Review

DELAYING BEHAVIOR IN INSTITUTIONS: PROCRASTINATION

Number: 1 April 1, 2019
EN

DELAYING BEHAVIOR IN INSTITUTIONS: PROCRASTINATION

Abstract

Human-resource, whose importance cannot be denied for institutions, can contribute to the institution with the knowledge and skills they have. On the other hand, they can punish the institution with different behaviors. Procrastination, interpreted as a coping mechanism (Burka and Yuen, 1983, p.60), is a complex fact that has behavioral, emotional, and cognitive features (Kovylin, 2013, p. 27).

In this study, the procrastination term was defined and the factors that cause the procrastination behavior were explained. In addition, the correlated dimensions and the results from the point of institutions were discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Ariely, D. ve Wertenbroch, K. (2002). Procrastination, Deadlines, and Performance: Self-Control by Precommitment. Psychological Science, 13(3), 219-224.
  2. Blunt, A. K. ve Pychyl, T. A. (2000). Task aversiveness and procrastination: A multi-dimensional approach to task aversiveness across stages of personal projects. Personality and Individual Differences, 28(1), 153-167.
  3. Burka,J.B. ve Yuen, L.M. (1983). Procrastination: why you do ıt, what to do abaut ıt. New York Addison-Wessley.
  4. Çavuşoğlu, C. ve Karataş, H. (2015). Academic procrastination of undergraduates: Self-determination theory and academic motivation. Anthropologist, 20(3), 735-743.
  5. Ferrari, J. R. ve Diaz-Morales, J. F. (2007). Procrastination: Different time orientations reflect different motives. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 707-714.
  6. Ferrari, J. R. (1992). Procrastination in the Workplace: Attrıbutıons for Faılure Among Indıvıduals Wıth Sımılar Behavıoral Tendencıes. Person. individ. Diff., 13(3), 315-319.
  7. Ferrari, J. R. (1994). Dysfunctional Procrastinatıon and its Relatıonshıp Wıth Self-Esteem, Interpersonal Dependency, and Self-Defeatıng Behavıors. Person. individ. Diff., 17(5), 673-679.
  8. Gafni, R. ve Geri, N. (2010). Time management: Procrastination tendency in individual and collaborative tasks. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 5, 115-125.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Review

Publication Date

April 1, 2019

Submission Date

February 20, 2019

Acceptance Date

March 4, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 2019 Number: 1

APA
Uyar, S. (2019). DELAYING BEHAVIOR IN INSTITUTIONS: PROCRASTINATION. Journal of Academic Perspective on Social Studies, 1, 40-43. https://doi.org/10.35344/japss.529729
AMA
1.Uyar S. DELAYING BEHAVIOR IN INSTITUTIONS: PROCRASTINATION. Journal of Academic Perspective on Social Studies. 2019;(1):40-43. doi:10.35344/japss.529729
Chicago
Uyar, Seda. 2019. “DELAYING BEHAVIOR IN INSTITUTIONS: PROCRASTINATION”. Journal of Academic Perspective on Social Studies, no. 1: 40-43. https://doi.org/10.35344/japss.529729.
EndNote
Uyar S (April 1, 2019) DELAYING BEHAVIOR IN INSTITUTIONS: PROCRASTINATION. Journal of Academic Perspective on Social Studies 1 40–43.
IEEE
[1]S. Uyar, “DELAYING BEHAVIOR IN INSTITUTIONS: PROCRASTINATION”, Journal of Academic Perspective on Social Studies, no. 1, pp. 40–43, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.35344/japss.529729.
ISNAD
Uyar, Seda. “DELAYING BEHAVIOR IN INSTITUTIONS: PROCRASTINATION”. Journal of Academic Perspective on Social Studies. 1 (April 1, 2019): 40-43. https://doi.org/10.35344/japss.529729.
JAMA
1.Uyar S. DELAYING BEHAVIOR IN INSTITUTIONS: PROCRASTINATION. Journal of Academic Perspective on Social Studies. 2019;:40–43.
MLA
Uyar, Seda. “DELAYING BEHAVIOR IN INSTITUTIONS: PROCRASTINATION”. Journal of Academic Perspective on Social Studies, no. 1, Apr. 2019, pp. 40-43, doi:10.35344/japss.529729.
Vancouver
1.Seda Uyar. DELAYING BEHAVIOR IN INSTITUTIONS: PROCRASTINATION. Journal of Academic Perspective on Social Studies. 2019 Apr. 1;(1):40-3. doi:10.35344/japss.529729