Toprak ve Su Kirliliği Farkındalığı ve Havayolu İşletmelerinde Yolcuların Bilet Satın Alma Davranışları

Abstract

Sürdürülebilirlik çağında her sektör gibi sivil havacılık taşımacılığı da kendi varlığını sürdürebilmek için çözümler üretmelidir. Bu nedenle, havacılık endüstrisinde faaliyet gösteren uluslararası kuruluşlar ve bu endüstrinin diğer oyuncuları, Sera Gazı Emisyonları gibi güncel çevre sorunlarına bazı çözümler bulmaya çalışmaktadır. Ancak sivil havacılıkla ilgili toprak ve su kirliliği sorunları da özellikle çevre, insan ve hayvan sağlığı üzerinde belirleyici ve yıkıcı etkilere sahiptir. Bu makaleyi belirgin kılan, sivil havacılık taşımacılığı bağlamında su ve toprak kirliliği konusunda gerçek verilerle net bir değerlendirme yapması ve bundan sonraki makalelere temel teşkil etmesidir. Makalenin sonuçlarına göre, Türk havayolu yolcularının toprak ve su kirliliğine yönelik bilgi düzeyleri şüpheye yer bırakmayacak şekilde olgun düzeydedir. Ancak özellikle sivil havacılıkla ilgili su ve toprak kirliliğine yönelik farkındalık düzeyleri bazı sorunları içerebilir. Buna örnek olarak kerosen (gazyağı) bilincinin düşük olması verilebilir. Bu nedenlerle, bu makalenin konuları aydınlatıcıdır ve bulgular ilgi çekicidir.

Keywords

• Toprak ve su kirliliği
• Sivil Havacılık
• Bilet Satınalma Davranışı

Soil and Water Pollution Awareness and Fare Purchasing Behaviour of Passengers in Air Carriers

Abstract

In this sustainability age, like every sector, also civil aviation transportation should find solutions in order to sustain its own presence. Therefore, international aviational organizations and other players of this industry try to find some solutions recent environmental problems such as Greenhouse Gases Emissions. But also, civil aviation related soil and water pollution problems have got especially decisive and disruptive impacts on environment, human and animal health. What makes this paper more distinct is that it is clearly make an evaluation on water and soil pollution in civil aviation transportation context with real data therefore it serves as a baseline for next papers. 389 people are participated in the survey for this article from Turkey sample. According to article conclusions, the information levels of Turkish passengers toward soil and water pollution are mature level without suspicion, but especially their awareness level toward civil aviation related water and soil pollution can include some problems, for example, consciousness of kerosene is very low. For these reasons, subjects of this article are so illuminative, and findings are interesting.

Keywords

• Soil and Water pollution
• Civil aviation
• Airfare Purchasing Behaviour

References

1. 1. Abate, M., Christidis, P., &Purwanto, A. J. (2020). Government support to airlines in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of air transport management, 89, 101931.
2. 2. Ahn, D. H., Kim, S. W., Lee, H., Ko, I. J., Karthik, D., Lee, J. Y., &Kwon, J. H. (2019). Highly efficient blue thermally activated delayed fluorescence emitters based on symmetrical and rigid oxygen-bridged bor on acceptors. Nature Photonics, 13(8), 540-546.
3. 3. Al Sarrah, M., Ajmal, M. M., &Mertzanis, C. (2020). Identification of sustainability indicators in the civil aviation sector in Dubai: a stakeholders’ perspective. Social Responsibility Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-06-2019-0203.
4. 4. Amankwah-Amoah, J. (2020). Note: Mayday, Mayday, Mayday! Responding to environmental shocks: Insights on global airlines’ responses to COVID-19. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 143, 102098.
5. 5. Anger, A., & Köhler, J. (2010). Including aviation emissions in the EU ETS: Much a do about nothing? A review. Transport Policy, 17(1), 38-46.
6. 6. Araujo, G., Vivier, F., Labaja, J. J., Hartley, D., &Ponzo, A. (2017). Assessing the impacts of tourism on theworld's largest fish Rhinco dontypus at Panaon Island, SouthernLeyte, Philippines. AquaticConservation: Marine andFreshwaterEcosystems, 27(5), 986-994.
7. 7. Arjomandi, A., &Seufert, J. H. (2014). An evaluation of theworld's major airlines' technical and environmental performance. EconomicModelling, 41, 133-144.
8. 8. Baxter, G., Srisaeng, P., & Wild, G. (2020). Airport Related Emissions and their Impact on Air Quality at a Major Japanese Airport: The Case of Kansai International Airport. Transport and Telecommunication, 21(2), 95-109.

