood (90% probability) of the surface roughness and the compressive strength values of the SLS-built polyamide PA2200 components in the given sample space that was obtained from 20 random samples. The results show that the variance in the surface roughness (scan and built plane) and the compressive strength values were in the range of 6–7 μm and around 10 MPa, respectively. Moreover, the surface roughness of the two orthogonal planes with 90% reliability was mea- sured at 14.81 μm (scan plane) and 12.15 μm (built plane). Similarly, the yield strength and the compressive strength with 90% reliability were found 25.87 MPa and 62.64 MPa, respectively.

Keywords

• Compression testing
• PA2200
• selective laser sintering
• surface roughness
• Weibull distribution.

References

1. [1] Khan, H. M., Sirin, T. B., Tarakci, G., Bulduk, M. E., Coskun, M., Koc, E., & Kaynak, Y. (2021). Improving the surface quality and mechanical properties of selective laser sintered PA2200 components by the vibratory surface finishing process. SN Applied Sciences, 3, 364, 1-14.
2. [2] Khan, H. M., Dirikolu, M. H., & Koç, E. (2018). Parameters optimization for horizontally built circular profiles: Numerical and experimental investigation. Optik, 174, 521–529.
3. [3] Zarringhalam, H., Hopkinson, N., Kamperman, N. F., & de Vlieger, J. J. (2006). Effects of processing on microstructure and properties of SLS Nylon 12. Materials Science and Engineering A, 435–436, 172–180.
4. [4] Schmidt, J., Sachs, M., Blümel, C., Winzer, B., Toni, F., Wirth, K. E., & Peukert, W. (2015). A novel process chain for the production of spherical sls polymer powders with good flowability. Procedia Engineering, 102, 550–556.
5. [5] Khan, H. M., Karabulut, Y., Kitay, O., Kaynak, Y., Jawahir, I. S., Mahmood, K. H. (2021). Influence of the post-processing operations on surface integrity of metal components produced by laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing: a review. Machining Science and Technology, 25(1), 118–176.
6. [6] Zhou, J., Zhang, Y., & Chen, J. K. (2009). Numerical Simulation of Random Packing of Spherical Particles for Powder-Based Additive Manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 131(3), 031004.
7. [7] Salmoria, G. V, Leite, J. L., Ahrens, C. H., Lago, A., & Pires, A. T. N. (2007). Rapid manufacturing of PA/HDPE blend specimens by selective laser sintering: Microstructural characterization. Polymer Testing, 26(3), 361–368.
8. [8] Özbay, B., & Serhatlı, E. (2020). Processing and Characterization of Hollow Glass-Filled Polyamide 12 Composites by Selective Laser Sintering Method. Materials Technology, 00(00), 1–11.

9. [9] Koç, E., Çalışkan, C. İ., Coşkun, M., & Khan, H. M. (2020). Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Production With Additive Manufacturing. Journal of Aviation, 4(1), 22–30.
10. [10] Keleş, Ö., Blevins, C. W., & Bowman, K. J. (2017). Effect of build orientation on the mechanical reliability of 3D printed ABS. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 23(2), 320–328.
11. [11] Dirikolu, M. M. H., Aktas, A., & Birgoren, B. (2002). Statistical analysis of fracture strength of composite materials using Weibull distribution. Turkish Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences, 26(1), 45–48.
12. [12] Khan, H. M., Dirikolu, M. H., & Koç, E. (2019). Weibull distribution of selective laser melted AlSi10Mg parts for compression testing. AMC Turkey 2019 Conference, İstanbul, 1, 1–9.
13. [13] Weibull, W. (1951). A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 18, 290–293.
14. [14] Borzan, C. S. M., Moldovan, M., & Bocanet, V. (2018). Evaluation of Surface Modification of PA 2200 Parts Made by Selective Laser Sintering Process. Revista de Chimie, 69(4), 886–889.
15. [15] Liu, S., Xi, Z., Tang, H., Yang, X., Zhang, Z., & Liu, Q. (2014). Sintering Behavior of Porous Titanium Fiber Materials. Journal of Iron and Steel Research, International, 21(9), 849–854.
16. [16] Drummer, D., Rietzel, D., & Kühnlein, F. (2010). Development of a characterization approach for the sintering behavior of new thermoplastics for selective laser sintering. Physics Procedia, 5(2), 533–542.
17. [17] Sing, S. L., Wiria, F. E., & Yeong, W. Y. (2018). Selective laser melting of titanium alloy with 50 wt% tantalum: Effect of laser process parameters on part quality. International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials, 77, 120–127.
18. [18] Khan, H. M., Özer, G., Tarakci, G., Coskun, M., Koc, E., & Kaynak, Y. (2021). The impact of aging and drag-finishing on the surface integrity and corrosion behavior of the selective laser melted maraging steel samples. Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik, 52(1), 60–73.