Research Article

Microstructure of Eobania vermiculata (Müller, 1774): SEM, F-TIR and XRD Methods

Volume: 3 Number: 2 December 31, 2022
EN

Microstructure of Eobania vermiculata (Müller, 1774): SEM, F-TIR and XRD Methods

Abstract

In this study, Scanning electron microscope (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses are used for the microstructure characterisation of Eobania vermiculata samples collected from Iskenderun region. The shells of land snails are discarded as waste; however, they are qualified materials with multiple use areas. To substantiate this proposition, an attempt was made to elucidate the physical and chemical properties of the shells of chocolate band snail, E. vermiculata. SEM observations indicated that nacre crystals are always laminated aragonite, usually presenting sharp edges. Nacre crystallites which pile up into columns vertically abreast aligned observed. The crystals are about 390-155 nm thick, and they form stacks along a fixed spacing, filled with biological matter. The XRD and FTIR observations revealed the dominance of the aragonite form of the calcium carbonate crystal in the microstructures of each snail shell with the occurrence of different shell surface functional groups. Thus, further exploration of the shell inclusive of the organic components is required to promote its possible use as a biocomposite. Nonetheless, the present study provides an overview of physical and chemical characteristics of the land snail shells and inlight their potential use in different areas in the perspective of sustainability.

Keywords

Characterization , Chocolate band snail , Land snail , Microstructure , SEM

References

  1. Addadi, L., Joester, D., Nudelman, F., & Weiner, S. (2006). Mollusk shell formation: A source of new concepts for understanding biomineralization processes. Chemistry - A European Journal, 12(4), 980-987. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.200500980
  2. Agbaje, O. B. A., Wirth, R., Morales, L. F. G., Shirai, K., Kosnik, M., Watanabe, T., & Jacob, D. E. (2017). Architecture of crossed-lamellar bivalve shells: The southern giant clam (Tridacna derasa, Röding, 1798). Royal Society Open Science, 4(9), 170622. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170622
  3. Anjaneyulu, U., Pattanayak, D. K., & Vijayalakshmi, U. (2015). Snail shell derived natural hydroxyapatite: Effects on NIH-3T3 cells for orthopedic applications. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 31(2), 206-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2015.1070415
  4. Cárdenas, G., Cabrera, G., Taboada, E., & Miranda, S. P. (2004). Chitin characterization by SEM, FTIR, XRD, and 13C cross polarization/mass angle spinning NMR. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 93(4), 1876-1885. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.20647
  5. Checa, A. (2000). A new model for periostracum and shell formation in Unionidae (Bivalvia, Mollusca). Tissue and Cell, 32(5), 405-416. https://doi.org/10.1054/tice.2000.0129
  6. Currey, J. D. (1988). Shell form and strength. In E. R. Trueman & M. R. Clarke (Eds.), The Mollusca: Form and function (pp. 183-210). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-751411-6.50015-1
  7. Dauphin, Y. (1999). Infrared spectra and elemental composition in recent biogenic calcites: Relationships between the upsilon 4 band wavelength and Sr and Mg concentrations. Applied Spectroscopy, 53(2), 184-190.
  8. Dauphin, Y., Brunelle, A., Medjoubi, K., Somogyi, A., & Cuif, J. P. (2018). The prismatic layer of Pinna: A showcase of methodological problems and preconceived hypotheses. Minerals, 8(9), 365. https://doi.org/10.3390/min8090365
  9. de Paula, S. M., & Silveira, M. (2009). Studies on molluscan shells: Contributions from microscopic and analytical methods. Micron, 40(7), 669-690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2009.05.006
  10. Dedov, I. (1998). Annotated check-list of the Bulgarian terrestrial snails (Mollusca, Gastropoda). Linzer Biologische Beiträge, 30(2), 745-765.
APA
Öksüz, K. E., & Şereflişan, H. (2022). Microstructure of Eobania vermiculata (Müller, 1774): SEM, F-TIR and XRD Methods. Journal of Agricultural Production, 3(2), 42-47. https://doi.org/10.56430/japro.1128026