9. 9. Brtnický, M., Pecina, V., Galiová, M. V., Prokeš, L., Zvěřina, O., Juřička, D., ... &Kynický, J. (2020). The impact of tourism on extremely visited volcanic island: Link between environmental pollution and transportation modes. Chemosphere, 249, 126118.
10. 10. Calvo, O. C., Quaglia, G., Mohiley, A., Cesarini, M., & Fangmeier, A. (2020). Assessing potential aquatic toxicity of airport runoff using physicochemical parameters and Lemna gibba and Aliivibrio fischeri bioassays. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(32), 40604-40617.
11. 11. Cui, Q., &Li, Y. (2020). A crossefficiencydistinguishingmethodtoexplorethecooperationdegree in dynamic airline environmental efficiency. Transport Policy, 99, 31-43.
12. 12. Cui, Q., Li, Y., & Lin, J. L. (2018). Pollution abatement costs change decomposition for airlines: An analysis from a dynamic perspective. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 111, 96-107.
13. 13. Deane, J. P., &Pye, S. (2018). Europe's ambition forbio fuels in aviation-A strategic review of challenges and opportunities. Energy strategy reviews, 20, 1-5.
14. 14. Dubois, G., &Ceron, J. P. (2020). The future GHG emissions of tourism by Brazilians. Current Issues in Tourism, 23(14), 1742-1757.
15. 15. Efthymiou, M., &Papatheodorou, A. (2019). EU Emissions Trading scheme in aviation: Policyanalysis and suggestions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117734.
16. 16. Fageda, X., &Gonzalez-Aregall, M. (2017). Do all transport modes impact on industrial employment? Empirical evidence from the Spanish regions. Transport Policy, 55, 70-78.
17. 17. Freeman, A. I., Surridge, B. W., Matthews, M., Stewart, M., &Haygarth, P. M. (2015). Understanding and managing de-icer contamination of airport surface waters: A synthesis and future perspectives. Environmental Technology&Innovation, 3, 46-62.
18. 18. Gabriel, F. A., Silva, A. G., Queiroz, H. M., Ferreira, T. O., Hauser‐Davis, R. A., & Bernardino, A. F. (2020). Ecological risks of metal and metalloid contamination in the Rio Doce estuary. Integrated environmental assessment and management, 16(5), 655-660.
19. 19. García-Sánchez, E., García-Morales, V. J., &Martín-Rojas, R. (2018). Analysis of the influence of the environment, stakeholder integration capability, absorptive capacity, and technological skills on organizationalperformancethroughcorporateentrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurshipand Management Journal, 14(2), 345-377.
20. 20. Guo, H., Jiang, C., & Wan, Y. (2018). Can airfares tell? An alternative empirical strategy for airport congestion internalization. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 118, 648-661.
21. 21. Høisæter, Å., Pfaff, A., & Breedveld, G. D. (2019). Leaching and transport of PFAS from aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) in the unsaturated soil at a fire fighting training facility under cold climatic conditions. Journal of contaminant hydrology, 222, 112-122.
22. 22. Hwang, J., & Choi, J. K. (2020). Understanding environmentally friendly airline travelers' internal environmental locus of control and its consequences. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 100612.
23. 23. Inman, A., Winter, M., Wheeler, R., Vrain, E., Lovett, A., Collins, A., ... &Cleasby, W. (2018). An exploration of individual, social and material factors influencing water pollution mitigation behaviours within the farming community. Land UsePolicy, 70, 16-26.
24. 24. Jin, Y., O'Connor, D., Ok, Y. S., Tsang, D. C., Liu, A., & Hou, D. (2019). Assessment of sources of heavy metals in soil and dust at children's playgrounds in Beijing using GIS and multivariate statistical analysis. Environment international, 124, 320-328.
25. 25. Kanda, W., &Kivimaa, P. (2020). What opportunities could the COVID-19 out break offer for sustainability transitions research on electricity and mobility?. EnergyResearch&Social Science, 68, 101666.
26. 26. Kent, R. A., Andersen, D., Caux, P. Y., &Teed, S. (1999). Canadian water quality guidelines for glycols–An eco toxicological review of glycols and associated aircraft anti‐icing and deicing fluids. Environmental Toxicology: An International Journal, 14(5), 481-522.
27. 27. Koščák, P., Berežný, Š., Vajdová, I., Koblen, I., Ojciec, M., Matisková, D., &Puškáš, T. (2020). Reducing the Negative Environmental Impact of Winter Airport Maintenance through Its Model Design and Simulation. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(4), 1296.
28. 28. Li, Y., &Cui, Q. (2018). Investigating the role of cooperation in the GHG abatement costs of airlines under CNG2020 strategy via a DEA cross PAC model. Energy, 161, 725-736.
29. 29. Ma, W., Wang, Q., Yang, H., &Zhang, Y. (2020). Evaluating the price effects of two airline mergers in China. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 141, 102030.
30. 30. Ma, W., Wang, Q., Yang, H., Zhang, A., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Effects of Beijing-Shanghai high-speed rail on air travel: Passenger types, airline groups and tacit collusion. Research in Transportation Economics, 74, 64-76.
31. 31. Meleo, L., Nava, C. R., &Pozzi, C. (2016). Aviation and the costs of the European Emission Trading Scheme: The case of Italy. EnergyPolicy, 88, 138-147.
32. 32. Merkert, R., &Webber, T. (2018). How to manage seasonality in service industries–the case of price and seat factor management in airlines. Journal of Air Transport Management, 72, 39-46.
33. 33. Milley, S. A., Koch, I., Fortin, P., Archer, J., Reynolds, D., &Weber, K. P. (2018). Estimating the number of airports potentiallycontaminatedwithperfluoroalkylandpolyfluoroalkylsubstances fromaqueous film formingfoam: A Canadianexample. Journal of environmental management, 222, 122-131.
34. 34. Mohammadian, I., Abareshi, A., Abbasi, B., &Goh, M. (2019). Airline capacity decisions undersupply- demand equilibrium of Australia’s domestic aviation market. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 119, 108-121.
35. 35. Okumah, M., &Ankomah-Hackman, P. (2020). Applying conditional process modelling to investigate factors influencing the adoption of water pollution mitigation behaviours. Sustainable Water Resources Management, 6(2), 1-14.
36. 36. Pechstein, J., Bullerdiek, N., &Kaltschmitt, M. (2020). A “book andClaim”-Approach to account for sustainable aviation fuels in the EU-ETS–Development of a basic concept. Energypolicy, 136,
37. 37. Pressl, A., Pucher, B., Scharf, B., & Langergraber, G. (2019). Treatment of de-icing contaminated surface water runoff along an airport runway using in-situ soil enriched with structural filter materials. Science of The Total Environment, 660, 321-328.
38. 38. Rahim, M. F., Pal, D., & Ariya, P. A. (2019). Physico chemical studies of aerosols at Montreal Trudeau Airport: Theimportance of airborne nano particles containing metal contaminants. Environmental Pollution, 246, 734-744.
39. 39. Revitt, D. M., &Worrall, P. (2003). Low temperature biodegradation of airport de-icing fluids. Water ScienceandTechnology, 48(9), 103-111.
40. 40. Rodziewicz, J., Mielcarek, A., Janczukowicz, W., Bryszewski, K., &Ostrowska, K. (2020). Treatment of Waste water Containing Runway De-Icing Agents in Bio filters as a Part of Airport Environment Management System. Sustainability, 12(9), 3608.
41. 41. Rotondo, F., Corsi, K., &Giovanelli, L. (2019). The social side of sustainable business models: An explorative analysis of thelow-cost airline industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 225, 806- 819.
42. 42. Singh, A. K., &Sharma, P. (2018). Measuring the productivity of food-grain crops in different climate change scenarios in India: An evidence from time series investigation. Climate change, 4(16), 661-673.
43. 43. Sulej, A. M., Polkowska, Ż., &Namieśnik, J. (2011). Analysis of airport runoff waters. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, 41(3), 190-213.
44. 44. Switzenbaum, M. S., Veltman, S., Mericas, D., Wagoner, B., &Schoenberg, T. (2001). Best managementpracticesforairportdeicingstormwater. Chemosphere, 43(8), 1051-1062.
45. 45. Tiong, C. S., Lean, Q. Y., Ming, L. C., Abdullah, A. H. B., Mahalingam, S. R., Arshad, K., &Hock, L. S. (2021). Knowledge, perceptions of risks, attitudes and practices of environmental health among university students in northern Malaysia. International Journal of HealthPromotionand Education, 59(1), 23-34.
46. 46. Valotto, G., Zannoni, D., Rampazzo, G., Visin, F., Formenton, G., &Gasparello, A. (2018). Characterization and preliminary risk assessment of road dust collected in Venice airport (Italy). Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 190, 142-153.
47. 47. Wang, J.; H. Zhang; and X. Zhang. (2018). “Fire Sales and Liquidity Provision in the Corporate Bond “Market.” Working Paper, available at ssrn.com/abstract=2644098.
48. 48. Wanke, P., Chen, Z., Zheng, X., &Antunes, J. (2020). Sustainability efficiency and carbon inequality of the Chinese transportation system: A Robust Bayesian Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Journal of environmental management, 260, 110163.
49. 49. Wen, C. H., &Yeh, Y. (2017). Modeling air travelers’ choice of flight departure and return dates on long holiday weekends. Journal of Air Transport Management, 65, 220-225.
50. 50. Xu, X., &Cui, Q. (2017). Evaluating airline energy efficiency: An integrated approach with Network Epsilon-based Measure and Network Slacks-based Measure. Energy, 122, 274-286.
51. 51. Zhao, D. X., He, B. J., Johnson, C., &Mou, B. (2015). Social problems of green buildings: From the humanisticneedstosocialacceptance. RenewableandSustainableEnergyReviews, 51, 1594-1609.